failures with sundials 6.2.0

fnrizzi@192 ~/D/w/m/build-external-sundials-otf2> ./RunAllTests
[==========] Running 370 tests from 67 test suites.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 13 tests from DatasetTest
[ RUN      ] DatasetTest.Groups
[       OK ] DatasetTest.Groups (7 ms)
[ RUN      ] DatasetTest.DoubleSetGet
[       OK ] DatasetTest.DoubleSetGet (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] DatasetTest.CopyDataset
[       OK ] DatasetTest.CopyDataset (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] DatasetTest.CopyDatasetWithAttribute
[       OK ] DatasetTest.CopyDatasetWithAttribute (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] DatasetTest.CopyGroup
[       OK ] DatasetTest.CopyGroup (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] DatasetTest.AttributeSetGet
[       OK ] DatasetTest.AttributeSetGet (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] DatasetTest.BlockReadOps
[       OK ] DatasetTest.BlockReadOps (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] DatasetTest.BlockWriteOps
[       OK ] DatasetTest.BlockWriteOps (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] DatasetTest.IntSetGet
[       OK ] DatasetTest.IntSetGet (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] DatasetTest.CloseOpen
[       OK ] DatasetTest.CloseOpen (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] DatasetTest.GroupSizeFail
[       OK ] DatasetTest.GroupSizeFail (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] DatasetTest.CreateDataset
[       OK ] DatasetTest.CreateDataset (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] DatasetTest.FromH5File
[       OK ] DatasetTest.FromH5File (0 ms)
[----------] 13 tests from DatasetTest (15 ms total)

[----------] 1 test from Paths
[ RUN      ] Paths.GetParent
[       OK ] Paths.GetParent (0 ms)
[----------] 1 test from Paths (0 ms total)

[----------] 7 tests from HDF5FileTest
[ RUN      ] HDF5FileTest.ReadWrite
[       OK ] HDF5FileTest.ReadWrite (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] HDF5FileTest.ChildList
[       OK ] HDF5FileTest.ChildList (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] HDF5FileTest.MultiLevelGroup
[       OK ] HDF5FileTest.MultiLevelGroup (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] HDF5FileTest.Attributes
[       OK ] HDF5FileTest.Attributes (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] HDF5FileTest.WritePartial1
[       OK ] HDF5FileTest.WritePartial1 (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] HDF5FileTest.WritePartial2
[       OK ] HDF5FileTest.WritePartial2 (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] HDF5FileTest.MergeFiles
[       OK ] HDF5FileTest.MergeFiles (0 ms)
[----------] 7 tests from HDF5FileTest (3 ms total)

[----------] 17 tests from Utilities_MultiIndices
[ RUN      ] Utilities_MultiIndices.DefaultConstructor
[       OK ] Utilities_MultiIndices.DefaultConstructor (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities_MultiIndices.CreateVector
[       OK ] Utilities_MultiIndices.CreateVector (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities_MultiIndices.RowConstructor
[       OK ] Utilities_MultiIndices.RowConstructor (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities_MultiIndices.InitializerListConstructor
[       OK ] Utilities_MultiIndices.InitializerListConstructor (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities_MultiIndices.Comparison
[       OK ] Utilities_MultiIndices.Comparison (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities_MultiIndices.SetValue
[       OK ] Utilities_MultiIndices.SetValue (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities_MultiIndices.AdditionOperators
[       OK ] Utilities_MultiIndices.AdditionOperators (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities_MultiIndices.SubtractionOperators
[       OK ] Utilities_MultiIndices.SubtractionOperators (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities_MultiIndices.ValidNeighbor
[       OK ] Utilities_MultiIndices.ValidNeighbor (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities_MultiIndices.UndefinedNeighbor
[       OK ] Utilities_MultiIndices.UndefinedNeighbor (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities_MultiIndices.OutsideMaxOrder
[       OK ] Utilities_MultiIndices.OutsideMaxOrder (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities_MultiIndices.OutsideTotalOrder
[       OK ] Utilities_MultiIndices.OutsideTotalOrder (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities_MultiIndices.AddAdmissibleNeighbor
[       OK ] Utilities_MultiIndices.AddAdmissibleNeighbor (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities_MultiIndices.BackwardsNeighbors
[       OK ] Utilities_MultiIndices.BackwardsNeighbors (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities_MultiIndices.Expand
[       OK ] Utilities_MultiIndices.Expand (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities_MultiIndices.SaveLoadHDF5
[       OK ] Utilities_MultiIndices.SaveLoadHDF5 (1 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities_MultiIndices.CreateAnisotropic
0 0
1 0
2 0
3 0
0 1
1 1
[       OK ] Utilities_MultiIndices.CreateAnisotropic (0 ms)
[----------] 17 tests from Utilities_MultiIndices (1 ms total)

[----------] 7 tests from Utilities_MultiIndicies
[ RUN      ] Utilities_MultiIndicies.MaxLimiter
[       OK ] Utilities_MultiIndicies.MaxLimiter (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities_MultiIndicies.TotalLimiter
[       OK ] Utilities_MultiIndicies.TotalLimiter (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities_MultiIndicies.AndLimiter
[       OK ] Utilities_MultiIndicies.AndLimiter (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities_MultiIndicies.OrLimiter
[       OK ] Utilities_MultiIndicies.OrLimiter (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities_MultiIndicies.XorLimiter
[       OK ] Utilities_MultiIndicies.XorLimiter (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities_MultiIndicies.ValidDimensionLimiter
[       OK ] Utilities_MultiIndicies.ValidDimensionLimiter (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities_MultiIndicies.AnisotropicLimiter
[       OK ] Utilities_MultiIndicies.AnisotropicLimiter (0 ms)
[----------] 7 tests from Utilities_MultiIndicies (0 ms total)

[----------] 8 tests from UtilitiesRandomGenerator
[ RUN      ] UtilitiesRandomGenerator.UniformReal
[       OK ] UtilitiesRandomGenerator.UniformReal (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] UtilitiesRandomGenerator.Gaussian
[       OK ] UtilitiesRandomGenerator.Gaussian (1 ms)
[ RUN      ] UtilitiesRandomGenerator.UniformRealInt
[       OK ] UtilitiesRandomGenerator.UniformRealInt (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] UtilitiesRandomGenerator.SeedResetTest
[       OK ] UtilitiesRandomGenerator.SeedResetTest (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] UtilitiesRandomGenerator.SeedTempSet
[       OK ] UtilitiesRandomGenerator.SeedTempSet (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] UtilitiesRandomGenerator.Discrete
[       OK ] UtilitiesRandomGenerator.Discrete (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] UtilitiesRandomGenerator.Gamma
[       OK ] UtilitiesRandomGenerator.Gamma (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] UtilitiesRandomGenerator.StoreRng
[       OK ] UtilitiesRandomGenerator.StoreRng (0 ms)
[----------] 8 tests from UtilitiesRandomGenerator (3 ms total)

[----------] 2 tests from UtilitiesAnyHelpers
[ RUN      ] UtilitiesAnyHelpers.AnyCast
[       OK ] UtilitiesAnyHelpers.AnyCast (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] UtilitiesAnyHelpers.AnyConstCast
[       OK ] UtilitiesAnyHelpers.AnyConstCast (0 ms)
[----------] 2 tests from UtilitiesAnyHelpers (0 ms total)

[----------] 5 tests from Utilities
[ RUN      ] Utilities.StringStrip
[       OK ] Utilities.StringStrip (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities.StringSplit
[       OK ] Utilities.StringSplit (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities.StringCombine
[       OK ] Utilities.StringCombine (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities.VectorSlice_Eigen
[       OK ] Utilities.VectorSlice_Eigen (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities.VectorSlice_StdVec
[       OK ] Utilities.VectorSlice_StdVec (0 ms)
[----------] 5 tests from Utilities (0 ms total)

[----------] 1 test from CerealizeEigen
[ RUN      ] CerealizeEigen.RandomMatrix
[       OK ] CerealizeEigen.RandomMatrix (0 ms)
[----------] 1 test from CerealizeEigen (0 ms total)

[----------] 1 test from Cerealize
[ RUN      ] Cerealize.BoostAnyDouble
[       OK ] Cerealize.BoostAnyDouble (0 ms)
[----------] 1 test from Cerealize (0 ms total)

[----------] 22 tests from WorkPieceTests
[ RUN      ] WorkPieceTests.Unfixed
[       OK ] WorkPieceTests.Unfixed (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] WorkPieceTests.FixedInputNum
[       OK ] WorkPieceTests.FixedInputNum (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] WorkPieceTests.FixedOutputNum
[       OK ] WorkPieceTests.FixedOutputNum (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] WorkPieceTests.FixedInputOutputNum
[       OK ] WorkPieceTests.FixedInputOutputNum (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] WorkPieceTests.FixedInputTypes
[       OK ] WorkPieceTests.FixedInputTypes (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] WorkPieceTests.FixedOutputTypes
[       OK ] WorkPieceTests.FixedOutputTypes (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] WorkPieceTests.SomeFixedInputTypes
[       OK ] WorkPieceTests.SomeFixedInputTypes (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] WorkPieceTests.SomeFixedOutputTypes
[       OK ] WorkPieceTests.SomeFixedOutputTypes (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] WorkPieceTests.SomeFixedInputTypesFixedInputNum
[       OK ] WorkPieceTests.SomeFixedInputTypesFixedInputNum (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] WorkPieceTests.SomeFixedInputTypesFixedOutputNum
[       OK ] WorkPieceTests.SomeFixedInputTypesFixedOutputNum (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] WorkPieceTests.SomeFixedOutputTypesFixedInputNumber
[       OK ] WorkPieceTests.SomeFixedOutputTypesFixedInputNumber (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] WorkPieceTests.SomeFixedOutputTypesFixedOutputNumber
[       OK ] WorkPieceTests.SomeFixedOutputTypesFixedOutputNumber (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] WorkPieceTests.FixedInputTypesFixedOutputNum
[       OK ] WorkPieceTests.FixedInputTypesFixedOutputNum (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] WorkPieceTests.FixedOutputTypesFixedInputNum
[       OK ] WorkPieceTests.FixedOutputTypesFixedInputNum (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] WorkPieceTests.SomeFixedInputTypesFixedInputOutputNum
[       OK ] WorkPieceTests.SomeFixedInputTypesFixedInputOutputNum (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] WorkPieceTests.SomeFixedOutputTypesFixedInputOutputNumber
[       OK ] WorkPieceTests.SomeFixedOutputTypesFixedInputOutputNumber (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] WorkPieceTests.FixedTypes
[       OK ] WorkPieceTests.FixedTypes (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] WorkPieceTests.SomeFixedInputTypesFixedOutputTypes
[       OK ] WorkPieceTests.SomeFixedInputTypesFixedOutputTypes (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] WorkPieceTests.SomeFixedInputTypesFixedInputNumFixedOutputTypes
[       OK ] WorkPieceTests.SomeFixedInputTypesFixedInputNumFixedOutputTypes (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] WorkPieceTests.FixedInputTypesSomeFixedOutputTypes
[       OK ] WorkPieceTests.FixedInputTypesSomeFixedOutputTypes (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] WorkPieceTests.FixedInputTypesSomeFixedOutputTypesFixedOutputNum
[       OK ] WorkPieceTests.FixedInputTypesSomeFixedOutputTypesFixedOutputNum (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] WorkPieceTests.SomeFixedInOuts
[       OK ] WorkPieceTests.SomeFixedInOuts (0 ms)
[----------] 22 tests from WorkPieceTests (0 ms total)

[----------] 10 tests from WorkGraphTests
[ RUN      ] WorkGraphTests.UnfixedInOut
sh: dot: command not found
rm: modules/Modeling/test/WorkGraphVisualizations/UnfixedInOut_temp.dot: No such file or directory
[       OK ] WorkGraphTests.UnfixedInOut (5 ms)
[ RUN      ] WorkGraphTests.NodeLookup
[       OK ] WorkGraphTests.NodeLookup (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] WorkGraphTests.EdgeFinding
[       OK ] WorkGraphTests.EdgeFinding (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] WorkGraphTests.ParentsAndChildrenFromPiece
NumNodes = 3
inputs.size() = 0
[       OK ] WorkGraphTests.ParentsAndChildrenFromPiece (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] WorkGraphTests.ParentsAndChildren
[       OK ] WorkGraphTests.ParentsAndChildren (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] WorkGraphTests.FixedInOutNum
sh: dot: command not found
rm: modules/Modeling/test/WorkGraphVisualizations/FixedInOutNum_temp.dot: No such file or directory
[       OK ] WorkGraphTests.FixedInOutNum (3 ms)
[ RUN      ] WorkGraphTests.FixedInOutType

Nodes:
	test 0
	test 1
Edges:
	test 0[1] -> test 1[1]
	test 0[0] -> test 1[0]

sh: dot: command not found
rm: modules/Modeling/test/WorkGraphVisualizations/FixedInOutType_temp.dot: No such file or directory
[       OK ] WorkGraphTests.FixedInOutType (4 ms)
[ RUN      ] WorkGraphTests.DependentCut
sh: dot: command not found
rm: modules/Modeling/test/WorkGraphVisualizations/DependentCut_temp.dot: No such file or directory
[       OK ] WorkGraphTests.DependentCut (3 ms)
[ RUN      ] WorkGraphTests.IsConstant
[       OK ] WorkGraphTests.IsConstant (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] WorkGraphTests.ConstantDependentCut
sh: dot: command not found
rm: modules/Modeling/test/WorkGraphVisualizations/ConstantDependentCut_BeforeCut_temp.dot: No such file or directory
sh: dot: command not found
rm: modules/Modeling/test/WorkGraphVisualizations/ConstantDependentCut_AfterCut_temp.dot: No such file or directory
[       OK ] WorkGraphTests.ConstantDependentCut (7 ms)
[----------] 10 tests from WorkGraphTests (25 ms total)

[----------] 1 test from WorkGraphPiece
[ RUN      ] WorkGraphPiece.FixedInOutNum
sh: dot: command not found
rm: modules/Modeling/test/WorkGraphVisualizations/FixedInOutNum_WorkPiece_temp.dot: No such file or directory
[       OK ] WorkGraphPiece.FixedInOutNum (3 ms)
[----------] 1 test from WorkGraphPiece (3 ms total)

[----------] 8 tests from Modeling_ModGraphPiece
[ RUN      ] Modeling_ModGraphPiece.MatchInputs
[       OK ] Modeling_ModGraphPiece.MatchInputs (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Modeling_ModGraphPiece.BasicTest
[       OK ] Modeling_ModGraphPiece.BasicTest (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Modeling_ModGraphPiece.Caching
[       OK ] Modeling_ModGraphPiece.Caching (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Modeling_ModGraphPiece.MultiSplit
sh: dot: command not found
[       OK ] Modeling_ModGraphPiece.MultiSplit (4 ms)
[ RUN      ] Modeling_ModGraphPiece.SplitHessianTest
[       OK ] Modeling_ModGraphPiece.SplitHessianTest (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Modeling_ModGraphPiece.DiamondTest
[       OK ] Modeling_ModGraphPiece.DiamondTest (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Modeling_ModGraphPiece.LinearGaussPosterior
sh: dot: command not found
sh: dot: command not found
[       OK ] Modeling_ModGraphPiece.LinearGaussPosterior (7 ms)
[ RUN      ] Modeling_ModGraphPiece.DiamondTestOperator
[       OK ] Modeling_ModGraphPiece.DiamondTestOperator (0 ms)
[----------] 8 tests from Modeling_ModGraphPiece (15 ms total)

[----------] 5 tests from ModPieceTest
[ RUN      ] ModPieceTest.NamingTest
[       OK ] ModPieceTest.NamingTest (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] ModPieceTest.UniqueNames
[       OK ] ModPieceTest.UniqueNames (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] ModPieceTest.FiniteDifference
[       OK ] ModPieceTest.FiniteDifference (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] ModPieceTest.SingleGrad
[       OK ] ModPieceTest.SingleGrad (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] ModPieceTest.SingleJacobian
[       OK ] ModPieceTest.SingleJacobian (0 ms)
[----------] 5 tests from ModPieceTest (0 ms total)

[----------] 1 test from ModellingModelTest
[ RUN      ] ModellingModelTest.SingleEval
[       OK ] ModellingModelTest.SingleEval (0 ms)
[----------] 1 test from ModellingModelTest (0 ms total)

[----------] 3 tests from ConstantPiece
[ RUN      ] ConstantPiece.BasicTest
[       OK ] ConstantPiece.BasicTest (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] ConstantPiece.RecursiveConstructor
[       OK ] ConstantPiece.RecursiveConstructor (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] ConstantPiece.DefaultConstructor
[       OK ] ConstantPiece.DefaultConstructor (0 ms)
[----------] 3 tests from ConstantPiece (0 ms total)

[----------] 2 tests from DerivativePiecesTest
[ RUN      ] DerivativePiecesTest.GradientPiece
[       OK ] DerivativePiecesTest.GradientPiece (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] DerivativePiecesTest.JacobianPiece
[       OK ] DerivativePiecesTest.JacobianPiece (0 ms)
[----------] 2 tests from DerivativePiecesTest (0 ms total)

[----------] 5 tests from IdentityPiece
[ RUN      ] IdentityPiece.Unfixed
[       OK ] IdentityPiece.Unfixed (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] IdentityPiece.FixedNum
[       OK ] IdentityPiece.FixedNum (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] IdentityPiece.FixedType
[       OK ] IdentityPiece.FixedType (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] IdentityPiece.SomeFixedTypes
[       OK ] IdentityPiece.SomeFixedTypes (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] IdentityPiece.SomeFixedTypesFixedNum
[       OK ] IdentityPiece.SomeFixedTypesFixedNum (0 ms)
[----------] 5 tests from IdentityPiece (0 ms total)

[----------] 2 tests from SplitVectorTests
[ RUN      ] SplitVectorTests.Basic
[       OK ] SplitVectorTests.Basic (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] SplitVectorTests.Extract
[       OK ] SplitVectorTests.Extract (0 ms)
[----------] 2 tests from SplitVectorTests (0 ms total)

[----------] 1 test from ScaleVectorTests
[ RUN      ] ScaleVectorTests.Basic
[       OK ] ScaleVectorTests.Basic (0 ms)
[----------] 1 test from ScaleVectorTests (0 ms total)

[----------] 1 test from CombineVectorsTests
[ RUN      ] CombineVectorsTests.Basic
[       OK ] CombineVectorsTests.Basic (0 ms)
[----------] 1 test from CombineVectorsTests (0 ms total)

[----------] 1 test from Modeling
[ RUN      ] Modeling.SumPiece
[       OK ] Modeling.SumPiece (0 ms)
[----------] 1 test from Modeling (0 ms total)

[----------] 2 tests from MultiLogisticLikelihood
[ RUN      ] MultiLogisticLikelihood.Evaluate
[       OK ] MultiLogisticLikelihood.Evaluate (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] MultiLogisticLikelihood.Derivatives
[       OK ] MultiLogisticLikelihood.Derivatives (0 ms)
[----------] 2 tests from MultiLogisticLikelihood (0 ms total)

[----------] 4 tests from LinearSDE
[ RUN      ] LinearSDE.MeanCovariance
[       OK ] LinearSDE.MeanCovariance (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] LinearSDE.MeanCovariance_NoL
[       OK ] LinearSDE.MeanCovariance_NoL (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] LinearSDE.Concatenate
[       OK ] LinearSDE.Concatenate (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] LinearSDE.Discretize
[       OK ] LinearSDE.Discretize (0 ms)
[----------] 4 tests from LinearSDE (2 ms total)

[----------] 8 tests from CwiseOperators
[ RUN      ] CwiseOperators.SimpleBase
[       OK ] CwiseOperators.SimpleBase (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] CwiseOperators.ExpOperator
[       OK ] CwiseOperators.ExpOperator (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] CwiseOperators.SinOperator
[       OK ] CwiseOperators.SinOperator (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] CwiseOperators.CosOperator
[       OK ] CwiseOperators.CosOperator (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] CwiseOperators.AbsOperator
[       OK ] CwiseOperators.AbsOperator (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] CwiseOperators.AcosOperator
[       OK ] CwiseOperators.AcosOperator (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] CwiseOperators.CbrtOperator
[       OK ] CwiseOperators.CbrtOperator (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] CwiseOperators.DigammaOperator
[       OK ] CwiseOperators.DigammaOperator (0 ms)
[----------] 8 tests from CwiseOperators (0 ms total)

[----------] 1 test from FlannCache
[ RUN      ] FlannCache.CreateCache
[       OK ] FlannCache.CreateCache (0 ms)
[----------] 1 test from FlannCache (0 ms total)

[----------] 5 tests from Utilties_LinearOperator
[ RUN      ] Utilties_LinearOperator.EigenDense
[       OK ] Utilties_LinearOperator.EigenDense (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilties_LinearOperator.EigenSparse
[       OK ] Utilties_LinearOperator.EigenSparse (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilties_LinearOperator.SliceOperator
[       OK ] Utilties_LinearOperator.SliceOperator (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilties_LinearOperator.SliceOperatorReverse
[       OK ] Utilties_LinearOperator.SliceOperatorReverse (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilties_LinearOperator.SliceOperatorNegativeIndex
[       OK ] Utilties_LinearOperator.SliceOperatorNegativeIndex (0 ms)
[----------] 5 tests from Utilties_LinearOperator (0 ms total)

[----------] 10 tests from Utilities_LinearOperator
[ RUN      ] Utilities_LinearOperator.Conversion
[       OK ] Utilities_LinearOperator.Conversion (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities_LinearOperator.CompanionMatrix
[       OK ] Utilities_LinearOperator.CompanionMatrix (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities_LinearOperator.BlockDiagonal
[       OK ] Utilities_LinearOperator.BlockDiagonal (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities_LinearOperator.KroneckerProduct
[       OK ] Utilities_LinearOperator.KroneckerProduct (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities_LinearOperator.DenseKronecker
[       OK ] Utilities_LinearOperator.DenseKronecker (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities_LinearOperator.Sum
[       OK ] Utilities_LinearOperator.Sum (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities_LinearOperator.BlockRow
[       OK ] Utilities_LinearOperator.BlockRow (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities_LinearOperator.Concatenate_BadSizes
[       OK ] Utilities_LinearOperator.Concatenate_BadSizes (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities_LinearOperator.Concatenate
[       OK ] Utilities_LinearOperator.Concatenate (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities_LinearOperator.Concatenate_StackFuncs
[       OK ] Utilities_LinearOperator.Concatenate_StackFuncs (0 ms)
[----------] 10 tests from Utilities_LinearOperator (0 ms total)

[----------] 3 tests from Utilities_LyapunovSolver
[ RUN      ] Utilities_LyapunovSolver.Diagonal
[       OK ] Utilities_LyapunovSolver.Diagonal (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities_LyapunovSolver.DampedOscillator
[       OK ] Utilities_LyapunovSolver.DampedOscillator (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Utilities_LyapunovSolver.MaternTest
/Users/fnrizzi/Desktop/work/muq/MIT-MUQ/modules/Modeling/test/LinearAlgebra/LyapunovSolverTests.cpp:83: Failure
The difference between 0.0 and resid(i,j).real() is 1.6176689577029889e-10, which exceeds 1e-10, where
0.0 evaluates to 0,
resid(i,j).real() evaluates to 1.6176689577029889e-10, and
1e-10 evaluates to 1e-10.
[  FAILED  ] Utilities_LyapunovSolver.MaternTest (0 ms)
[----------] 3 tests from Utilities_LyapunovSolver (0 ms total)

[----------] 1 test from Utilties_AffineOperator
[ RUN      ] Utilties_AffineOperator.EigenDense
[       OK ] Utilties_AffineOperator.EigenDense (0 ms)
[----------] 1 test from Utilties_AffineOperator (0 ms total)

[----------] 9 tests from LOBPCG
[ RUN      ] LOBPCG.Diagonal_BigBlock
[       OK ] LOBPCG.Diagonal_BigBlock (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] LOBPCG.Diagonal_MedBlock
[       OK ] LOBPCG.Diagonal_MedBlock (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] LOBPCG.Diagonal_SmallBlock
[       OK ] LOBPCG.Diagonal_SmallBlock (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] LOBPCG.Diagonal_Tolerance
[       OK ] LOBPCG.Diagonal_Tolerance (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] LOBPCG.Random
[       OK ] LOBPCG.Random (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] LOBPCG.RandomIdentity
[       OK ] LOBPCG.RandomIdentity (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] LOBPCG.RandomGeneral
[       OK ] LOBPCG.RandomGeneral (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] LOBPCG.RandomGeneralPrecond
[       OK ] LOBPCG.RandomGeneralPrecond (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] LOBPCG.RandomGeneralPrecondConstrained
[       OK ] LOBPCG.RandomGeneralPrecondConstrained (0 ms)
[----------] 9 tests from LOBPCG (2 ms total)

[----------] 4 tests from StochasticEigenSolver
[ RUN      ] StochasticEigenSolver.Diagonal_AllAtOnce
[       OK ] StochasticEigenSolver.Diagonal_AllAtOnce (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] StochasticEigenSolver.Diagonal_Incremental
[       OK ] StochasticEigenSolver.Diagonal_Incremental (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] StochasticEigenSolver.Random
[       OK ] StochasticEigenSolver.Random (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] StochasticEigenSolver.RandomGeneral
[       OK ] StochasticEigenSolver.RandomGeneral (0 ms)
[----------] 4 tests from StochasticEigenSolver (0 ms total)

[----------] 1 test from ODEExample
[ RUN      ] ODEExample.RHS
[       OK ] ODEExample.RHS (0 ms)
[----------] 1 test from ODEExample (0 ms total)

[----------] 7 tests from ODETests
[ RUN      ] ODETests.BDFNewtonMethod
[       OK ] ODETests.BDFNewtonMethod (2 ms)
[ RUN      ] ODETests.BDFIterMethod

[CVODES ERROR]  CVodeSetNonlinearSolverSensSim
  NLS must be non-NULL

[CVODES ERROR]  cvNlsInitSensSim
  Setting linear solver solve function failed

[CVODES ERROR]  cvInitialSetup
  The nonlinear solver's init routine failed.

unknown file: Failure
C++ exception with description "SUNDIALS_ERROR: CVode failed with retval = -13" thrown in TearDown().
[  FAILED  ] ODETests.BDFIterMethod (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] ODETests.AdamsNewtonMethod
[       OK ] ODETests.AdamsNewtonMethod (1 ms)
[ RUN      ] ODETests.AdamsIterMethod

[CVODES ERROR]  CVodeSetNonlinearSolverSensSim
  NLS must be non-NULL

[CVODES ERROR]  cvNlsInitSensSim
  Setting linear solver solve function failed

[CVODES ERROR]  cvInitialSetup
  The nonlinear solver's init routine failed.

unknown file: Failure
C++ exception with description "SUNDIALS_ERROR: CVode failed with retval = -13" thrown in TearDown().
[  FAILED  ] ODETests.AdamsIterMethod (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] ODETests.SPGMR
unknown file: Failure
C++ exception with description "SUNDIALS_ERROR: SUNLinSol_SPGMR failed - returned NULL pointer" thrown in TearDown().
[  FAILED  ] ODETests.SPGMR (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] ODETests.SPBCGS
unknown file: Failure
C++ exception with description "SUNDIALS_ERROR: SUNLinSol_SPBCGS failed - returned NULL pointer" thrown in TearDown().
[  FAILED  ] ODETests.SPBCGS (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] ODETests.SPTFQMR
unknown file: Failure
C++ exception with description "SUNDIALS_ERROR: SUNLinSol_SPTFQMR failed - returned NULL pointer" thrown in TearDown().
[  FAILED  ] ODETests.SPTFQMR (0 ms)
[----------] 7 tests from ODETests (4 ms total)

[----------] 2 tests from Distribution
[ RUN      ] Distribution.EvaluateDensity
[       OK ] Distribution.EvaluateDensity (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Distribution.EvaluateSample
[       OK ] Distribution.EvaluateSample (0 ms)
[----------] 2 tests from Distribution (0 ms total)

[----------] 4 tests from InverseGammaDistributionTests
[ RUN      ] InverseGammaDistributionTests.EvaluateLogDensity
[       OK ] InverseGammaDistributionTests.EvaluateLogDensity (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] InverseGammaDistributionTests.EvaluateLogDensity_Multivariate
[       OK ] InverseGammaDistributionTests.EvaluateLogDensity_Multivariate (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] InverseGammaDistributionTests.Sample
[       OK ] InverseGammaDistributionTests.Sample (43 ms)
[ RUN      ] InverseGammaDistributionTests.Sample_Multivariate
[       OK ] InverseGammaDistributionTests.Sample_Multivariate (75 ms)
[----------] 4 tests from InverseGammaDistributionTests (118 ms total)

[----------] 3 tests from UniformDistributionTests
[ RUN      ] UniformDistributionTests.EvaluateLogDensity
[       OK ] UniformDistributionTests.EvaluateLogDensity (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] UniformDistributionTests.Sample1D
[       OK ] UniformDistributionTests.Sample1D (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] UniformDistributionTests.Sample
[       OK ] UniformDistributionTests.Sample (0 ms)
[----------] 3 tests from UniformDistributionTests (0 ms total)

[----------] 8 tests from GaussianDistributionTests
[ RUN      ] GaussianDistributionTests.SpecifyMean
[       OK ] GaussianDistributionTests.SpecifyMean (22 ms)
[ RUN      ] GaussianDistributionTests.ChangeHyperparameters
[       OK ] GaussianDistributionTests.ChangeHyperparameters (25 ms)
[ RUN      ] GaussianDistributionTests.SpecifyBoth
[       OK ] GaussianDistributionTests.SpecifyBoth (260 ms)
[ RUN      ] GaussianDistributionTests.ModPieceInputs
[       OK ] GaussianDistributionTests.ModPieceInputs (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] GaussianDistributionTests.Gradient
[       OK ] GaussianDistributionTests.Gradient (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] GaussianDistributionTests.Hessian
[       OK ] GaussianDistributionTests.Hessian (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] GaussianDistributionTests.DiagonalCovPrec
[       OK ] GaussianDistributionTests.DiagonalCovPrec (20 ms)
[ RUN      ] GaussianDistributionTests.MatrixCovPrec
[       OK ] GaussianDistributionTests.MatrixCovPrec (245 ms)
[----------] 8 tests from GaussianDistributionTests (574 ms total)

[----------] 2 tests from Distribution_DensityProduct
[ RUN      ] Distribution_DensityProduct.EvaluateDensity
[       OK ] Distribution_DensityProduct.EvaluateDensity (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Distribution_DensityProduct.EvaluateOnGraph
[       OK ] Distribution_DensityProduct.EvaluateOnGraph (0 ms)
[----------] 2 tests from Distribution_DensityProduct (0 ms total)

[----------] 5 tests from GammaDistributionTests
[ RUN      ] GammaDistributionTests.EvaluateLogDensity
[       OK ] GammaDistributionTests.EvaluateLogDensity (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] GammaDistributionTests.EvaluateLogDensity_Multivariate
[       OK ] GammaDistributionTests.EvaluateLogDensity_Multivariate (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] GammaDistributionTests.Sample
[       OK ] GammaDistributionTests.Sample (42 ms)
[ RUN      ] GammaDistributionTests.Sample_Multivariate
[       OK ] GammaDistributionTests.Sample_Multivariate (74 ms)
[ RUN      ] GammaDistributionTests.FromMoments
[       OK ] GammaDistributionTests.FromMoments (0 ms)
[----------] 5 tests from GammaDistributionTests (116 ms total)

[----------] 13 tests from OptimizationTests
[ RUN      ] OptimizationTests.COBYLA
[       OK ] OptimizationTests.COBYLA (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] OptimizationTests.UnknownMethod
[       OK ] OptimizationTests.UnknownMethod (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] OptimizationTests.BOBYQA
[       OK ] OptimizationTests.BOBYQA (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] OptimizationTests.NEWUOA
[       OK ] OptimizationTests.NEWUOA (7 ms)
[ RUN      ] OptimizationTests.PRAXIS
[       OK ] OptimizationTests.PRAXIS (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] OptimizationTests.NM
[       OK ] OptimizationTests.NM (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] OptimizationTests.SBPLX
[       OK ] OptimizationTests.SBPLX (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] OptimizationTests.MMA
[       OK ] OptimizationTests.MMA (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] OptimizationTests.SLSQP
[       OK ] OptimizationTests.SLSQP (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] OptimizationTests.LBFGS
[       OK ] OptimizationTests.LBFGS (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] OptimizationTests.PreTN
[       OK ] OptimizationTests.PreTN (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] OptimizationTests.LMVM
[       OK ] OptimizationTests.LMVM (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] OptimizationTests.NewtonTrust
[       OK ] OptimizationTests.NewtonTrust (0 ms)
[----------] 13 tests from OptimizationTests (8 ms total)

[----------] 2 tests from ConstrainedOptimizationTests
[ RUN      ] ConstrainedOptimizationTests.COBYLA
[       OK ] ConstrainedOptimizationTests.COBYLA (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] ConstrainedOptimizationTests.SLSQP
[       OK ] ConstrainedOptimizationTests.SLSQP (0 ms)
[----------] 2 tests from ConstrainedOptimizationTests (0 ms total)

[----------] 1 test from CostFunctionTests
[ RUN      ] CostFunctionTests.RosenbrockCost
[       OK ] CostFunctionTests.RosenbrockCost (0 ms)
[----------] 1 test from CostFunctionTests (0 ms total)

[----------] 1 test from ModPieceCostFunctionTests
[ RUN      ] ModPieceCostFunctionTests.RosenbrockCost
[       OK ] ModPieceCostFunctionTests.RosenbrockCost (0 ms)
[----------] 1 test from ModPieceCostFunctionTests (0 ms total)

[----------] 27 tests from Approximation_GP
[ RUN      ] Approximation_GP.LinearTransformKernel
[       OK ] Approximation_GP.LinearTransformKernel (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_GP.Clone
[       OK ] Approximation_GP.Clone (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_GP.KernelConcatenation
[       OK ] Approximation_GP.KernelConcatenation (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_GP.SquaredExpKernel
[       OK ] Approximation_GP.SquaredExpKernel (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_GP.MaternKernel
[       OK ] Approximation_GP.MaternKernel (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_GP.Discretize
[       OK ] Approximation_GP.Discretize (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_GP.DiscretizeConcatenate
[       OK ] Approximation_GP.DiscretizeConcatenate (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_GP.HyperFit1d
[       OK ] Approximation_GP.HyperFit1d (28 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_GP.HyperFit2d
[       OK ] Approximation_GP.HyperFit2d (160 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_GP.ValueCondition
[       OK ] Approximation_GP.ValueCondition (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_GP.GradientCondition
[       OK ] Approximation_GP.GradientCondition (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_GP.HessianCondition
[       OK ] Approximation_GP.HessianCondition (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_GP.NoisyCondition
[       OK ] Approximation_GP.NoisyCondition (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_GP.MaternStateSpace
[       OK ] Approximation_GP.MaternStateSpace (1 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_GP.ConstantStateSpace
[       OK ] Approximation_GP.ConstantStateSpace (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_GP.ConcatenateConstantStateSpace
[       OK ] Approximation_GP.ConcatenateConstantStateSpace (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_GP.ConcatenateStateSpace
[       OK ] Approximation_GP.ConcatenateStateSpace (2 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_GP.StateSpace_DistributionIntegration
[       OK ] Approximation_GP.StateSpace_DistributionIntegration (144 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_GP.StateSpace_DistributionIntegration2
[       OK ] Approximation_GP.StateSpace_DistributionIntegration2 (138 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_GP.PeriodicStateSpace
[       OK ] Approximation_GP.PeriodicStateSpace (22 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_GP.SumStateSpace
[       OK ] Approximation_GP.SumStateSpace (21 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_GP.ProductStateSpace
[       OK ] Approximation_GP.ProductStateSpace (49 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_GP.StateSpacePredict_Interpolation
[       OK ] Approximation_GP.StateSpacePredict_Interpolation (33 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_GP.StateSpacePredict_ExtrapolateRight
[       OK ] Approximation_GP.StateSpacePredict_ExtrapolateRight (68 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_GP.StateSpacePredict_ExtrapolateLeft
[       OK ] Approximation_GP.StateSpacePredict_ExtrapolateLeft (89 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_GP.KarhunenLoeve_BasicConstruction
[       OK ] Approximation_GP.KarhunenLoeve_BasicConstruction (756 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_GP.KarhunenLoeve_GaussQuad
[       OK ] Approximation_GP.KarhunenLoeve_GaussQuad (22 ms)
[----------] 27 tests from Approximation_GP (1543 ms total)

[----------] 6 tests from Approximation_BasisExpansion
[ RUN      ] Approximation_BasisExpansion.Constructor1
[       OK ] Approximation_BasisExpansion.Constructor1 (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_BasisExpansion.Constructor2
[       OK ] Approximation_BasisExpansion.Constructor2 (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_BasisExpansion.Constructor3
[       OK ] Approximation_BasisExpansion.Constructor3 (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_BasisExpansion.Linear
[       OK ] Approximation_BasisExpansion.Linear (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_BasisExpansion.Quadratic
[       OK ] Approximation_BasisExpansion.Quadratic (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_BasisExpansion.ToFromHDF5
[       OK ] Approximation_BasisExpansion.ToFromHDF5 (0 ms)
[----------] 6 tests from Approximation_BasisExpansion (0 ms total)

[----------] 5 tests from Approximation_MonotoneExpansion1d
[ RUN      ] Approximation_MonotoneExpansion1d.Evaluate
[       OK ] Approximation_MonotoneExpansion1d.Evaluate (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_MonotoneExpansion1d.JacobianFD
[       OK ] Approximation_MonotoneExpansion1d.JacobianFD (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_MonotoneExpansion1d.CoeffJacobian
[       OK ] Approximation_MonotoneExpansion1d.CoeffJacobian (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_MonotoneExpansion1d.Determinant
[       OK ] Approximation_MonotoneExpansion1d.Determinant (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_MonotoneExpansion1d.EvaluateWithCoeffs
[       OK ] Approximation_MonotoneExpansion1d.EvaluateWithCoeffs (0 ms)
[----------] 5 tests from Approximation_MonotoneExpansion1d (0 ms total)

[----------] 5 tests from Approximation_MonotoneExpansion2d
[ RUN      ] Approximation_MonotoneExpansion2d.Evaluate
[       OK ] Approximation_MonotoneExpansion2d.Evaluate (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_MonotoneExpansion2d.Inverse
[       OK ] Approximation_MonotoneExpansion2d.Inverse (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_MonotoneExpansion2d.Jacobian
[       OK ] Approximation_MonotoneExpansion2d.Jacobian (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_MonotoneExpansion2d.CoeffsJacobian
[       OK ] Approximation_MonotoneExpansion2d.CoeffsJacobian (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Approximation_MonotoneExpansion2d.Determinant
[       OK ] Approximation_MonotoneExpansion2d.Determinant (0 ms)
[----------] 5 tests from Approximation_MonotoneExpansion2d (0 ms total)

[----------] 7 tests from Polynomial
[ RUN      ] Polynomial.Monomial
[       OK ] Polynomial.Monomial (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Polynomial.PhysicistHermite
[       OK ] Polynomial.PhysicistHermite (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Polynomial.ProbabilistHermite
[       OK ] Polynomial.ProbabilistHermite (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Polynomial.Legendre
[       OK ] Polynomial.Legendre (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Polynomial.Laguerre
[       OK ] Polynomial.Laguerre (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Polynomial.Jacobi
[       OK ] Polynomial.Jacobi (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Polynomial.Factory
[       OK ] Polynomial.Factory (0 ms)
[----------] 7 tests from Polynomial (0 ms total)

[----------] 10 tests from PolynomialChaos
[ RUN      ] PolynomialChaos.PCEFactory_Legendre1D_Gauss
[       OK ] PolynomialChaos.PCEFactory_Legendre1D_Gauss (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] PolynomialChaos.PCEFactory_Legendre2D_Gauss
[       OK ] PolynomialChaos.PCEFactory_Legendre2D_Gauss (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] PolynomialChaos.PCE_Moments
[       OK ] PolynomialChaos.PCE_Moments (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] PolynomialChaos.PCE_Sensitivities
[       OK ] PolynomialChaos.PCE_Sensitivities (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] PolynomialChaos.PCE_WeightedSum
[       OK ] PolynomialChaos.PCE_WeightedSum (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] PolynomialChaos.ToFromHDF5
[       OK ] PolynomialChaos.ToFromHDF5 (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] PolynomialChaos.AdaptiveSmolyak_Cos2d
[       OK ] PolynomialChaos.AdaptiveSmolyak_Cos2d (7 ms)
[ RUN      ] PolynomialChaos.AdaptiveSmolyak_AdaptForError
[       OK ] PolynomialChaos.AdaptiveSmolyak_AdaptForError (5 ms)
[ RUN      ] PolynomialChaos.AdaptiveSmolyak_AdaptForTime
[       OK ] PolynomialChaos.AdaptiveSmolyak_AdaptForTime (53 ms)
[ RUN      ] PolynomialChaos.AdaptiveSmolyak_AdaptForEvals
[       OK ] PolynomialChaos.AdaptiveSmolyak_AdaptForEvals (3 ms)
[----------] 10 tests from PolynomialChaos (71 ms total)

[----------] 17 tests from Quadrature
[ RUN      ] Quadrature.AdaptiveSmolyak_StaticGaussQuad
[       OK ] Quadrature.AdaptiveSmolyak_StaticGaussQuad (1 ms)
[ RUN      ] Quadrature.AdaptiveSmolyak_AdaptiveGaussQuad
[       OK ] Quadrature.AdaptiveSmolyak_AdaptiveGaussQuad (1 ms)
[ RUN      ] Quadrature.AdaptiveSmolyak_AdaptiveClenshawCurtis
[       OK ] Quadrature.AdaptiveSmolyak_AdaptiveClenshawCurtis (1 ms)
[ RUN      ] Quadrature.AdaptiveSmolyak_AdaptiveGaussPatterson
[       OK ] Quadrature.AdaptiveSmolyak_AdaptiveGaussPatterson (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Quadrature.AdaptiveSmolyak_AdaptiveExponential
[       OK ] Quadrature.AdaptiveSmolyak_AdaptiveExponential (1 ms)
[ RUN      ] Quadrature.PhysicistHermite
[       OK ] Quadrature.PhysicistHermite (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Quadrature.ProbabilistHermite
[       OK ] Quadrature.ProbabilistHermite (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Quadrature.LegendreFromString
[       OK ] Quadrature.LegendreFromString (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Quadrature.Legendre
[       OK ] Quadrature.Legendre (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Quadrature.LaguerreDefault
[       OK ] Quadrature.LaguerreDefault (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Quadrature.Laguerre
[       OK ] Quadrature.Laguerre (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Quadrature.JacobiDefault
[       OK ] Quadrature.JacobiDefault (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Quadrature.Jacobi
Points:
   -0.7198842953848504
   -0.3852703828805473
-2.779569164716846e-17
    0.3852703828805472
    0.7198842953848507
Weights:
0.03294330378740577
 0.2271817563376543
 0.3940355940355935
 0.2271817563376543
0.03294330378740584
[       OK ] Quadrature.Jacobi (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Quadrature.FullTensorSquareTest
[       OK ] Quadrature.FullTensorSquareTest (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Quadrature.SmolyakWeights
[       OK ] Quadrature.SmolyakWeights (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Quadrature.SmolyakSquareTest
[       OK ] Quadrature.SmolyakSquareTest (7 ms)
[ RUN      ] Quadrature.ClenshawCurtis
[       OK ] Quadrature.ClenshawCurtis (0 ms)
[----------] 17 tests from Quadrature (14 ms total)

[----------] 6 tests from RegressionTest
[ RUN      ] RegressionTest.LegendreBasis
[       OK ] RegressionTest.LegendreBasis (1 ms)
[ RUN      ] RegressionTest.MonomialBasis
[       OK ] RegressionTest.MonomialBasis (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] RegressionTest.PhysicistHermiteBasis
[       OK ] RegressionTest.PhysicistHermiteBasis (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] RegressionTest.ProbabilistHermiteBasis
[       OK ] RegressionTest.ProbabilistHermiteBasis (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] RegressionTest.LaguerreBasis
[       OK ] RegressionTest.LaguerreBasis (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] RegressionTest.JacobiBasis
[       OK ] RegressionTest.JacobiBasis (1 ms)
[----------] 6 tests from RegressionTest (6 ms total)

[----------] 2 tests from LocalRegressionTest
[ RUN      ] LocalRegressionTest.Basic
[       OK ] LocalRegressionTest.Basic (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] LocalRegressionTest.Poisedness
[       OK ] LocalRegressionTest.Poisedness (16 ms)
[----------] 2 tests from LocalRegressionTest (16 ms total)

[----------] 1 test from SampleCollectionMetaTest
[ RUN      ] SampleCollectionMetaTest.List
bonus
id
[       OK ] SampleCollectionMetaTest.List (0 ms)
[----------] 1 test from SampleCollectionMetaTest (0 ms total)

[----------] 10 tests from SampleCollectionTest
[ RUN      ] SampleCollectionTest.Segment
[       OK ] SampleCollectionTest.Segment (6 ms)
[ RUN      ] SampleCollectionTest.Mean
[       OK ] SampleCollectionTest.Mean (5 ms)
[ RUN      ] SampleCollectionTest.SampMean
[       OK ] SampleCollectionTest.SampMean (4 ms)
[ RUN      ] SampleCollectionTest.ExpectedValue
[       OK ] SampleCollectionTest.ExpectedValue (5 ms)
[ RUN      ] SampleCollectionTest.ToMatrix
[       OK ] SampleCollectionTest.ToMatrix (5 ms)
[ RUN      ] SampleCollectionTest.ToWeights
[       OK ] SampleCollectionTest.ToWeights (5 ms)
[ RUN      ] SampleCollectionTest.ESS
[       OK ] SampleCollectionTest.ESS (7 ms)
[ RUN      ] SampleCollectionTest.Variance
[       OK ] SampleCollectionTest.Variance (8 ms)
[ RUN      ] SampleCollectionTest.Covariance
[       OK ] SampleCollectionTest.Covariance (6 ms)
[ RUN      ] SampleCollectionTest.WriteToFile
[       OK ] SampleCollectionTest.WriteToFile (28 ms)
[----------] 10 tests from SampleCollectionTest (83 ms total)

[----------] 1 test from SampleEstimatorTest
[ RUN      ] SampleEstimatorTest.Gaussian
[       OK ] SampleEstimatorTest.Gaussian (113 ms)
[----------] 1 test from SampleEstimatorTest (113 ms total)

[----------] 8 tests from MarkovChainTest
[ RUN      ] MarkovChainTest.Mean
[       OK ] MarkovChainTest.Mean (15 ms)
[ RUN      ] MarkovChainTest.SampMean
[       OK ] MarkovChainTest.SampMean (13 ms)
[ RUN      ] MarkovChainTest.ToMatrix
[       OK ] MarkovChainTest.ToMatrix (16 ms)
[ RUN      ] MarkovChainTest.ToWeights
[       OK ] MarkovChainTest.ToWeights (14 ms)
[ RUN      ] MarkovChainTest.WolffESS
[       OK ] MarkovChainTest.WolffESS (27 ms)
[ RUN      ] MarkovChainTest.BatchESS
[       OK ] MarkovChainTest.BatchESS (84 ms)
[ RUN      ] MarkovChainTest.Variance
[       OK ] MarkovChainTest.Variance (27 ms)
[ RUN      ] MarkovChainTest.Covariance
[       OK ] MarkovChainTest.Covariance (24 ms)
[----------] 8 tests from MarkovChainTest (225 ms total)

[----------] 2 tests from MIMCMCTest
[ RUN      ] MIMCMCTest.MIMCMC
MIMCMC MCSE: 0.2410678773197787 0.2930296825526196
MIMCMC MCSE: 0.2415288123953296 0.2932689738351369
[       OK ] MIMCMCTest.MIMCMC (640 ms)
[ RUN      ] MIMCMCTest.SLMCMC
Starting single chain MCMC sampler...
  10% Complete
    Block 0:
      MHKernel acceptance Rate = 29%
  20% Complete
    Block 0:
      MHKernel acceptance Rate = 29%
  30% Complete
    Block 0:
      MHKernel acceptance Rate = 28%
  40% Complete
    Block 0:
      MHKernel acceptance Rate = 27%
  50% Complete
    Block 0:
      MHKernel acceptance Rate = 27%
  60% Complete
    Block 0:
      MHKernel acceptance Rate = 27%
  70% Complete
    Block 0:
      MHKernel acceptance Rate = 27%
  80% Complete
    Block 0:
      MHKernel acceptance Rate = 27%
  90% Complete
    Block 0:
      MHKernel acceptance Rate = 27%
  100% Complete
    Block 0:
      MHKernel acceptance Rate = 27%
Completed in 0.00465700000000027 seconds.
[       OK ] MIMCMCTest.SLMCMC (5 ms)
[----------] 2 tests from MIMCMCTest (646 ms total)

[----------] 1 test from MLMCMCTest
[ RUN      ] MLMCMCTest.GreedyMLMCMC
[       OK ] MLMCMCTest.GreedyMLMCMC (674 ms)
[----------] 1 test from MLMCMCTest (674 ms total)

[----------] 1 test from GMHKernelTest
[ RUN      ] GMHKernelTest.ProposalTest
[       OK ] GMHKernelTest.ProposalTest (0 ms)
[----------] 1 test from GMHKernelTest (0 ms total)

[----------] 1 test from ImportanceSamplingTests
[ RUN      ] ImportanceSamplingTests.Setup
[       OK ] ImportanceSamplingTests.Setup (104 ms)
[----------] 1 test from ImportanceSamplingTests (104 ms total)

[----------] 34 tests from MCMC
[ RUN      ] MCMC.MHKernel_ThinScheduler
[       OK ] MCMC.MHKernel_ThinScheduler (7 ms)
[ RUN      ] MCMC.MHKernel_MHProposal
[       OK ] MCMC.MHKernel_MHProposal (31 ms)
[ RUN      ] MCMC.Diagnostics_Pass
[       OK ] MCMC.Diagnostics_Pass (18 ms)
[ RUN      ] MCMC.Diagnostics_Fail
[       OK ] MCMC.Diagnostics_Fail (1 ms)
[ RUN      ] MCMC.Diagnostics_SingularCovarianceMPSRF_Fail
[       OK ] MCMC.Diagnostics_SingularCovarianceMPSRF_Fail (2 ms)
[ RUN      ] MCMC.Diagnostics_SingularCovarianceMPSRF_Pass
[       OK ] MCMC.Diagnostics_SingularCovarianceMPSRF_Pass (29 ms)
[ RUN      ] MCMC.MHKernel_RepeatedRuns
[       OK ] MCMC.MHKernel_RepeatedRuns (8 ms)
[ RUN      ] MCMC.MHKernel_MixtureProposal
[       OK ] MCMC.MHKernel_MixtureProposal (10 ms)
[ RUN      ] MCMC.MHKernel_MALAProposal
[       OK ] MCMC.MHKernel_MALAProposal (20 ms)
[ RUN      ] MCMC.MetropolisInGibbs_IsoGauss
[       OK ] MCMC.MetropolisInGibbs_IsoGauss (162 ms)
[ RUN      ] MCMC.MHKernel_AMProposal
[       OK ] MCMC.MHKernel_AMProposal (42 ms)
[ RUN      ] MCMC.MHKernel_DRAM
[       OK ] MCMC.MHKernel_DRAM (226 ms)
[ RUN      ] MCMC.DRKernel_MHProposal
[       OK ] MCMC.DRKernel_MHProposal (33 ms)
[ RUN      ] MCMC.DRKernel_MALA_Scaled
[       OK ] MCMC.DRKernel_MALA_Scaled (54 ms)
[ RUN      ] MCMC.DRKernel_MALA_Direct
[       OK ] MCMC.DRKernel_MALA_Direct (44 ms)
[ RUN      ] MCMC.DRKernel_Mixed
[       OK ] MCMC.DRKernel_Mixed (31 ms)
[ RUN      ] MCMC.DRKernel_MHProposal_Scaling
[       OK ] MCMC.DRKernel_MHProposal_Scaling (15 ms)
[ RUN      ] MCMC.DILI_AverageHessian
[       OK ] MCMC.DILI_AverageHessian (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] MCMC.DILIKernel_HessianOperator
[       OK ] MCMC.DILIKernel_HessianOperator (1 ms)
[ RUN      ] MCMC.DILIKernel_SubspaceCheck
[       OK ] MCMC.DILIKernel_SubspaceCheck (1 ms)
[ RUN      ] MCMC.DILIKernel_ManualConstruction
[       OK ] MCMC.DILIKernel_ManualConstruction (1192 ms)
[ RUN      ] MCMC.DILIKernel_AutomaticConstruction
Starting single chain MCMC sampler...
  10% Complete
    Block 0:
       LIS (dim=5): MHKernel acceptance Rate = 31%
       CS: MHKernel acceptance Rate = 100%
  20% Complete
    Block 0:
       LIS (dim=5): MHKernel acceptance Rate = 31%
       CS: MHKernel acceptance Rate = 100%
  30% Complete
    Block 0:
       LIS (dim=5): MHKernel acceptance Rate = 31%
       CS: MHKernel acceptance Rate = 100%
  40% Complete
    Block 0:
       LIS (dim=5): MHKernel acceptance Rate = 31%
       CS: MHKernel acceptance Rate = 100%
  50% Complete
    Block 0:
       LIS (dim=5): MHKernel acceptance Rate = 31%
       CS: MHKernel acceptance Rate = 100%
  60% Complete
    Block 0:
       LIS (dim=5): MHKernel acceptance Rate = 31%
       CS: MHKernel acceptance Rate = 100%
  70% Complete
    Block 0:
       LIS (dim=5): MHKernel acceptance Rate = 31%
       CS: MHKernel acceptance Rate = 100%
  80% Complete
    Block 0:
       LIS (dim=5): MHKernel acceptance Rate = 32%
       CS: MHKernel acceptance Rate = 100%
  90% Complete
    Block 0:
       LIS (dim=5): MHKernel acceptance Rate = 31%
       CS: MHKernel acceptance Rate = 100%
  100% Complete
    Block 0:
       LIS (dim=5): MHKernel acceptance Rate = 32%
       CS: MHKernel acceptance Rate = 100%
Completed in 1.792849000000008 seconds.
[       OK ] MCMC.DILIKernel_AutomaticConstruction (1929 ms)
[ RUN      ] MCMC.DILIKernel_AutomaticGaussNewton
[       OK ] MCMC.DILIKernel_AutomaticGaussNewton (423 ms)
[ RUN      ] MCMC.DILIKernel_LogNormal
[       OK ] MCMC.DILIKernel_LogNormal (877 ms)
[ RUN      ] MCMC.CrankNicolson
[       OK ] MCMC.CrankNicolson (1046 ms)
[ RUN      ] MCMC.CrankNicolsonInGibbs
[       OK ] MCMC.CrankNicolsonInGibbs (244 ms)
[ RUN      ] MCMC.InfMALA
[       OK ] MCMC.InfMALA (281 ms)
[ RUN      ] MCMC.InfMALAInGibbs
[       OK ] MCMC.InfMALAInGibbs (5 ms)
[ RUN      ] MCMC.InverseGammaProposal_DirectInput
[       OK ] MCMC.InverseGammaProposal_DirectInput (63 ms)
[ RUN      ] MCMC.InverseGammaProposal_ModelInput
[       OK ] MCMC.InverseGammaProposal_ModelInput (211 ms)
[ RUN      ] MCMC.IndependenceProposal_FromOpts
[       OK ] MCMC.IndependenceProposal_FromOpts (32 ms)
[ RUN      ] MCMC.IndependenceProposal_Manual
[       OK ] MCMC.IndependenceProposal_Manual (27 ms)
[ RUN      ] MCMC.ParallelTempering_FromOpts
[       OK ] MCMC.ParallelTempering_FromOpts (58 ms)
[ RUN      ] MCMC.ParallelTempering_Manual
MCSE: 0.02336822247598114 0.01965372606477608
[       OK ] MCMC.ParallelTempering_Manual (56 ms)
[----------] 34 tests from MCMC (7196 ms total)

[----------] 1 test from SamplingProblem
[ RUN      ] SamplingProblem.GaussianTarget
[       OK ] SamplingProblem.GaussianTarget (0 ms)
[----------] 1 test from SamplingProblem (0 ms total)

[----------] 1 test from InferenceProblem
[ RUN      ] InferenceProblem.Gaussian
[       OK ] InferenceProblem.Gaussian (0 ms)
[----------] 1 test from InferenceProblem (0 ms total)

[----------] 1 test from ExpensiveSamplingProblemTests
[ RUN      ] ExpensiveSamplingProblemTests.GaussianTarget
[       OK ] ExpensiveSamplingProblemTests.GaussianTarget (84 ms)
[----------] 1 test from ExpensiveSamplingProblemTests (84 ms total)

[----------] 3 tests from Inference_KalmanFilter
[ RUN      ] Inference_KalmanFilter.SizeFail
[       OK ] Inference_KalmanFilter.SizeFail (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Inference_KalmanFilter.VectorNoise
[       OK ] Inference_KalmanFilter.VectorNoise (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] Inference_KalmanFilter.FullNoise
[       OK ] Inference_KalmanFilter.FullNoise (0 ms)
[----------] 3 tests from Inference_KalmanFilter (0 ms total)

[----------] Global test environment tear-down
[==========] 370 tests from 67 test suites ran. (11682 ms total)
[  PASSED  ] 364 tests.
[  FAILED  ] 6 tests, listed below:
[  FAILED  ] Utilities_LyapunovSolver.MaternTest
[  FAILED  ] ODETests.BDFIterMethod
[  FAILED  ] ODETests.AdamsIterMethod
[  FAILED  ] ODETests.SPGMR
[  FAILED  ] ODETests.SPBCGS
[  FAILED  ] ODETests.SPTFQMR

 6 FAILED TESTS

not dealing with this now


Possible division by 0 in the hold_reward function

This is the quoted response when I had Copilot explain to me the hold_reward function
"The hold_reward is a part of the reward calculation in the SimpleReward class. It represents the reward for the portion of the asset that was held (not bought or sold) between the last state and the next state.
The hold_reward is calculated as the percentage change in the closing price of the asset times the allocation percentage. The allocation percentage represents the portion of the portfolio that is allocated to the asset.
Here's how it's calculated in each case:

Buy: If the allocation percentage increases from the last state to the next state, this means that some of the asset was bought. The hold_reward is calculated based on the last state's allocation percentage, because this is the portion of the asset that was held.
Sell: If the allocation percentage decreases, this means that some of the asset was sold. The hold_reward is calculated based on the next state's allocation percentage, because this is the portion of the asset that was held after selling.
Hold: If the allocation percentage doesn't change, this means that all of the asset was held. The reward is calculated based on the last state's allocation percentage, but with a negative sign if the allocation percentage is zero. This is because if no asset is held, the reward should be zero, but the formula (next_state.close - last_state.close) / last_state.close * ratio would result in a division by zero error.
In all cases, the hold_reward is added to the reward variable, which is then returned by the function. This means that the total reward for each action (buy, sell, or hold) is a combination of the reward for the action itself and the reward for the portion of the asset that was held."

As you can see in number 3 is where it brings up the issue. To my understanding, for this edge case to occur, there would have to be some kind of positive outcome from a next_state.close - last_state.close while holding. Otherwise if the last_state.close was a hold your next state.close also is a hold so it would mean hold_reward would be 0/0 = 0. I might be wrong, though. Let me know what you think.

Hey, thanks for this response. Here is the reward function:
class SimpleReward(Reward):
    def __init__(self) -> None:
        super().__init__()

    def __call__(self, observations: Observations) -> float:
        assert isinstance(observations, Observations) == True, "observations must be an instance of Observations"

        last_state, next_state = observations[-2:]

        # buy
        if next_state.allocation_percentage > last_state.allocation_percentage:
            # check whether it was good or bad to buy
            order_size = next_state.allocation_percentage - last_state.allocation_percentage
            reward = (next_state.close - last_state.close) / last_state.close * order_size
            hold_reward = (next_state.close - last_state.close) / last_state.close * last_state.allocation_percentage
            reward += hold_reward

        # sell
        elif next_state.allocation_percentage < last_state.allocation_percentage:
            # check whether it was good or bad to sell
            order_size = last_state.allocation_percentage - next_state.allocation_percentage
            reward = -1 * (next_state.close - last_state.close) / last_state.close * order_size
            hold_reward = (next_state.close - last_state.close) / last_state.close * next_state.allocation_percentage
            reward += hold_reward

        # hold
        else:
            # check whether it was good or bad to hold
            ratio = -1 if not last_state.allocation_percentage else last_state.allocation_percentage
            reward = (next_state.close - last_state.close) / last_state.close * ratio

        return reward

but I can't find a situation when there might be division by zero
(next_state.close - last_state.close) / last_state.close * ratio
because last_state.close and next_state.close will never become zero
and that's the reason why I define ratio as -1 when allocation_percentage is 0, to find out whether it was good or bad to wait for next step without assets
That's my opinion

I see, yes that makes sense, cause according to Chat GPT the time will only be 0 when last_state.close and last_state.allocation_percentage is 0. "In the provided code, the potential division by zero occurs in the following line:
python
ratio = -1 if not last_state.allocation_percentage else last_state.allocation_percentage
Here, the code is attempting to calculate the reward for the "hold" scenario. It checks if last_state.allocation_percentage is zero or not before assigning it to ratio. If last_state.allocation_percentage is zero, it assigns -1 to ratio. This is done to handle the case when last_state.allocation_percentage is zero to avoid division by zero later in the code.
However, if last_state.allocation_percentage is indeed zero, the code will still proceed to the calculation:
python
reward = (next_state.close - last_state.close) / last_state.close * ratio
In this calculation, there is a division by last_state.close, and if last_state.close is also zero, it will result in a division by zero error.
To prevent this issue, you should add a check for last_state.close before performing the division. For example:
python
if last_state.close != 0:
reward = (next_state.close - last_state.close) / last_state.close * ratio
else:
# Handle the case when last_state.close is zero (avoid division by zero)
reward = 0  # or any appropriate value
This modification ensures that the division is only performed when last_state.close is not zero, preventing a division by zero error." Please check its solution to see if it is slightly better. Also, according to your code, I have not seen this syntax before but if ratio = -1 if not last_state.allocation_percentage. Do you need the else clause in there?

I see, thank you for explaining this. Makes sense. =)


Slo chaos testing

This pull request includes updates to the SLO workflow configuration and enhancements to the metrics collection in the SLO tests. The most important changes include adding concurrency control, preparing the SLO database before running tests, and introducing a new metric for retry attempts.
SLO Workflow Configuration Updates:

.github/workflows/slo.yml: Added cancel-in-progress: true to the concurrency group to ensure only one workflow runs at a time for a given SDK.
.github/workflows/slo.yml: Introduced a new step to prepare the SLO database before running the tests and added a step to upload artifacts and clean up the database.

Metrics Collection Enhancements:

tests/slo/internal/metrics/metrics.go: Added a new retryAttempts gauge metric to track current retry attempts by operation type. [1] [2]
tests/slo/internal/metrics/metrics.go: Updated the Metrics struct and related methods to include the new retryAttempts metric. [1] [2]
tests/slo/internal/metrics/metrics.go: Modified the Finish method to set the retryAttempts gauge and update the success and failure retry counters.

Please check the type of change your PR introduces:

[ ] Bugfix
[ ] Feature
[ ] Code style update (formatting, renaming)
[ ] Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
[x] Build related changes
[ ] Documentation content changes
[x] Other (please describe):

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?

Other information

Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 41.05%. Comparing base (17a901b) to head (f0b0b0e).
Report is 115 commits behind head on master.

:exclamation:  There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (17a901b) and HEAD (f0b0b0e). Click for more details.
HEAD has 529 uploads less than BASE

Flag
BASE (17a901b)
HEAD (f0b0b0e)

unit
72
1

go-1.21.x
48
0

ubuntu
103
0

macOS
24
1

go-1.22.x
48
1

integration
72
0

ydb-23.3
24
0

go-1.23.x
55
0

windows
24
0

ydb-24.2
24
0

ydb-24.1
24
0

ydb-nightly
7
0

experiment
7
0

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1567       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   70.98%   41.05%   -29.93%
===========================================
  Files         356      360        +4
  Lines       37510    37427       -83
===========================================
- Hits        26625    15365    -11260
- Misses       9782    21553    +11771
+ Partials     1103      509      -594

Flag
Coverage Δ

experiment
?

go-1.21.x
?

go-1.22.x
41.05% <ø> (-27.45%)
:arrow_down:

go-1.23.x
?

integration
?

macOS
41.05% <ø> (+0.13%)
:arrow_up:

ubuntu
?

unit
41.05% <ø> (+0.12%)
:arrow_up:

windows
?

ydb-23.3
?

ydb-24.1
?

ydb-24.2
?

ydb-nightly
?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚨 Try these New Features:

Flaky Tests Detection - Detect and resolve failed and flaky tests


dube: Nicer reported bytes

Started looking at existing crates in the ecosystem for [KMGTP]i?B support. ubyte seems to be a good implementation, though with some serde deficiencies which requires reimplementation of the deserialize.
This will of course confuse python tests as they are now, but posting as wip.

In today's meeting we decided to not pursue this.


Error: spawn UNKNOWN on launch()

Having used puppeteer less than two weeks ago I am no longer able to launch puppetteer on my Windows machine. The launch still works on a Mac Book. The code, or versions have not changed.
Pupetteer 0.12
Node 8.4
All examples are copied straight from the puppeteer api documentation. e.g.
puppeteer.launch().then(async browser => {
    const page = await browser.newPage();
    await page.goto('https://example.com');
    await page.screenshot({path: 'example.png'});
    await browser.close();
});

The .launch() always ends in Error: spawn UNKNOWN

@dbauszus-glx it looks like the puppeteer doesn't have a chromium instance to start. Can you please:

check if there's a .local-chromium folder in the node_modules/puppeteer
try launching chromium from .local-chromium manually

I thought so initially and reinstalled Chromium but this isn't it. Chromium is installed runs manually. puppeteer.executablePath() returns the correct path which starts chromium straight away.

This is bizarre... I remember now what was different when puppeteer was working on my machine. I was evaluating visual studio code. I just started VS Code again and sure enough puppeteer just works. Not a single line of code has changed, no installs, no environment settings. While when started through WebStorm; Puppeteer bombs out on launch every single time.

@dbauszus-glx this sounds like an editor configuration that's affecting your Node env...? Are you launching your puppeteer script from Webstorm or vscode or running it from the CLI?

Yes, I am trying to launch puppeteer from script.
I double checked the launch configurations. They look to be the same for Webstorm and VSC. Anyways you can close this issue. I will post this to the Webstorm support if it becomes a problem again. Will continue to work with VSC on this project.


License?

Thank you for your project. However, I'm unable to find its license — would it be possible for you to add one so the terms of use are clear? https://choosealicense.com/ might be a good way for you to find a license that works for your project. Thanks in advance.

I've added the license thanks

Thank you!


INT vs STR issues still make unit display unreliable

INT vs STR issues still make unit display unreliable in the nutrition summary and in the nutrition table.
We need to add a client side check, and make a server side fix.

Why would INT vs STR issues affect the unit display? Units are always the same. The app should use the some-nutrient_100g value, and display everything in grams.

I have no idea. The error is transient, depending on the product

@teolemon could you check last develop on this one?

@teolemon could you check last develop on this one?

I checked it on latest master and looks like it already fixed. Maybe you have a name of specific product for this bug?
Phone: HTC U11 (en-ru)


virtualization: Add unit tests for virtualization.c

Fixes #25

This change is

Reviewed 2 of 2 files at r1.
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion.

Comments from Reviewable


Existing reference and idempotency

Bicep version
0.26.54 (5e20b29b58)
Describe the bug
When using an existing reference to compute properties for the resources to create in bicep, module is not idempotent.
Indeed, successive re-execution of the whatif will show modifications even though it would resolve to the same values.
For instance, i see this in the whatif:
~ name:                        "toAzure10.55" => "[format('toAzure{0}', join(take(split(parseCidr(reference(extensionResourceId(format('/subscriptions/{0}/resourceGroups/{1}', parameters('hubVnetSubscriptionID'), parameters('hubVnetResourceGroupName')), 'Microsoft.Network/virtualNetworks', parameters('hubVnetName')), '2023-04-01').addressSpace.addressPrefixes[0]).network, '.'), 2), '.'))]"

if i apply the deployment, no change appear as the computed name is (as expected) : "toAzure10.55"
To Reproduce
resource vnetHub 'Microsoft.Network/virtualNetworks@2023-04-01' existing = {
  scope: resourceGroup(hubVnetSubscriptionID, hubVnetResourceGroupName)
  name: hubVnetName
}

var networkBase = join(take(split(parseCidr(vnetHub.properties.addressSpace.addressPrefixes[0]).network, '.'), 2), '.') // ex: 10.128
var dnsServers = vnetHub.properties.dhcpOptions.dnsServers

resource routeTable 'Microsoft.Network/routeTables@2023-04-01' = {
  name: routeTableName
  location: location
  tags: tags
  properties: {
    disableBgpRoutePropagation: false
    routes: [
      {
        name: 'toAzure${networkBase}'
        properties: {
          addressPrefix: '${networkBase}.0.0/16'
          hasBgpOverride: false
          nextHopIpAddress: '${networkBase}.0.4'
          nextHopType: 'VirtualAppliance'
        }
      }
      # other routes...
    ]
  }
}

resource vnetSpoke 'Microsoft.Network/virtualNetworks@2023-04-01' = {
  name: vnetSpokeName
  location: location
  tags: tags
  properties: {
    addressSpace: {
      addressPrefixes: [
        addressSpace
      ]
    }
    dhcpOptions: empty(dnsServers) ? null : {
      dnsServers: dnsServers         # value from hub vnet
    }
    subnets: [
      # ....
    ]
  }
  dependsOn: [nsg, routeTable]
}

dnsServers also tried to replace computed value with
=> "[if(empty(reference(extensionResourceId(format('/subscriptions/{0}/resourceGroups/{1}', parameters('hubVnetSubscriptionID'), parameters('hubVnetResourceGroupName')), 'Microsoft.Network/virtualNetworks', parameters('hubVnetName')), '2023-04-01').dhcpOptions.dnsServers), null(), createObject('dnsServers', reference(extensionResourceId(format('/subscriptions/{0}/resourceGroups/{1}', parameters('hubVnetSubscriptionID'), parameters('hubVnetResourceGroupName')), 'Microsoft.Network/virtualNetworks', parameters('hubVnetName')), '2023-04-01').dhcpOptions.dnsServers))]"

despite resolving to the same values....
Creation is working fine.
My issue is the non-idempotence when re-executing the same bicep a second time with whatif, to check infra is in proper/expected state.

Yeah, there are known issues (ACKed bugs) with what-if - it's predictions are sort of wonky.


[Open in Sublime Text] Give the possibility to open in an existing Sublime session instead of creating a new one.

Extension
https://www.raycast.com/anfalas/open-in-sublime-text
Description

Current behavior: each new open file opens a new Sublime session.
Desired Behavior: A new tab would be opened if Sublime is already open.

Who will benefit from this feature?
People would love tidy things: Fewer windows opened—less chaos.
Anything else?
Thank you!

I just submitted a pull request that fixes the problem.

Thank you for the fast reaction.


kinetochore term merges

merge
GO:0000778    condensed nuclear chromosome kinetochore
and
GO:0000777    condensed chromosome kinetochore
into GO:0000776   kinetochore
rename
GO:0000939    condensed chromosome inner kinetochore
to
inner kinetochore
rename
GO:0000940    condensed chromosome outer kinetochore
to
outer kinetochore
merge
GO:0000942    condensed nuclear chromosome outer kinetochore
into  GO:0000940
merge
GO:0000941    condensed nuclear chromosome inner kinetochore
into GO:0000939

why do you want to merge those ? Just so it's documented.

because

it is the same kinetochore. I thought that was the plan?
The chromosome consensation status would be covered by the cell cycle phase (occurs_during blah).

The inner kinetochore exists throughout the cell cycle, the outer kinetochore only during mitosis.  So in actual fact, there is not outer kinetochore when a chromosome is not condensed.

My reason for requesting  right now is very trivial though.
I want to say
kinetochore adaptor activity  part_of blah occurs_at GO:0000941 inner kinetochore

not
kinetochore adaptor activity  part_of blah occurs at GO:0000941 condensed nuclear chromosome inner kinetochore
which would be annoying for users because they will  likely think "what other sort of inner kinetochore is there" (for an organism with closed mitosis).

It also means that we use the same terms for open and closed mitosis which makes comparison easier.

I see - if I understand correctly it's the chromosome that's condensed, not the kinetochore, so there are not 2 different kinetochores.
@srengel notifying you because SGD has a number of annotations to those terms.

We have ' GO:0000817 COMA complex part_of 'GO:0000778 condensed nuclear chromosome kinetochore'
that seems wrong, the definition states that "This complex bridges the subunits that are in contact with centromeric DNA and the subunits bound to microtubules during kinetochore assembly."
So I will remove any links to kinetochore.

Also GO:0042729 DASH complex  - the definition states that "The complex forms part of the kinetochore" - but right now it has a is_a relation to GO:0000942 condensed nuclear chromosome outer kinetochore

I will move that to 'part of' 'outer kinetochore'
I will also change the definition to mention outer kinetochore (rather than just kinetochore)

@ValWood
GO:0031511 Mis6-Sim4 complex  is part_of GO:0000939 condensed chromosome inner kinetochore
However the definition does not mention kinetochore: "A protein complex that forms part of the inner centromere, which is involved in the loading of the centromeric histone h3 variant CENP-A onto centromeres and in centromere specific heterochromatin formation." - should we edit the definition?

@ValWood @cmungall
GO:0000776 kinetochore
is both  GO:0099080 supramolecular complex
and GO:0043228 non-membrane-bounded organelle
I would expect those to be disjoint classes; what do you think?

GO:0000817 COMA complex is  definitely part_of kinetochore (It seems to overlap with the complex called
Mis6-Sim4 complex (GO:0031511)  in fission yeast and higher eukaryotes)
GO:0031511 Mis6-Sim4 complex is part_of GO:0000939 condensed chromosome inner kinetochore
we could edit.
inner centromere and inner kinetochore are analogous. Inner kinetochore aligns better with component terms, so yes that can be changed.
DASH complex part_of outer kinetochore -good

is both GO:0099080 supramolecular complex
and GO:0043228 non-membrane-bounded organelle
I think it is both. The ribosome and is also described as both a complex and an organelle.

is both GO:0099080 supramolecular complex
and GO:0043228 non-membrane-bounded organelle

OK - should inner and outer kinetochore have the same parentage then ?

OK - should inner and outer kinetochore have the same parentage then ?

only as part_of kinetochore?

Sorry my question was not direct enough:

are inner and outer kinetochore protein complexes, supramolecular complexes, or neither?

On their own no, probably not. The inner kinetochore almost definitely not. I would  probably only class the entire kinetochore as an organelle (since that is the functional unit)


WebView Vimeo not play if volume unmuted

In android webview, when i am muting it plays but when i am unmuting it pauses and not playing.

same here

Is there a solution for this bug? my problem is a little urgent. I haven't found the problem yet.

You all are seeing this in Chrome, right?

Found the solution. In plugins/vimeo.js, the iframe attributes should be changed from this:
autoplay,fullscreen,picture-in-picture

To this:
autoplay;fullscreen;picture-in-picture

According to Google's iframe delegation docs here:
https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2017/09/autoplay-policy-changes#iframe

@ajg

Found the solution. In plugins/vimeo.js, the iframe attributes should be changed from this:
autoplay,fullscreen,picture-in-picture

To this:
autoplay;fullscreen;picture-in-picture

According to Google's iframe delegation docs here:
https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2017/09/autoplay-policy-changes#iframe

Have you tested it? Is it working?
If yes, then can you also help with the Youtube plugin as well?

Issue: if plyr or any other video player is used in website and video can’t be played by tapping on play icon typically it throws the following error in android logcat: play() can only be initiated by a user gesture, source: https://player.vimeo.com/api/player.js
Solution: webViewSettings.setMediaPlaybackRequiresUserGesture(false);

I find it puzzling that the same thing works in Chrome, but not in Android System WebView? Doesn't these Google documents should match both cases? It feels like that the permission delegation is not working on Android System WebView.
Is there like any explanation from Google why not?


A lot of warnings for 'use strict'

The app is giving alot of warnings that 'use strict' is redundant.

delete them..

Submitted a pull request https://github.com/gothinkster/react-redux-realworld-example-app/pull/53


Suggestion: Allow any config file name

Currently, monorepo only supports including MkDocs config files that are named exactly mkdocs.yml.
However, it can be useful to have multiple config files, especially when working with projects that are built both individually and as part of a multirepo. In this case, the default "standalone" config file would ideally be named mkdocs.yml, and the monorepo version would have a different name, e.g., mkdocs-monorepo.yml.
So I suggest to get rid of this limitation and support any *.yml file. I think this could be achieved quite easily:

Adapt the regex that matches the config file name:
https://github.com/backstage/mkdocs-monorepo-plugin/blob/bbe9ddab8192fa5e49c0cc82901ef850a045bf79/mkdocs_monorepo_plugin/parser.py#L59

rootDir, re.sub(r'(.*)\/.*\.yml$', r'\1', path, re.IGNORECASE)))

Adapt read():
https://github.com/backstage/mkdocs-monorepo-plugin/blob/bbe9ddab8192fa5e49c0cc82901ef850a045bf79/mkdocs_monorepo_plugin/parser.py#L124

if not self.absNavPath.endswith(".yml"):

Any thoughts? Should I submit a PR for this?

Thanks for reporting! Is it possible to tell the plugin in anyway that the config file is called something else than mkdocs.yml?
Regex way sounds good, although I think we should ensure match with something like this - *mkdocs*.yml so that non-mkdocs yaml files are not matched. I am not too familiar with how this plugin is implemented, but I'm happy to accept any PR if it's helpful.

Thanks for reporting! Is it possible to tell the plugin in anyway that the config file is called something else than mkdocs.yml?

Currently, you can (and must) define where the mkdocs.yml is located, but not how it is called.
 - Subproject: '!include ./my_sub_dir/mkdocs.yml'
my_sub_dir can be anything, but mkdocs.yml must be exactly that or the build process will fail.

Regex way sounds good, although I think we should ensure match with something like this - *mkdocs*.yml so that non-mkdocs yaml files are not matched. I am not too familiar with how this plugin is implemented, but I'm happy to accept any PR if it's helpful.

I don't think this is necessary since you'll still provide the full file path and name as outlined above. So files can't be mixed up.
I'll provide a PR.


Element X

Package name
io.element.android.x
Hash(es)
C6:DB:9B:9C:8C:BD:D6:5D:16:E8:EC:8C:8B:91:C8:31:B9:EF:C9:5C:BF:98:AE:41:F6:A9:D8:35:15:1A:7E:16
Source code link (Optional)
https://github.com/vector-im/element-x-android

already in my PR

As of now, contributing through issues won't be accepted. Please check the updated https://github.com/soupslurpr/AppVerifier/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md for instructions. Thanks.


[data/values] improve error message when value is specified as a flag and not data values file

slack thread: https://kubernetes.slack.com/archives/CH8KCCKA5/p1576624551037500
current error messsage:
$ cat example.yaml
#@ load("@ytt:data", "data")
---
boo: #@ data.values.foo

$ ytt -f example.yaml --data-value foo="asdf"
Error: Processing data values: Overlaying additional data values on top of data values from files (marked as @data/values): Document on line ?: Map item (key 'foo') on line ?: Expected number of matched nodes to be 1, but was 0

I think this represents what I was trying to do. ie.
Have a template that I could override specific values in using the flags.
Is this possible today in some other way? The title suggests improving the error messaging.
Note that the slack link is no longer valid, as the Kubernetes Slack doesn't retain history for very long.

@garethr here is the issue for the feature: https://github.com/k14s/ytt/issues/81. this issue was more about making the error more clear about why the failure happens.


rename project to 'kspecs' to adhere to the Apache Software Foundation's (ASF) trademark policies.

OMG 😟 !
There are so many starting with K nowadays: Kernel, Kotlin, Kubernetes, KDE, Kafka
Should find a cool name ala Azkarra ;-)


Fix styling in User Guide

Codecov Report

Merging #163 (b4e7a46) into master (4f1dbed) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #163   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     48.75%   48.75%
  Complexity      569      569
=========================================
  Files           123      123
  Lines          2640     2640
  Branches        286      286
=========================================
  Hits           1287     1287
  Misses         1271     1271
  Partials         82       82

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4f1dbed...b4e7a46. Read the comment docs.


Debug Data Flow Activity

When I run the dataflow using Data Flow activity, I am unable to see the debug details. It shows an error "ERROR LOADING DATA FLOW"

Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

ID: 5d60ca6a-bd64-a782-5c9a-4c2652a6d9a5
Version Independent ID: 7239ee59-25fa-04cf-1423-f324fb429cdc
Content: Execute data flow activity in Azure Data Factory
Content Source: articles/data-factory/control-flow-execute-data-flow-activity.md
Service: data-factory
GitHub Login: @kromerm
Microsoft Alias: makromer

Thanks for the feedback and bringing this to our notice . At this time we are reviewing the feedback and will update the document as appropriate .

@anmtando : At the end of the document they do have some info on how to debug , i just wanted to know if you have looked at that .
Debugging parameterized data flows
You can only debug data flows with parameterized datasets from the Pipeline Debug run using the execute data flow activity. Currently, interactive debug sessions in ADF Data Flow do not work with parameterized data sets. Pipeline executions and debug runs will work with parameters.

Hello @anmtando .  Could you please give us some more information?
Do you see this message after pipeline completion?
Do you see this message during the run when you click on the glasses icon?
This message usually means there is something wrong in your Flow, or the sources it uses.
Do you see a message starting with "The private preview of Mapping Data Flows is disabled now..." ?

Himanshu, my datasets are not parameterized.

@MartinJaffer-MSFT, I am getting this message when I click on the glasses icon during the debug run.
When I validate my data flow, there are no validation error. I also have valid source and destination Azure SQL DW Datasets(not parameterized).
No, I did not come across the message "The private preview of Mapping Data Flows is disabled now..." .

Also, one more issue I noticed was, if I cancel (recursively) my debug run in the pipeline then the data flow activity gets cancelled but the data flow keeps on running. It kept on copying data from my source to sink even after cancellation.

@anmtando : Can you please provide us the subscriptionId for the azure subscription which you are using ?

@himanshusinha-msft Azure subscription ID: 321b2a20-1798-463b-9011-55056ff5bc17
ADF Name: glbbirptadfdev

@anmtando : 	Do you have support plan for your account? IF not, could you please send us an email at azcommunity@microsoft.com?We can create a free support ticket for you for further help.

@anmtando Since we have not heard back from you we will now proceed to close this thread. If there are further questions regarding this matter, please tag me in your reply. We will gladly reopen the issue and continue the discussion.

I am experiencing this as well.
I am trying to view the debug pipeline process for the mapping activity. I have parameters and it always says cannot view the mapping debug progress. After it completes I can see the activity summary - but never during.


Updated with the latest SDL3 changes

SDL_SetWindowShape() has returned in SDL 3.0
Use the property definitions instead of hard-coded strings

Good to go?

Good to go?

Yes, as far as I can see

Thanks!


Can not checkout this repo in gitbash

I try to clone the repo but got a checkout error. Hmm..
$git clone https://github.com/firecow/gitlab-ci-local.git
Cloning into 'gitlab-ci-local'...
remote: Enumerating objects: 13225, done.
remote: Counting objects: 100% (3377/3377), done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (561/561), done.
remote: Total 13225 (delta 3109), reused 2914 (delta 2809), pack-reused 9848 (from 1)
Receiving objects: 100% (13225/13225), 382.63 MiB | 15.45 MiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (8505/8505), done.
error: invalid path 'tests/test-cases/rules-changes/.gitlab-ci-rules:changes:paths.yml'
fatal: unable to checkout working tree
warning: Clone succeeded, but checkout failed.
You can inspect what was checked out with 'git status'
and retry with 'git restore --source=HEAD :/'

$git -v
git version 2.47.0.windows.2

argh..  not sure but maybe path issue here?
error: invalid path 'tests/test-cases/rules-changes/.gitlab-ci-rules:changes:paths.yml'
don't really have a windows machine to investigate ..

I never had such an error before :-) But I can start googling little bit.

duplicate of #1279


feat: Change web base url when restoring database

Fix this issues #21

I think it's less risky to delete key = web.base.url.freeze instead.
Because the base URL is not localhost through the Docker. Deleting web.base.url.freeze will ask Odoo to recompute the base URL.

someone know why the workflows don't run correctly ? looks like there is problems when checking out @BonnetAdam branch

I fixed the previous git fetch error, but I think the current one requires changes on repo configuration...
I let you check


Add topics preview header to more RepositoriesService methods

Recently there's been an addition of topics endpoints (in #670 and #672 by @RaviTezu), the GitHub API also responds with a Topics slice in their repository responses such as in https://developer.github.com/v3/repos/#get.
Could we add this to the Repositories type? I'd like the topics response in RepositoriesService.List method.

Could we add this to the Repositories type?

Sorry, I don't understand what you're referring to. What would you like added exactly?
Doesn't Repository type already have the Topics slice? See https://godoc.org/github.com/google/go-github/github#Repository.Topics.

I must have updated my gopath repo but not my vendored version. My fault. Please ignore!

OK, my apologies but, I wasn't going crazy, but I did misdiagnose the issue.
I was checking the RepositoriesService.List method and that isn't sending the mediaTypeTopicsPreview accept header in it's request, which is why I wasn't seeing the correct results.
My apologies for the misdiagnosed issue, but are we able to add this header tot he various RepositoriesService.List* methods?

@bradleyfalzon  I see it now
We are adding the custom header mediaTypeTopicsPreview only in ListAllTopic and ReplaceAllTopic methods. I can take this up, if we decide to include Topics as part of Repository/Repositories returned  in all the List* methods.
@shurcooL @gmlewis

Now we know that GitHub will accept multiple accept headers, I'm wondering whether there's another API beyond:
acceptHeaders := []string{mediaTypeLicensesPreview, mediaTypeTopicsPreview, ...}
req.Header.Set("Accept", strings.Join(acceptHeaders, ", "))

I was thinking a helper (although a test didn't show a great improvement), but perhaps assigning these accept headers to the service itself, and each method could add just a few more if they need.

I was checking the RepositoriesService.List method and that isn't sending the mediaTypeTopicsPreview accept header in its request, which is why I wasn't seeing the correct results.

@bradleyfalzon I see.

My apologies for the misdiagnosed issue, but are we able to add this header tot he various RepositoriesService.List* methods?

Absolutely.
The original announcement did not mention list endpoints explicitly (/cc @kytrinyx), but I can see in https://developer.github.com/v3/repos/ docs sample responses that topics are indeed a part of some of the list methods too.
So we should add the ones that support this.
Methods to investigate:

https://godoc.org/github.com/google/go-github/github#RepositoriesService.List
https://godoc.org/github.com/google/go-github/github#RepositoriesService.ListAll (probably not, but not sure)
https://godoc.org/github.com/google/go-github/github#RepositoriesService.ListByOrg
https://godoc.org/github.com/google/go-github/github#RepositoriesService.ListForks
https://godoc.org/github.com/google/go-github/github#OrganizationsService.ListTeamRepos

Those methods return []*github.Repository. We'll need to confirm which ones do/do not support the topics preview header, and set it only where it's needed.

I can take this up, if we decide to include Topics as part of Repository/Repositories returned in all the List* methods.

@RaviTezu Feel free to go for it, since this is a supported/documented aspect of GitHub API. Thanks!
Note, this situation is very similar to PR #656.

perhaps assigning these accept headers to the service itself, and each method could add just a few more if they need.

I'd prefer we don't do that. Let's just keep each method explicit about what headers it sets, and not try to over-set the preview headers. This problem doesn't happen often, and it's easy to fix. We can consider/discuss a more elaborate solution later on, but it doesn't seem to be a net positive to me so far.
In general, we should remember that whenever preview headers are used, it reduces the surface area of the API which go-github exposes that can be considered fully stable, reliable, suitable for production use. So it's better to under-set them than over-set.

@shurcooL Sure, I will take this up.
@bradleyfalzon @gmlewis

The original announcement did not mention list endpoints explicitly

The change that was made didn't touch the list endpoints explicitly—but that might just mean that the changes were made earlier and weren't announced. I can take a look at this if you're having trouble figuring it out on your end.

but that might just mean that the changes were made earlier and weren't announced

When I read that announcement, it certainly felt like it followed another announcement that I had never seen before. Notably:

Today we're introducing additions to the repository topics preview.

After looking through a few pages of posts at https://developer.github.com/changes/, I did not find any other posts related to repository topics preview. I figured I just didn't look hard enough and moved on.

I can take a look at this if you're having trouble figuring it out on your end.

Thanks @kytrinyx. I think we should be okay, since the sample responses are informative enough. I just mentioned it to give an explanation for why we didn't catch this in the original PR for this feature.

I think we should be okay, since the sample responses are informative enough.

👍 that sounds good. Don't hesitate to ping me, however. :heart:

❓ https://godoc.org/github.com/google/go-github/github#RepositoriesService.ListAll (probably not, but need to test to confirm)

I just confirmed that, https://api.github.com/repositories?since=blah is not returning the topics as part of its response.
Tried with https://api.github.com/repositories?since=97864963 creating a test repo with topics. BTW the custom header Accept: application/vnd.github.mercy-preview+json is set while querying.
@shurcooL @bradleyfalzon

I'd prefer we don't do that. Let's just keep each method explicit about what headers it sets, and not try to over-set the preview headers.

sgtm.

In general, we should remember that whenever preview headers are used, it reduces the surface area of the API which go-github exposes that can be considered fully stable, reliable, suitable for production use.

Well said, thanks.


This Pull Request resolves Issue #25

This Pull Request resolves Issue #25
Description:
In this Pull Request we have done the following additions/edits for the code:
Implemented Binary Search

This PR is closed because it deletes all other files! Please make sure you either revert the commit or create a new branch and send the PR on the new branch!


sveltekit - deliberately crash

Describe the problem
Is there a way to deliberately crash a sveltekit app (on the client) in PROD without displaying a stack trace or other potentially sensitive data?
Describe the proposed solution
a simply labelled function that can be called from anywhere in sveltekit application that will cause a runtime crash.
Alternatives considered
No response
Importance
nice to have
Additional Information
Other languages and frameworks have this feature.

What do you mean 'crash on the client'? There's nothing sensitive in a client-side stack trace, and server-side stack traces are already removed in prod (unless you have a reproduction of this not happening?)

Make the app unusable until a reload.

How could it be done via userland?
My use case it's:

I'm building a progressive webapp using svelte kit and adapter-static.
I'm releasing it as a beta to people.
I want to 'invalidate' the app after a certain date.
I'm concerned people will keep a copy of the source (as it's a static site)

Hence, my solution is to 'crash' the application.

Right, but what does 'crash' mean? Be super-specific!

Updated comment

It's not the same but Many server side frameworks such as PHP/laravel has a function to provide that functionality. eg. abort()

Again, please explain what 'crash' means. In what specific ways does the app become 'unusable'? Does the page immediately vanish, replaced with an error page? Does the router stop working? Do components become non-interactive? How is all this communicated to the user? We can't discuss a feature request without knowing what the feature is.

Yes I misunderstood what you wanted because for my particular use case I don't care what happens or gets displayed to the user, as long as the site just stops working (until at least a reload, in which case I will call the abort function again).
But for a more generally applicable feature request, I guess the ability to display a custom static page and make javascript interpretation stop working.
I've tried throwing an uncaught exception, but it just displays a message in console, but everything still works as best as it meaningfully could.
Maybe sveltekit can produce output with Content-Type: text/plain.

I don't care what happens or gets displayed to the user, as long as the site just stops working

This is user-hostile design and I hope you reconsider. But this can be done in userland — just redirect someone to a page that uses beforeNavigate to prevent the user from navigating onwards or backwards. There's no reason to add stuff to SvelteKit to achieve this.

Is there a way for sveltekit to return Content-Type: text/plain?


Remove Custom Search support

[ ] Remove template code that includes search fields
[ ] Turn off the API

@kevmoo, @mkustermann: Do you want to have a milestone set before we turn it off / remove it? Either "our search must implement X" or "must live through a serious upgrade" or something, or shall I just go ahead and turn it off?

@isoos We still fall back to CSE if the normal search fails (any exception occurs) atm. As long as this code is in, we shouldn't turn off/disable the API.
@kevmoo should decide whether quality/speed/features of the new search are better than old one.
If the answer is yes, we should monitor the logs for some time, to ensure we never fall back to to CSE search in prod. Once that is established we can a) remove special cse html in our templates b) remove the fallback to CSE code c) turn off the API.

Are we still falling back to CSE? Can we remove all CSE related code support?
Once we have no CSE code left, please write it here and leave the issue open, so we can disable our CSE account / api service / ...

My ad-hoc and infrequent sampling of the /debug url showed no signs of fallback, ever, we did the searches from our service, and not from CSE.
If you are happy with the logs, I can start removing the CSE-related code any time.

Looks like we had 1 hit 15 days ago...

Can we correlate it with a log entry and reason?

Can we correlate it with a log entry and reason?

Do I have to? 😄

Nope, not that important. I was just curious whether it was just a timeout, an error or something else. And it is also possible that it was used not by the prod up, but staging (if search was down there).

@isoos – are we ready to turn off the API?

Yeah, I think we can turn that off.

Done!


a missing match quotation mark?

I am using LSF version of the juicer 1.5, around juicer.sh line 350, the code:
bsub -o "$topDir/lsf.out" -q "$queue" -W "$queue_time" -n 2 -M 68 -R rusage[mem=68] -J "${groupname}_cmd" -g "${groupname}" <<EOF
date
echo "Juicer version:$juicer_version"
echo "This job is $LSB_JOBID"
"$0 $@
EOF
It seems to miss a quotation mark at line 354 ( "$0 $@ be "$0 $@)? I have the error message with "missing a match "
May I know what does $0 refer to?
Thanks!
Rong

Yes looks like it’s missing that. $0 is the command.
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 4:27 PM ryao-mdanderson<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

I am using LSF version of the juicer 1.5, around juicer.sh line 350, the
code:
bsub -o "$topDir/lsf.out" -q "$queue" -W "$queue_time" -n 2 -M 68 -R
rusage[mem=68] -J "${groupname}_cmd" -g "${groupname}" <<EOF
date
echo "Juicer version:$juicer_version"
echo "This job is $LSB_JOBID"
"$0 $@
EOF
It seems to miss a quotation mark at line 354 ( "$0 $@ be "$0 $@)? I have
the error message with "missing a match "
May I know what does $0 refer to?
Thanks!
Rong
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/aidenlab/juicer/issues/196, or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAK2EWZ3RIUJT6II3IMXCRTSUKFFRANCNFSM4UXIVTNQ
.
--
Neva Cherniavsky Durand, Ph.D. | she, her, hers
Assistant Professor |  Molecular and Human Genetics
Aiden Lab | Baylor College of Medicine
www.aidenlab.org


Add actuator support

I'm seeing the error below when trying to use the command line runner example.
No @CompilationHint found for import selector: org.springframework.boot.actuate.autoconfigure.web.server.ManagementContextConfigurationImportSelector
What is the best way to determine the root cause of an error during native-image?

Many errors are very confusing. And currently if you stray much beyond the existing usage demonstrated in samples, it will start failing (it is still pre 1.0).
That said, if you ever get a 'class not found' type message you can quickly try to fix that yourself by creating your own reflect-config.json file in the project META-INF/native-image folder, per the instructions in https://github.com/oracle/graal/blob/master/substratevm/REFLECTION.md.
However, in this case the feature is trying to tell you something early so we don't get a very cryptic error later. The features encapsulates hints on various types that suggest "oh if this type is being used, we need to make sure graal can reflect on these other types".  At the moment each selector needs specific handling that specifics what types it might select. We'll need to add handling for ManagementContextConfigurationImportSelector.

There are now actuator samples in the repository so the feature does support basic usage of actuator - please try it out and let me know how it goes.

So this issue is not specific to spring-actuator, and it requires a more general solution.

The problem is difficult to solve in the general sense because import selectors can do anything they want in code to compute the result of calling them at runtime. It isn't reasonable to analyze the code to work it out, so we need a hint. The messages coming out now are warning there is no hint and failing early rather than more cryptically later. The docs discuss how to create a hint when you get the problem (and perhaps contribute it back):
https://repo.spring.io/milestone/org/springframework/experimental/spring-graal-native-docs/0.6.1.RELEASE/spring-graal-native-docs-0.6.1.RELEASE.zip!/reference/index.html#_no_access_hint_found_for_import_selector_xxx
Supporting actuator was writing a complicated hint. But as I was there I also dropped one in for the KafkaListenerConfigurationSelector - however there will be import selectors out in the wild that we have no idea about, and supplying hints with them (or turning this error down to warning if you want to risk it) is the current mechanism to support it.
Please reopen if actuator not behaving for you, I am pretty sure our two samples do not cover it exhaustively.


Add Cheongju University

Please add Cheongju University.
Their website is located here: https://cju.ac.kr
Thank you for your time and consideration!

@dev-taewon-kim Thank you for your patience while waiting for a review and processing your request. Pull request merged. Please start applying for JetBrains educational subscription at https://www.jetbrains.com/shop/eform/students in an hour, to allow the changes to propagate through JetBrains systems.


draggable should not move slides when fade is on

When both draggable and fade are on slides transition with fade, but dragging still changes the horizontal position, so e.g. you can move you slide outside the screen.

+1 I think this PR would fix it - https://github.com/akiran/react-slick/pull/30 - Not sure why @akiran did not merge it when it was submitted in March..

+1 For fix. This has really been bugging me lately :/

Same issue here. Does https://github.com/akiran/react-slick/pull/30 indeed fix the issue? if so, could we get it merged in?

The issue has been fixed long back. Please feel free to request reopen if someone disagrees.


Watch-progress indicator (no-API version)

Test: kp

It's looking and working great! Having @toshokanneko do a styling pass.  In some cases the bar does blend into the thumbnail, wonder if that can be improved..


Logging In with QR code to pc with new account (greymass)

Error
{"json":{"code":500,"message":"Internal Service Error","error":{"code":0,"name":"exception","what":"unspecified","details":[{"message":"unknown key (boost::tuples::tuple<bool, eosio::chain::name, boost::tuples::null_type, boost::tuples::null_type, boost::tuples::null_type, boost::tuples::null_type, boost::tuples::null_type, boost::tuples::null_type, boost::tuples::null_type, boost::tuples::null_type>): (0 chaotic.gm)","file":"http_plugin.cpp","line_number":968,"method":"handle_exception"}]}}}

![](https://user-images.githubuserco

ntent.com/100243168/156081583-f2109605-82db-4694-9087-0916b42b54a8.png)