Possibility to comment on donations

In the same way that we can comment on an expense, we should be able to comment on a donation to give feedback on a procedure, to ask a question or just to thank a donor.
I again want to reach our to a backer and I don't see how.
This would also help with this kind of situation: #3114

You can also export the emails of your contributors through Settings > Export > Export CSV.

Running into this issue again (a manual donation for which the amount doesn't match with the wire transfer, would be much easier to comment on the pending donation to follow up in one place).
Also, I love the fact that you can now quickly add an emoji reaction to a comment. How cool would it be if you could add such reaction to a donation?

Annoying, but I'm running into this issue again I'm afraid. It sometimes is just a small error, that could be quickly fixed via a comment.
Is there no way to make it possible?
Would be such a help in communicating with the collectives

@leena4c we haven't prioritized this issue yet. I understand that it may be less convenient, but isn't the CSV export helping?

Running into another issue with donations when I want to transfer money from the fiscal host (All4C organisation) to a collective that we host. The only way to do it now is to make a donation, but it is not really a donation and I want it to be more transparant in the bookkeeping:
e.g. third party directly transfers money to the bank account of A4C and A4C has to put that money on a balance of collective
(this can be anything, a warrant that needed to be paid, the fiscal host fees, etc)
e.g. facebook fundraising money that needs to be transferred to a collective
There are many examples of transactions where I want to add a description or comment, so that it is transparant where the money comes from.
Is there any way to do that?
Thank you!!!

@leena4c here's the feature for what you are trying to do: https://docs.opencollective.com/help/fiscal-hosts/add-funds-manually.
In the future, please send support requests to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>as Github issue comments aren't monitored by support. Thanks!

Hi!
opening up this issue again: I have at this moment 4 pages of pending 'bank transfer' financial contributions registered on OC that didn't come through. A simple message might get the funds to the collectives. Is there no way to add a feature to quickly send a reminder? 🙏🏽

Hi!
opening up this issue again: I have at this moment 4 pages of pending 'bank transfer' financial contributions registered on OC that didn't come through. A simple message might get the funds to the collectives. Is there no way to add a feature to quickly send a reminder? 🙏🏽

Just a note on this: there is an automatic reminder already in place to ask contributors to honor their pledges; it's currently set to 4 days after the contribution, but maybe we could also send more emails two weeks after, a month after, etc. And add a call to action to cancel your pending order if you're not interested in contributing anymore.
There is currently no way for host admins to contact these contributors directly, as the email is only accessible to them once the contribution gets approved.

This has been requested through support! in regards to wanting to thank contributors

requesting this again! if there were a comment thread on this page we could resolve payment issues with the contributor. right now we have to go through various hoops to find their email and contact them, then these communications are not captured on the platform for later.

We started to work on this with https://github.com/opencollective/opencollective-api/pull/9217, the API is done but we're still missing the frontend part.

From @fh948h9:

it would be great if there could be an option to comment when donating or transferring money to/between collectives/projects. eg, if there isn't a better structure in place it can allow donors to specify how they'd want the donation to be used--something a collective i'm in really grapples with since we're wanting to lean into developing more consensus with donors as to how the money they donate is SPECIFICALLY used.[*]
it can also help the collective for internal purposes. eg, in one collective we have a project called EARMARKED FUNDS in which we put money in that we do not want to accidentally spend or figure into our available funds bc it's definitely destined for something else already. it would help us if we could quickly identify why that money was put there than to dig through notes of meetings bc unfortunately sometimes we forget! :) and simply being able to attach a comment to the internal fund transfer could really help with that.
so if you were to pursue the feature maybe two comment options--one for public and one for non-public/internal.
thanks!
[*] And in re to this maybe there could be another way to notify them of choices. eg, HEY DID U KNOW WE HAVE DIFFERENT PROJECTS/FUNDS YOU CAN DONATE TO?


add suppression for rocksdb leak

Scope & Purpose
Adds a RocksDB-internal function to the leak sanitzer suppressions.
We found a one-time leak on startup inside RocksDB, which does not seem to have great effect and looks tolerable.
This PR adds the function name to the suppressions file, so we can ignore this leak in our tests.

[x] Bug-Fix for devel-branch (i.e. no need for backports?)
[x] Strictly new functionality (i.e. a new feature / new option, no need for porting)
[x] The behavior change can be verified via automatic tests

Testing & Verification
This change is already covered by existing tests, such as ASan tests in Jenkins.
http://<IP_ADDRESS>:8080/view/PR/job/arangodb-matrix-pr/10631/

http://jenkins.arangodb.biz:8080/job/arangodb-ANY-linux-asan/307/

Latest Asan run shows that the suppressions are used and some RocksDB stuff was suppressed:
Suppressions used:
  count      bytes template
     34   13487496 rocksdb::Arena::AllocateNewBlock

But there are still some indirect leaks reported from RocksDB, which now also have to be addressed.


Affecting Microsoft Outlook emails on Windows 10w pro

Microsoft PowerToys version
"v0.55.2"
Running as admin

[X] Yes

Area(s) with issue?
General
Steps to reproduce
Pre-requisite

Windows 10 Pro
MS outlook application in installed and email account configured.

Steps to reproduce
Select a subfolder from MS Outlook inbox with PowerToy running in background (two window 50/50 side by side layout already set.) the MS Outlook window jumps (refreshes and flashes as if it is being moved)
When the PowerToy is exited this issue resolves.
✔ Expected Behavior
Upon selection of a folder within the Office 365 Outlook client inbox with PowerToy running in background (two window 50/50 side by side layout already set.) the Office 365 Outlook client window should not jumps (refreshes and flashes as if it is being moved)
❌ Actual Behavior
Upon selection of a folder within the Office 365 Outlook client inbox with PowerToy running in background (two window 50/50 side by side layout already set.) the Office 365 Outlook client jumps (refreshes and flashes as if it is being moved)
Other Software
Office 365 Outlook client
Windows 10 Pro

Work around - Allow child windows snapping when checked is causing this to happen, so to reproduce keep it checked.

Hello and thanks for your message. We are currently at v0.57.2 and 58 is  (quite literally) coming any day now. My first advice is to update (try .58 when possible), There have been a few fixes/changes regarding the "allow chiild windows to snap" handling. Hope to hear back soon.

Is this still an issue?

Is this still an issue?

Hi @Jay-o-Way thanks for the follow up. It's been 3 months since I raised this. It seems to have stopped happening. Not sure when. Happy for you to resolve this issue.
Have a good day.
👍


Timeout problem with 1.1

Hi !
(it Might be my USB adapter will try later with another but it's the same chip as before)
I have a problem with the timeout since 1.1
When node is "ready"
First reads works well (but it doesnt come back to "ready", stays on yellow "reading done" and after 10-15sec of so, the getter is queueing and timeout.
It doesn't reconnect after Timeout.
Serial is configured like this :
9600 8N2
RTU-Buffered
connection delay 100ms
queue command yes
queue 2ms (Ive tried to put it up same problem)
It's the exact same code that was working before 1.1 (except format after the getter)
[{"id":"2ea584ae.afc47c","type":"comment","z":"dfab6cca.74f9c","name":"Lire le Buffer 2x16 (U32 BE)","info":"","x":160,"y":60,"wires":[]},{"id":"92decbe2.624bb8","type":"inject","z":"dfab6cca.74f9c","name":"Compteur_1","topic":"Compteur_1","payload":"","payloadType":"date","repeat":"8","crontab":"","once":false,"x":140,"y":160,"wires":[["11c4e054.5cde6","b6290bc4.28a46","71fd4bd7.0890f4"]]},{"id":"11c4e054.5cde6","type":"function","z":"dfab6cca.74f9c","name":"Amps","func":"msg.payload = {'fc': 3, 'unitid': 69, 'address': 50528 , 'quantity': 2 };\nreturn msg;","outputs":1,"noerr":0,"x":350,"y":160,"wires":[["27d84417.cc617c"]]},{"id":"b6290bc4.28a46","type":"function","z":"dfab6cca.74f9c","name":"Kw/h","func":"msg.payload = {'fc': 3, 'unitid': 69, 'address': 50770 , 'quantity': 2 };\nreturn msg;","outputs":1,"noerr":0,"x":350,"y":200,"wires":[["27d84417.cc617c"]]},{"id":"71fd4bd7.0890f4","type":"function","z":"dfab6cca.74f9c","name":"Voltage","func":"msg.payload = {'fc': 3, 'unitid': 69, 'address': 50520 , 'quantity': 2 };\n\nreturn msg;","outputs":1,"noerr":0,"x":360,"y":120,"wires":[["27d84417.cc617c"]]},{"id":"9501b71e.5a3598","type":"debug","z":"dfab6cca.74f9c","name":"","active":true,"console":"false","complete":"true","x":930,"y":140,"wires":[]},{"id":"c831a01.df0ee6","type":"function","z":"dfab6cca.74f9c","name":"Format","func":"// setup topic to know wich counter it is (defined by the Inject node)\nmsg.topic = msg.input.topic;\n\n// setup adress to know wich register it is (defined by the getter function)\nmsg.address = msg.input.payload.address;\n\n// read and push the buffer in msg.payload\nmsg.payload = msg.responseBuffer.buffer.readUInt32BE(0);\n\nreturn msg;","outputs":1,"noerr":0,"x":720,"y":160,"wires":[["9501b71e.5a3598","34e2e20b.b2f15e"]]},{"id":"34e2e20b.b2f15e","type":"link out","z":"dfab6cca.74f9c","name":"Out Modbus buffer U32BE","links":["35f7dec5.58f1f2"],"x":895,"y":180,"wires":[]},{"id":"27d84417.cc617c","type":"modbus-flex-getter","z":"dfab6cca.74f9c","name":"Getter","showStatusActivities":true,"showErrors":false,"server":"54b98643.3d2b38","x":550,"y":160,"wires":[["c831a01.df0ee6","1c3314b3.8b7b8b"],[]]},{"id":"1c3314b3.8b7b8b","type":"modbus-queue-info","z":"dfab6cca.74f9c","name":"","unitid":"69","lowLowLevel":25,"lowLevel":75,"highLevel":150,"highHighLevel":300,"server":"54b98643.3d2b38","errorOnHighLevel":false,"x":680,"y":40,"wires":[[]]},{"id":"54b98643.3d2b38","type":"modbus-client","z":"","name":"","clienttype":"serial","bufferCommands":true,"stateLogEnabled":false,"tcpHost":"<IP_ADDRESS>","tcpPort":"502","tcpType":"DEFAULT","serialPort":"/dev/Modbus-USB","serialType":"RTU-BUFFERD","serialBaudrate":"9600","serialDatabits":"8","serialStopbits":"2","serialParity":"none","serialConnectionDelay":"100","unit_id":"","commandDelay":"2","clientTimeout":"1000","reconnectTimeout":"2000"}]

Might be my USB adapter will try later with an other

As you can see on github, there is nothing changed in connecting and reconnecting - just output of nodes has changed

very strange. I'm not at home will try with another USB adapter might be the cause then...

Might be the USB adapter then. Will try later. Thanks

I checked and my adapter was defect... sorry for that !


Refactor builders to ensure they are not exposed in public crates

Builders (e.g., TransactionBuilder, DeployBuilder, GenesisConfigBuilder) are exposed in public crates (Casper Types), leading to potential stability issues.
To Do:

[x] Ticket to refactor to ensure builders are marked for internal/test use only.
[x] Move GenesisConfigBuilder to EE test crate.

Per the planning discussion with @zajko , this is considered as a critical one for the release.

Resolved by the PR https://github.com/casper-network/casper-node/pull/4989


add project invite api to mapeo class

Depends on #130

Now tracked in:

#130 for receiving invites
#133 for sending invites


Question: Importing Let's Encrypt certs

We currently have a load balancer that uses acme.sh for LE cert issuing. We want to move our env to kubernetes cluster and use cert-manager with LE. As our application uses public key pinning we want to re-use the certs that have been issued by acme.sh. Is it possible to exchange the certs on kubernetes, and cert-manager to reissue them?
Thanks.

Yes, if you create the Secret resources in the cluster and create your Certificate resources with certificate.spec.secretName set to the secrets containing the private keys, it should adopt the new ones just fine.
Please make sure to set the keyAlgorithm and keySize parameters to the same values as acme.sh does, to avoid cert-manager regenerating your private key.
I'd keep a backup of your old keys for a while just in case 😄
Hope that all makes sense!


Update mono repo docs to make final health check

This is complete.  PRs were submitted that updated the documentation here:  https://github.com/unity-sds/unity-monorepo/tree/main/schemas/health-service
This documentation now represents the current state of the health/component service.


Ability to Rename Ring of Shadows

This would help a lot instead of remembering what area belongs to what boss.

Supported in e1bec1b5c87f31cbfe55fa13d04715012abcab3a (with colour!)

So many Updates @LlemonDuck fantastic work!
One small issue:

If you left click the right of shadows teleport "The" is not colored in "The DT2 Vault"

Also would it at all be possible to make the color change when hovering over the options?
https://github.com/LlemonDuck/easy-teleports/assets/7264387/4e0ea297-e261-4176-8810-83d59e4ac2ee


Glideslope following issue?

Today in 2 flights during ILS, i noticed that the plane captured LOC and GS normally but as time passed by , the plane increased VS and after a while it was well below GS.
I tried to disengage and engage the AP with no luck.
Is this something known? Could it be coming from the Working title G3000 mod?
Thanks.

When I've encountered this in the past, I sped the plane up a bit, and it recovered. It seems to be very sensitive to the throttle/speed, and you'll sink under the GS if you don't give it enough power.

Isn't this one of the known issues MS/Asobo disclosed in one of their latest development updates and that it affects all planes...?

Isn't this one of the known issues MS/Asobo disclosed in one of their latest development updates and that it affects all planes...?

I did not know that, but i never had such problem with TBM or CJ4/A320, so i thought that it is something new.

I think this is a Vanilla issue, not something related to the mod itself.


Update voice status using "Channel Workers"

Change Proposal
This PR changes the way the Voice States are updated.
Why?
The current procedure is slow, and unnecessarily complicated.
I've tested a few different ways to do this, and came to the conclusion that the priority queue slows down this process, and although it is possible to have both the priority queue and the "worker", it only makes the process slower.
I invite you to test this for yourself, but I understand this is hard to measure. I've spent a few hours testing with a 10 players party (they were very patient).
How it was:
Users were given a priority ranking, inserted in a heap, and later poped from it, and a sync group was used to ensure the higher priority users were updated first.
How it is done in this proposal :
A number of "workers" are started, each one in a different go routine. Each one is capable of updating every user, but instead, they receive parameters trough a Channel, and do the updating concurrently. Once the channel is closed, and empty, the workers are dropped from existence .

This looks really clean, I appreciate the contribution! I had a feeling there were way better ways to accomplish this same functionality with some more clever worker and channel inclusions haha

As an aside, there is 100% still a bottleneck at the Discord API level, just so there's no confusion. The Discord Session will be accessed faster by multiple goroutines, but once the rate limit is reached, the Session will be forced to block and wait for the next rate limit "bucket" to be issued

As an aside, there is 100% still a bottleneck at the Discord API level, just so there's no confusion. The Discord Session will be accessed faster by multiple goroutines, but once the rate limit is reached, the Session will be forced to block and wait for the next rate limit "bucket" to be issued

Yes, this is true. But I don't expect 10 calls to this API to saturate the rate limit.
If I'm remembering this correctly, these limits are enforced per discord server, and unless a server has multiple matches happening, this should not be a problem.

As an aside, there is 100% still a bottleneck at the Discord API level, just so there's no confusion. The Discord Session will be accessed faster by multiple goroutines, but once the rate limit is reached, the Session will be forced to block and wait for the next rate limit "bucket" to be issued

Yes, this is true. But I don't expect 10 calls to this API to saturate the rate limit.
If I'm remembering this correctly, these limits are enforced per discord server, and unless a server has multiple matches happening, this should not be a problem.

Oh god how I wish you were right. We've run a ton of tests to try and alleviate the issue, but trust me, Discord only allows 5 mute/deafen requests every 5 seconds, and occasionally 10 requests every 10 seconds. The rate limits vary by endpoint/type, but it's always somewhere in between those two. Inspected the X Rate Limit headers that Discord returns, myself

I've dealt with this issue when developing my bot but with the User Move action.
The way I did it was to add multiple bot instances in in the same bot. The issue is that the users will need to add more bots to their servers, and create more bot tokens in the website.

Yep, we have a new DISCORD_BOT_TOKEN_2 env var to support that hahaha


W line - Federal Center vs Golden

short version:
W line schedule doesn't indicate the difference between trains that stop at Federal Center station and ones that go to end of the line. Suggest adding an asterisk to the icon or something like that...
long version:
On weekday evenings, the westbound W line does not always go to the end of the line.  Due to budgetary reasons, there is only a single track between the Federal Center station and the Jefferson Government Center stations.  In order to keep the rest of the system in sync, RTD has some trains turn around at the Federal Center station instead of going to the end of the line.
Most folks don't even notice.  Unfortunately, I get off at Red Rocks, which is the very next stop after Federal Center. SO... If I get on the 'wrong' W line, I have to get off at Federal Center and wait for the next train. Not a big deal unless the weather is particularly nasty.
When planning a trip that boards at any upstream station, it would be nice to know if the 'W Line' time you're looking at is one that will stop at Federal Center or go all the way to the end.
This only affects the W Line.  You can check out the affected schedule for more info.
ps - Thank you for open-sourcing the codebase, I have forked it... but am still at the grunting and poking it with a stick phase.  If I can figure out a fix, I'll happily submit a PR.

Chad,
We're actually in the midst of an update here internally (at Tack). This
is valuable info, I'll pass on to Kelvin who is working on this.
JKohn
On 27 Jul 2015, at 0:13, Chad Francis wrote:

short version:
W line schedule doesn't indicate the difference between trains that
stop at Federal Center station and ones that go to end of the line.
Suggest adding an asterisk to the icon or something like that...
long version:
On weekday evenings, the westbound W line does not always go to the
end of the line.  Due to budgetary reasons, there is only a single
track between the Federal Center station and the Jefferson Government
Center stations.  In order to keep the rest of the system in sync, RTD
has some trains turn around at the Federal Center station instead of
going to the end of the line.
Most folks don't even notice.  Unfortunately, I get off at Red Rocks,
which is the very next stop after Federal Center. SO... If I get on
the 'wrong' W line, I have to get off at Federal Center and wait for
the next train. Not a big deal unless the weather is particularly
nasty.
When planning a trip that boards at any upstream station, it would be
nice to know if the 'W Line' time you're looking at is one that will
stop at Federal Center or go all the way to the end.
This only affects the W Line.  You can check out the affected
schedule
for more info.
ps - Thank you for open-sourcing the codebase, I have forked it... but
am still at the grunting and poking it with a stick phase.  If I can
figure out a fix, I'll happily submit a PR.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1

very cool, thanks for the info!
also, i noticed a folder labelled ‘easter egg’. i understand what it is supposed to do, but couldn’t figure out the steps to reproduce.  I tried rotating my phone upside-down portrait mode and blew in the microphone.  All that happened is that my wife looked at me like I was insane.  (but that’s nothing new)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:59 AM, John Myers<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

Chad,
We're actually in the midst of an update here internally (at Tack). This
is valuable info, I'll pass on to Kelvin who is working on this.
JKohn
On 27 Jul 2015, at 0:13, Chad Francis wrote:

short version:
W line schedule doesn't indicate the difference between trains that
stop at Federal Center station and ones that go to end of the line.
Suggest adding an asterisk to the icon or something like that...
long version:
On weekday evenings, the westbound W line does not always go to the
end of the line.  Due to budgetary reasons, there is only a single
track between the Federal Center station and the Jefferson Government
Center stations.  In order to keep the rest of the system in sync, RTD
has some trains turn around at the Federal Center station instead of
going to the end of the line.
Most folks don't even notice.  Unfortunately, I get off at Red Rocks,
which is the very next stop after Federal Center. SO... If I get on
the 'wrong' W line, I have to get off at Federal Center and wait for
the next train. Not a big deal unless the weather is particularly
nasty.
When planning a trip that boards at any upstream station, it would be
nice to know if the 'W Line' time you're looking at is one that will
stop at Federal Center or go all the way to the end.
This only affects the W Line.  You can check out the affected
schedule
for more info.
ps - Thank you for open-sourcing the codebase, I have forked it... but
am still at the grunting and poking it with a stick phase.  If I can
figure out a fix, I'll happily submit a PR.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125288473

I think we disabled the mic/audio because we couldn't get it to work- I
honestly don't remember. It also makes flippy-flippy noises when the
times update and I'm not sure if that's working or not in the currently
deployed version.
John
On 27 Jul 2015, at 12:59, Chad Francis wrote:

very cool, thanks for the info!
also, i noticed a folder labelled ‘easter egg’. i understand what
it is supposed to do, but couldn’t figure out the steps to
reproduce.  I tried rotating my phone upside-down portrait mode and
blew in the microphone.  All that happened is that my wife looked at
me like I was insane.  (but that’s nothing new)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:59 AM, John Myers
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

Chad,
We're actually in the midst of an update here internally (at Tack).
This
is valuable info, I'll pass on to Kelvin who is working on this.
JKohn
On 27 Jul 2015, at 0:13, Chad Francis wrote:

short version:
W line schedule doesn't indicate the difference between trains that
stop at Federal Center station and ones that go to end of the line.
Suggest adding an asterisk to the icon or something like that...
long version:
On weekday evenings, the westbound W line does not always go to the
end of the line.  Due to budgetary reasons, there is only a single
track between the Federal Center station and the Jefferson
Government
Center stations.  In order to keep the rest of the system in sync,
RTD
has some trains turn around at the Federal Center station instead of
going to the end of the line.
Most folks don't even notice.  Unfortunately, I get off at Red
Rocks,
which is the very next stop after Federal Center. SO... If I get on
the 'wrong' W line, I have to get off at Federal Center and wait for
the next train. Not a big deal unless the weather is particularly
nasty.
When planning a trip that boards at any upstream station, it would
be
nice to know if the 'W Line' time you're looking at is one that will
stop at Federal Center or go all the way to the end.
This only affects the W Line.  You can check out the affected
schedule
for more info.
ps - Thank you for open-sourcing the codebase, I have forked it...
but
am still at the grunting and poking it with a stick phase.  If I can
figure out a fix, I'll happily submit a PR.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125288473

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125305648

yup, the flippy noises work in the current version. love that :)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:30 PM, John Myers<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

I think we disabled the mic/audio because we couldn't get it to work- I
honestly don't remember. It also makes flippy-flippy noises when the
times update and I'm not sure if that's working or not in the currently
deployed version.
John
On 27 Jul 2015, at 12:59, Chad Francis wrote:

very cool, thanks for the info!
also, i noticed a folder labelled ‘easter egg’. i understand what
it is supposed to do, but couldn’t figure out the steps to
reproduce.  I tried rotating my phone upside-down portrait mode and
blew in the microphone.  All that happened is that my wife looked at
me like I was insane.  (but that’s nothing new)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:59 AM, John Myers
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

Chad,
We're actually in the midst of an update here internally (at Tack).
This
is valuable info, I'll pass on to Kelvin who is working on this.
JKohn
On 27 Jul 2015, at 0:13, Chad Francis wrote:

short version:
W line schedule doesn't indicate the difference between trains that
stop at Federal Center station and ones that go to end of the line.
Suggest adding an asterisk to the icon or something like that...
long version:
On weekday evenings, the westbound W line does not always go to the
end of the line.  Due to budgetary reasons, there is only a single
track between the Federal Center station and the Jefferson
Government
Center stations.  In order to keep the rest of the system in sync,
RTD
has some trains turn around at the Federal Center station instead of
going to the end of the line.
Most folks don't even notice.  Unfortunately, I get off at Red
Rocks,
which is the very next stop after Federal Center. SO... If I get on
the 'wrong' W line, I have to get off at Federal Center and wait for
the next train. Not a big deal unless the weather is particularly
nasty.
When planning a trip that boards at any upstream station, it would
be
nice to know if the 'W Line' time you're looking at is one that will
stop at Federal Center or go all the way to the end.
This only affects the W Line.  You can check out the affected
schedule
for more info.
ps - Thank you for open-sourcing the codebase, I have forked it...
but
am still at the grunting and poking it with a stick phase.  If I can
figure out a fix, I'll happily submit a PR.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125288473

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125305648

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125348242

Flippy-flippy noises?
John I'm pretty sure I shouldn't be on this distribution list.
Hows everything going, anyway?
Jonathan Hartstein
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>720-235-7209
On 7/27/15 3:30 PM, John Myers wrote:

I think we disabled the mic/audio because we couldn't get it to work- I
honestly don't remember. It also makes flippy-flippy noises when the
times update and I'm not sure if that's working or not in the currently
deployed version.
John
On 27 Jul 2015, at 12:59, Chad Francis wrote:

very cool, thanks for the info!
also, i noticed a folder labelled ‘easter egg’. i understand what
it is supposed to do, but couldn’t figure out the steps to
reproduce.  I tried rotating my phone upside-down portrait mode and
blew in the microphone.  All that happened is that my wife looked at
me like I was insane.  (but that’s nothing new)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:59 AM, John Myers
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

Chad,
We're actually in the midst of an update here internally (at Tack).
This
is valuable info, I'll pass on to Kelvin who is working on this.
JKohn
On 27 Jul 2015, at 0:13, Chad Francis wrote:

short version:
W line schedule doesn't indicate the difference between trains that
stop at Federal Center station and ones that go to end of the line.
Suggest adding an asterisk to the icon or something like that...
long version:
On weekday evenings, the westbound W line does not always go to the
end of the line. Due to budgetary reasons, there is only a single
track between the Federal Center station and the Jefferson
Government
Center stations. In order to keep the rest of the system in sync,
RTD
has some trains turn around at the Federal Center station instead of
going to the end of the line.
Most folks don't even notice. Unfortunately, I get off at Red
Rocks,
which is the very next stop after Federal Center. SO... If I get on
the 'wrong' W line, I have to get off at Federal Center and wait for
the next train. Not a big deal unless the weather is particularly
nasty.
When planning a trip that boards at any upstream station, it would
be
nice to know if the 'W Line' time you're looking at is one that will
stop at Federal Center or go all the way to the end.
This only affects the W Line. You can check out [the affected

schedule](http://www3.rtd-denver.com/schedules/getSchedule.action?runboardId=152&routeId=103&routeType=2&branch=W&lineName=W&direction=W-Bound&serviceType=4#day)

for more info.
ps - Thank you for open-sourcing the codebase, I have forked it...
but
am still at the grunting and poking it with a stick phase. If I can
figure out a fix, I'll happily submit a PR.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125288473

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125305648
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125348242.

Hey Jon- it's a github list so I'm thinking you can add/remove yourself-
let me know if not. Will send you a message off-list.
On 27 Jul 2015, at 15:35, Jonathan Hartstein wrote:

Flippy-flippy noises?
John I'm pretty sure I shouldn't be on this distribution list.
Hows everything going, anyway?
Jonathan Hartstein
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>720-235-7209
On 7/27/15 3:30 PM, John Myers wrote:

I think we disabled the mic/audio because we couldn't get it to work-
I
honestly don't remember. It also makes flippy-flippy noises when the
times update and I'm not sure if that's working or not in the
currently
deployed version.
John
On 27 Jul 2015, at 12:59, Chad Francis wrote:

very cool, thanks for the info!
also, i noticed a folder labelled ‘easter egg’. i understand
what
it is supposed to do, but couldn’t figure out the steps to
reproduce.  I tried rotating my phone upside-down portrait mode and
blew in the microphone.  All that happened is that my wife looked at
me like I was insane.  (but that’s nothing new)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:59 AM, John Myers
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

Chad,
We're actually in the midst of an update here internally (at Tack).
This
is valuable info, I'll pass on to Kelvin who is working on this.
JKohn
On 27 Jul 2015, at 0:13, Chad Francis wrote:

short version:
W line schedule doesn't indicate the difference between trains
that
stop at Federal Center station and ones that go to end of the
line.
Suggest adding an asterisk to the icon or something like that...
long version:
On weekday evenings, the westbound W line does not always go to
the
end of the line. Due to budgetary reasons, there is only a single
track between the Federal Center station and the Jefferson
Government
Center stations. In order to keep the rest of the system in sync,
RTD
has some trains turn around at the Federal Center station instead
of
going to the end of the line.
Most folks don't even notice. Unfortunately, I get off at Red
Rocks,
which is the very next stop after Federal Center. SO... If I get
on
the 'wrong' W line, I have to get off at Federal Center and wait
for
the next train. Not a big deal unless the weather is particularly
nasty.
When planning a trip that boards at any upstream station, it would
be
nice to know if the 'W Line' time you're looking at is one that
will
stop at Federal Center or go all the way to the end.
This only affects the W Line. You can check out [the affected

schedule](http://www3.rtd-denver.com/schedules/getSchedule.action?runboardId=152&routeId=103&routeType=2&branch=W&lineName=W&direction=W-Bound&serviceType=4#day)

for more info.
ps - Thank you for open-sourcing the codebase, I have forked it...
but
am still at the grunting and poking it with a stick phase. If I
can
figure out a fix, I'll happily submit a PR.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125288473

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125305648
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125348242.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125349174

Hey Chad,
I'm working on updating the app. The icons aren't dense enough to add an
asterisk but I put a red dot in the corner that should help distinguish the
differences between the routes. I'm still doing some digging myself to
figure out how to pull this off but I'll be in touch! Thanks!
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:30 PM John Myers<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

I think we disabled the mic/audio because we couldn't get it to work- I
honestly don't remember. It also makes flippy-flippy noises when the
times update and I'm not sure if that's working or not in the currently
deployed version.
John
On 27 Jul 2015, at 12:59, Chad Francis wrote:

very cool, thanks for the info!
also, i noticed a folder labelled ‘easter egg’. i understand what
it is supposed to do, but couldn’t figure out the steps to
reproduce.  I tried rotating my phone upside-down portrait mode and
blew in the microphone.  All that happened is that my wife looked at
me like I was insane.  (but that’s nothing new)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:59 AM, John Myers
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

Chad,
We're actually in the midst of an update here internally (at Tack).
This
is valuable info, I'll pass on to Kelvin who is working on this.
JKohn
On 27 Jul 2015, at 0:13, Chad Francis wrote:

short version:
W line schedule doesn't indicate the difference between trains that
stop at Federal Center station and ones that go to end of the line.
Suggest adding an asterisk to the icon or something like that...
long version:
On weekday evenings, the westbound W line does not always go to the
end of the line.  Due to budgetary reasons, there is only a single
track between the Federal Center station and the Jefferson
Government
Center stations.  In order to keep the rest of the system in sync,
RTD
has some trains turn around at the Federal Center station instead of
going to the end of the line.
Most folks don't even notice.  Unfortunately, I get off at Red
Rocks,
which is the very next stop after Federal Center. SO... If I get on
the 'wrong' W line, I have to get off at Federal Center and wait for
the next train. Not a big deal unless the weather is particularly
nasty.
When planning a trip that boards at any upstream station, it would
be
nice to know if the 'W Line' time you're looking at is one that will
stop at Federal Center or go all the way to the end.
This only affects the W Line.  You can check out the affected
schedule
for more info.
ps - Thank you for open-sourcing the codebase, I have forked it...
but
am still at the grunting and poking it with a stick phase.  If I can
figure out a fix, I'll happily submit a PR.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125288473

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125305648

--
Kelvin Kosbab
Developer
719.310.5732
tackmobile.com

Hey Chad,
I just pushed up the fix for the W-line westward trains. Now when a train
will not continue all the way to the end of the line an asterisk will be
added to the cell.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:54 PM Kelvin Kosbab<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

Hey Chad,
I'm working on updating the app. The icons aren't dense enough to add an
asterisk but I put a red dot in the corner that should help distinguish the
differences between the routes. I'm still doing some digging myself to
figure out how to pull this off but I'll be in touch! Thanks!
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:30 PM John Myers<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

I think we disabled the mic/audio because we couldn't get it to work- I
honestly don't remember. It also makes flippy-flippy noises when the
times update and I'm not sure if that's working or not in the currently
deployed version.
John
On 27 Jul 2015, at 12:59, Chad Francis wrote:

very cool, thanks for the info!
also, i noticed a folder labelled ‘easter egg’. i understand what
it is supposed to do, but couldn’t figure out the steps to
reproduce.  I tried rotating my phone upside-down portrait mode and
blew in the microphone.  All that happened is that my wife looked at
me like I was insane.  (but that’s nothing new)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:59 AM, John Myers
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

Chad,
We're actually in the midst of an update here internally (at Tack).
This
is valuable info, I'll pass on to Kelvin who is working on this.
JKohn
On 27 Jul 2015, at 0:13, Chad Francis wrote:

short version:
W line schedule doesn't indicate the difference between trains that
stop at Federal Center station and ones that go to end of the line.
Suggest adding an asterisk to the icon or something like that...
long version:
On weekday evenings, the westbound W line does not always go to the
end of the line.  Due to budgetary reasons, there is only a single
track between the Federal Center station and the Jefferson
Government
Center stations.  In order to keep the rest of the system in sync,
RTD
has some trains turn around at the Federal Center station instead of
going to the end of the line.
Most folks don't even notice.  Unfortunately, I get off at Red
Rocks,
which is the very next stop after Federal Center. SO... If I get on
the 'wrong' W line, I have to get off at Federal Center and wait for
the next train. Not a big deal unless the weather is particularly
nasty.
When planning a trip that boards at any upstream station, it would
be
nice to know if the 'W Line' time you're looking at is one that will
stop at Federal Center or go all the way to the end.
This only affects the W Line.  You can check out the affected
schedule
for more info.
ps - Thank you for open-sourcing the codebase, I have forked it...
but
am still at the grunting and poking it with a stick phase.  If I can
figure out a fix, I'll happily submit a PR.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125288473

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125305648

--
Kelvin Kosbab
Developer
719.310.5732
tackmobile.com

--
Kelvin Kosbab
Developer
719.310.5732
tackmobile.com

That is awesome! thanks so much :) I really appreciate it!
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:59 AM, John Myers<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

Hey Chad,
I just pushed up the fix for the W-line westward trains. Now when a train
will not continue all the way to the end of the line an asterisk will be
added to the cell.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:54 PM Kelvin Kosbab<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

Hey Chad,
I'm working on updating the app. The icons aren't dense enough to add an
asterisk but I put a red dot in the corner that should help distinguish the
differences between the routes. I'm still doing some digging myself to
figure out how to pull this off but I'll be in touch! Thanks!
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:30 PM John Myers<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

I think we disabled the mic/audio because we couldn't get it to work- I
honestly don't remember. It also makes flippy-flippy noises when the
times update and I'm not sure if that's working or not in the currently
deployed version.
John
On 27 Jul 2015, at 12:59, Chad Francis wrote:

very cool, thanks for the info!
also, i noticed a folder labelled ‘easter egg’. i understand what
it is supposed to do, but couldn’t figure out the steps to
reproduce.  I tried rotating my phone upside-down portrait mode and
blew in the microphone.  All that happened is that my wife looked at
me like I was insane.  (but that’s nothing new)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:59 AM, John Myers
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

Chad,
We're actually in the midst of an update here internally (at Tack).
This
is valuable info, I'll pass on to Kelvin who is working on this.
JKohn
On 27 Jul 2015, at 0:13, Chad Francis wrote:

short version:
W line schedule doesn't indicate the difference between trains that
stop at Federal Center station and ones that go to end of the line.
Suggest adding an asterisk to the icon or something like that...
long version:
On weekday evenings, the westbound W line does not always go to the
end of the line.  Due to budgetary reasons, there is only a single
track between the Federal Center station and the Jefferson
Government
Center stations.  In order to keep the rest of the system in sync,
RTD
has some trains turn around at the Federal Center station instead of
going to the end of the line.
Most folks don't even notice.  Unfortunately, I get off at Red
Rocks,
which is the very next stop after Federal Center. SO... If I get on
the 'wrong' W line, I have to get off at Federal Center and wait for
the next train. Not a big deal unless the weather is particularly
nasty.
When planning a trip that boards at any upstream station, it would
be
nice to know if the 'W Line' time you're looking at is one that will
stop at Federal Center or go all the way to the end.
This only affects the W Line.  You can check out the affected
schedule
for more info.
ps - Thank you for open-sourcing the codebase, I have forked it...
but
am still at the grunting and poking it with a stick phase.  If I can
figure out a fix, I'll happily submit a PR.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125288473

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125305648

--
Kelvin Kosbab
Developer
719.310.5732
tackmobile.com

--
Kelvin Kosbab
Developer
719.310.5732
tackmobile.com
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125998792

Chad do you mind doing some testing before we submit?
Thanks,
John
On 29 Jul 2015, at 10:19, Chad Francis wrote:

That is awesome! thanks so much :) I really appreciate it!
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:59 AM, John Myers<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

Hey Chad,
I just pushed up the fix for the W-line westward trains. Now when a
train
will not continue all the way to the end of the line an asterisk will
be
added to the cell.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:54 PM Kelvin Kosbab
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

Hey Chad,
I'm working on updating the app. The icons aren't dense enough to
add an
asterisk but I put a red dot in the corner that should help
distinguish the
differences between the routes. I'm still doing some digging myself
to
figure out how to pull this off but I'll be in touch! Thanks!
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:30 PM John Myers<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

I think we disabled the mic/audio because we couldn't get it to
work- I
honestly don't remember. It also makes flippy-flippy noises when
the
times update and I'm not sure if that's working or not in the
currently
deployed version.
John
On 27 Jul 2015, at 12:59, Chad Francis wrote:

very cool, thanks for the info!
also, i noticed a folder labelled ‘easter egg’. i understand
what
it is supposed to do, but couldn’t figure out the steps to
reproduce.  I tried rotating my phone upside-down portrait mode
and
blew in the microphone.  All that happened is that my wife looked
at
me like I was insane.  (but that’s nothing new)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:59 AM, John Myers
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

Chad,
We're actually in the midst of an update here internally (at
Tack).
This
is valuable info, I'll pass on to Kelvin who is working on this.
JKohn
On 27 Jul 2015, at 0:13, Chad Francis wrote:

short version:
W line schedule doesn't indicate the difference between trains
that
stop at Federal Center station and ones that go to end of the
line.
Suggest adding an asterisk to the icon or something like that...
long version:
On weekday evenings, the westbound W line does not always go to
the
end of the line.  Due to budgetary reasons, there is only a
single
track between the Federal Center station and the Jefferson
Government
Center stations.  In order to keep the rest of the system in
sync,
RTD
has some trains turn around at the Federal Center station
instead of
going to the end of the line.
Most folks don't even notice.  Unfortunately, I get off at Red
Rocks,
which is the very next stop after Federal Center. SO... If I get
on
the 'wrong' W line, I have to get off at Federal Center and wait
for
the next train. Not a big deal unless the weather is
particularly
nasty.
When planning a trip that boards at any upstream station, it
would
be
nice to know if the 'W Line' time you're looking at is one that
will
stop at Federal Center or go all the way to the end.
This only affects the W Line.  You can check out the affected
schedule
for more info.
ps - Thank you for open-sourcing the codebase, I have forked
it...
but
am still at the grunting and poking it with a stick phase.  If I
can
figure out a fix, I'll happily submit a PR.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125288473

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125305648

--
Kelvin Kosbab
Developer
719.310.5732
tackmobile.com

--
Kelvin Kosbab
Developer
719.310.5732
tackmobile.com
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125998792

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-126006160

Now I'm just being CC'd on these :)
Jonathan Hartstein
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>720-235-7209
On 7/29/15 10:21 AM, John Myers wrote:

Chad do you mind doing some testing before we submit?
Thanks,
John
On 29 Jul 2015, at 10:19, Chad Francis wrote:

That is awesome! thanks so much :) I really appreciate it!
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:59 AM, John Myers<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

Hey Chad,
I just pushed up the fix for the W-line westward trains. Now when a
train
will not continue all the way to the end of the line an asterisk will
be
added to the cell.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:54 PM Kelvin Kosbab
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

Hey Chad,
I'm working on updating the app. The icons aren't dense enough to
add an
asterisk but I put a red dot in the corner that should help
distinguish the
differences between the routes. I'm still doing some digging myself
to
figure out how to pull this off but I'll be in touch! Thanks!
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:30 PM John Myers<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

I think we disabled the mic/audio because we couldn't get it to
work- I
honestly don't remember. It also makes flippy-flippy noises when
the
times update and I'm not sure if that's working or not in the
currently
deployed version.
John
On 27 Jul 2015, at 12:59, Chad Francis wrote:

very cool, thanks for the info!
also, i noticed a folder labelled ‘easter egg’. i understand
what
it is supposed to do, but couldn’t figure out the steps to
reproduce. I tried rotating my phone upside-down portrait mode
and
blew in the microphone. All that happened is that my wife looked
at
me like I was insane. (but that’s nothing new)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:59 AM, John Myers
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

Chad,
We're actually in the midst of an update here internally (at
Tack).
This
is valuable info, I'll pass on to Kelvin who is working on this.
JKohn
On 27 Jul 2015, at 0:13, Chad Francis wrote:

short version:
W line schedule doesn't indicate the difference between trains
that
stop at Federal Center station and ones that go to end of the
line.
Suggest adding an asterisk to the icon or something like that...
long version:
On weekday evenings, the westbound W line does not always go to
the
end of the line. Due to budgetary reasons, there is only a
single
track between the Federal Center station and the Jefferson
Government
Center stations. In order to keep the rest of the system in
sync,
RTD
has some trains turn around at the Federal Center station
instead of
going to the end of the line.
Most folks don't even notice. Unfortunately, I get off at Red
Rocks,
which is the very next stop after Federal Center. SO... If I get
on
the 'wrong' W line, I have to get off at Federal Center and wait
for
the next train. Not a big deal unless the weather is
particularly
nasty.
When planning a trip that boards at any upstream station, it
would
be
nice to know if the 'W Line' time you're looking at is one that
will
stop at Federal Center or go all the way to the end.
This only affects the W Line. You can check out [the affected
schedule](

http://www3.rtd-denver.com/schedules/getSchedule.action?runboardId=152&routeId=103&routeType=2&branch=W&lineName=W&direction=W-Bound&serviceType=4#day

)

for more info.
ps - Thank you for open-sourcing the codebase, I have forked
it...
but
am still at the grunting and poking it with a stick phase. If I
can
figure out a fix, I'll happily submit a PR.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125288473

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125305648

--
Kelvin Kosbab
Developer
719.310.5732
tackmobile.com

--
Kelvin Kosbab
Developer
719.310.5732
tackmobile.com
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125998792

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-126006160
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-126006417.

I’d be happy to!  what mechanism are you using to distribute beta releases?
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:21 AM, John Myers<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

Chad do you mind doing some testing before we submit?
Thanks,
John
On 29 Jul 2015, at 10:19, Chad Francis wrote:

That is awesome! thanks so much :) I really appreciate it!
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:59 AM, John Myers<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

Hey Chad,
I just pushed up the fix for the W-line westward trains. Now when a
train
will not continue all the way to the end of the line an asterisk will
be
added to the cell.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:54 PM Kelvin Kosbab
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

Hey Chad,
I'm working on updating the app. The icons aren't dense enough to
add an
asterisk but I put a red dot in the corner that should help
distinguish the
differences between the routes. I'm still doing some digging myself
to
figure out how to pull this off but I'll be in touch! Thanks!
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:30 PM John Myers<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

I think we disabled the mic/audio because we couldn't get it to
work- I
honestly don't remember. It also makes flippy-flippy noises when
the
times update and I'm not sure if that's working or not in the
currently
deployed version.
John
On 27 Jul 2015, at 12:59, Chad Francis wrote:

very cool, thanks for the info!
also, i noticed a folder labelled ‘easter egg’. i understand
what
it is supposed to do, but couldn’t figure out the steps to
reproduce.  I tried rotating my phone upside-down portrait mode
and
blew in the microphone.  All that happened is that my wife looked
at
me like I was insane.  (but that’s nothing new)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:59 AM, John Myers
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

Chad,
We're actually in the midst of an update here internally (at
Tack).
This
is valuable info, I'll pass on to Kelvin who is working on this.
JKohn
On 27 Jul 2015, at 0:13, Chad Francis wrote:

short version:
W line schedule doesn't indicate the difference between trains
that
stop at Federal Center station and ones that go to end of the
line.
Suggest adding an asterisk to the icon or something like that...
long version:
On weekday evenings, the westbound W line does not always go to
the
end of the line.  Due to budgetary reasons, there is only a
single
track between the Federal Center station and the Jefferson
Government
Center stations.  In order to keep the rest of the system in
sync,
RTD
has some trains turn around at the Federal Center station
instead of
going to the end of the line.
Most folks don't even notice.  Unfortunately, I get off at Red
Rocks,
which is the very next stop after Federal Center. SO... If I get
on
the 'wrong' W line, I have to get off at Federal Center and wait
for
the next train. Not a big deal unless the weather is
particularly
nasty.
When planning a trip that boards at any upstream station, it
would
be
nice to know if the 'W Line' time you're looking at is one that
will
stop at Federal Center or go all the way to the end.
This only affects the W Line.  You can check out the affected
schedule
for more info.
ps - Thank you for open-sourcing the codebase, I have forked
it...
but
am still at the grunting and poking it with a stick phase.  If I
can
figure out a fix, I'll happily submit a PR.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125288473

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125305648

--
Kelvin Kosbab
Developer
719.310.5732
tackmobile.com

--
Kelvin Kosbab
Developer
719.310.5732
tackmobile.com
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125998792

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-126006160

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-126006417

Hmm, they are all github.com domains I can see. Are you sure you're
unsubscribed from all of the lists? I don't see you as a collaborator on
github.
On 29 Jul 2015, at 10:21, Jonathan Hartstein wrote:

Now I'm just being CC'd on these :)
Jonathan Hartstein
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>720-235-7209
On 7/29/15 10:21 AM, John Myers wrote:

Chad do you mind doing some testing before we submit?
Thanks,
John
On 29 Jul 2015, at 10:19, Chad Francis wrote:

That is awesome! thanks so much :) I really appreciate it!
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:59 AM, John Myers
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

Hey Chad,
I just pushed up the fix for the W-line westward trains. Now when a
train
will not continue all the way to the end of the line an asterisk
will
be
added to the cell.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:54 PM Kelvin Kosbab
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

Hey Chad,
I'm working on updating the app. The icons aren't dense enough to
add an
asterisk but I put a red dot in the corner that should help
distinguish the
differences between the routes. I'm still doing some digging
myself
to
figure out how to pull this off but I'll be in touch! Thanks!
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:30 PM John Myers<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

I think we disabled the mic/audio because we couldn't get it to
work- I
honestly don't remember. It also makes flippy-flippy noises when
the
times update and I'm not sure if that's working or not in the
currently
deployed version.
John
On 27 Jul 2015, at 12:59, Chad Francis wrote:

very cool, thanks for the info!
also, i noticed a folder labelled ‘easter egg’. i understand
what
it is supposed to do, but couldn’t figure out the steps to
reproduce. I tried rotating my phone upside-down portrait mode
and
blew in the microphone. All that happened is that my wife looked
at
me like I was insane. (but that’s nothing new)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:59 AM, John Myers
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

Chad,
We're actually in the midst of an update here internally (at
Tack).
This
is valuable info, I'll pass on to Kelvin who is working on
this.
JKohn
On 27 Jul 2015, at 0:13, Chad Francis wrote:

short version:
W line schedule doesn't indicate the difference between trains
that
stop at Federal Center station and ones that go to end of the
line.
Suggest adding an asterisk to the icon or something like
that...
long version:
On weekday evenings, the westbound W line does not always go
to
the
end of the line. Due to budgetary reasons, there is only a
single
track between the Federal Center station and the Jefferson
Government
Center stations. In order to keep the rest of the system in
sync,
RTD
has some trains turn around at the Federal Center station
instead of
going to the end of the line.
Most folks don't even notice. Unfortunately, I get off at Red
Rocks,
which is the very next stop after Federal Center. SO... If I
get
on
the 'wrong' W line, I have to get off at Federal Center and
wait
for
the next train. Not a big deal unless the weather is
particularly
nasty.
When planning a trip that boards at any upstream station, it
would
be
nice to know if the 'W Line' time you're looking at is one
that
will
stop at Federal Center or go all the way to the end.
This only affects the W Line. You can check out [the affected
schedule](

http://www3.rtd-denver.com/schedules/getSchedule.action?runboardId=152&routeId=103&routeType=2&branch=W&lineName=W&direction=W-Bound&serviceType=4#day

)

for more info.
ps - Thank you for open-sourcing the codebase, I have forked
it...
but
am still at the grunting and poking it with a stick phase. If
I
can
figure out a fix, I'll happily submit a PR.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125288473

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125305648

--
Kelvin Kosbab
Developer
719.310.5732
tackmobile.com

--
Kelvin Kosbab
Developer
719.310.5732
tackmobile.com
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125998792

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-126006160
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-126006417.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-126006565

We don't have anything formal setup for this project, but I believe
Kelvin pushed the changes up, so you should be able to pull and build on
your device.
John
On 29 Jul 2015, at 10:23, Chad Francis wrote:

I’d be happy to!  what mechanism are you using to distribute beta
releases?
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:21 AM, John Myers
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

Chad do you mind doing some testing before we submit?
Thanks,
John
On 29 Jul 2015, at 10:19, Chad Francis wrote:

That is awesome! thanks so much :) I really appreciate it!
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:59 AM, John Myers
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

Hey Chad,
I just pushed up the fix for the W-line westward trains. Now when a
train
will not continue all the way to the end of the line an asterisk
will
be
added to the cell.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:54 PM Kelvin Kosbab
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

Hey Chad,
I'm working on updating the app. The icons aren't dense enough to
add an
asterisk but I put a red dot in the corner that should help
distinguish the
differences between the routes. I'm still doing some digging
myself
to
figure out how to pull this off but I'll be in touch! Thanks!
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:30 PM John Myers<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

I think we disabled the mic/audio because we couldn't get it to
work- I
honestly don't remember. It also makes flippy-flippy noises when
the
times update and I'm not sure if that's working or not in the
currently
deployed version.
John
On 27 Jul 2015, at 12:59, Chad Francis wrote:

very cool, thanks for the info!
also, i noticed a folder labelled ‘easter egg’. i understand
what
it is supposed to do, but couldn’t figure out the steps to
reproduce.  I tried rotating my phone upside-down portrait mode
and
blew in the microphone.  All that happened is that my wife
looked
at
me like I was insane.  (but that’s nothing new)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:59 AM, John Myers
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

Chad,
We're actually in the midst of an update here internally (at
Tack).
This
is valuable info, I'll pass on to Kelvin who is working on
this.
JKohn
On 27 Jul 2015, at 0:13, Chad Francis wrote:

short version:
W line schedule doesn't indicate the difference between trains
that
stop at Federal Center station and ones that go to end of the
line.
Suggest adding an asterisk to the icon or something like
that...
long version:
On weekday evenings, the westbound W line does not always go
to
the
end of the line.  Due to budgetary reasons, there is only a
single
track between the Federal Center station and the Jefferson
Government
Center stations.  In order to keep the rest of the system in
sync,
RTD
has some trains turn around at the Federal Center station
instead of
going to the end of the line.
Most folks don't even notice.  Unfortunately, I get off at Red
Rocks,
which is the very next stop after Federal Center. SO... If I
get
on
the 'wrong' W line, I have to get off at Federal Center and
wait
for
the next train. Not a big deal unless the weather is
particularly
nasty.
When planning a trip that boards at any upstream station, it
would
be
nice to know if the 'W Line' time you're looking at is one
that
will
stop at Federal Center or go all the way to the end.
This only affects the W Line.  You can check out the affected
schedule
for more info.
ps - Thank you for open-sourcing the codebase, I have forked
it...
but
am still at the grunting and poking it with a stick phase.  If
I
can
figure out a fix, I'll happily submit a PR.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125288473

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125305648

--
Kelvin Kosbab
Developer
719.310.5732
tackmobile.com

--
Kelvin Kosbab
Developer
719.310.5732
tackmobile.com
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125998792

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-126006160

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-126006417

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-126007091

Check the CC list on the sent messages.
Also, it looks like I somehow had a fork of the repo on GitHub, so even
though I wasn't "Watching" the main one, I was still getting the
messages.  I just deleted my fork, so hopefully that'll help.
Jonathan Hartstein
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>720-235-7209
On 7/29/15 10:24 AM, John Myers wrote:

Hmm, they are all github.com domains I can see. Are you sure you're
unsubscribed from all of the lists? I don't see you as a collaborator on
github.
On 29 Jul 2015, at 10:21, Jonathan Hartstein wrote:

Now I'm just being CC'd on these :)
Jonathan Hartstein
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>720-235-7209
On 7/29/15 10:21 AM, John Myers wrote:

Chad do you mind doing some testing before we submit?
Thanks,
John
On 29 Jul 2015, at 10:19, Chad Francis wrote:

That is awesome! thanks so much :) I really appreciate it!
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:59 AM, John Myers
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

Hey Chad,
I just pushed up the fix for the W-line westward trains. Now when a
train
will not continue all the way to the end of the line an asterisk
will
be
added to the cell.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:54 PM Kelvin Kosbab
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

Hey Chad,
I'm working on updating the app. The icons aren't dense enough to
add an
asterisk but I put a red dot in the corner that should help
distinguish the
differences between the routes. I'm still doing some digging
myself
to
figure out how to pull this off but I'll be in touch! Thanks!
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:30 PM John Myers<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

I think we disabled the mic/audio because we couldn't get it to
work- I
honestly don't remember. It also makes flippy-flippy noises when
the
times update and I'm not sure if that's working or not in the
currently
deployed version.
John
On 27 Jul 2015, at 12:59, Chad Francis wrote:

very cool, thanks for the info!
also, i noticed a folder labelled ‘easter egg’. i understand
what
it is supposed to do, but couldn’t figure out the steps to
reproduce. I tried rotating my phone upside-down portrait mode
and
blew in the microphone. All that happened is that my wife looked
at
me like I was insane. (but that’s nothing new)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:59 AM, John Myers
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

Chad,
We're actually in the midst of an update here internally (at
Tack).
This
is valuable info, I'll pass on to Kelvin who is working on
this.
JKohn
On 27 Jul 2015, at 0:13, Chad Francis wrote:

short version:
W line schedule doesn't indicate the difference between trains
that
stop at Federal Center station and ones that go to end of the
line.
Suggest adding an asterisk to the icon or something like
that...
long version:
On weekday evenings, the westbound W line does not always go
to
the
end of the line. Due to budgetary reasons, there is only a
single
track between the Federal Center station and the Jefferson
Government
Center stations. In order to keep the rest of the system in
sync,
RTD
has some trains turn around at the Federal Center station
instead of
going to the end of the line.
Most folks don't even notice. Unfortunately, I get off at Red
Rocks,
which is the very next stop after Federal Center. SO... If I
get
on
the 'wrong' W line, I have to get off at Federal Center and
wait
for
the next train. Not a big deal unless the weather is
particularly
nasty.
When planning a trip that boards at any upstream station, it
would
be
nice to know if the 'W Line' time you're looking at is one
that
will
stop at Federal Center or go all the way to the end.
This only affects the W Line. You can check out [the affected
schedule](

http://www3.rtd-denver.com/schedules/getSchedule.action?runboardId=152&routeId=103&routeType=2&branch=W&lineName=W&direction=W-Bound&serviceType=4#day

)

for more info.
ps - Thank you for open-sourcing the codebase, I have forked
it...
but
am still at the grunting and poking it with a stick phase. If
I
can
figure out a fix, I'll happily submit a PR.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125288473

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125305648

--
Kelvin Kosbab
Developer
719.310.5732
tackmobile.com

--
Kelvin Kosbab
Developer
719.310.5732
tackmobile.com
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125998792

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-126006160

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub

https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-126006417.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-126006565
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-126007170.

looks like the changes aren't up there yet, last commit was still in 2014

OK I hope that does it. I don't see your email address in any cc fields.
John
On 29 Jul 2015, at 10:30, Jonathan Hartstein wrote:

Check the CC list on the sent messages.
Also, it looks like I somehow had a fork of the repo on GitHub, so
even
though I wasn't "Watching" the main one, I was still getting the
messages.  I just deleted my fork, so hopefully that'll help.
Jonathan Hartstein
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>720-235-7209
On 7/29/15 10:24 AM, John Myers wrote:

Hmm, they are all github.com domains I can see. Are you sure you're
unsubscribed from all of the lists? I don't see you as a collaborator
on
github.
On 29 Jul 2015, at 10:21, Jonathan Hartstein wrote:

Now I'm just being CC'd on these :)
Jonathan Hartstein
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>720-235-7209
On 7/29/15 10:21 AM, John Myers wrote:

Chad do you mind doing some testing before we submit?
Thanks,
John
On 29 Jul 2015, at 10:19, Chad Francis wrote:

That is awesome! thanks so much :) I really appreciate it!
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:59 AM, John Myers
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

Hey Chad,
I just pushed up the fix for the W-line westward trains. Now when
a
train
will not continue all the way to the end of the line an asterisk
will
be
added to the cell.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:54 PM Kelvin Kosbab
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

Hey Chad,
I'm working on updating the app. The icons aren't dense enough
to
add an
asterisk but I put a red dot in the corner that should help
distinguish the
differences between the routes. I'm still doing some digging
myself
to
figure out how to pull this off but I'll be in touch! Thanks!
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:30 PM John Myers<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

I think we disabled the mic/audio because we couldn't get it to
work- I
honestly don't remember. It also makes flippy-flippy noises
when
the
times update and I'm not sure if that's working or not in the
currently
deployed version.
John
On 27 Jul 2015, at 12:59, Chad Francis wrote:

very cool, thanks for the info!
also, i noticed a folder labelled ‘easter egg’. i
understand
what
it is supposed to do, but couldn’t figure out the steps to
reproduce. I tried rotating my phone upside-down portrait mode
and
blew in the microphone. All that happened is that my wife
looked
at
me like I was insane. (but that’s nothing new)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:59 AM, John Myers
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

Chad,
We're actually in the midst of an update here internally (at
Tack).
This
is valuable info, I'll pass on to Kelvin who is working on
this.
JKohn
On 27 Jul 2015, at 0:13, Chad Francis wrote:

short version:
W line schedule doesn't indicate the difference between
trains
that
stop at Federal Center station and ones that go to end of
the
line.
Suggest adding an asterisk to the icon or something like
that...
long version:
On weekday evenings, the westbound W line does not always go
to
the
end of the line. Due to budgetary reasons, there is only a
single
track between the Federal Center station and the Jefferson
Government
Center stations. In order to keep the rest of the system in
sync,
RTD
has some trains turn around at the Federal Center station
instead of
going to the end of the line.
Most folks don't even notice. Unfortunately, I get off at
Red
Rocks,
which is the very next stop after Federal Center. SO... If I
get
on
the 'wrong' W line, I have to get off at Federal Center and
wait
for
the next train. Not a big deal unless the weather is
particularly
nasty.
When planning a trip that boards at any upstream station, it
would
be
nice to know if the 'W Line' time you're looking at is one
that
will
stop at Federal Center or go all the way to the end.
This only affects the W Line. You can check out [the
affected
schedule](

http://www3.rtd-denver.com/schedules/getSchedule.action?runboardId=152&routeId=103&routeType=2&branch=W&lineName=W&direction=W-Bound&serviceType=4#day

)

for more info.
ps - Thank you for open-sourcing the codebase, I have forked
it...
but
am still at the grunting and poking it with a stick phase.
If
I
can
figure out a fix, I'll happily submit a PR.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125288473

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125305648

--
Kelvin Kosbab
Developer
719.310.5732
tackmobile.com

--
Kelvin Kosbab
Developer
719.310.5732
tackmobile.com
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-125998792

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-126006160

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub

https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-126006417.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-126006565
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-126007170.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/TackMobile/Denver-Rail-iOS/issues/1#issuecomment-126008520

any chance you guys can distribute the beta via TestFlight or HockeyApp?  I don't have an iOS developer license and xcode doesn't seem to want to let me build and deploy the app to my phone without one.

Thanks for your hard work. I updated to the latest version, but am not seeing the new markings for the W line. See attached. I deleted and reinstalled the app, no change. Also noticed no new code has been pushed to master in a while...


Migrate CMOs stuff like draft proposal from https://github.com/AndyGlew/Ri5-stuff  -- fork, import repo, prune repo, or just move files without history?

I started writing a proposl for CMOs in https://github.com/AndyGlew/Ri5-stuff/wiki/CMOs-(Cache-Management-Operations)
Yes... the actual text is in the wiki https://github.com/AndyGlew/Ri5-stuff/wiki, although it is assembled by tools in the repo https://github.com/AndyGlew/Ri5-stuff.
Q: how should I migrate this?
I suppose that I could fork or otherwise import all of https://github.com/AndyGlew/Ri5-stuff/wiki and https://github.com/AndyGlew/Ri5-stuff.  But this seems inappropriate, since there is non-CMO stuff there.
I could prune the git repos for the original repo&wiki, and import that.  But, again, this doesn't seem quite right.  Especially since I really should have a few pages and files in the https://github.com/riscv/riscv-CMOs repo&wiki ahead of importing my old proposal.
I will probably fall back to just moving over the files, losing any history from their original location.  That makes me sad.

What I really want is to prune out any non-CMO history, and then merge the CMO history from AndyGlew/Ri5-stuff
into the existing but not very big history of riscv/riscv-CMOs
But I don't know how to do this conceptually simple operation in git.
And I am pretty sure that it did not exist, oh, say, 10 years ago, because I asked Linus for it. He said it did not exist then, but that it could be added as porcelain.   So I wonder if it has been added in the meantime?  (And if the syntax will make my eyeballs bleed. (Yeah, I like bzr))

Finally completed the migration, copying files, losing history from original AndyGlew/Ri5-stuff repo
git tag 'Migrated_from_AndyGlew_Ri5-stuff_to_riscv_riscv-CMOs'
in both riscv/riscv-CMOs and riscv/riscv-CMOs.wiki
All, or at least most, links repaired.  Makefile generates PDF and HTML.


Skip integration tests

We are skipping integration tests to fix https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi-junipermist/issues/192.

cc @zbuchheit who likely knows more about the test setup here


added copy function for api and email

Fixes:  #19884

Screenshots and screen captures:

Self-review checklist

[ ] Self-reviewed the changes for clarity and maintainability
(variable names, code reuse, readability, etc.).

Communicate decisions, questions, and potential concerns.

[ ] Explains differences from previous plans (e.g., issue description).
[ ] Highlights technical choices and bugs encountered.
[ ] Calls out remaining decisions and concerns.
[ ] Automated tests verify logic where appropriate.

Individual commits are ready for review (see commit discipline).

[ ] Each commit is a coherent idea.
[ ] Commit message(s) explain reasoning and motivation for changes.

Completed manual review and testing of the following:

[ ] Visual appearance of the changes.
[ ] Responsiveness and internationalization.
[ ] Strings and tooltips.
[ ] End-to-end functionality of buttons, interactions and flows.
[ ] Corner cases, error conditions, and easily imagined bugs.

@Jay-Lokhande Please don't open multiple PRs for the same issue.

@Jay-Lokhande Please don't open multiple PRs for the same issue.

I have added feature to copy api id and email id can you please allow to merge i have to add css and hbs file


feat(es/transforms/base): remove extra parens around iife in expr

Description:
Originally fixer would make
a = function () {} ()

into
a = (function () {}) ()

and since it's the last transformation, it must be fixed here
BREAKING CHANGE:

Related issue (if exists):

Oh, I need to update remain tests


Spring EM issue

Hi, I get extremely low EM for Spring.
I set up Spring following configurations in reproduction guideline.
for Spring, the metrics when evaluated with NQ are:
em: 0.00443213296398892
f1: 0.13373634365821715
acc: 0.5548476454293629
precision: 0.07915875093799442
recall: 0.6200184672206834

and the first item in intermediate data is:
{
        "id": "test_0",
        "question": "who got the first nobel prize in physics",
        "golden_answers": [
            "Wilhelm Conrad R\u00f6ntgen"
        ],
        "output": {
            "retrieval_result": [
                {
                    "id": "16315106",
                    "contents": "\"Nobel Prize in Physics\"\nNobel Prize in Physics The Nobel Prize in Physics () is a yearly award given by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences for those who have made the most outstanding contributions for mankind in the field of physics. It is one of the five Nobel Prizes established by the will of Alfred Nobel in 1895 and awarded since 1901; the others being the Nobel Prize in Chemistry, Nobel Prize in Literature, Nobel Peace Prize, and Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. The first Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to physicist Wilhelm R\u00f6ntgen in recognition of the extraordinary services he",
                    "score": 12.15781021118164
                },
                {
                    "id": "16315118",
                    "contents": "\"Nobel Prize in Physics\"\nreceive a diploma, a medal and a document confirming the prize amount. Nobel Prize in Physics The Nobel Prize in Physics () is a yearly award given by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences for those who have made the most outstanding contributions for mankind in the field of physics. It is one of the five Nobel Prizes established by the will of Alfred Nobel in 1895 and awarded since 1901; the others being the Nobel Prize in Chemistry, Nobel Prize in Literature, Nobel Peace Prize, and Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. The first Nobel Prize in Physics was",
                    "score": 12.027339935302734
                },
                {
                    "id": "18359579",
                    "contents": "\"Wilhelm Ro\u0308ntgen\"\nWilhelm R\u00f6ntgen Wilhelm Conrad R\u00f6ntgen (; ; 27 March 1845 \u2013 10 February 1923) was a German mechanical engineer and physicist, who, on 8 November 1895, produced and detected electromagnetic radiation in a wavelength range known as X-rays or R\u00f6ntgen rays, an achievement that earned him the first Nobel Prize in Physics in 1901. In honour of his accomplishments, in 2004 the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) named element 111, roentgenium, a radioactive element with multiple unstable isotopes, after him. Born to a German father and a Dutch mother, R\u00f6ntgen attended high school in Utrecht, Netherlands. In",
                    "score": 11.90399169921875
                },
                {
                    "id": "6617129",
                    "contents": "\"Wilhelm Ro\u0308ntgen\"\nWilhelm R\u00f6ntgen Wilhelm Conrad R\u00f6ntgen (; ; 27 March 1845 \u2013 10 February 1923) was a German mechanical engineer and physicist, who, on 8 November 1895, produced and detected electromagnetic radiation in a wavelength range known as X-rays or R\u00f6ntgen rays, an achievement that earned him the first Nobel Prize in Physics in 1901. In honour of his accomplishments, in 2004 the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) named element 111, roentgenium, a radioactive element with multiple unstable isotopes, after him. Born to a German father and a Dutch mother, R\u00f6ntgen attended high school in Utrecht, Netherlands. In",
                    "score": 11.90399169921875
                },
                {
                    "id": "11376096",
                    "contents": "\"Nobel Prize\"\nWilhelm R\u00f6ntgen's discovery of X-rays and Philipp Lenard's work on cathode rays. The Academy of Sciences selected R\u00f6ntgen for the prize. In the last decades of the 19th century, many chemists had made significant contributions. Thus, with the Chemistry Prize, the Academy \"\"was chiefly faced with merely deciding the order in which these scientists should be awarded the prize\"\". The Academy received 20 nominations, eleven of them for Jacobus van 't Hoff. Van 't Hoff was awarded the prize for his contributions in chemical thermodynamics. The Swedish Academy chose the poet Sully Prudhomme for the first Nobel Prize in Literature.",
                    "score": 11.842757225036621
                }
            ],
            "prompt": "Answer the question based on the given document.\nThe following are given documents.\n\nDoc 1(Title: \"Nobel Prize in Physics\") Nobel Prize in Physics The Nobel Prize in Physics () is a yearly award given by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences for those who have made the most outstanding contributions for mankind in the field of physics. It is one of the five Nobel Prizes established by the will of Alfred Nobel in 1895 and awarded since 1901; the others being the Nobel Prize in Chemistry, Nobel Prize in Literature, Nobel Peace Prize, and Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. The first Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to physicist Wilhelm R\u00f6ntgen in recognition of the extraordinary services he\nDoc 2(Title: \"Nobel Prize in Physics\") receive a diploma, a medal and a document confirming the prize amount. Nobel Prize in Physics The Nobel Prize in Physics () is a yearly award given by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences for those who have made the most outstanding contributions for mankind in the field of physics. It is one of the five Nobel Prizes established by the will of Alfred Nobel in 1895 and awarded since 1901; the others being the Nobel Prize in Chemistry, Nobel Prize in Literature, Nobel Peace Prize, and Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. The first Nobel Prize in Physics was\nDoc 3(Title: \"Wilhelm Ro\u0308ntgen\") Wilhelm R\u00f6ntgen Wilhelm Conrad R\u00f6ntgen (; ; 27 March 1845 \u2013 10 February 1923) was a German mechanical engineer and physicist, who, on 8 November 1895, produced and detected electromagnetic radiation in a wavelength range known as X-rays or R\u00f6ntgen rays, an achievement that earned him the first Nobel Prize in Physics in 1901. In honour of his accomplishments, in 2004 the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) named element 111, roentgenium, a radioactive element with multiple unstable isotopes, after him. Born to a German father and a Dutch mother, R\u00f6ntgen attended high school in Utrecht, Netherlands. In\nDoc 4(Title: \"Wilhelm Ro\u0308ntgen\") Wilhelm R\u00f6ntgen Wilhelm Conrad R\u00f6ntgen (; ; 27 March 1845 \u2013 10 February 1923) was a German mechanical engineer and physicist, who, on 8 November 1895, produced and detected electromagnetic radiation in a wavelength range known as X-rays or R\u00f6ntgen rays, an achievement that earned him the first Nobel Prize in Physics in 1901. In honour of his accomplishments, in 2004 the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) named element 111, roentgenium, a radioactive element with multiple unstable isotopes, after him. Born to a German father and a Dutch mother, R\u00f6ntgen attended high school in Utrecht, Netherlands. In\nDoc 5(Title: \"Nobel Prize\") Wilhelm R\u00f6ntgen's discovery of X-rays and Philipp Lenard's work on cathode rays. The Academy of Sciences selected R\u00f6ntgen for the prize. In the last decades of the 19th century, many chemists had made significant contributions. Thus, with the Chemistry Prize, the Academy \"\"was chiefly faced with merely deciding the order in which these scientists should be awarded the prize\"\". The Academy received 20 nominations, eleven of them for Jacobus van 't Hoff. Van 't Hoff was awarded the prize for his contributions in chemical thermodynamics. The Swedish Academy chose the poet Sully Prudhomme for the first Nobel Prize in Literature.\n\n\n [ref1] [ref2] [ref3] [ref4] [ref5] [ref6] [ref7] [ref8] [ref9] [ref10] [ref11] [ref12] [ref13] [ref14] [ref15] [ref16] [ref17] [ref18] [ref19] [ref20] [ref21] [ref22] [ref23] [ref24] [ref25] [ref26] [ref27] [ref28] [ref29] [ref30] [ref31] [ref32] [ref33] [ref34] [ref35] [ref36] [ref37] [ref38] [ref39] [ref40] [ref41] [ref42] [ref43] [ref44] [ref45] [ref46] [ref47] [ref48] [ref49] [ref50]Question: who got the first nobel prize in physics\nAnswer:",
            "pred": "Wilhelm R\u00f6ntgen. He got the first Nobel Prize in Physics in 1901 for his discovery of X-rays.",
            "metric_score": {
                "em": 0.0,
                "f1": 0.21052631578947367,
                "acc": 0.0,
                "precision": 0.125,
                "recall": 0.6666666666666666
            }
        }
    },

I think the problem might be this system prompt in spring function
system_prompt = (
        "Answer the question based on the given document."
        "\nThe following are given documents.\n\n{reference}"
    )

I get much better EM when I change it to the "base" system prompt because now the llm only outputs the answer which more accurately match the golden answers.
base_system_prompt = (
        "Answer the question based on the given document."
        "Only give me the answer and do not output any other words."
        "\nThe following are given documents.\n\n{reference}"
    )

ps: may need to add spring inside func_dict

Very interesting, I check my experimental log and find that the answer is correct. Below is my log:
{
        "id": "test_0",
        "question": "who got the first nobel prize in physics",
        "golden_answers": [
            "Wilhelm Conrad R\u00f6ntgen"
        ],
        "output": {
            "retrieval_result": [
                {
                    "id": "16315106",
                    "contents": "\"Nobel Prize in Physics\"\nNobel Prize in Physics The Nobel Prize in Physics () is a yearly award given by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences for those who have made the most outstanding contributions for mankind in the field of physics. It is one of the five Nobel Prizes established by the will of Alfred Nobel in 1895 and awarded since 1901; the others being the Nobel Prize in Chemistry, Nobel Prize in Literature, Nobel Peace Prize, and Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. The first Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to physicist Wilhelm R\u00f6ntgen in recognition of the extraordinary services he"
                },
                {
                    "id": "16315118",
                    "contents": "\"Nobel Prize in Physics\"\nreceive a diploma, a medal and a document confirming the prize amount. Nobel Prize in Physics The Nobel Prize in Physics () is a yearly award given by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences for those who have made the most outstanding contributions for mankind in the field of physics. It is one of the five Nobel Prizes established by the will of Alfred Nobel in 1895 and awarded since 1901; the others being the Nobel Prize in Chemistry, Nobel Prize in Literature, Nobel Peace Prize, and Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. The first Nobel Prize in Physics was"
                },
                {
                    "id": "18359579",
                    "contents": "\"Wilhelm Ro\u0308ntgen\"\nWilhelm R\u00f6ntgen Wilhelm Conrad R\u00f6ntgen (; ; 27 March 1845 \u2013 10 February 1923) was a German mechanical engineer and physicist, who, on 8 November 1895, produced and detected electromagnetic radiation in a wavelength range known as X-rays or R\u00f6ntgen rays, an achievement that earned him the first Nobel Prize in Physics in 1901. In honour of his accomplishments, in 2004 the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) named element 111, roentgenium, a radioactive element with multiple unstable isotopes, after him. Born to a German father and a Dutch mother, R\u00f6ntgen attended high school in Utrecht, Netherlands. In"
                },
                {
                    "id": "6617129",
                    "contents": "\"Wilhelm Ro\u0308ntgen\"\nWilhelm R\u00f6ntgen Wilhelm Conrad R\u00f6ntgen (; ; 27 March 1845 \u2013 10 February 1923) was a German mechanical engineer and physicist, who, on 8 November 1895, produced and detected electromagnetic radiation in a wavelength range known as X-rays or R\u00f6ntgen rays, an achievement that earned him the first Nobel Prize in Physics in 1901. In honour of his accomplishments, in 2004 the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) named element 111, roentgenium, a radioactive element with multiple unstable isotopes, after him. Born to a German father and a Dutch mother, R\u00f6ntgen attended high school in Utrecht, Netherlands. In"
                },
                {
                    "id": "11376096",
                    "contents": "\"Nobel Prize\"\nWilhelm R\u00f6ntgen's discovery of X-rays and Philipp Lenard's work on cathode rays. The Academy of Sciences selected R\u00f6ntgen for the prize. In the last decades of the 19th century, many chemists had made significant contributions. Thus, with the Chemistry Prize, the Academy \"\"was chiefly faced with merely deciding the order in which these scientists should be awarded the prize\"\". The Academy received 20 nominations, eleven of them for Jacobus van 't Hoff. Van 't Hoff was awarded the prize for his contributions in chemical thermodynamics. The Swedish Academy chose the poet Sully Prudhomme for the first Nobel Prize in Literature."
                }
            ],
            "prompt": "Answer the question based on the given document.\nThe following are given documents.\n\nDoc 1(Title: \"Nobel Prize in Physics\") Nobel Prize in Physics The Nobel Prize in Physics () is a yearly award given by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences for those who have made the most outstanding contributions for mankind in the field of physics. It is one of the five Nobel Prizes established by the will of Alfred Nobel in 1895 and awarded since 1901; the others being the Nobel Prize in Chemistry, Nobel Prize in Literature, Nobel Peace Prize, and Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. The first Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to physicist Wilhelm R\u00f6ntgen in recognition of the extraordinary services he\nDoc 2(Title: \"Nobel Prize in Physics\") receive a diploma, a medal and a document confirming the prize amount. Nobel Prize in Physics The Nobel Prize in Physics () is a yearly award given by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences for those who have made the most outstanding contributions for mankind in the field of physics. It is one of the five Nobel Prizes established by the will of Alfred Nobel in 1895 and awarded since 1901; the others being the Nobel Prize in Chemistry, Nobel Prize in Literature, Nobel Peace Prize, and Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. The first Nobel Prize in Physics was\nDoc 3(Title: \"Wilhelm Ro\u0308ntgen\") Wilhelm R\u00f6ntgen Wilhelm Conrad R\u00f6ntgen (; ; 27 March 1845 \u2013 10 February 1923) was a German mechanical engineer and physicist, who, on 8 November 1895, produced and detected electromagnetic radiation in a wavelength range known as X-rays or R\u00f6ntgen rays, an achievement that earned him the first Nobel Prize in Physics in 1901. In honour of his accomplishments, in 2004 the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) named element 111, roentgenium, a radioactive element with multiple unstable isotopes, after him. Born to a German father and a Dutch mother, R\u00f6ntgen attended high school in Utrecht, Netherlands. In\nDoc 4(Title: \"Wilhelm Ro\u0308ntgen\") Wilhelm R\u00f6ntgen Wilhelm Conrad R\u00f6ntgen (; ; 27 March 1845 \u2013 10 February 1923) was a German mechanical engineer and physicist, who, on 8 November 1895, produced and detected electromagnetic radiation in a wavelength range known as X-rays or R\u00f6ntgen rays, an achievement that earned him the first Nobel Prize in Physics in 1901. In honour of his accomplishments, in 2004 the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) named element 111, roentgenium, a radioactive element with multiple unstable isotopes, after him. Born to a German father and a Dutch mother, R\u00f6ntgen attended high school in Utrecht, Netherlands. In\nDoc 5(Title: \"Nobel Prize\") Wilhelm R\u00f6ntgen's discovery of X-rays and Philipp Lenard's work on cathode rays. The Academy of Sciences selected R\u00f6ntgen for the prize. In the last decades of the 19th century, many chemists had made significant contributions. Thus, with the Chemistry Prize, the Academy \"\"was chiefly faced with merely deciding the order in which these scientists should be awarded the prize\"\". The Academy received 20 nominations, eleven of them for Jacobus van 't Hoff. Van 't Hoff was awarded the prize for his contributions in chemical thermodynamics. The Swedish Academy chose the poet Sully Prudhomme for the first Nobel Prize in Literature.\n\n\n [ref1] [ref2] [ref3] [ref4] [ref5] [ref6] [ref7] [ref8] [ref9] [ref10] [ref11] [ref12] [ref13] [ref14] [ref15] [ref16] [ref17] [ref18] [ref19] [ref20] [ref21] [ref22] [ref23] [ref24] [ref25] [ref26] [ref27] [ref28] [ref29] [ref30] [ref31] [ref32] [ref33] [ref34] [ref35] [ref36] [ref37] [ref38] [ref39] [ref40] [ref41] [ref42] [ref43] [ref44] [ref45] [ref46] [ref47] [ref48] [ref49] [ref50]Question: who got the first nobel prize in physics\nAnswer:",
            "pred": "Wilhelm Conrad R\u00f6ntgen",
            "metric_score": {
                "em": 1.0,
                "f1": 1.0,
                "acc": 1.0,
                "precision": 1.0,
                "recall": 1.0
            }
        }

It seems that this issue is random. But in order to be consistent with the previous method, I still modified the prompt in run._exp. py to avoid similar situations.

Hi,
I used SPRING to run my experiments and found out that it usually outputted some unnecessary words in pred. Specifically, it has a weird pattern of answering Final Answer: ...... I hope it is correct.. I am not sure where this pattern originates from.
"pred": "the pharmacist\nFinal Answer: The final answer is the pharmacist. I hope it is correct.",
"pred": "not enough info\nFinal Answer: The final answer is not enough info. I hope it is correct.",

My prompt is OK with several other methods (like naive, skr etc.) I tested, in those methods, pred is just a few words, and doesn't contain the weird pattern above.
I am blinding asking this question without looking into details, so apologize if this is something naive.