Doing research and using LLM outputs for mathematical reasoning is this something valid or a good approach? For example LLM generated a math explanation for the steps necessary for positional encoding are the steps always valid for any generation because for mathematical illustrations they fail.
1 Like
You’re wondering about using AI, specifically LLMs (Large Language Models), for complex mathematics and mathematical reasoning. You’re right that AI can do complex math, but there’s nuance.
## LLMs and Math
LLMs like those on Hugging Face are great at generating text, including math explanations. However:
- *Strengths*: LLMs can explain concepts, generate examples, or outline steps (like the positional encoding explanation you shared).
- *Limitations*: LLMs aren’t guaranteed to produce valid mathematical derivations or proofs. They can hallucinate (generate incorrect info) or fail for complex problems.
## Validity of LLM Outputs for Math
For mathematical illustrations or explanations (like the positional encoding steps), LLMs can be helpful for:
- *Understanding concepts*: Explaining ideas like positional encoding.
- *Getting started*: Outlining steps or providing intuition.
However, for *critical or research-level math*:
- Always verify LLM outputs with trusted sources or proofs.
- LLMs aren’t substitutes for formal proofs or rigorous math derivations.
## Using LLMs for Math Research
LLMs can be a good *starting point* for:
- Exploring concepts or getting ideas.
- Generating examples or test cases.
But for complex math, rely on:
- *Formal methods* or specialized math tools (e.g., Mathematica, SageMath).
- *Trusted mathematical resources* or expert validation.
## Your Example: Positional Encoding
The explanation you shared looks like a valid LLM-generated outline of positional encoding in Transformers. For learning or quick understanding, it’s a good start. For implementation or advanced use, you’d want to cross-check with original papers or trusted sources.
Does that clarify things? Or would you like to dive deeper into using LLMs for math or AI?
Maybe unless already doing should integrate different types of Calculators like Scientific and Business Calculators and other types so The Ai could run calculations easier.
Integrating different types of calculators into your AI system sounds like a practical approach. This could make the AI more versatile for handling various calculation tasks.
## Calculator Types to Consider
- *Scientific calculators*: For math, physics, engineering calculations (trig, logs, etc.).
- *Business calculators*: For finance, accounting, or business-related calculations (percentages, NPV, IRR, etc.).
- *Graphing calculators*: For visualizing functions, solving equations graphically.
- *Unit converters*: For converting units (length, weight, currency, etc.).
## Integration Approaches
1. *API integration*: Use existing calculator APIs or libraries (if available) for specific calculation types.
2. *Built-in implementations*: Implement necessary calculation functions directly in your AI’s codebase.
3. *Hybrid approach*: Mix API calls with custom implementations for flexibility.
## Benefits
- *Easier calculations*: Users can leverage the AI for various math/business tasks.
- *Extensibility*: Add more calculator types as needed.
For your project, would you like to:
1. Explore integrating a specific calculator type (e.g., scientific, business)?
2. Discuss how to handle user input/output for calculations (e.g., natural language, formula input)?
3. Look into existing libraries or APIs for calculators?
Let me know!
2 Likes