Line Number:  22-25 line  Issue: The README update introduces Code2Flow integration with specific flags for flowchart generation. However, if these flags are not supported by the user's version of Code2Flow, it could lead to execution errors or unexpected behavior.
 Fix: Add a version check for Code2Flow at the beginning of your script or documentation generation process to ensure compatibility with the used flags. Inform the user to update their Code2Flow installation if their version is outdated.  Importance: high  Code Suggestion:

No Code Suggestion

file: documentation/create_overview_doc/createdoc.sh

Suggestions:

Refine the implementation of the 'bito_response_ok' and 'update_token_usage' functions to enhance readability and maintainability. The proposed changes aim to simplify the logic and improve the handling of token counts.  Line Number: 12, 17-20  Relevant line:

[[ $1 -ne 0 || $2 == Whoops* || -z $2 ]] && return 1 || return 0

Code Suggestion:
+function bito_response_ok() {
+    echo "Validating response from Bito command..." >&2
+    # Simplify the condition for readability
+    if [[ $1 -ne 0 ]] || [[ $2 == Whoops* ]] || [[ -z $2 ]]; then
+        return 1
+    else
+        return 0
+    fi
+}
+
+function update_token_usage() {
+    echo "Updating session token counts..." >&2
+    # Streamline token count update process
+    local input_tokens=$(echo "$1" | wc -w | awk '{print int($1 * 1.34)}')
+    local output_tokens=$(echo "$2" | wc -w | awk '{print int($1 * 1.34)}')
+    total_input_token_count=$((total_input_token_count + input_tokens))
+    total_output_token_count=$((total_output_token_count + output_tokens))
+}

Code Structure Analysis feedback:

Line Number:  1-27 line  Issue: The script's initial comments and variable naming do not clearly describe their purpose, leading to potential confusion.
 Fix: Refine the initial comments to clearly state the script's purpose and ensure variable names are descriptive and consistent.  Importance: low  Code Suggestion:

No Code Suggestion

Line Number:  82-215 line  Issue: The function 'is_skippable' uses a hardcoded list of directories and file types to skip, which may not be comprehensive or flexible for different projects.
 Fix: Refactor the 'is_skippable' function to read skip patterns from a configuration file, allowing for easy updates and customization per project without modifying the script.  Importance: high  Code Suggestion:

No Code Suggestion

Line Number:  340-365 line  Issue: The 'create_module_documentation' function lacks error handling for when documentation generation fails, potentially leading to partial or missing documentation without notice.
 Fix: Implement error handling within the 'create_module_documentation' function to catch and log failures, ensuring users are aware of any issues during the documentation generation process.  Importance: high  Code Suggestion:

No Code Suggestion

Performance Analysis feedback:

Line Number:  1-27 line  Issue: The refactoring of the logging and token usage functions in the script enhances readability and maintainability. However, it's crucial to ensure that the simplification does not obscure error handling and logging details necessary for debugging and performance monitoring.
 Fix: Ensure that the refactored functions provide detailed logs for debugging purposes. Consider implementing a more structured logging approach that categorizes messages by severity levels (INFO, WARNING, ERROR) and includes timestamps for easier tracking of events.  Importance: medium  Code Suggestion:

No Code Suggestion

Line Number:  82-215 line  Issue: The script's approach to handling file paths and operations could lead to inefficiencies and potential bugs, especially in environments with large numbers of files or complex directory structures. The extensive use of shell commands within the script could also impact performance.
 Fix: Consider rewriting critical path handling and file manipulation logic in a  Importance: high  Code Suggestion:

No Code Suggestion

Optimization Analysis feedback:

Line Number:  1-27 line  Issue: The script's approach to logging and handling of session token counts is redundant and can be optimized by consolidating the logging functionality and removing unnecessary global variables.
 Fix: Consolidate the logging functionality into a single function that handles both the logging of session duration and token usage. This reduces code redundancy and improves maintainability.  Importance: medium  Code Suggestion:

No Code Suggestion

Line Number:  82-215 line  Issue: The script's method for determining skippable paths is inefficient and can be optimized. The current implementation iterates over a static list of directories and files to skip, which could be improved by leveraging patterns or regular expressions for matching.
 Fix: Utilize a more efficient approach for determining skippable paths by using regular expressions to match against the list of directories and files to skip. This will improve the script's performance by reducing the number of iterations needed to determine if a path should be excluded.  Importance: medium  Code Suggestion:

No Code Suggestion

Line Number:  340-25 line  Issue: The process for generating documentation for individual modules is overly complex and contains unnecessary steps that could be streamlined for efficiency.
 Fix: Simplify the process for generating documentation for individual modules by removing unnecessary steps and consolidating functions. This includes optimizing the way module details are extracted and reducing the reliance on temporary files.  Importance: medium  Code Suggestion:

No Code Suggestion

Line Number:  340-25 line  Issue: The script's approach to creating flow charts for system documentation is not optimized for cases where the system's structure is complex and involves numerous modules. This can lead to performance issues and difficulties in maintaining accurate and up-to-date documentation.
 Fix: Implement a more dynamic and scalable approach for generating flow charts that can adapt to complex system structures. This could involve using a graph database for managing module relationships or adopting a more modular documentation generation process that allows for incremental updates.  Importance: medium  Code Suggestion:

No Code Suggestion

Security Analysis feedback:

Line Number:  4-20 line  Issue: The script contains variables for logging and managing prompt files for NLP tasks, but there's a potential issue with hardcoded paths or filenames which might not exist or change, leading to script failures.
 Fix: Implement checks to ensure that the paths or files referenced by these variables exist before attempting to use them. Additionally, consider making the paths configurable through environment variables or script arguments to increase the script's flexibility and robustness.  Importance: high  Code Suggestion:

No Code Suggestion

Line Number:  104-116 line  Issue: The 'call_bito_with_retry' function attempts to call the Bito command with retry logic but lacks proper error handling and message logging for each retry attempt, which could lead to confusion during troubleshooting.
 Fix: Enhance the error handling within the 'call_bito_with_retry' function to log detailed error messages for each failed attempt, including the reason for failure if possible, and to provide clearer guidance on next steps if all attempts fail.  Importance: high  Code Suggestion:

No Code Suggestion

file: Colab-TextGen-GPU.ipynb

Code Structure Analysis feedback:

Line Number:  1-144 line  Issue: The JSON structure of the Jupyter notebook indicates a mix of code and markdown cells without clear separation of concerns.
 Fix: Refactor the notebook to separate code logic from documentation. Ensure each cell has a single responsibility, either executing code or providing documentation.  Importance: high  Code Suggestion:

No Code Suggestion

Performance Analysis feedback:

Line Number:  62-134 line  Issue: The code block for launching the web UI performs several operations that could be optimized for better performance. Specifically, the process of cloning the repository, adjusting requirements based on CUDA version, and installing dependencies can be made more efficient.
 Fix: Consider simplifying the dependency management process by creating a separate script or Docker container that encapsulates these operations. This approach can reduce the complexity within the notebook and ensure a more consistent environment setup. Additionally, evaluate the necessity of each dependency to minimize the installation time.  Importance: high  Code Suggestion:

No Code Suggestion

Scalability Analysis feedback:

Line Number:  62-134 line  Issue: The code block for launching the web UI lacks scalability considerations. Specifically, the process of cloning the repository, adjusting requirements based on CUDA versions, and launching a server using a potentially large model could lead to significant resource consumption and potential bottlenecks, especially when scaled up for multiple users or instances.
 Fix: Implement asynchronous operations and load balancing to manage the resource consumption effectively. Consider using a queue system for handling multiple user requests and a scalable architecture that allows for the dynamic allocation and deallocation of resources based on demand.  Importance: high  Code Suggestion:

No Code Suggestion

Optimization Analysis feedback:

Line Number:  62-134 line  Issue: The code for launching the web UI and handling model download and setup is inefficient and can lead to unnecessary re-downloads and reinstalls of dependencies, which is particularly costly in terms of time and network resources in a Colab environment.
 Fix: Implement checks to verify if the required dependencies are already installed and if the model has been previously downloaded. This will avoid redundant operations and make the execution faster and more resource-efficient.  Importance: high  Code Suggestion:

No Code Suggestion

Security Analysis feedback:

Line Number:  47 line  Issue: The code uses an external audio source "https://oobabooga.github.io/silence.m4a" to keep the Colab session alive. This method can be considered a workaround to avoid session timeout and might not comply with Google Colab's usage policies.
 Fix: Remove the workaround using the external audio source to keep the session alive. Instead, explore legitimate ways to ensure session activity, such as implementing a more interactive or engaging notebook that naturally encourages user interaction.  Importance: high  Code Suggestion:

No Code Suggestion

file: documentation

Security Analysis feedback:

Line Number:  None line  Issue: None
 Fix: None  Importance: None  Code Suggestion:

No Code Suggestion

<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
Code Review Agent Run Status

AI Based Review: Successful

Code Review Overview

Summary: This review covers a series of changes aimed at enhancing the documentation generation tool by transitioning from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow for flowchart generation. The changes include updates to the documentation, code adjustments for integration with Code2Flow, and modifications to the setup script to accommodate new dependencies. These updates aim to provide clearer, more detailed visual representations of code architecture, improving the tool's functionality and user experience.
Code change type: Configuration Changes, Feature Addition, Documentation
Unit tests added: False
Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 2, considering the structured and incremental nature of the changes, which facilitates a more straightforward review process.

<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
High-level Feedback
General feedback for improvement includes ensuring comprehensive testing across different environments to validate the integration with Code2Flow, considering potential edge cases or compatibility issues. Additionally, it's advisable to provide more detailed documentation on using the new flowchart generation features, including examples and troubleshooting tips. Engaging the community for feedback on these changes could also offer valuable insights for further refinement.
Detailed code Feedback
file: documentation/create_overview_doc/README.md

Suggestions:

Ensure consistency in the documentation regarding the transition to Code2Flow. Specifically, clarify the advantages of using Code2Flow over Mermaid.js and provide examples demonstrating the improvements in flowchart detail and clarity. Additionally, consider adding a section on troubleshooting common issues encountered when generating flowcharts with Code2Flow.  Line Number: 22, 24, 32  Relevant line:

- **Visualization with Code2Flow**: AI-generated visual flow maps to represent module interactions, configured with flags such as --hide-legend, --no-trimming, --verbose, and --skip-parse-errors for optimal detail and clarity.

Code Suggestion:
- **Visualization with Code2Flow**: AI-generated visual flow maps to represent module interactions. Code2Flow is configured with flags such as --hide-legend, --no-trimming, --verbose, and --skip-parse-errors to optimize the detail and clarity of flowcharts. This transition enhances the visual representation of code architecture, making it easier to understand complex systems at a glance. For troubleshooting and detailed usage, refer to the [Code2Flow documentation](https://code2flow.com/docs).

file: documentation/create_overview_doc/createdoc.sh

Suggestions:

Simplify the validation and token usage update logic in the script to improve readability and maintainability. The current implementation could be streamlined to enhance clarity, especially for new contributors to the project. Refactoring these sections to use more descriptive variable names and modular functions could significantly aid in understanding the script's functionality.  Line Number: 12, 17-20  Relevant line:

+ echo "Validating response from Bito command..." >&2

Code Suggestion:
+    validate_bito_response() {
+        echo "Validating response from Bito command..." >&2
+        if [[ $1 -ne 0 || $2 == Whoops* || -z $2 ]]; then
+            echo "Bito command failed or returned an error." >&2
+            return 1
+        else
+            return 0
+        fi
+    }
+
+    update_session_token_counts() {
+        echo "Updating session token counts..." >&2
+        local tokens=$(( $(echo "$1 $2" | wc -w) * 134 / 100 ))
+        total_input_token_count=$((total_input_token_count + tokens))
+        total_output_token_count=$((total_output_token_count + tokens))
+    }

When implementing retry logic for the Bito command, consider encapsulating the retry mechanism in a separate utility function to enhance modularity and reuse. This approach would make the script more maintainable and simplify the integration of retry logic for other operations that may require it in the future.  Line Number: 104-121  Relevant line:

+ echo "Initiating Bito command with retry for prompt file $2..." >&2

Code Suggestion:
+    execute_with_retry() {
+        local command=$1
+        local max_retries=$2
+        local retry_delay=$3
+        local attempt=1
+        while [ $attempt -le $max_retries ]; do
+            if $command; then
+                echo "Command succeeded on attempt $attempt." >&2
+                return 0
+            else
+                echo "Command failed on attempt $attempt. Retrying in $retry_delay seconds..." >&2
+                sleep $retry_delay
+                ((attempt++))
+            fi
+        done
+        echo "Command failed after $max_retries attempts." >&2
+        return 1
+    }

Code Structure Analysis feedback:

Line Number:  340-357 line  Issue: The introduction of 'generate_flow_chart_for_system' function without showing its implementation or ensuring it exists elsewhere in the codebase. This could lead to errors if the function is not defined.
 Fix: Ensure that the 'generate_flow_chart_for_system' function is properly defined and implemented within the script or in an included library. This prevents runtime errors due to missing function definitions.  Importance: high  Code Suggestion:

Ensure that the 'generate_flow_chart_for_system' function is properly defined and implemented within the script or in an included library. This prevents runtime errors due to missing function definitions.

Scalability Analysis feedback:

Line Number:  82-215 line  Issue: The script's approach to generating documentation and flow charts does not consider the scalability aspects of handling large codebases or high-frequency updates. The sequential processing model used could become a bottleneck.
 Fix: Refactor the script to support parallel processing of module files for documentation generation. Utilize tools like GNU Parallel or implement multiprocessing within the script to process multiple modules in parallel, reducing the overall time required for documentation generation.  Importance: high  Code Suggestion:

Refactor the script to support parallel processing of module files for documentation generation. Utilize tools like GNU Parallel or implement multiprocessing within the script to process multiple modules in parallel, reducing the overall time required for documentation generation.

Line Number:  340-357 line  Issue: The current implementation for appending the system flow chart to the aggregated documentation does not account for the potential scalability issues of rendering large and complex flow charts, which could significantly impact performance and responsiveness.
 Fix: Optimize the flow chart generation process by implementing caching mechanisms for previously generated flow charts and only regenerating them when there are changes in the source files. Additionally, consider generating flow charts at a lower resolution or with simplified details for large and complex systems to improve rendering performance.  Importance: high  Code Suggestion:

Optimize the flow chart generation process by implementing caching mechanisms for previously generated flow charts and only regenerating them when there are changes in the source files. Additionally, consider generating flow charts at a lower resolution or with simplified details for large and complex systems to improve rendering performance.

Optimization Analysis feedback:

Line Number:  1-27 line  Issue: The script performs redundant checks and operations for setting up logging, which could be streamlined for efficiency.
 Fix: Consolidate the initialization of logging-related variables and functions into a single setup function to reduce redundancy and improve code maintainability.  Importance: medium  Code Suggestion:

Consolidate the initialization of logging-related variables and functions into a single setup function to reduce redundancy and improve code maintainability.

Line Number:  64-98 line  Issue: The function 'check_tools_and_files' has been modified to check for the presence of "code2flow" and "dot", but it does not account for the possibility that these tools might not be installed or accessible from the PATH, leading to potential failures in execution.
 Fix: Implement additional checks to verify that "code2flow" and "dot" are not only present but also executable. Provide detailed error messages and recovery suggestions if the checks fail.  Importance: medium  Code Suggestion:

Implement additional checks to verify that "code2flow" and "dot" are not only present but also executable. Provide detailed error messages and recovery suggestions if the checks fail.

Security Analysis feedback:

Line Number:  73-121 line  Issue: The script's handling of the response from the 'bito' command lacks proper error handling and validation. This could potentially allow the execution of unintended commands or the processing of unexpected responses, leading to vulnerabilities in the script's execution flow.
 Fix: Implement comprehensive error handling and validation for the response from the 'bito' command. Ensure that the script correctly handles different types of errors and validates the command's output before proceeding with its execution. This can help prevent vulnerabilities related to unexpected command execution or the processing of malicious responses.  Importance: high  Code Suggestion:

Implement comprehensive error handling and validation for the response from the 'bito' command. Ensure that the script correctly handles different types of errors and validates the command's output before proceeding with its execution. This can help prevent vulnerabilities related to unexpected command execution or the processing of malicious responses.

Performance Analysis feedback:

Line Number:  1-27 line  Issue: The script's approach to handling Bito responses and updating token usage is inefficient and lacks proper validation of the response content. This could lead to inaccurate token counting and potential issues in handling responses that do not meet expected criteria.
 Fix: Refactor the 'bito_response_ok' and 'update_token_usage' functions to include more robust validation checks. Specifically, ensure that the response content is thoroughly validated against expected outcomes. For token usage updates, ensure that the calculation accurately reflects the tokens used in the session, considering both input and output tokens. Implementing more detailed logging for both success and error cases can also aid in debugging and maintaining the script.  Importance: high  Code Suggestion:

Refactor the 'bito_response_ok' and 'update_token_usage' functions to include more robust validation checks. Specifically, ensure that the response content is thoroughly validated against expected outcomes. For token usage updates, ensure that the calculation accurately reflects the tokens used in the session, considering both input and output tokens. Implementing more detailed logging for both success and error cases can also aid in debugging and maintaining the script.

file: Colab-TextGen-GPU.ipynb

Scalability Analysis feedback:

Line Number:  62-135 line  Issue: The code for launching the web UI and handling GPU resources does not implement any scalability strategies such as load balancing, efficient resource utilization, or handling peak loads through rate limiting or asynchronous processing. This could lead to potential bottlenecks when multiple users attempt to access the web UI simultaneously or when processing large text generation tasks.
 Fix: Implement a load balancing mechanism to distribute incoming requests evenly across multiple instances of the web UI. Consider using asynchronous processing for text generation tasks to improve CPU utilization and responsiveness. Introduce rate limiting to manage peak loads effectively.  Importance: high  Code Suggestion:

if not Path('text-generation-webui').exists():
  print("Installing the webui...")

  !git clone https://github.com/oobabooga/text-generation-webui
  %cd text-generation-webui

# Implement load balancing
# Consider using a load balancer like Nginx or HAProxy

# Asynchronous processing
from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor
executor = ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=10)

# Rate limiting
import time

def rate_limited(max_per_second):
    min_interval = 1.0 / float(max_per_second)
    def decorate(func):
        last_time_called = [0.0]
        def rate_limited_function(*args, **kargs):
            elapsed = time.clock() - last_time_called[0]
            left_to_wait = min_interval - elapsed
            if left_to_wait > 0:
                time.sleep(left_to_wait)
            last_time_called[0] = time.clock()
            return func(*args, **kargs)
        return rate_limited_function
    return decorate

Optimization Analysis feedback:

Line Number:  62-134 line  Issue: The script clones a GitHub repository and installs dependencies every time it runs. This approach is inefficient, especially for repeated executions, as it leads to unnecessary network calls and delays.
 Fix: To optimize, consider checking if the repository and dependencies are already present before attempting to clone or install. Use conditional checks to minimize redundant operations.  Importance: high  Code Suggestion:

if Path('text-generation-webui').exists() and Path('requirements.txt').exists():
  print("Dependencies already present. Skipping clone and install...")
else:
  !git clone https://github.com/oobabooga/text-generation-webui
  %cd text-generation-webui
  !pip install -r requirements.txt --upgrade

Security Analysis feedback:

Line Number:  62-134 line  Issue: The script clones an external repository and executes code without any form of validation or sanitization, introducing a significant security risk of arbitrary code execution. This risk is exacerbated by the use of a dynamically constructed command that includes user-controlled input without proper validation, leading to potential command injection vulnerabilities.
 Fix: Ensure that any external code or repositories are thoroughly vetted and come from trusted sources. Implement strict input validation and sanitization before constructing and executing commands, especially those that include user-supplied inputs. Consider using static paths and inputs that do not allow external manipulation. If dynamic inputs are necessary, strictly validate and sanitize these inputs to ensure they do not introduce command injection vulnerabilities.  Importance: high  Code Suggestion:

import subprocess
import shlex

def safe_clone_and_execute(user_input):
    # Validate and sanitize the user_input
    # Ensure it does not contain malicious characters or patterns
    if is_valid(user_input):
        sanitized_input = sanitize(user_input)
        # Use static paths or trusted repositories
        repo_url = f'https://trustedsource.com/{sanitized_input}'
        subprocess.run(shlex.split(f'git clone {repo_url}'))
        # Execute code in a safe manner
        # Consider using a sandbox environment or execution control mechanisms

<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
Code Review Agent Run Status

AI Based Review: Successful

Code Review Overview

Summary: The PR introduces a significant shift in the documentation generation process by migrating from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow for flowchart generation. This change aims to enhance the clarity and detail of flowcharts, improving the tool's overall functionality and user experience. The PR also updates the README.md and the script files to reflect the new flowchart generation tool and introduces additional checks for Code2Flow and Graphviz, ensuring all necessary dependencies are in place for successful script execution.
Code change type: Refactoring, Configuration Changes, Documentation
Unit tests added: False
Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 2, due to the comprehensive nature of the changes and the need to ensure that the new tool integration does not introduce any regressions or compatibility issues.

<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
High-level Feedback
The transition from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow represents a strategic enhancement to the documentation generation tool. It leverages Code2Flow's advanced capabilities to produce more detailed and informative flowcharts, which can significantly improve the understanding of the codebase. However, it is crucial to thoroughly test the integration to ensure compatibility and stability across different environments and projects. Additionally, updating the documentation to guide users through the new dependencies and setup steps is essential for a smooth transition.
Detailed code Feedback
file: documentation/create_overview_doc/README.md

Suggestions:

Ensure the updated documentation clearly explains the transition to Code2Flow, including any new dependency installation steps and potential migration steps for existing projects. Include examples of the improved flowcharts generated with Code2Flow to demonstrate the benefits of the transition.  Line Number: 22, 24, 25, 32, 54-61, 69  Relevant line:

Various lines introducing Code2Flow and its configuration.

Code Suggestion:
- Visualization with Code2Flow: AI-generated visual flow maps to represent module interactions, configured with flags such as --hide-legend, --no-trimming, --verbose, and --skip-parse-errors for optimal detail and clarity.
+ Visualization with Code2Flow: Enhanced AI-generated visual flow maps represent module interactions. See the 'Getting Started' section for setup instructions and configuration options to optimize detail and clarity.

- Required Tool and File Verification: Checks for the presence of necessary tools ("bito", "code2flow", "dot") and prompt files before starting the documentation process.
+ Required Tool and File Verification: Ensure "bito", "Code2Flow", and "Graphviz (dot)" are installed on your system. Refer to the 'Installation' section for detailed steps.

Optimization Analysis feedback:

Line Number:  22-32 line  Issue: The transition from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow for visualization is mentioned, but the documentation does not detail the performance or scalability benefits of this change. Given that Code2Flow might handle large codebases or complex dependency graphs more efficiently than Mermaid.js, highlighting these aspects could justify the transition and provide users with insights into the optimization gains.
 Fix: Expand the README section on visualization tools to include a comparison between Mermaid.js and Code2Flow, focusing on performance metrics, scalability, and the ability to handle complex codebases. This information will help users understand the reasons behind the transition and the expected benefits in terms of documentation quality and generation speed.  Importance: high  Code Suggestion:

- **Visualization with Mermaid.js Flow Maps and Enhanced Syntax Handling**: AI-generated visual flow maps to represent module interactions. Now with improved handling of Mermaid diagram syntax, minimizing manual interventions.

- **Mermaid CLI Image Conversion**: Transforms Mermaid.js diagrams into images, offering a clear visual representation of your code architecture.
+ **Visualization with Code2Flow**: AI-generated visual flow maps to represent module interactions, configured with flags such as --hide-legend, --no-trimming, --verbose, and --skip-parse-errors for optimal detail and clarity.

+ **Code2Flow CLI Image Conversion**: The tool uses Code2Flow for creating detailed flow maps, offering a clear visual representation of your code architecture.
+ **Customizable Flowchart Generation: Code2Flow** Configured with flags such as --hide-legend, --no-trimming, --verbose, and --skip-parse-errors to optimize the detail and clarity of flowcharts.**

file: documentation/create_overview_doc/createdoc.sh

Suggestions:

Simplify the script by removing redundant checks and consolidating the validation logic for Bito's response. Also, ensure that the script's comments are updated to reflect the transition to Code2Flow and any new logic introduced for handling dependencies or generating flowcharts.  Line Number: 4-5, 12-13, 17-20, 35-37, 104-106, 343  Relevant line:

Various lines related to logging, Bito response validation, and Code2Flow integration.

Code Suggestion:
- log_file="bito_usage_log.txt"
+ log_file="documentation_generation_log.txt" # Reflect the broader scope of logging beyond Bito usage.

- [[ $1 -ne 0 || $2 == Whoops* || -z $2 ]] && return 1 || return 0
+ # Simplify the response validation logic and improve readability
+ if [[ $1 -ne 0 ]] || [[ $2 == Whoops* ]] || [[ -z $2 ]]; then
+     echo "Error: Invalid response from Bito command."
+     return 1
+ else
+     return 0
+ fi

- echo "Initiating Bito command with retry for prompt file $2..." >&2
+ echo "Attempting to execute Bito command. Prompt File: $2" >&2 # Make the log message more informative.

Optimization Analysis feedback:

Line Number:  1-27 line  Issue: The script includes hard-coded paths and file names, which reduces its flexibility and reusability across different projects or environments. Additionally, the mechanism for checking the response from Bito and updating token usage is less efficient than it could be, potentially leading to increased execution time and reduced maintainability.
 Fix: Refactor the script to use configuration files or environment variables for paths and file names, allowing for easier customization without modifying the script itself. Also, streamline the response checking and token updating mechanisms by encapsulating this logic into functions that can be reused throughout the script, improving both efficiency and maintainability.  Importance: high  Code Suggestion:

config_file="config.cfg"

load_config() {
  if [ ! -f "$config_file" ]; then
    echo "Configuration file not found"
    exit 1
  fi
  source "$config_file"
}

update_token_usage() {
  local response=$1
  local token_usage=$2
  if [[ $response == "success" ]]; then
    token_usage=$((token_usage+1))
    echo "Token usage updated to $token_usage"
  fi
}

# Usage
load_config
update_token_usage "$response" $token_usage

Scalability Analysis feedback:

Line Number:  1-27 line  Issue: The refactoring of logging and retry mechanisms in the shell script, while improving readability, does not address scalability concerns directly. The script still relies on sequential execution and does not leverage parallel processing or asynchronous execution which could significantly improve scalability, especially when dealing with a large number of modules or files.
 Fix: Introduce parallel processing for tasks that can be executed concurrently, such as generating documentation for different modules or downloading dependencies. This can be achieved using background processes in Bash or by leveraging tools like GNU Parallel. Additionally, consider breaking down the script into smaller, more focused scripts that can be executed independently or in parallel.  Importance: medium  Code Suggestion:

function generate_documentation_parallel() {
  local modules=(module1 module2 module3)
  for module in "${modules[@]}"; do
    (generate_documentation "$module" &)
  done
  wait
}

function generate_documentation() {
  local module=$1
  echo "Generating documentation for $module"
  # Your documentation generation logic here
}

Performance Analysis feedback:

Line Number:  82-125 line  Issue: The script's approach to retrying Bito commands does not implement exponential backoff, which can lead to inefficient use of resources and potential rate limit issues when interacting with external APIs or services.
 Fix: Implement an exponential backoff strategy for retrying Bito commands. This method involves increasing the delay between retries exponentially in case of repeated failures, reducing the load on the server and minimizing the risk of hitting rate limits.  Importance: high  Code Suggestion:

call_bito_with_retry() {
  local attempt=0
  local max_attempts=5
  local delay=1

  while [ $attempt -lt $max_attempts ]; do
    if call_bito; then
      break
    fi
    sleep $delay
    attempt=$((attempt + 1))
    delay=$((delay * 2))
  done

  if [ $attempt -eq $max_attempts ]; then
    echo "Failed to call Bito after $max_attempts attempts."
  fi
}

# Example usage of the function
call_bito_with_retry

Line Number:  340-362 line  Issue: The function 'generate_flow_chart_for_system' attempts to create a system flowchart without verifying the successful execution of 'code2flow'. This could lead to silent failures where the script continues execution without generating the intended flowchart.
 Fix: Check the exit status of 'code2flow' immediately after its execution. If 'code2flow' fails, log an error message and exit the function early to prevent further execution and to notify the user of the failure.  Importance: high  Code Suggestion:

generate_flow_chart_for_system() {
  code2flow "$@"
  if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
    echo "Failed to generate flow chart with code2flow"
    exit 1
  fi
}

# Example usage of the function
generate_flow_chart_for_system ./source_code

file: Colab-TextGen-GPU.ipynb

Security Analysis feedback:

Line Number:  62-134 line  Issue: The code executes a series of shell commands to clone a repository, change directories, and install requirements without any form of validation or sanitization. This introduces a significant security risk, particularly command injection, where an attacker could inject malicious commands to be executed on the host system.
 Fix: Validate and sanitize all inputs that are part of command execution. Consider using more secure alternatives to execute system commands, such as directly using language-specific libraries or APIs that abstract the system's command execution with built-in security checks.  Importance: high  Code Suggestion:

+# Secure command execution example
+import subprocess
+
+def validate_input(user_input):
+    # Implement validation logic
+    return True
+
+def secure_clone(repo_url):
+    if validate_input(repo_url):
+        subprocess.run(['git', 'clone', repo_url], check=True)
+
+secure_clone('https://github.com/safe/repo.git')

Optimization Analysis feedback:

Line Number:  62-134 line  Issue: The code block for launching the web UI performs several operations that could be optimized for better efficiency and maintainability. These operations include checking the current working directory, cloning a repository, installing dependencies conditionally based on CUDA version, and executing a Python script with various flags. Additionally, the code block contains a mix of shell commands and Python code, which could be streamlined for clarity.
 Fix: Refactor the code block to separate concerns more clearly, possibly by moving some of the logic into separate scripts or functions. For instance, dependency installation based on CUDA version could be encapsulated in a Python script that is called from the notebook. This would make the notebook code more focused on its primary purpose and easier to maintain. Additionally, consider using environment variables or configuration files for parameters like model URLs and branch names to make them easier to update and reuse.  Importance: high  Code Suggestion:

+# Refactored code block for launching the web UI with improved efficiency
+import os
+from pathlib import Path
+
+if Path.cwd().name != 'text-generation-webui':
+    print("Installing the webui...")
+    os.system('git clone https://github.com/oobabooga/text-generation-webui')
+    os.chdir('text-generation-webui')
+
+# Example of handling dependencies based on CUDA version in a Python script
+def install_dependencies(cuda_version):
+    # Logic to determine and install dependencies based on CUDA version
+    pass
+
+cuda_version = detect_cuda_version()  # Implement this function based on your requirements
+install_dependencies(cuda_version)

Scalability Analysis feedback:

Line Number:  67-134 line  Issue: The script clones a specific GitHub repository and installs dependencies based on the CUDA version detected. This approach is not scalable for multiple reasons: hard-coded repository URLs, dependency on specific CUDA versions, and potential conflicts with already installed packages.
 Fix: Refactor the script to dynamically determine the necessary dependencies based on the environment it's running in. Use environment variables or configuration files for repository URLs and dependency versions. Consider using a containerized approach with Docker or similar technologies to ensure consistency and scalability across different environments.  Importance: high  Code Suggestion:

+# Refactored script for dynamic dependency determination and containerized approach
+import os
+
+repository_url = os.getenv('REPO_URL', 'default_repo_url')
+dependency_version = os.getenv('DEP_VERSION', 'default_version')
+
+# Example of using Docker for a containerized approach
+# This is a simplified example. Adapt it based on your specific requirements.
+docker run -e REPO_URL=$repository_url -e DEP_VERSION=$dependency_version my_docker_image

Performance Analysis feedback:

Line Number:  67-133 line  Issue: The script clones a large repository and installs multiple dependencies without checking for existing installations or utilizing environment isolation (e.g., Python virtual environments). This approach can lead to version conflicts and extended setup times, especially when running in environments like Google Colab where the runtime environment is ephemeral.
 Fix: Implement checks to see if required dependencies are already installed before attempting to install them again. Use Python virtual environments to isolate dependencies and ensure compatibility. This can be achieved by adding a few lines of code to check for the existence of dependencies and to set up a virtual environment if needed.  Importance: high  Code Suggestion:

+# Implementing checks for existing installations and using Python virtual environments
+import subprocess
+import sys
+from venv import create
+
+def check_installed(package_name):
+    reqs = subprocess.check_output([sys.executable, '-m', 'pip', 'freeze'])
+    installed_packages = [r.decode().split('==')[0] for r in reqs.split()]
+    return package_name in installed_packages
+
+if not check_installed('some_package'):
+    subprocess.check_call([sys.executable, '-m', 'pip', 'install', 'some_package'])
+
+# Example of setting up a virtual environment
+create('env', with_pip=True)
+subprocess.call(['env/bin/pip', 'install', '-r', 'requirements.txt'])

file: documentation/create_overview_doc/AI_Prompts/fix_mermaid_syntax_prompt.txt

Security Analysis feedback:

Line Number:  0 line  Issue: Removal of the Mermaid syntax cheat sheet and related documentation may reduce the usability and security understanding for developers who rely on this documentation to ensure their Mermaid diagrams are created securely and correctly.
 Fix: Reinstate the removed Mermaid syntax cheat sheet or provide updated documentation that addresses secure and correct usage of Mermaid diagrams, especially focusing on avoiding script injections in diagrams.  Importance: medium  Code Suggestion:

Reinstate the removed Mermaid syntax cheat sheet or provide updated documentation that addresses secure and correct usage of Mermaid diagrams, especially focusing on avoiding script injections in diagrams.

/review

<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
Code Review Agent Run Status

AI Based Review: Successful

Code Review Overview

Summary: This code review assesses a set of changes aimed at transitioning a documentation generation tool from using Mermaid.js to Code2Flow for flowchart generation. The changes involve updating scripts, README documentation, and adding support for additional programming languages with Code2Flow. The refactor enhances the tool's ability to generate more detailed and clearer visual representations of code architecture, improving functionality and user experience. The review identifies areas for improvement in code quality, maintainability, and best practices adherence.
Code change type: Refactoring, Feature Addition, Documentation, Configuration Changes
Unit tests added: False
Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 2. The changes are well-organized and focused on a specific functionality improvement, making the review process straightforward.

 >>See detailed code suggestions<< The Bito AI Code Review Agent successfully reviewed 3 files and discovered 13 issues. Please review these issues along with suggested fixes in the Changed Files.
<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
High-level Feedback
The transition from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow represents a significant improvement in the tool's capabilities. However, there are opportunities to enhance the code quality, maintainability, and documentation clarity. Ensuring consistency in code comments, improving error handling, and providing more comprehensive documentation on new dependencies and their configurations would benefit the project's long-term success.

<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
Code Review Agent Run Status

AI Based Review: Successful

Code Review Overview

Summary: The code review focuses on significant changes made to transition flowchart generation from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow in a documentation generation tool. These changes aim to enhance the visual representation of code architecture, improve the tool's functionality, and ensure a better user experience. Additionally, the review covers updates in the setup checks, README file adjustments, and the introduction of new dependencies and scripts adjustments to align with the Code2Flow integration.
Code change type: Refactoring, Feature Addition, Configuration Changes, Documentation
Unit tests added: False
Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 2. The changes are well-structured and focused on integrating Code2Flow, making it relatively straightforward to review. However, the absence of unit tests requires careful manual validation to ensure the new functionality works as expected.

 >>See detailed code suggestions<< The Bito AI Code Review Agent successfully reviewed 3 files and discovered 15 issues. Please review these issues along with suggested fixes in the Changed Files.
<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
High-level Feedback
General feedback for improvement focuses on enhancing documentation clarity, ensuring code maintainability, and the importance of adding unit tests for new features to ensure reliability and ease future updates. Transitioning to Code2Flow is a significant step forward, but it's crucial to maintain clear, updated documentation and ensure that all dependencies are properly managed to prevent integration issues.

/review

<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
Code Review Agent Run Status

AI Based Review: Successful

Code Review Overview

Summary: The PR encompasses a significant refactor of the documentation generation tool, shifting from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow for flowchart generation. This transition aims to enhance the visual representation of code architecture, making it more detailed and clearer. The changes include updates to script functionalities, README adjustments to reflect the new tool, and the addition of checks for Code2Flow and Graphviz dependencies. This refactor not only improves the tool's capabilities but also aligns the documentation process with modern standards.
Code change type: Refactoring, Configuration Changes, Documentation
Unit tests added: False
Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 2. The changes are well-structured and documented, making the review process straightforward. However, the transition to a new tool requires careful consideration of dependency management and integration with existing systems.

 >>See detailed code suggestions<< The Bito AI Code Review Agent successfully reviewed 3 files and discovered 8 issues. Please review these issues along with suggested fixes in the Changed Files.
<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->

High-level Feedback:

The transition from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow is a significant improvement in the documentation generation tool, offering more advanced and flexible flowchart generation capabilities.
The inclusion of checks for Code2Flow and Graphviz dependencies ensures that all necessary tools are in place before the documentation process begins, enhancing the tool's reliability.
Refactoring the README to reflect the new flowchart generation tool and removing references to Mermaid.js help maintain the documentation's accuracy and relevance.
The modifications to the script functionalities to accommodate Code2Flow's features demonstrate a thoughtful approach to integrating the new tool while maintaining the existing functionality.
The introduction of new flags for Code2Flow configuration allows for customization and optimization of the flowchart generation process, catering to different project needs.

<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
Code Review Agent Run Status

AI Based Review: Successful

Code Review Overview

Summary: The PR encompasses a significant transition in the documentation generation tool, moving from Mermaid to Code2Flow for flowchart generation. This shift not only modernizes the tool but also introduces new capabilities and enhancements geared towards generating more detailed and clearer visual representations of code architecture. The changes are well-structured, covering tool checks, README updates, and script adjustments to accommodate the new flowchart generation methodology.
Code change type: Configuration Changes, Documentation, Feature Addition
Unit tests added: False
Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 2. The PR is well-documented and structured, making it easier to review. The changes are straightforward and mainly involve updating configurations and documentation to support the new flowchart tool.

 >>See detailed code suggestions<< The Bito AI Code Review Agent successfully reviewed 4 files and discovered 9 issues. Please review these issues along with suggested fixes in the Changed Files.
<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
High-level Feedback
The transition to Code2Flow is a positive move, enhancing the documentation tool's capabilities. However, it's crucial to ensure that the new tool integrates seamlessly with the existing codebase and that the documentation clearly guides users through the transition. Additionally, considering the scope of changes, it would be beneficial to include unit tests or integration tests to verify the functionality and stability of the new features.

<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
Code Review Agent Run Status

AI Based Review: Successful

Code Review Overview

Summary: The PR encompasses a transition from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow for flowchart generation in the High-Level Documentation Generator. This change introduces enhanced flowchart generation capabilities, including additional Code2Flow options for improved detail and clarity, as well as updates to tool and file checks to ensure the necessary dependencies are in place. The README has been refactored to reflect these updates, removing references to Mermaid.js and highlighting the new features and requirements associated with Code2Flow.
Code change type: Refactoring, Configuration Changes, Documentation
Unit tests added: False
Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 2. The changes are well-documented and straightforward, focusing on tooling and documentation updates.

 >>See detailed code suggestions<< The Bito AI Code Review Agent successfully reviewed 2 files and discovered 8 issues. Please review these issues along with suggested fixes in the Changed Files.
<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
High-level Feedback
General feedback for improvement includes ensuring comprehensive testing of new tool integrations, clear and detailed documentation for users transitioning from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow, and validation of the new flowchart generation process in various environments to catch any potential issues early.

/review

<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
Code Review Agent Run Status

AI Based Review: Successful

Code Review Overview

Summary: The PR introduces a significant transition in the documentation generation process from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow for flowchart generation. This change aims to enhance the clarity and detail of visual representations of code architecture within the project's documentation. The PR covers updates to the documentation script, README adjustments to reflect the new tooling, and removal of Mermaid.js references and syntax guides. The transition to Code2Flow is expected to provide a more detailed and scalable approach to generating flowcharts, improving the overall documentation quality and maintainability.
Code change type: Configuration Changes, Feature Addition, Documentation
Unit tests added: False
Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 2. The changes are well-documented and straightforward, focusing on tool migration and documentation updates. The effort is mainly in validating the new flowchart generation process and ensuring compatibility with existing documentation standards.

 >>See detailed code suggestions<< The Bito AI Code Review Agent successfully reviewed 4 files and discovered 13 issues. Please review these issues along with suggested fixes in the Changed Files.
<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
High-level Feedback
The transition to Code2Flow for flowchart generation represents a positive step towards enhancing the project's documentation quality. This move addresses the need for more detailed and scalable visual representations of code architecture. However, it's crucial to ensure that the new tool integrates seamlessly with the project's existing documentation processes and that the project's contributors are well-informed about the change to mitigate any potential disruptions. Additionally, considering the removal of Mermaid.js, it's important to verify that all dependencies and references are updated accordingly to avoid any broken functionalities or documentation gaps.

Code Review Agent Run Status

Limitations and other issues: Failure - We encountered technical difficulties while attempting to generate code feedback. Please try again or contact<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

Code Review Agent Run Status

Limitations and other issues: Failure - We encountered technical difficulties while attempting to generate code feedback. Please try again or contact<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

/review

<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
Code Review Agent Run Status

AI Based Review: Successful

Code Review Overview

Summary: This review covers a series of significant changes aimed at enhancing the documentation generation tool by transitioning from Mermaid to Code2Flow for flowchart generation. The updates include integration of Code2Flow for advanced flowchart capabilities, addition of checks for Code2Flow and Graphviz tools, and updates to the README to reflect these changes. The transition is intended to provide more detailed and clearer visual representations of code architecture, improving the tool's overall functionality and user experience.
Code change type: Feature Addition, Configuration Changes, Documentation
Unit tests added: False
Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 2, due to well-organized and clearly documented changes, though the scope of changes is broad, covering multiple aspects of the project.

 >>See detailed code suggestions<< The Bito AI Code Review Agent successfully reviewed 3 files and discovered 15 issues. Please review these issues along with suggested fixes in the Changed Files.
<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
High-level Feedback
The transition from Mermaid to Code2Flow introduces advanced capabilities for flowchart generation, enhancing the tool's functionality. The updates are well-documented, and the inclusion of checks for necessary tools like Code2Flow and Graphviz ensures the tool's reliability. However, the absence of unit tests for these new features is a notable gap. Incorporating tests would help ensure the robustness of these changes and facilitate future maintenance.

<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
Code Review Agent Run Status

AI Based Review: Successful

Code Review Overview

Summary: This review assesses the transition from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow for flowchart generation in documentation tools. The changes aim to enhance visual representations and improve the tool's functionality by leveraging Code2Flow's capabilities and integrating additional checks for tool dependencies. The refactor includes modifications to the README, script adjustments for better error handling, and the incorporation of Code2Flow for flowchart generation, reflecting a significant shift towards a more detailed and optimized documentation process.
Code change type: Refactoring, Feature Addition, Configuration Changes, Performance Improvement
Unit tests added: False
Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 2. The PR involves multiple files with significant changes focusing on integrating a new tool and enhancing the documentation process. The effort is moderate due to the need to understand the context and the impact of the changes on the tool's functionality.

 >>See detailed code suggestions<< The Bito AI Code Review Agent successfully reviewed 1 file and discovered 3 issues. Please review these issues along with suggested fixes in the Changed Files.
<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
High-level Feedback

General feedback for improvement:

The transition to Code2Flow is well executed with clear updates in documentation and code. However, the absence of unit tests or validation checks for the newly integrated features may pose risks. Incorporating tests to validate the integration and functionality of Code2Flow within the tool could enhance reliability and maintainability.
Consideration of backward compatibility or migration path for existing users relying on Mermaid.js would be beneficial. Providing guidelines or scripts for users to transition smoothly without disrupting their current workflow can improve user experience.
While the refactor improves the tool's capabilities, further documentation on extending support for additional languages with Code2Flow or detailing the process for contributing to language support can foster community contributions and extend the tool's applicability.

<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
Code Review Agent Run Status

AI Based Review: Successful

Code Review Overview

Summary: This code review assesses a significant refactor in the documentation generation process for a software project. The changes transition the flowchart generation from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow, aiming to enhance the clarity and detail of visual representations in the documentation. The PR includes updates to the core script, adjustments in the documentation to reflect this change, and modifications to ensure all necessary tools are checked and validated. The transition to Code2Flow is complemented by additional command-line options for improved flowchart customization and integration checks for Code2Flow and Graphviz, ensuring a smooth setup process for users.
Code change type: Refactoring, Configuration Changes, Documentation
Unit tests added: False
Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 2, due to the clear structure of the changes and the detailed context provided which facilitates a thorough and efficient review process.

 >>See detailed code suggestions<< The Bito AI Code Review Agent successfully reviewed 1 file and discovered 2 issues. Please review these issues along with suggested fixes in the Changed Files.
<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
High-level Feedback
The transition to Code2Flow for flowchart generation in documentation represents a significant improvement in visual clarity and detail. The PR effectively incorporates Code2Flow into the existing documentation generation pipeline, ensuring backward compatibility and enhancing future maintainability. However, there are areas where further improvements could be made, particularly in error handling, code modularity, and testing.

<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
Code Review Agent Run Status

AI Based Review: Successful

Code Review Overview

Summary: The PR focuses on transitioning the High-Level Documentation Generator's flowchart generation from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow. This shift aims to enhance the tool's ability to produce more detailed and clearer visual representations of code architecture, thereby improving functionality and user experience. The PR comprises updates to the script for Code2Flow integration, additional Code2Flow options, checks for Code2Flow and Graphviz, and README adjustments to reflect these changes.
Code change type: Refactoring, Configuration Changes, Documentation
Unit tests added: False
Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 2, due to the clear documentation and structured changes, reviewing is straightforward but requires attention to detail in configuration and integration changes.

 >>See detailed code suggestions<< The Bito AI Code Review Agent successfully reviewed 2 files and discovered 4 issues. Please review these issues along with suggested fixes in the Changed Files.
<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
High-level Feedback
The transition from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow is a significant enhancement for the High-Level Documentation Generator. The addition of Code2Flow options and checks for necessary tools (Code2Flow and Graphviz) before script execution are practical improvements. However, it's crucial to ensure that the integration does not compromise the tool's usability and that the documentation accurately guides new and existing users through the transition.

Code Review Agent Run Status

Limitations and other issues: Failure - We encountered technical difficulties while attempting to generate code feedback. Please try again or contact<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
Code Review Agent Run Status

AI Based Review: Successful

Code Review Overview

Summary: This code review analyzes a significant refactor in the documentation generation process, transitioning from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow for flowchart generation. The changes aim to enhance the tool's capabilities, providing more detailed and clearer visual representations of code architecture. The PR includes updates to scripts, README adjustments, and the introduction of new dependencies and checks to ensure the successful execution of the updated documentation generation tool.
Code change type: Refactoring, Configuration Changes, Documentation, Performance Improvement
Unit tests added: False
Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 2. The PR involves multiple files and conceptual changes requiring a thorough review to ensure quality and maintainability.

 >>See detailed code suggestions<< The Bito AI Code Review Agent successfully reviewed 2 files and discovered 11 issues. Please review these issues along with suggested fixes in the Changed Files.
<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
High-level Feedback
General feedback for improvement includes ensuring consistency in documentation and comments, verifying the integration of new dependencies, and enhancing error handling and user feedback mechanisms. The transition to Code2Flow appears well-executed with careful consideration of necessary configurations and system requirements. However, adding unit tests to validate the new flowchart generation process and its integration with the existing codebase would significantly improve reliability and ease future maintenance efforts.

<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
Code Review Agent Run Status

AI Based Review: Successful

Code Review Overview

Summary: The PR introduces a significant shift in the methodology for generating flowcharts within the documentation generator tool, transitioning from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow. This change aims to enhance the clarity and detail of generated flowcharts, improving the tool's overall functionality. Additionally, the PR includes updates to the tool's setup checks and documentation to reflect the new flowchart generation tool, alongside optimizations for flowchart detail and clarity.
Code change type: Refactoring, Configuration Changes, Documentation
Unit tests added: False
Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 2, due to the comprehensive nature of the changes and the need to ensure that the transition to Code2Flow does not negatively impact existing functionalities.

 >>See detailed code suggestions<< The Bito AI Code Review Agent successfully reviewed 2 files and discovered 8 issues. Please review these issues along with suggested fixes in the Changed Files.
<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
High-level Feedback
Overall, the transition from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow for flowchart generation within the documentation tool is a positive enhancement. The added checks for Code2Flow and Graphviz dependencies, alongside the updated README to reflect these changes, ensure users are well-informed about the tool's requirements. However, the lack of unit tests for verifying the integration and functionality of Code2Flow within the tool is a notable omission. Including such tests would significantly improve confidence in the reliability and stability of the new features.

<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
Code Review Agent Run Status

AI Based Review: Successful

Code Review Overview

Summary: This code review assesses a significant refactor in the documentation generation process, transitioning from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow for flowchart visualization. The changes aim to enhance the clarity and detail of flowcharts, ensuring better integration with the existing documentation tool. Additional improvements include checks for necessary tools and updates to the README to reflect the new flowchart generation method. This transition not only modernizes the tool but also addresses scalability and maintainability by leveraging Code2Flow's advanced features.
Code change type: Refactoring, Configuration Changes, Documentation
Unit tests added: False
Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 2, due to the clear structuring of changes and the straightforward nature of the refactor. The documentation and configuration updates are well-detailed, making it easier to understand the impact of the changes.

 >>See detailed code suggestions<< The Bito AI Code Review Agent successfully reviewed 2 files and discovered 1 issue. Please review these issues along with suggested fixes in the Changed Files.
<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
High-level Feedback
Overall, the transition from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow for flowchart generation is a positive change that enhances the tool's functionality and user experience. The PR is well-organized, and the changes are clearly documented. However, there are opportunities to further improve code quality and ensure consistency across the documentation.

<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
Code Review Agent Run Status

AI Based Review: Successful

Code Review Overview

Summary: The PR introduces a significant shift in the documentation generation process by replacing Mermaid.js with Code2Flow for flowchart generation. This transition aims to enhance the tool's functionality by utilizing Code2Flow's advanced features for creating more detailed and clearer flowcharts. The PR also updates the README and script files to reflect these changes, ensuring users are well-informed about the new tool requirements and capabilities.
Code change type: Refactoring, Configuration Changes, Documentation
Unit tests added: False
Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 2, due to the comprehensive nature of the changes and the need to ensure that the transition to Code2Flow does not introduce any regressions or compatibility issues with existing documentation.

 >>See detailed code suggestions<< The Bito AI Code Review Agent successfully reviewed 3 files and discovered 10 issues. Please review these issues along with suggested fixes in the Changed Files.
<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
High-level Feedback
The transition from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow is a significant improvement in the documentation generation process. The use of Code2Flow's advanced features for flowchart generation can potentially offer more detailed and clearer visual representations. However, it is crucial to ensure that this transition is seamless for users and that all dependencies are properly documented and easy to install. Additionally, maintaining code quality and ensuring compatibility with existing systems are essential for a smooth transition.

<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
Code Review Agent Run Status

AI Based Review: Successful

Code Review Overview

Summary: This review focuses on the transition from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow for flowchart generation within a documentation generation tool. The changes aim to enhance the clarity and detail of flowcharts, improve tool setup checks, and update documentation to reflect new tooling and capabilities. These modifications promise to significantly improve the tool's functionality and user experience by leveraging Code2Flow's advanced features.
Code change type: Refactoring, Configuration Changes, Documentation, Performance Improvement
Unit tests added: False
Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 2, due to the clear structure of the changes and the focused nature of the improvements, making it easier to assess the impact and effectiveness of the updates.

 >>See detailed code suggestions<< The Bito AI Code Review Agent successfully reviewed 1 file and discovered 7 issues. Please review these issues along with suggested fixes in the Changed Files.
<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
High-level Feedback
The transition from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow in the High-Level Documentation Generator tool represents a significant enhancement in flowchart generation capabilities. The addition of detailed setup checks and updated documentation further strengthens the tool's reliability and usability. However, the inclusion of unit tests to validate these changes and ensure backward compatibility would enhance the robustness of the updates. Additionally, considering the potential for further optimization in the integration process and documentation clarity could yield even greater benefits.

<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
Code Review Agent Run Status

AI Based Review: Successful

Code Review Overview

Summary: This PR introduces a significant shift in the flowchart generation methodology for high-level documentation from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow. It enhances the tool's capabilities by providing more detailed and clearer visual representations of code architecture. Additionally, it updates the README to reflect these changes and ensures that all necessary tools and files are checked for before documentation generation begins.
Code change type: Refactoring, Configuration Changes, Documentation, Performance Improvement
Unit tests added: False
Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 2. The changes are well-structured and impact several key components of the documentation generation tool. The effort to review is moderate due to the need to understand the implications of switching to Code2Flow and ensuring compatibility with existing functionalities.

 >>See detailed code suggestions<< The Bito AI Code Review Agent successfully reviewed 1 file and discovered 1 issue. Please review these issues along with suggested fixes in the Changed Files.
<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
High-level Feedback
The transition from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow for flowchart generation is a commendable effort to enhance the documentation tool's capabilities. This change not only promises more detailed visual representations but also introduces a more robust setup for checking prerequisites. However, it's crucial to ensure that the transition does not introduce regressions in functionality or performance. Additionally, adapting the documentation and examples to reflect this new methodology will be vital for end-users. Overall, this PR represents a positive step forward in improving the tool's utility and user experience.

<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
Code Review Agent Run Status

AI Based Review: Successful

Code Review Overview

Summary: The PR encompasses a significant shift in the documentation generation tool's flowchart technology, transitioning from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow. This change aims to enhance the visual clarity and detail of flowcharts, improving the tool's overall functionality and user experience. The PR also includes updates to the README and script files to align with the new flowchart generation method and ensure all necessary dependencies are checked and validated. The addition of Code2Flow introduces a more advanced and flexible option for generating detailed flowcharts, marking a pivotal enhancement in the tool's capabilities.
Code change type: Refactoring, Configuration Changes, Documentation
Unit tests added: False
Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 2, given the clear documentation and structured changes, the review process is straightforward but requires attention to detail due to the integration of a new flowchart tool and its dependencies.

 >>See detailed code suggestions<< The Bito AI Code Review Agent successfully reviewed 1 file and discovered 1 issue. Please review these issues along with suggested fixes in the Changed Files.
<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
High-level Feedback
The transition from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow in the documentation generation tool represents a significant improvement in the tool's ability to generate more detailed and clearer flowcharts. The PR effectively addresses the need for a more advanced flowchart generation method and demonstrates a thorough approach by updating the README, script files, and ensuring compatibility with the new method. However, the absence of unit tests for the new features and changes introduces a potential risk for future maintenance and scalability. Incorporating tests could enhance the reliability and robustness of the tool, ensuring that future updates do not inadvertently break existing functionality.

<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
Code Review Agent Run Status

AI Based Review: Successful

Code Review Overview

Summary: The PR focuses on transitioning the documentation generation tool from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow for flowchart visualization. It involves updating scripts for better integration with Code2Flow, enhancing the tool's setup checks, and revising the README to reflect new dependencies and usage instructions. These changes aim to leverage Code2Flow's advanced capabilities for generating more detailed and clearer visual representations of code architecture, thus improving the tool's overall functionality and user experience.
Code change type: Configuration Changes, Documentation, Performance Improvement
Unit tests added: False
Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 2, considering the need to validate integration and configuration changes, and the absence of unit tests which requires manual validation of the changes.

 >>See detailed code suggestions<< The Bito AI Code Review Agent successfully reviewed 7 files and discovered 2 issues. Please review these issues along with suggested fixes in the Changed Files.
<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
High-level Feedback
General feedback for improvement includes ensuring that all new dependencies are clearly documented and easily installable, verifying the integration of Code2Flow with the existing codebase, and potentially adding automated tests to cover the new functionality. The transition to Code2Flow is a significant improvement in the tool's capabilities, but careful attention to detail is necessary to ensure a smooth user experience and to leverage the full potential of Code2Flow.

<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
Code Review Agent Run Status

AI Based Review: Successful

Code Review Overview

Summary: This code review assesses the transition from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow for flowchart generation in a documentation tool. The changes involve updating script functionalities, enhancing flowchart generation capabilities, and ensuring compatibility with Code2Flow. Additionally, the review covers updates to the README file to reflect the new tool usage and prerequisites, as well as modifications to the script for checking necessary tools and generating flowcharts.
Code change type: Feature Addition, Configuration Changes, Documentation
Unit tests added: False
Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 2, due to the detailed nature of the changes across multiple files and the need to ensure compatibility and functionality with the new flowchart generation tool.

 >>See detailed code suggestions<< The Bito AI Code Review Agent successfully reviewed 7 files and discovered 1 issue. Please review these issues along with suggested fixes in the Changed Files.
<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
High-level Feedback
The transition from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow for flowchart generation is a significant enhancement to the documentation tool. It introduces more advanced and flexible visualization capabilities, which can provide clearer and more detailed representations of code architecture. However, ensuring thorough testing and validation of the new integration is crucial to maintain the tool's reliability and effectiveness.

<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
Code Review Agent Run Status

AI Based Review: Successful

Code Review Overview

Summary: This review covers a significant refactor in the documentation generation process, transitioning from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow for flowchart visualization. The changes aim to enhance clarity and detail in the generated flowcharts, ensuring a more accurate representation of code architecture. The introduction of additional Code2Flow options and checks for tool availability before execution further solidifies the tool's reliability and user-friendliness. The PR also includes updates to the README to reflect these changes, ensuring users are well-informed about the new requirements and capabilities.
Code change type: Refactoring, Configuration Changes, Documentation, Performance Improvement
Unit tests added: False
Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 2, due to the well-structured changes and clear documentation, making the review process straightforward.

 >>See detailed code suggestions<< The Bito AI Code Review Agent successfully reviewed 7 files and discovered no issues.
<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
High-level Feedback
The transition from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow represents a significant improvement in the tool's ability to generate more detailed and clear visual representations of code architecture. The addition of checks for tool availability and the inclusion of detailed instructions in the README are commendable, ensuring a smooth user experience. However, the absence of unit tests for the new functionalities introduced poses a risk to stability and reliability. Incorporating automated tests would not only safeguard against potential regressions but also enhance trust in the tool's capabilities among users.

/review

<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
Code Review Agent Run Status

AI Based Review: Successful

Code Review Overview

Summary: This review assesses the transition of the High-Level Documentation Generator's flowchart generation from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow. The changes aim to leverage Code2Flow's advanced capabilities for generating detailed and clearer visual representations of code architecture. This transition involves updates to tooling checks, installation instructions, and the removal of Mermaid.js references, ensuring a seamless integration of Code2Flow into the existing documentation generation process.
Code change type: Configuration Changes, Feature Addition, Documentation
Unit tests added: False
Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 2, due to the well-structured changes and clear documentation adjustments, making the review process straightforward.

 >>See detailed code suggestions<< The Bito AI Code Review Agent successfully reviewed 7 files and discovered 1 issue. Please review these issues along with suggested fixes in the Changed Files.
<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
High-level Feedback
The transition from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow is well-executed with clear updates to the documentation, scripts, and checks for necessary tools. However, there are opportunities to enhance the documentation and error handling further. Including examples of generated flowcharts and addressing potential compatibility issues can provide users with a smoother transition experience. Additionally, expanding the automated testing to cover the integration of Code2Flow would ensure the reliability of this new feature.

<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
Code Review Agent Run Status

AI Based Review: Successful

Code Review Overview

Summary: The code review feedback highlights several key areas for improvement across performance, security, code structure, and optimization. Major concerns include the need for refactoring to adhere to the single responsibility principle, enhancing security measures to prevent potential vulnerabilities, optimizing performance to handle large-scale operations efficiently, and ensuring code maintainability and readability. There's a consistent call for more modular code design, better error handling, and secure coding practices.
Code change type: Refactoring, Security, Performance Improvement, Documentation
Unit tests added: False
Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 3

 >>See detailed code suggestions<< The Bito AI Code Review Agent successfully reviewed 7 files and discovered 15 issues. Please review these issues along with suggested fixes in the Changed Files.
<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
High-level Feedback
Focus on refactoring the code to improve modularity and readability, particularly by separating concerns within functions. Enhance security by removing hard-coded secrets, validating external inputs, and using secure coding practices. Optimize performance through more efficient command constructions and logging mechanisms. Ensure the addition of comprehensive documentation for new functions and changes to facilitate maintainability.

<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
Code Review Agent Run Status

AI Based Review: Successful

Code Review Overview

Summary: The feedback from various categories highlights significant concerns around security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, and the need for optimization across the codebase. Suggestions include encapsulating logic into separate scripts, implementing efficient memory and error handling mechanisms, and enhancing security through comprehensive validation and secure credential management. There's a recurring theme of improving the setup and execution efficiency, particularly by abstracting GPU version checks, optimizing tool checks, and refining retry logic for resilience.
Code change type: Security, Performance Improvement, Refactoring, Optimization
Unit tests added: False
Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 3

 >>See detailed code suggestions<< The Bito AI Code Review Agent successfully reviewed 7 files and discovered 15 issues. Please review these issues along with suggested fixes in the Changed Files.
<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
High-level Feedback
Focus on isolating execution environments and improving maintainability by separating concerns. Prioritize the implementation of memory-efficient data structures and algorithms to address performance issues. Enhance security by avoiding hard-coded credentials and implementing robust error handling and validation mechanisms. Consider the scalability of solutions, especially in handling large datasets or codebases. Streamline the setup process for new users and ensure that external tool integrations are secure and efficient.

<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
Code Review Agent Run Status

AI Based Review: Successful

Code Review Overview

Summary: The code review has identified critical security concerns related to the handling of external inputs in shell commands, highlighting the need for sanitization and validation to prevent command injection vulnerabilities. Recommendations span across improving security practices, enhancing code structure for safety, and ensuring performance does not suffer due to these changes. The feedback suggests a focused effort on security, code quality, and optimization to address these key areas.
Code change type: Security, Refactoring, Optimization
Unit tests added: False
Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 3

 >>See detailed code suggestions<< The Bito AI Code Review Agent successfully reviewed 7 files and discovered 1 issue. Please review these issues along with suggested fixes in the Changed Files.
<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
High-level Feedback
Ensure all external inputs are sanitized and validated before use in shell commands to mitigate security risks. Refactor the code to incorporate more secure methods of handling inputs, such as parameterized inputs or whitelisting, and consider optimizing the code structure for better performance and maintainability.

Code Review is in progress.

Code Review is in progress.

Code Review is in progress.

Code Review is in progress.

Code Review is in progress.

Code Review is in progress.

Code Review is in progress.

Code Review is in progress.

Code Review is in progress.

Code Review is in progress.

Code Review is in progress.

Code Review is in progress.

Code Review is in progress.

Code Review is in progress.

Code Review is in progress.

Code Review is in progress.

Code Review is in progress.

Code Review is in progress.

Code Review is in progress.

Code Review is in progress.

Code Review is in progress.

Code Review is in progress.

Code Review is in progress.

Code Review is in progress.

Code Review is in progress.

/review

<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
Code Review Agent Run Status

AI Based Review: Successful

Code Review Overview

Summary: This code review analyzes the transition from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow in a documentation generation tool. The changes enhance the tool's visualization capabilities, ensuring better clarity and detail in flowcharts. The review focuses on code modifications across various files, including script updates, README adjustments, and the removal of Mermaid-specific content. The goal is to ensure the integration is seamless, maintainable, and scalable.
Code change type: Refactoring, Configuration Changes, Documentation
Unit tests added: False
Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 2, due to the comprehensive nature of the changes across multiple files and the need to ensure compatibility and maintainability of the new flowchart generation tool.

 >>See detailed code suggestions<< The Bito AI Code Review Agent successfully reviewed 7 files and discovered 8 issues. Please review these issues along with suggested fixes in the Changed Files.
<-- SUBMIT FEEDBACK -->
High-level Feedback
Overall, the transition from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow in the documentation generation tool is well-executed. The changes are consistent across files, and the effort to enhance clarity and detail in the generated flowcharts is commendable. However, there are opportunities to improve code maintainability, reduce redundancy, and ensure that the new tool's integration is as seamless and scalable as possible.

Code Review is in progress.

AI Code Review is in progress (usually takes <10 minutes unless it's a very large PR).

AI Code Review is in progress (usually takes <10 minutes unless it's a very large PR).

AI Code Review is in progress (usually takes <10 minutes unless it's a very large PR).

AI Code Review is in progress (usually takes <10 minutes unless it's a very large PR).

AI Code Review is in progress (usually takes <10 minutes unless it's a very large PR).

AI Code Review is in progress (usually takes <10 minutes unless it's a very large PR).

AI Code Review is in progress (usually takes <10 minutes unless it's a very large PR).

Code Review Agent Run #automa

AI Based Review: ✔ Successful

Code Review Overview

Summary: This PR transitions the flowchart generation in the High-Level Documentation Generator from Mermaid.js to Code2Flow, enhancing detail and clarity with new tool integrations and updated documentation.
Files: 7
Issue found: Total - 3, High importance - 3      See detailed feedback ->
Code change type: Refactoring, Documentation, Configuration Changes
Unit tests added: False
Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 3

High-level Feedback
Consider implementing conditional logic and environment-based configurations to optimize performance and security. Validate and sanitize inputs for new flags in Code2Flow to prevent security risks. Ensure dependencies are up-to-date and consider lazy loading to enhance performance. Streamline configuration options to balance flexibility with performance, and manage unsupported languages gracefully to avoid process failures.

Detailed Feedback

:page_facing_up: documentation/create_overview_doc/README.md

Issues: Total- 1, High importance- 1

Line 32-32

🔴 High importance - 1

:page_facing_up: documentation/create_overview_doc/createdoc.sh

Issues: Total- 2, High importance- 2

Line 241-241

🔴 High importance - 1

Line 352-352

🔴 High importance - 1

AI Code Review powered by

Code Review Agent Run Status

Limitations and other issues: ❌ Failure - The AI Code Review Agent skipped reviewing this change because it is configured to exclude certain pull requests based on the source/target branch or the pull request status. You can change the settings here, or contact the agent instance creator at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

Code Review Agent Run Status

Limitations and other issues: ❌ Failure - The AI Code Review Agent skipped reviewing this change because it is configured to exclude certain pull requests based on the source/target branch or the pull request status. You can change the settings here, or contact the agent instance creator at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

Code Review Agent Run Status

Limitations and other issues: ❌ Failure - The AI Code Review Agent skipped reviewing this change because it is configured to exclude certain pull requests based on the source/target branch or the pull request status. You can change the settings here, or contact the agent instance creator at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

/review

Code Review Agent Run Status

Limitations and other issues: ❌ Failure - The AI Code Review Agent skipped reviewing this change because it is configured to exclude certain pull requests based on the source/target branch or the pull request status. You can change the settings here, or contact the agent instance creator at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

/review

Code Review Agent Run Status

Limitations and other issues: ❌ Failure - The AI Code Review Agent skipped reviewing this change because it is configured to exclude certain pull requests based on the source/target branch or the pull request status. You can change the settings here, or contact the agent instance creator at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

/review

Code Review Agent Run Status

Limitations and other issues: ❌ Failure - The AI Code Review Agent skipped reviewing this change because it is configured to exclude certain pull requests based on the source/target branch or the pull request status. You can change the settings here, or contact the agent instance creator at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

/review

Code Review Agent Run Status

Limitations and other issues: ❌ Failure - The AI Code Review Agent skipped reviewing this change because it is configured to exclude certain pull requests based on the source/target branch or the pull request status. You can change the settings here, or contact the agent instance creator at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>


Changed _create_new_example.py so that it works on my machine

Example change:
existing_examples = glob(f"{NOTEBOOKS_FOLDER}/*/")
to this:
existing_examples = glob(NOTEBOOKS_FOLDER+"/*/")

Thanks Hannes! This looks good to me.


Add room and time headers on timetable screen

Issue

close #378

Overview (Required)

Added Room horizontal axis header and Time vertical axis header to time table in grid view

Links

Screenshot (Optional if screenshot test is present or unrelated to UI)

Before
After

Movie (Optional)

@takahirom
Conflicts were corrected!
https://github.com/DroidKaigi/conference-app-2023/pull/985/commits/f13737e7997b8eda4bf640192e59c0683adb751e


DOCS-#0000: Update RunLLM Ask AI widget path

What do these changes do?
This PR to updates the widget's script path. RunLLM has switched to a new deployment framework which resolved multiple package delivery issues caused by jscdn caching. This improvement ensures RunLLM's askAI widget is more consistently up-to-date.

[x] first commit message and PR title follow format outlined here

NOTE:  If you edit the PR title to match this format, you need to add another commit (even if it's empty) or amend your last commit for the CI job that checks the PR title to pick up the new PR title.

[ ] passes flake8 modin/ asv_bench/benchmarks scripts/doc_checker.py
[ ] passes black --check modin/ asv_bench/benchmarks scripts/doc_checker.py
[ ] signed commit with git commit -s
[ ] Resolves #?
[ ] tests added and passing
[ ] module layout described at docs/development/architecture.rst is up-to-date

@likawind, could you correct the commit message to be in line with our rules for commits?

@YarShev thanks for updating the PR title.  Could you ping us when you do this?

@YarShev thank you! Updated the commit message, lmk if you have any other suggestions


I want to add no.of pr's,issues, stars and other in read me file.

I want to add no.of pr's, issues, stars and other in readme file.
Example:

I want to work on this . Please assign me this issue @avinashkranjan .

Sure Go Ahead @srisatya1197


CronJobs not updated after operator upgrade

It seems the CronJobs for a NetworkAssertion are fixed at NetworkAssertion creation time.
It would be ideal if an upgrade of operator or change of configmap resulted in updated CronJobs.
The use-case is where numerous checks are deployed, but a new netchecks image should be used.
It is currently necessary to remove and re-create all of the network assertions to pickup changes.
Best Regards

Should be addressed by the changes in #113 which is in release 0.5.3.


[Meta] Crash issues

The app crashes occasionally or frequently. I usually send these crash reports by e-mail. If I find any starting points to trace, I will open an issue here on GitHub.
This ticket is intended to provide an overview of all crashes.
Crash in sleep mode #440

Crash during download #448

Crash during background playback / bookmarking #449

Crash when searching the media library #455

First crash, then "my programs" empty #466


Update behavior of edit release vs edit pipeline

@N-Usha : Thanks for your contribution! The author, @alexhomer1, has been notified to review your proposed change.

Microsoft authors of articles need to make updates through the private repository so the updates can be staged and validated by the current validation rules. After you review staging and fix all validation issues, you can add the sign-off comment to let the PR reviewers know the updates are ready to be merged.It's easy to access the private repo version of your articles in GitHub. Just add -pr to the URL, as follows:
Public repo URL: https://github.com/Microsoft/azure-docs/blob/master/articles/azure-portal-overview.md
Private repo URL: https://github.com/Microsoft/azure-docs-pr/blob/master/articles/azure-portal-overview.md
We have closed this pull request. Please resubmit the updates through the private repo. If you need perms to the private repo, see the contributor guide instructions


Re-Organize file format

Using this format: https://github.com/fullstack-hy2020/create-app
Task should be started shortly after we do the add-event-form merge, but you can start to familiarize yourself with the formatting required.

Tasks related for this issue can be found here #77.
This issue only entail:

Creating a server folder and move anything backend related into said folder.

All of the tasks for re-organizing file structure can be found in issue #77.
Task related to this issue:
* Creating a server folder and move anything backend related into said folder.

@Caleb-Cohen Hope you are alright with this and approve of the spliting all of the main re-organizing task into separate issue and PR so that it will be easier to manage.

I've got PR https://github.com/Caleb-Cohen/Together/pull/85. We need to assess the build folder location because we are server-side rendering.


Improve project statistics click feature

Summary of changes
Merging a story branch, see commits.

Rebased in https://github.com/opossum-tool/OpossumUI/pull/2116


[1.20.1] Slabs placed by others players are always vertical

Slabs placed by other players will render to everyone but then as vertical facing north.
My POV:

Their POV:

Further investigation reveals that the world host perceives the slabs they place as vertical, but they see the blocks they place correctly. Any slabs I place are vertical for them, but right for me. We use Essential to play with each other, not sure if that could be part of the issue. It even happens with slabs added before the mod was added.


Downgrade Rails to 6.0.0

Context
We found a bug where:
RecruitmentCycle.current.providers.find_by(provider_code: '1JW')
  .courses.includes(:enrichments, :subjects, :sites, site_statuses: :site, provider: %i[sites])
  .find_by(course_code: '2GYH').syncable?

returns false, versus:
RecruitmentCycle.current.providers.find_by(provider_code: '1JW')
  .courses.find_by(course_code: '2GYH').syncable?

returns true. This is because the includes version above doesn't pass
validations for reasons as-to-yet unknown.
Changes proposed in this pull request
Downgrade Rails to 6.0.0
Guidance to review
:eyes:
Checklist

[ ] Make sure all information from the Trello card is in here
[ ] Attach to Trello card
[ ] Rebased master
[ ] Cleaned commit history
[ ] Tested by running locally

 10% of courses missing


How to install iperf on vsrx

Hi,
I have installed vsrx on Ubuntu 16.04. And now for throughput testing I need to install iperf on vsrx!
Could you please tell me how can I install iperf on vsrx?

this is invalid place to ask such question. and I don't how to do it and where it can be asked...


VNC recording should not depend on vnc2flv being installed on the host machine

Should use a container instead.

Resolved with #11


Adjust DB Connection variables over time

We should revisit these variables every so often to make sure they meet the requirements:
https://github.com/cds-snc/covid-shield-server/blob/master/pkg/persistence/db.go#L66-L68
maxConnLifetime = 5 * time.Minute
maxOpenConns    = 100
maxIdleConns    = 10

This was a TODO recommendation from codebase.

These look good - we have proper alerts and will investigate if they trigger.


Update to 1.21 Please

done

Thanks 😊

@CharlieMcLarty what about 1.21.4?

Updated! Let me know if you have any issues


Mobile - landing - advanced content section

Acceptance criteria

Cards should be stacked vertically, 32px apart
No adjustments to typography or any other padding or margin need to be made as this will be done globally

Links
https://www.figma.com/file/qqfeYAh6Z7QdyJXsQjIUfh/Stampy?type=design&node-id=1330%3A4335&mode=dev&t=3JymhbySjY5M4k8L-1

update: melissa check pr

@mruwnik here is my QA, there are some visual things still a bit off
https://www.figma.com/file/qqfeYAh6Z7QdyJXsQjIUfh/Stampy?type=design&node-id=3013%3A8456&mode=dev&t=SNAwBbvUbwhNOBsL-1

We just need to wait and see what it looks like once it's filled in


Global shortcut register 'super+space' on Windows returns false

I'm trying to make an app where the main window pops up by hitting window_key+space, but registering that key combination with global shortcuts returns false.
Here is a sample app gist reproducing the error
https://gist.github.com/jbasinger/6f09d502f813e3d7fb0b

Global shortcuts can only work when the shortcut has not been taken by other applications, in your case Super + Space is a reserved shortcut by Windows, so there is no way for other app to register it.