patch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.

+1 :green_heart:
hadoopcheck
5m 15s
Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 2.8.5 2.9.2.

-1 :x:
javadoc
0m  7s
root in the patch failed with JDK v1.8.0_252.

+1 :green_heart:
javadoc
4m 19s
the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_262

+0 :ok:
findbugs
0m 11s
hbase-resource-bundle has no data from findbugs

-1 :x:
findbugs
0m  7s
hbase-tinylfu-blockcache in the patch failed.

_ Other Tests _

-1 :x:
unit
168m 10s
root in the patch failed.

+1 :green_heart:
asflicense
0m 30s
The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.

285m  0s

Reason
Tests

XML
Parsing Error(s):

hbase-common/src/main/resources/hbase-default.xml

hbase-it/pom.xml

hbase-resource-bundle/src/main/resources/supplemental-models.xml

hbase-tinylfu-blockcache/pom.xml

pom.xml

Failed junit tests
hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestLoadIncrementalHFilesUseSecurityEndPoint

Subsystem
Report/Notes

Docker
Client=19.03.11 Server=19.03.11 base: https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/4/artifact/out/Dockerfile

GITHUB PR
https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/251

Optional Tests
dupname asflicense javac javadoc unit spotbugs findbugs shadedjars hadoopcheck hbaseanti checkstyle compile refguide xml

uname
Linux 7478d965f4d1 4.15.0-101-generic #102-Ubuntu SMP Mon May 11 10:07:26 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Build tool
maven

Personality
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR_PR-251/out/precommit/personality/provided.sh

git revision
branch-1 / f74d181

Default Java
1.7.0_262

Multi-JDK versions
/usr/lib/jvm/zulu-8-amd64:1.8.0_252 /usr/lib/jvm/zulu-7-amd64:1.7.0_262

refguide
https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/4/artifact/out/branch-site/book.html

compile
https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/4/artifact/out/patch-compile-root-jdk1.8.0_252.txt

javac
https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/4/artifact/out/patch-compile-root-jdk1.8.0_252.txt

xml
https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/4/artifact/out/xml.txt

refguide
https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/4/artifact/out/patch-site/book.html

javadoc
https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/4/artifact/out/patch-javadoc-root-jdk1.8.0_252.txt

findbugs
https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/4/artifact/out/patch-findbugs-hbase-tinylfu-blockcache.txt

unit
https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/4/artifact/out/patch-unit-root.txt

Test Results
https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/4/testReport/

Max. process+thread count
4994 (vs. ulimit of 10000)

modules
C: hbase-resource-bundle hbase-common hbase-server hbase-it . hbase-tinylfu-blockcache U: .

Console output
https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/4/console

versions
git=1.9.1 maven=3.0.5 findbugs=3.0.1

Powered by
Apache Yetus 0.11.1 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@apurtell  close?

:broken_heart: -1 overall

Vote
Subsystem
Runtime
Comment

+0 :ok:
reexec
11m 42s
Docker mode activated.

_ Prechecks _

+1 :green_heart:
dupname
0m  1s
No case conflicting files found.

-1 :x:
hbaseanti
0m  0s
The patch appears use Hadoop classification instead of HBase.

+1 :green_heart:
@author
0m  0s
The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 :green_heart:
test4tests
0m  0s
The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test files.

_ branch-1 Compile Tests _

+0 :ok:
mvndep
2m 48s
Maven dependency ordering for branch

+1 :green_heart:
mvninstall
8m 14s
branch-1 passed

+1 :green_heart:
compile
1m 50s
branch-1 passed with JDK v1.8.0_262

+1 :green_heart:
compile
1m 58s
branch-1 passed with JDK v1.7.0_272

+1 :green_heart:
checkstyle
8m 59s
branch-1 passed

+0 :ok:
refguide
4m 14s
branch has no errors when building the reference guide. See footer for rendered docs, which you should manually inspect.

+1 :green_heart:
shadedjars
3m 15s
branch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.

+1 :green_heart:
javadoc
3m 23s
branch-1 passed with JDK v1.8.0_262

+1 :green_heart:
javadoc
5m 37s
branch-1 passed with JDK v1.7.0_272

+0 :ok:
spotbugs
2m 55s
Used deprecated FindBugs config; considering switching to SpotBugs.

+0 :ok:
findbugs
0m 24s
branch/hbase-resource-bundle no findbugs output file (findbugsXml.xml)

_ Patch Compile Tests _

+0 :ok:
mvndep
0m 22s
Maven dependency ordering for patch

+1 :green_heart:
mvninstall
2m  6s
the patch passed

-1 :x:
compile
0m  8s
root in the patch failed with JDK v1.8.0_262.

-1 :x:
javac
0m  8s
root in the patch failed with JDK v1.8.0_262.

+1 :green_heart:
compile
1m 55s
the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_272

+1 :green_heart:
javac
1m 55s
the patch passed

+1 :green_heart:
checkstyle
5m 51s
root: The patch generated 0 new + 87 unchanged - 11 fixed = 87 total (was 98)

+1 :green_heart:
whitespace
0m  0s
The patch has no whitespace issues.

-1 :x:
xml
0m  1s
The patch has 5 ill-formed XML file(s).

+0 :ok:
refguide
3m 13s
patch has no errors when building the reference guide. See footer for rendered docs, which you should manually inspect.

+1 :green_heart:
shadedjars
3m  5s
patch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.

+1 :green_heart:
hadoopcheck
5m  3s
Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 2.8.5 2.9.2.

-1 :x:
javadoc
0m  8s
root in the patch failed with JDK v1.8.0_262.

+1 :green_heart:
javadoc
4m 12s
the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_272

+0 :ok:
findbugs
0m 13s
hbase-resource-bundle has no data from findbugs

-1 :x:
findbugs
0m  8s
hbase-tinylfu-blockcache in the patch failed.

_ Other Tests _

-1 :x:
unit
177m 25s
root in the patch failed.

+1 :green_heart:
asflicense
0m 29s
The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.

293m 31s

Reason
Tests

XML
Parsing Error(s):

hbase-common/src/main/resources/hbase-default.xml

hbase-it/pom.xml

hbase-resource-bundle/src/main/resources/supplemental-models.xml

hbase-tinylfu-blockcache/pom.xml

pom.xml

Failed junit tests
hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestTableSnapshotInputFormat

hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestLoadIncrementalHFilesUseSecurityEndPoint

hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestSecureLoadIncrementalHFiles

hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestLoadIncrementalHFiles

Subsystem
Report/Notes

Docker
Client=19.03.13 Server=19.03.13 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/4/artifact/out/Dockerfile

GITHUB PR
https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/251

Optional Tests
dupname asflicense javac javadoc unit spotbugs findbugs shadedjars hadoopcheck hbaseanti checkstyle compile refguide xml

uname
Linux ed75486022a4 4.15.0-112-generic #113-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jul 9 23:41:39 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Build tool
maven

Personality
/home/jenkins/jenkins-agent/workspace/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR_PR-251/out/precommit/personality/provided.sh

git revision
branch-1 / 55cae10

Default Java
1.7.0_272

Multi-JDK versions
/usr/lib/jvm/zulu-8-amd64:1.8.0_262 /usr/lib/jvm/zulu-7-amd64:1.7.0_272

refguide
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/4/artifact/out/branch-site/book.html

compile
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/4/artifact/out/patch-compile-root-jdk1.8.0_262.txt

javac
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/4/artifact/out/patch-compile-root-jdk1.8.0_262.txt

xml
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/4/artifact/out/xml.txt

refguide
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/4/artifact/out/patch-site/book.html

javadoc
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/4/artifact/out/patch-javadoc-root-jdk1.8.0_262.txt

findbugs
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/4/artifact/out/patch-findbugs-hbase-tinylfu-blockcache.txt

unit
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/4/artifact/out/patch-unit-root.txt

Test Results
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/4/testReport/

Max. process+thread count
3913 (vs. ulimit of 10000)

modules
C: hbase-resource-bundle hbase-common hbase-server hbase-it . hbase-tinylfu-blockcache U: .

Console output
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/4/console

versions
git=1.9.1 maven=3.0.5 findbugs=3.0.1

Powered by
Apache Yetus 0.11.1 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

Oh, had a push 13 days ago so not so old....

:broken_heart: -1 overall

Vote
Subsystem
Runtime
Comment

+0 :ok:
reexec
0m 37s
Docker mode activated.

_ Prechecks _

+1 :green_heart:
dupname
0m  1s
No case conflicting files found.

-1 :x:
hbaseanti
0m  0s
The patch appears use Hadoop classification instead of HBase.

+1 :green_heart:
@author
0m  0s
The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 :green_heart:
test4tests
0m  0s
The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test files.

_ branch-1 Compile Tests _

+0 :ok:
mvndep
2m 49s
Maven dependency ordering for branch

+1 :green_heart:
mvninstall
8m  3s
branch-1 passed

+1 :green_heart:
compile
1m 41s
branch-1 passed with JDK v1.8.0_262

+1 :green_heart:
compile
1m 46s
branch-1 passed with JDK v1.7.0_272

+1 :green_heart:
checkstyle
7m 53s
branch-1 passed

+0 :ok:
refguide
3m 58s
branch has no errors when building the reference guide. See footer for rendered docs, which you should manually inspect.

+1 :green_heart:
shadedjars
2m 58s
branch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.

+1 :green_heart:
javadoc
3m 20s
branch-1 passed with JDK v1.8.0_262

+1 :green_heart:
javadoc
5m 50s
branch-1 passed with JDK v1.7.0_272

+0 :ok:
spotbugs
2m 47s
Used deprecated FindBugs config; considering switching to SpotBugs.

+0 :ok:
findbugs
0m 28s
branch/hbase-resource-bundle no findbugs output file (findbugsXml.xml)

_ Patch Compile Tests _

+0 :ok:
mvndep
0m 23s
Maven dependency ordering for patch

+1 :green_heart:
mvninstall
1m 57s
the patch passed

-1 :x:
compile
0m 10s
root in the patch failed with JDK v1.8.0_262.

-1 :x:
javac
0m 10s
root in the patch failed with JDK v1.8.0_262.

+1 :green_heart:
compile
1m 45s
the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_272

+1 :green_heart:
javac
1m 45s
the patch passed

+1 :green_heart:
checkstyle
4m 59s
root: The patch generated 0 new + 87 unchanged - 11 fixed = 87 total (was 98)

+1 :green_heart:
whitespace
0m  0s
The patch has no whitespace issues.

-1 :x:
xml
0m  1s
The patch has 5 ill-formed XML file(s).

+0 :ok:
refguide
2m 55s
patch has no errors when building the reference guide. See footer for rendered docs, which you should manually inspect.

+1 :green_heart:
shadedjars
2m 49s
patch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.

+1 :green_heart:
hadoopcheck
4m 38s
Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 2.8.5 2.9.2.

-1 :x:
javadoc
0m 10s
root in the patch failed with JDK v1.8.0_262.

+1 :green_heart:
javadoc
3m 47s
the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_272

+0 :ok:
findbugs
0m 13s
hbase-resource-bundle has no data from findbugs

-1 :x:
findbugs
0m 10s
hbase-tinylfu-blockcache in the patch failed.

_ Other Tests _

-1 :x:
unit
163m 26s
root in the patch failed.

+1 :green_heart:
asflicense
0m 33s
The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.

261m 50s

Reason
Tests

XML
Parsing Error(s):

hbase-common/src/main/resources/hbase-default.xml

hbase-it/pom.xml

hbase-resource-bundle/src/main/resources/supplemental-models.xml

hbase-tinylfu-blockcache/pom.xml

pom.xml

Subsystem
Report/Notes

Docker
Client=19.03.13 Server=19.03.13 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/5/artifact/out/Dockerfile

GITHUB PR
https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/251

Optional Tests
dupname asflicense javac javadoc unit spotbugs findbugs shadedjars hadoopcheck hbaseanti checkstyle compile refguide xml

uname
Linux 50d02774c5a9 4.15.0-58-generic #64-Ubuntu SMP Tue Aug 6 11:12:41 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Build tool
maven

Personality
/home/jenkins/jenkins-home/workspace/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR_PR-251/out/precommit/personality/provided.sh

git revision
branch-1 / e4a8dcc

Default Java
1.7.0_272

Multi-JDK versions
/usr/lib/jvm/zulu-8-amd64:1.8.0_262 /usr/lib/jvm/zulu-7-amd64:1.7.0_272

refguide
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/5/artifact/out/branch-site/book.html

compile
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/5/artifact/out/patch-compile-root-jdk1.8.0_262.txt

javac
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/5/artifact/out/patch-compile-root-jdk1.8.0_262.txt

xml
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/5/artifact/out/xml.txt

refguide
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/5/artifact/out/patch-site/book.html

javadoc
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/5/artifact/out/patch-javadoc-root-jdk1.8.0_262.txt

findbugs
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/5/artifact/out/patch-findbugs-hbase-tinylfu-blockcache.txt

unit
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/5/artifact/out/patch-unit-root.txt

Test Results
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/5/testReport/

Max. process+thread count
4391 (vs. ulimit of 10000)

modules
C: hbase-resource-bundle hbase-common hbase-server hbase-it . hbase-tinylfu-blockcache U: .

Console output
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/5/console

versions
git=1.9.1 maven=3.0.5 findbugs=3.0.1

Powered by
Apache Yetus 0.11.1 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

I would really like to not close this out. Iirc it's just waiting on an update to our CI tooling to properly handle jdk dependent modules. That's debt that has a hard time finding help, to be sure.

:broken_heart: -1 overall

Vote
Subsystem
Runtime
Comment

+0 :ok:
reexec
6m 45s
Docker mode activated.

_ Prechecks _

+1 :green_heart:
dupname
0m  0s
No case conflicting files found.

-1 :x:
hbaseanti
0m  0s
The patch appears use Hadoop classification instead of HBase.

+1 :green_heart:
@author
0m  0s
The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 :green_heart:
test4tests
0m  0s
The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test files.

_ branch-1 Compile Tests _

+0 :ok:
mvndep
2m 49s
Maven dependency ordering for branch

+1 :green_heart:
mvninstall
8m  3s
branch-1 passed

+1 :green_heart:
compile
1m 41s
branch-1 passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19

+1 :green_heart:
compile
1m 44s
branch-1 passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

+1 :green_heart:
checkstyle
7m 56s
branch-1 passed

+0 :ok:
refguide
4m  5s
branch has no errors when building the reference guide. See footer for rendered docs, which you should manually inspect.

+1 :green_heart:
shadedjars
2m 58s
branch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.

+1 :green_heart:
javadoc
3m 18s
branch-1 passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19

+1 :green_heart:
javadoc
5m 12s
branch-1 passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

+0 :ok:
spotbugs
2m 43s
Used deprecated FindBugs config; considering switching to SpotBugs.

+0 :ok:
findbugs
0m 25s
branch/hbase-resource-bundle no findbugs output file (findbugsXml.xml)

_ Patch Compile Tests _

+0 :ok:
mvndep
0m 23s
Maven dependency ordering for patch

+1 :green_heart:
mvninstall
1m 57s
the patch passed

-1 :x:
compile
0m 10s
root in the patch failed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19.

-1 :x:
javac
0m 10s
root in the patch failed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19.

+1 :green_heart:
compile
1m 43s
the patch passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

+1 :green_heart:
javac
1m 43s
the patch passed

+1 :green_heart:
checkstyle
5m  1s
root: The patch generated 0 new + 87 unchanged - 11 fixed = 87 total (was 98)

+1 :green_heart:
whitespace
0m  0s
The patch has no whitespace issues.

-1 :x:
xml
0m  1s
The patch has 5 ill-formed XML file(s).

+0 :ok:
refguide
3m  1s
patch has no errors when building the reference guide. See footer for rendered docs, which you should manually inspect.

+1 :green_heart:
shadedjars
2m 51s
patch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.

+1 :green_heart:
hadoopcheck
4m 38s
Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 2.8.5 2.9.2.

-1 :x:
javadoc
0m 10s
root in the patch failed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19.

+1 :green_heart:
javadoc
3m 43s
the patch passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

+0 :ok:
findbugs
0m 13s
hbase-resource-bundle has no data from findbugs

-1 :x:
findbugs
0m  9s
hbase-tinylfu-blockcache in the patch failed.

_ Other Tests _

-1 :x:
unit
147m  0s
root in the patch failed.

+1 :green_heart:
asflicense
0m 33s
The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.

250m 24s

Reason
Tests

XML
Parsing Error(s):

hbase-common/src/main/resources/hbase-default.xml

hbase-it/pom.xml

hbase-resource-bundle/src/main/resources/supplemental-models.xml

hbase-tinylfu-blockcache/pom.xml

pom.xml

Subsystem
Report/Notes

Docker
ClientAPI=1.40 ServerAPI=1.40 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/6/artifact/out/Dockerfile

GITHUB PR
https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/251

Optional Tests
dupname asflicense javac javadoc unit spotbugs findbugs shadedjars hadoopcheck hbaseanti checkstyle compile refguide xml

uname
Linux 3784a751a851 4.15.0-112-generic #113-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jul 9 23:41:39 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Build tool
maven

Personality
/home/jenkins/jenkins-agent/workspace/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR_PR-251/out/precommit/personality/provided.sh

git revision
branch-1 / 16b91c8

Default Java
Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

Multi-JDK versions
/usr/lib/jvm/zulu-8-amd64:Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19 /usr/lib/jvm/zulu-7-amd64:Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

refguide
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/6/artifact/out/branch-site/book.html

compile
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/6/artifact/out/patch-compile-root-jdkAzulSystems,Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19.txt

javac
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/6/artifact/out/patch-compile-root-jdkAzulSystems,Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19.txt

xml
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/6/artifact/out/xml.txt

refguide
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/6/artifact/out/patch-site/book.html

javadoc
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/6/artifact/out/patch-javadoc-root-jdkAzulSystems,Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19.txt

findbugs
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/6/artifact/out/patch-findbugs-hbase-tinylfu-blockcache.txt

unit
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/6/artifact/out/patch-unit-root.txt

Test Results
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/6/testReport/

Max. process+thread count
3597 (vs. ulimit of 10000)

modules
C: hbase-resource-bundle hbase-common hbase-server hbase-it . hbase-tinylfu-blockcache U: .

Console output
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/6/console

versions
git=1.9.1 maven=3.0.5 findbugs=3.0.1

Powered by
Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

:broken_heart: -1 overall

Vote
Subsystem
Runtime
Comment

+0 :ok:
reexec
0m 38s
Docker mode activated.

_ Prechecks _

+1 :green_heart:
dupname
0m  0s
No case conflicting files found.

-1 :x:
hbaseanti
0m  0s
The patch appears use Hadoop classification instead of HBase.

+1 :green_heart:
@author
0m  0s
The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 :green_heart:
test4tests
0m  0s
The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test files.

_ branch-1 Compile Tests _

+0 :ok:
mvndep
2m 48s
Maven dependency ordering for branch

+1 :green_heart:
mvninstall
7m 41s
branch-1 passed

+1 :green_heart:
compile
1m 38s
branch-1 passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19

+1 :green_heart:
compile
1m 44s
branch-1 passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

+1 :green_heart:
checkstyle
7m 56s
branch-1 passed

+0 :ok:
refguide
3m 56s
branch has no errors when building the reference guide. See footer for rendered docs, which you should manually inspect.

+1 :green_heart:
shadedjars
3m  2s
branch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.

+1 :green_heart:
javadoc
3m 18s
branch-1 passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19

+1 :green_heart:
javadoc
5m 11s
branch-1 passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

+0 :ok:
spotbugs
2m 46s
Used deprecated FindBugs config; considering switching to SpotBugs.

+0 :ok:
findbugs
0m 26s
branch/hbase-resource-bundle no findbugs output file (findbugsXml.xml)

_ Patch Compile Tests _

+0 :ok:
mvndep
0m 25s
Maven dependency ordering for patch

+1 :green_heart:
mvninstall
1m 54s
the patch passed

+1 :green_heart:
compile
1m 48s
the patch passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19

+1 :green_heart:
javac
1m 48s
the patch passed

+1 :green_heart:
compile
1m 45s
the patch passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

+1 :green_heart:
javac
1m 45s
the patch passed

+1 :green_heart:
checkstyle
5m  9s
root: The patch generated 0 new + 83 unchanged - 11 fixed = 83 total (was 94)

+1 :green_heart:
whitespace
0m  0s
The patch has no whitespace issues.

-1 :x:
xml
0m  1s
The patch has 5 ill-formed XML file(s).

+0 :ok:
refguide
3m  3s
patch has no errors when building the reference guide. See footer for rendered docs, which you should manually inspect.

-1 :x:
shadedjars
0m 13s
patch has 7 errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.

+1 :green_heart:
hadoopcheck
4m 36s
Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 2.8.5 2.9.2.

-1 :x:
javadoc
1m 51s
root in the patch failed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19.

+1 :green_heart:
javadoc
3m 45s
the patch passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

+0 :ok:
findbugs
0m 13s
hbase-resource-bundle has no data from findbugs

-1 :x:
findbugs
0m 21s
hbase-tinylfu-blockcache in the patch failed.

_ Other Tests _

-1 :x:
unit
140m 50s
root in the patch failed.

-1 :x:
asflicense
0m 32s
The patch generated 4 ASF License warnings.

238m 55s

Reason
Tests

XML
Parsing Error(s):

hbase-common/src/main/resources/hbase-default.xml

hbase-it/pom.xml

hbase-resource-bundle/src/main/resources/supplemental-models.xml

hbase-tinylfu-blockcache/pom.xml

pom.xml

Timed out junit tests
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.fs.TestBlockReorderMultiBlocks

Subsystem
Report/Notes

Docker
ClientAPI=1.40 ServerAPI=1.40 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/7/artifact/out/Dockerfile

GITHUB PR
https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/251

Optional Tests
dupname asflicense javac javadoc unit spotbugs findbugs shadedjars hadoopcheck hbaseanti checkstyle compile refguide xml

uname
Linux e627a4b3e9c2 4.15.0-112-generic #113-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jul 9 23:41:39 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Build tool
maven

Personality
/home/jenkins/jenkins-agent/workspace/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR_PR-251/out/precommit/personality/provided.sh

git revision
branch-1 / 30d988f

Default Java
Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

Multi-JDK versions
/usr/lib/jvm/zulu-8-amd64:Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19 /usr/lib/jvm/zulu-7-amd64:Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

refguide
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/7/artifact/out/branch-site/book.html

xml
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/7/artifact/out/xml.txt

refguide
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/7/artifact/out/patch-site/book.html

shadedjars
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/7/artifact/out/patch-shadedjars.txt

javadoc
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/7/artifact/out/patch-javadoc-root-jdkAzulSystems,Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19.txt

findbugs
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/7/artifact/out/patch-findbugs-hbase-tinylfu-blockcache.txt

unit
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/7/artifact/out/patch-unit-root.txt

Test Results
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/7/testReport/

asflicense
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/7/artifact/out/patch-asflicense-problems.txt

Max. process+thread count
3162 (vs. ulimit of 10000)

modules
C: hbase-resource-bundle hbase-common hbase-server hbase-it . hbase-tinylfu-blockcache U: .

Console output
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/7/console

versions
git=1.9.1 maven=3.0.5 findbugs=3.0.1

Powered by
Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

:broken_heart: -1 overall

Vote
Subsystem
Runtime
Comment

+0 :ok:
reexec
6m 38s
Docker mode activated.

_ Prechecks _

+1 :green_heart:
dupname
0m  1s
No case conflicting files found.

-1 :x:
hbaseanti
0m  0s
The patch appears use Hadoop classification instead of HBase.

+1 :green_heart:
@author
0m  0s
The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 :green_heart:
test4tests
0m  0s
The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test files.

_ branch-1 Compile Tests _

+0 :ok:
mvndep
2m 49s
Maven dependency ordering for branch

+1 :green_heart:
mvninstall
7m 45s
branch-1 passed

+1 :green_heart:
compile
1m 40s
branch-1 passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19

+1 :green_heart:
compile
1m 45s
branch-1 passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

+1 :green_heart:
checkstyle
7m 54s
branch-1 passed

+0 :ok:
refguide
3m 57s
branch has no errors when building the reference guide. See footer for rendered docs, which you should manually inspect.

+1 :green_heart:
shadedjars
2m 57s
branch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.

+1 :green_heart:
javadoc
3m 19s
branch-1 passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19

+1 :green_heart:
javadoc
5m 11s
branch-1 passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

+0 :ok:
spotbugs
2m 43s
Used deprecated FindBugs config; considering switching to SpotBugs.

+0 :ok:
findbugs
0m 26s
branch/hbase-resource-bundle no findbugs output file (findbugsXml.xml)

_ Patch Compile Tests _

+0 :ok:
mvndep
0m 24s
Maven dependency ordering for patch

+1 :green_heart:
mvninstall
1m 53s
the patch passed

+1 :green_heart:
compile
1m 47s
the patch passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19

+1 :green_heart:
javac
1m 47s
the patch passed

+1 :green_heart:
compile
1m 46s
the patch passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

+1 :green_heart:
javac
1m 46s
the patch passed

+1 :green_heart:
checkstyle
5m  7s
root: The patch generated 0 new + 83 unchanged - 11 fixed = 83 total (was 94)

+1 :green_heart:
whitespace
0m  0s
The patch has no whitespace issues.

-1 :x:
xml
0m  1s
The patch has 5 ill-formed XML file(s).

+0 :ok:
refguide
2m 59s
patch has no errors when building the reference guide. See footer for rendered docs, which you should manually inspect.

-1 :x:
shadedjars
0m 11s
patch has 7 errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.

+1 :green_heart:
hadoopcheck
4m 34s
Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 2.8.5 2.9.2.

-1 :x:
javadoc
1m 50s
root in the patch failed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19.

+1 :green_heart:
javadoc
3m 43s
the patch passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

+0 :ok:
findbugs
0m 12s
hbase-resource-bundle has no data from findbugs

-1 :x:
findbugs
0m 14s
hbase-tinylfu-blockcache in the patch failed.

_ Other Tests _

-1 :x:
unit
112m 43s
root in the patch failed.

-1 :x:
asflicense
0m 32s
The patch generated 4 ASF License warnings.

216m 22s

Reason
Tests

XML
Parsing Error(s):

hbase-common/src/main/resources/hbase-default.xml

hbase-it/pom.xml

hbase-resource-bundle/src/main/resources/supplemental-models.xml

hbase-tinylfu-blockcache/pom.xml

pom.xml

Failed junit tests
hadoop.hbase.client.TestConnectionImplementation

Subsystem
Report/Notes

Docker
ClientAPI=1.40 ServerAPI=1.40 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/8/artifact/out/Dockerfile

GITHUB PR
https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/251

Optional Tests
dupname asflicense javac javadoc unit spotbugs findbugs shadedjars hadoopcheck hbaseanti checkstyle compile refguide xml

uname
Linux c2d094ac9386 4.15.0-112-generic #113-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jul 9 23:41:39 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Build tool
maven

Personality
/home/jenkins/jenkins-agent/workspace/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR_PR-251/out/precommit/personality/provided.sh

git revision
branch-1 / 8e45165

Default Java
Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

Multi-JDK versions
/usr/lib/jvm/zulu-8-amd64:Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19 /usr/lib/jvm/zulu-7-amd64:Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

refguide
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/8/artifact/out/branch-site/book.html

xml
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/8/artifact/out/xml.txt

refguide
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/8/artifact/out/patch-site/book.html

shadedjars
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/8/artifact/out/patch-shadedjars.txt

javadoc
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/8/artifact/out/patch-javadoc-root-jdkAzulSystems,Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19.txt

findbugs
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/8/artifact/out/patch-findbugs-hbase-tinylfu-blockcache.txt

unit
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/8/artifact/out/patch-unit-root.txt

Test Results
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/8/testReport/

asflicense
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/8/artifact/out/patch-asflicense-problems.txt

Max. process+thread count
3613 (vs. ulimit of 10000)

modules
C: hbase-resource-bundle hbase-common hbase-server hbase-it . hbase-tinylfu-blockcache U: .

Console output
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/8/console

versions
git=1.9.1 maven=3.0.5 findbugs=3.0.1

Powered by
Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

:broken_heart: -1 overall

Vote
Subsystem
Runtime
Comment

+0 :ok:
reexec
7m  3s
Docker mode activated.

_ Prechecks _

+1 :green_heart:
dupname
0m  0s
No case conflicting files found.

-1 :x:
hbaseanti
0m  0s
The patch appears use Hadoop classification instead of HBase.

+1 :green_heart:
@author
0m  0s
The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 :green_heart:
test4tests
0m  0s
The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test files.

_ branch-1 Compile Tests _

+0 :ok:
mvndep
2m 53s
Maven dependency ordering for branch

+1 :green_heart:
mvninstall
7m 54s
branch-1 passed

+1 :green_heart:
compile
1m 41s
branch-1 passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19

+1 :green_heart:
compile
1m 43s
branch-1 passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

+1 :green_heart:
checkstyle
7m 57s
branch-1 passed

+0 :ok:
refguide
4m  2s
branch has no errors when building the reference guide. See footer for rendered docs, which you should manually inspect.

+1 :green_heart:
shadedjars
3m  3s
branch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.

+1 :green_heart:
javadoc
3m 32s
branch-1 passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19

+1 :green_heart:
javadoc
5m 24s
branch-1 passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

+0 :ok:
spotbugs
2m 42s
Used deprecated FindBugs config; considering switching to SpotBugs.

+0 :ok:
findbugs
0m 26s
branch/hbase-resource-bundle no findbugs output file (findbugsXml.xml)

_ Patch Compile Tests _

+0 :ok:
mvndep
0m 25s
Maven dependency ordering for patch

+1 :green_heart:
mvninstall
1m 55s
the patch passed

+1 :green_heart:
compile
1m 46s
the patch passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19

+1 :green_heart:
javac
1m 46s
the patch passed

+1 :green_heart:
compile
1m 46s
the patch passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

+1 :green_heart:
javac
1m 46s
the patch passed

+1 :green_heart:
checkstyle
5m  2s
root: The patch generated 0 new + 83 unchanged - 11 fixed = 83 total (was 94)

+1 :green_heart:
whitespace
0m  0s
The patch has no whitespace issues.

-1 :x:
xml
0m  1s
The patch has 5 ill-formed XML file(s).

+0 :ok:
refguide
3m  1s
patch has no errors when building the reference guide. See footer for rendered docs, which you should manually inspect.

-1 :x:
shadedjars
0m 12s
patch has 7 errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.

+1 :green_heart:
hadoopcheck
47m 30s
Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 2.8.5 2.9.2.

-1 :x:
javadoc
1m 50s
root in the patch failed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19.

+1 :green_heart:
javadoc
3m 50s
the patch passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

+0 :ok:
findbugs
0m 13s
hbase-resource-bundle has no data from findbugs

-1 :x:
findbugs
0m 14s
hbase-tinylfu-blockcache in the patch failed.

_ Other Tests _

-1 :x:
unit
151m 40s
root in the patch failed.

-1 :x:
asflicense
0m 32s
The patch generated 4 ASF License warnings.

300m  5s

Reason
Tests

XML
Parsing Error(s):

hbase-common/src/main/resources/hbase-default.xml

hbase-it/pom.xml

hbase-resource-bundle/src/main/resources/supplemental-models.xml

hbase-tinylfu-blockcache/pom.xml

pom.xml

Subsystem
Report/Notes

Docker
ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/9/artifact/out/Dockerfile

GITHUB PR
https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/251

Optional Tests
dupname asflicense javac javadoc unit spotbugs findbugs shadedjars hadoopcheck hbaseanti checkstyle compile refguide xml

uname
Linux cbf00b79e290 4.15.0-112-generic #113-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jul 9 23:41:39 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Build tool
maven

Personality
/home/jenkins/jenkins-agent/workspace/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR_PR-251/out/precommit/personality/provided.sh

git revision
branch-1 / c9d03c4

Default Java
Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

Multi-JDK versions
/usr/lib/jvm/zulu-8-amd64:Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19 /usr/lib/jvm/zulu-7-amd64:Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

refguide
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/9/artifact/out/branch-site/book.html

xml
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/9/artifact/out/xml.txt

refguide
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/9/artifact/out/patch-site/book.html

shadedjars
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/9/artifact/out/patch-shadedjars.txt

javadoc
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/9/artifact/out/patch-javadoc-root-jdkAzulSystems,Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19.txt

findbugs
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/9/artifact/out/patch-findbugs-hbase-tinylfu-blockcache.txt

unit
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/9/artifact/out/patch-unit-root.txt

Test Results
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/9/testReport/

asflicense
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/9/artifact/out/patch-asflicense-problems.txt

Max. process+thread count
3208 (vs. ulimit of 10000)

modules
C: hbase-resource-bundle hbase-common hbase-server hbase-it . hbase-tinylfu-blockcache U: .

Console output
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/9/console

versions
git=1.9.1 maven=3.0.5 findbugs=3.0.1

Powered by
Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

:broken_heart: -1 overall

Vote
Subsystem
Runtime
Comment

+0 :ok:
reexec
0m  0s
Docker mode activated.

-1 :x:
docker
9m 26s
Docker failed to build yetus/hbase:edccfe439a.

Subsystem
Report/Notes

GITHUB PR
https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/251

Console output
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/10/console

versions
git=2.17.1

Powered by
Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

:broken_heart: -1 overall

Vote
Subsystem
Runtime
Comment

+0 :ok:
reexec
6m 39s
Docker mode activated.

_ Prechecks _

+1 :green_heart:
dupname
0m  0s
No case conflicting files found.

-1 :x:
hbaseanti
0m  0s
The patch appears use Hadoop classification instead of HBase.

+1 :green_heart:
@author
0m  0s
The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 :green_heart:
test4tests
0m  0s
The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test files.

_ branch-1 Compile Tests _

+0 :ok:
mvndep
2m 54s
Maven dependency ordering for branch

+1 :green_heart:
mvninstall
7m 57s
branch-1 passed

+1 :green_heart:
compile
1m 44s
branch-1 passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19

+1 :green_heart:
compile
1m 42s
branch-1 passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

+1 :green_heart:
checkstyle
7m 48s
branch-1 passed

+0 :ok:
refguide
3m 58s
branch has no errors when building the reference guide. See footer for rendered docs, which you should manually inspect.

-1 :x:
shadedjars
0m 16s
branch has 7 errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.

+1 :green_heart:
javadoc
3m 28s
branch-1 passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19

+1 :green_heart:
javadoc
4m 14s
branch-1 passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

+0 :ok:
spotbugs
2m 44s
Used deprecated FindBugs config; considering switching to SpotBugs.

+0 :ok:
findbugs
0m 25s
branch/hbase-resource-bundle no findbugs output file (findbugsXml.xml)

_ Patch Compile Tests _

+0 :ok:
mvndep
0m 23s
Maven dependency ordering for patch

+1 :green_heart:
mvninstall
1m 52s
the patch passed

-1 :x:
compile
0m 10s
root in the patch failed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19.

-1 :x:
javac
0m 10s
root in the patch failed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19.

+1 :green_heart:
compile
1m 43s
the patch passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

+1 :green_heart:
javac
1m 43s
the patch passed

+1 :green_heart:
checkstyle
5m  0s
root: The patch generated 0 new + 83 unchanged - 11 fixed = 83 total (was 94)

+1 :green_heart:
whitespace
0m  0s
The patch has no whitespace issues.

-1 :x:
xml
0m  1s
The patch has 5 ill-formed XML file(s).

+0 :ok:
refguide
3m  3s
patch has no errors when building the reference guide. See footer for rendered docs, which you should manually inspect.

+1 :green_heart:
shadedjars
2m 53s
patch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.

+1 :green_heart:
hadoopcheck
4m 29s
Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 2.8.5 2.9.2.

-1 :x:
javadoc
0m  9s
root in the patch failed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19.

+1 :green_heart:
javadoc
2m 44s
the patch passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

+0 :ok:
findbugs
0m 12s
hbase-resource-bundle has no data from findbugs

-1 :x:
findbugs
0m  9s
hbase-tinylfu-blockcache in the patch failed.

_ Other Tests _

+1 :green_heart:
unit
190m 34s
root in the patch passed.

+1 :green_heart:
asflicense
0m 38s
The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.

287m 14s

Reason
Tests

XML
Parsing Error(s):

hbase-common/src/main/resources/hbase-default.xml

hbase-it/pom.xml

hbase-resource-bundle/src/main/resources/supplemental-models.xml

hbase-tinylfu-blockcache/pom.xml

pom.xml

Subsystem
Report/Notes

Docker
ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/11/artifact/out/Dockerfile

GITHUB PR
https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/251

Optional Tests
dupname asflicense javac javadoc unit spotbugs findbugs shadedjars hadoopcheck hbaseanti checkstyle compile refguide xml

uname
Linux bcf201764d82 4.15.0-112-generic #113-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jul 9 23:41:39 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Build tool
maven

Personality
/home/jenkins/jenkins-agent/workspace/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR_PR-251/out/precommit/personality/provided.sh

git revision
branch-1 / 2e24bad

Default Java
Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

Multi-JDK versions
/usr/lib/jvm/zulu-8-amd64:Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19 /usr/lib/jvm/zulu-7-amd64:Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

refguide
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/11/artifact/out/branch-site/book.html

shadedjars
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/11/artifact/out/branch-shadedjars.txt

compile
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/11/artifact/out/patch-compile-root-jdkAzulSystems,Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19.txt

javac
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/11/artifact/out/patch-compile-root-jdkAzulSystems,Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19.txt

xml
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/11/artifact/out/xml.txt

refguide
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/11/artifact/out/patch-site/book.html

javadoc
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/11/artifact/out/patch-javadoc-root-jdkAzulSystems,Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19.txt

findbugs
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/11/artifact/out/patch-findbugs-hbase-tinylfu-blockcache.txt

Test Results
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/11/testReport/

Max. process+thread count
4422 (vs. ulimit of 10000)

modules
C: hbase-common hbase-resource-bundle hbase-server hbase-it . hbase-tinylfu-blockcache U: .

Console output
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/11/console

versions
git=1.9.1 maven=3.0.5 findbugs=3.0.1

Powered by
Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

:broken_heart: -1 overall

Vote
Subsystem
Runtime
Comment

+0 :ok:
reexec
0m 41s
Docker mode activated.

_ Prechecks _

+1 :green_heart:
dupname
0m  0s
No case conflicting files found.

-1 :x:
hbaseanti
0m  0s
The patch appears use Hadoop classification instead of HBase.

+1 :green_heart:
@author
0m  0s
The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 :green_heart:
test4tests
0m  0s
The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test files.

_ branch-1 Compile Tests _

+0 :ok:
mvndep
2m 52s
Maven dependency ordering for branch

+1 :green_heart:
mvninstall
8m 14s
branch-1 passed

+1 :green_heart:
compile
1m 59s
branch-1 passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19

+1 :green_heart:
compile
2m  2s
branch-1 passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

+1 :green_heart:
checkstyle
8m 59s
branch-1 passed

+0 :ok:
refguide
4m 36s
branch has no errors when building the reference guide. See footer for rendered docs, which you should manually inspect.

-1 :x:
shadedjars
0m 18s
branch has 7 errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.

+1 :green_heart:
javadoc
3m 54s
branch-1 passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19

+1 :green_heart:
javadoc
4m 43s
branch-1 passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

+0 :ok:
spotbugs
2m 42s
Used deprecated FindBugs config; considering switching to SpotBugs.

+0 :ok:
findbugs
0m 27s
branch/hbase-resource-bundle no findbugs output file (findbugsXml.xml)

_ Patch Compile Tests _

+0 :ok:
mvndep
0m 23s
Maven dependency ordering for patch

+1 :green_heart:
mvninstall
1m 51s
the patch passed

-1 :x:
compile
0m  9s
root in the patch failed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19.

-1 :x:
javac
0m  9s
root in the patch failed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19.

+1 :green_heart:
compile
1m 43s
the patch passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

+1 :green_heart:
javac
1m 43s
the patch passed

+1 :green_heart:
checkstyle
4m 57s
root: The patch generated 0 new + 83 unchanged - 11 fixed = 83 total (was 94)

+1 :green_heart:
whitespace
0m  0s
The patch has no whitespace issues.

-1 :x:
xml
0m  1s
The patch has 5 ill-formed XML file(s).

+0 :ok:
refguide
2m 57s
patch has no errors when building the reference guide. See footer for rendered docs, which you should manually inspect.

+1 :green_heart:
shadedjars
2m 56s
patch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.

+1 :green_heart:
hadoopcheck
4m 33s
Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 2.8.5 2.9.2.

-1 :x:
javadoc
0m  9s
root in the patch failed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19.

+1 :green_heart:
javadoc
2m 48s
the patch passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

+0 :ok:
findbugs
0m 12s
hbase-resource-bundle has no data from findbugs

-1 :x:
findbugs
0m 10s
hbase-tinylfu-blockcache in the patch failed.

_ Other Tests _

-1 :x:
unit
161m 29s
root in the patch failed.

+1 :green_heart:
asflicense
0m 36s
The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.

257m  8s

Reason
Tests

XML
Parsing Error(s):

hbase-common/src/main/resources/hbase-default.xml

hbase-it/pom.xml

hbase-resource-bundle/src/main/resources/supplemental-models.xml

hbase-tinylfu-blockcache/pom.xml

pom.xml

Subsystem
Report/Notes

Docker
ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/12/artifact/out/Dockerfile

GITHUB PR
https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/251

Optional Tests
dupname asflicense javac javadoc unit spotbugs findbugs shadedjars hadoopcheck hbaseanti checkstyle compile refguide xml

uname
Linux 2f7671152fab 4.15.0-112-generic #113-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jul 9 23:41:39 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Build tool
maven

Personality
/home/jenkins/jenkins-agent/workspace/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR_PR-251/out/precommit/personality/provided.sh

git revision
branch-1 / 5263b8c

Default Java
Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

Multi-JDK versions
/usr/lib/jvm/zulu-8-amd64:Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19 /usr/lib/jvm/zulu-7-amd64:Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

refguide
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/12/artifact/out/branch-site/book.html

shadedjars
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/12/artifact/out/branch-shadedjars.txt

compile
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/12/artifact/out/patch-compile-root-jdkAzulSystems,Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19.txt

javac
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/12/artifact/out/patch-compile-root-jdkAzulSystems,Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19.txt

xml
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/12/artifact/out/xml.txt

refguide
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/12/artifact/out/patch-site/book.html

javadoc
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/12/artifact/out/patch-javadoc-root-jdkAzulSystems,Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19.txt

findbugs
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/12/artifact/out/patch-findbugs-hbase-tinylfu-blockcache.txt

unit
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/12/artifact/out/patch-unit-root.txt

Test Results
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/12/testReport/

Max. process+thread count
4476 (vs. ulimit of 10000)

modules
C: hbase-common hbase-resource-bundle hbase-server hbase-it . hbase-tinylfu-blockcache U: .

Console output
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/12/console

versions
git=1.9.1 maven=3.0.5 findbugs=3.0.1

Powered by
Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

:broken_heart: -1 overall

Vote
Subsystem
Runtime
Comment

+0 :ok:
reexec
4m 58s
Docker mode activated.

_ Prechecks _

+1 :green_heart:
dupname
0m  0s
No case conflicting files found.

-1 :x:
hbaseanti
0m  0s
The patch appears use Hadoop classification instead of HBase.

+1 :green_heart:
@author
0m  0s
The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 :green_heart:
test4tests
0m  0s
The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test files.

_ branch-1 Compile Tests _

+0 :ok:
mvndep
2m 54s
Maven dependency ordering for branch

+1 :green_heart:
mvninstall
8m 12s
branch-1 passed

+1 :green_heart:
compile
2m 11s
branch-1 passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19

+1 :green_heart:
compile
1m 57s
branch-1 passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

+1 :green_heart:
checkstyle
7m 42s
branch-1 passed

+0 :ok:
refguide
3m 55s
branch has no errors when building the reference guide. See footer for rendered docs, which you should manually inspect.

+1 :green_heart:
shadedjars
3m 13s
branch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.

+1 :green_heart:
javadoc
3m 37s
branch-1 passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19

+1 :green_heart:
javadoc
4m 16s
branch-1 passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

+0 :ok:
spotbugs
2m 50s
Used deprecated FindBugs config; considering switching to SpotBugs.

+0 :ok:
findbugs
0m 27s
branch/hbase-resource-bundle no findbugs output file (findbugsXml.xml)

_ Patch Compile Tests _

+0 :ok:
mvndep
0m 26s
Maven dependency ordering for patch

+1 :green_heart:
mvninstall
2m  9s
the patch passed

-1 :x:
compile
0m 10s
root in the patch failed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19.

-1 :x:
javac
0m 10s
root in the patch failed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19.

+1 :green_heart:
compile
2m  0s
the patch passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

+1 :green_heart:
javac
2m  0s
the patch passed

+1 :green_heart:
checkstyle
4m 59s
root: The patch generated 0 new + 83 unchanged - 11 fixed = 83 total (was 94)

+1 :green_heart:
whitespace
0m  0s
The patch has no whitespace issues.

-1 :x:
xml
0m  1s
The patch has 5 ill-formed XML file(s).

+0 :ok:
refguide
2m 59s
patch has no errors when building the reference guide. See footer for rendered docs, which you should manually inspect.

+1 :green_heart:
shadedjars
3m  2s
patch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.

+1 :green_heart:
hadoopcheck
5m 12s
Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 2.8.5 2.9.2.

-1 :x:
javadoc
0m 10s
root in the patch failed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19.

+1 :green_heart:
javadoc
2m 44s
the patch passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

+0 :ok:
findbugs
0m 14s
hbase-resource-bundle has no data from findbugs

-1 :x:
findbugs
0m 10s
hbase-tinylfu-blockcache in the patch failed.

_ Other Tests _

-1 :x:
unit
147m 55s
root in the patch failed.

+1 :green_heart:
asflicense
0m 39s
The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.

249m 43s

Reason
Tests

XML
Parsing Error(s):

hbase-common/src/main/resources/hbase-default.xml

hbase-it/pom.xml

hbase-resource-bundle/src/main/resources/supplemental-models.xml

hbase-tinylfu-blockcache/pom.xml

pom.xml

Failed junit tests
hadoop.hbase.replication.TestReplicationSource

Subsystem
Report/Notes

Docker
ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/13/artifact/out/Dockerfile

GITHUB PR
https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/251

Optional Tests
dupname asflicense javac javadoc unit spotbugs findbugs shadedjars hadoopcheck hbaseanti checkstyle compile refguide xml

uname
Linux 0ff5ffaccee3 4.15.0-156-generic #163-Ubuntu SMP Thu Aug 19 23:31:58 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Build tool
maven

Personality
/home/jenkins/jenkins-home/workspace/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR_PR-251/out/precommit/personality/provided.sh

git revision
branch-1 / 40b4cb1f4c

Default Java
Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

Multi-JDK versions
/usr/lib/jvm/zulu-8-amd64:Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19 /usr/lib/jvm/zulu-7-amd64:Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

refguide
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/13/artifact/out/branch-site/book.html

compile
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/13/artifact/out/patch-compile-root-jdkAzulSystems,Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19.txt

javac
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/13/artifact/out/patch-compile-root-jdkAzulSystems,Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19.txt

xml
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/13/artifact/out/xml.txt

refguide
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/13/artifact/out/patch-site/book.html

javadoc
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/13/artifact/out/patch-javadoc-root-jdkAzulSystems,Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19.txt

findbugs
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/13/artifact/out/patch-findbugs-hbase-tinylfu-blockcache.txt

unit
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/13/artifact/out/patch-unit-root.txt

Test Results
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/13/testReport/

Max. process+thread count
4453 (vs. ulimit of 10000)

modules
C: hbase-common hbase-resource-bundle hbase-server hbase-it . hbase-tinylfu-blockcache U: .

Console output
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/13/console

versions
git=2.17.1 maven=3.6.0 findbugs=3.0.1

Powered by
Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

FYI stack I'll be taking a look at getting this PR merged over the weekend.

:broken_heart: -1 overall

Vote
Subsystem
Runtime
Comment

+0 :ok:
reexec
5m  3s
Docker mode activated.

_ Prechecks _

+1 :green_heart:
dupname
0m  0s
No case conflicting files found.

-1 :x:
hbaseanti
0m  0s
The patch appears use Hadoop classification instead of HBase.

+1 :green_heart:
@author
0m  0s
The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 :green_heart:
test4tests
0m  0s
The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test files.

_ branch-1 Compile Tests _

+0 :ok:
mvndep
2m 55s
Maven dependency ordering for branch

+1 :green_heart:
mvninstall
8m 30s
branch-1 passed

+1 :green_heart:
compile
2m 14s
branch-1 passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19

+1 :green_heart:
compile
2m  0s
branch-1 passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

+1 :green_heart:
checkstyle
7m 48s
branch-1 passed

+0 :ok:
refguide
4m 11s
branch has no errors when building the reference guide. See footer for rendered docs, which you should manually inspect.

+1 :green_heart:
shadedjars
4m 19s
branch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.

+1 :green_heart:
javadoc
4m 26s
branch-1 passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19

+1 :green_heart:
javadoc
5m 20s
branch-1 passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

+0 :ok:
spotbugs
3m 41s
Used deprecated FindBugs config; considering switching to SpotBugs.

+0 :ok:
findbugs
0m 29s
branch/hbase-resource-bundle no findbugs output file (findbugsXml.xml)

_ Patch Compile Tests _

+0 :ok:
mvndep
0m 32s
Maven dependency ordering for patch

+1 :green_heart:
mvninstall
2m 49s
the patch passed

-1 :x:
compile
0m 11s
root in the patch failed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19.

-1 :x:
javac
0m 11s
root in the patch failed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19.

+1 :green_heart:
compile
2m 48s
the patch passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

+1 :green_heart:
javac
2m 48s
the patch passed

+1 :green_heart:
checkstyle
6m 54s
root: The patch generated 0 new + 83 unchanged - 11 fixed = 83 total (was 94)

+1 :green_heart:
whitespace
0m  0s
The patch has no whitespace issues.

-1 :x:
xml
0m  1s
The patch has 5 ill-formed XML file(s).

+0 :ok:
refguide
4m 11s
patch has no errors when building the reference guide. See footer for rendered docs, which you should manually inspect.

+1 :green_heart:
shadedjars
4m  8s
patch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.

+1 :green_heart:
hadoopcheck
7m  1s
Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 2.8.5 2.9.2.

-1 :x:
javadoc
0m 10s
root in the patch failed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19.

+1 :green_heart:
javadoc
3m 26s
the patch passed with JDK Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

+0 :ok:
findbugs
0m 16s
hbase-resource-bundle has no data from findbugs

-1 :x:
findbugs
0m 10s
hbase-tinylfu-blockcache in the patch failed.

_ Other Tests _

-1 :x:
unit
156m 35s
root in the patch failed.

+1 :green_heart:
asflicense
0m 39s
The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.

281m 29s

Reason
Tests

XML
Parsing Error(s):

hbase-common/src/main/resources/hbase-default.xml

hbase-it/pom.xml

hbase-resource-bundle/src/main/resources/supplemental-models.xml

hbase-tinylfu-blockcache/pom.xml

pom.xml

Failed junit tests
hadoop.hbase.replication.TestReplicationSource

Subsystem
Report/Notes

Docker
ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/14/artifact/out/Dockerfile

GITHUB PR
https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/251

Optional Tests
dupname asflicense javac javadoc unit spotbugs findbugs shadedjars hadoopcheck hbaseanti checkstyle compile refguide xml

uname
Linux 1cda19d72a10 4.15.0-112-generic #113-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jul 9 23:41:39 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Build tool
maven

Personality
/home/jenkins/jenkins-home/workspace/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR_PR-251/out/precommit/personality/provided.sh

git revision
branch-1 / 8d96fc3614

Default Java
Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

Multi-JDK versions
/usr/lib/jvm/zulu-8-amd64:Azul Systems, Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19 /usr/lib/jvm/zulu-7-amd64:Azul Systems, Inc.-1.7.0_272-b10

refguide
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/14/artifact/out/branch-site/book.html

compile
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/14/artifact/out/patch-compile-root-jdkAzulSystems,Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19.txt

javac
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/14/artifact/out/patch-compile-root-jdkAzulSystems,Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19.txt

xml
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/14/artifact/out/xml.txt

refguide
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/14/artifact/out/patch-site/book.html

javadoc
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/14/artifact/out/patch-javadoc-root-jdkAzulSystems,Inc.-1.8.0_262-b19.txt

findbugs
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/14/artifact/out/patch-findbugs-hbase-tinylfu-blockcache.txt

unit
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/14/artifact/out/patch-unit-root.txt

Test Results
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/14/testReport/

Max. process+thread count
5029 (vs. ulimit of 10000)

modules
C: hbase-common hbase-resource-bundle hbase-server hbase-it . hbase-tinylfu-blockcache U: .

Console output
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-251/14/console

versions
git=2.17.1 maven=3.6.0 findbugs=3.0.1

Powered by
Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

Any progress here?


error running logstash-input-couchdb_changes plugin

Hi,
I am having problem running this plugin. Will appreciate any help. I downloaded logstash and logstash-input-couchdb_changes plugin, unzipped those and then followed 1st two steps in the sections below. I am running windows 7.
Run in a local Logstash clone
Edit Logstash Gemfile and add the local plugin path, for example:

gem "logstash-filter-awesome", :path => "/your/local/logstash-filter-awesome"
Install plugin

bin/plugin install --no-verify
But I am getting this error:
E:\logstash-1.5.3\logstash-1.5.3\bin>plugin install --no-v
erify
io/console not supported; tty will not be manipulated
Installing...
NameError: undefined local variable or method `path' for #<LogStash::DSL:0x24fab
d0f>
(eval) at (eval):122
instance_eval at org/jruby/RubyBasicObject.java:1541
parse at E:/Softwares/Web Related/logstash-1.5.3/logstash-1.5.3/l
ib/pluginmanager/gemfile.rb:156
load at E:/Softwares/Web Related/logstash-1.5.3/logstash-1.5.3/l
ib/pluginmanager/gemfile.rb:18
gemfile at E:/Softwares/Web Related/logstash-1.5.3/logstash-1.5.3/l
ib/pluginmanager/command.rb:3
install_gems_list! at E:/Softwares/Web Related/logstash-1.5.3/logstash-1.5.3/l
ib/pluginmanager/install.rb:96
execute at E:/Softwares/Web Related/logstash-1.5.3/logstash-1.5.3/l
ib/pluginmanager/install.rb:28
run at E:/Softwares/Web Related/logstash-1.5.3/logstash-1.5.3/v
endor/bundle/jruby/1.9/gems/clamp-0.6.5/lib/clamp/command.rb:67
execute at E:/Softwares/Web Related/logstash-1.5.3/logstash-1.5.3/v
endor/bundle/jruby/1.9/gems/clamp-0.6.5/lib/clamp/subcommand/execution.rb:11
run at E:/Softwares/Web Related/logstash-1.5.3/logstash-1.5.3/v
endor/bundle/jruby/1.9/gems/clamp-0.6.5/lib/clamp/command.rb:67
run at E:/Softwares/Web Related/logstash-1.5.3/logstash-1.5.3/v
endor/bundle/jruby/1.9/gems/clamp-0.6.5/lib/clamp/command.rb:132
(root) at E:\Softwares\Web Related\logstash-1.5.3\logstash-1.5.3\l
ib\pluginmanager\main.rb:36

I tried with logstash version 1.5.2. I tested logstash with "logstash -e 'input { stdin { } } output { stdout {} }'" and it worked except that I got message "io/console not supported; tty will not be manipulated" (don't know whats this for) but when I tried to install plugin it failed with error:
io/console not supported; tty will not be manipulated
Installing...
Plugin not found, aborting
ERROR: Installation Aborted, message: Could not find gem 'logstash-input-couchdb
_changes-master (>= 0) java' in source at E:/Softwares/Web Related/logstash-1.5.
2/logstash-input-couchdb_changes-master.
Source does not contain any versions of 'logstash-input-couchdb_changes-master (

= 0) java'

Is there anything Im missing? Please help

Is there a reason you couldn't use bin/plugin install logstash-input-couchdb_changes ?

Worked like a charm, thank you so much, I thought i would first need to add plugins path to Gemfile file of logstash. I have a design question, would really appreciate if you can shed some light on that. I'll post another question for that, thx.


When doesn't join variables in compound clauses with "collected matches..."

When /note/ is a post-it &\
     the collected matches for [list /note/ has /topic/ weight /weight/] are /matches/ {
}

will yield results where $note is different from the "note" key in matches

One option until this is fixed is to split it up into nested Whens:
  When the collected matches for [list $note has /topic/ weight /weight/] are /matches/ {
  }
}```


Add SetName for Device

This pull request adds the following features:

Added a v2 client method to perform the API call for setting a device name.
Added a v2 client method to perform the API call for retrieving device posture attributes.
Added a v2 client method to perform the API call for setting device posture attributes.

Requested changes have been pushed.


Investigate 'add another animation' sometimes not working?

From Nick: When adding a second animation to a property i.e. clicking on the plus icon in the left pane which shows an 'Add another animation' tooltip it seemed hit or miss if this would work. I think this might have been when acting on the bottom-most layer where the tooltip shows on top of the button

Yeah, I got this once too... not sure how to reproduce though.


adding more tests for findfiles module

Added a few more tests for find files module.

Change this stat from fstat
https://github.com/Microsoft/vsts-tasks/blob/master/Tasks/Common/find-files-legacy/findfiles.legacy.ts#L81
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/32478698/what-is-the-different-between-stat-fstat-and-lstat-functions-in-node-js

LGTM

I dont see the equivalent of these tests:
SupportsDirectoryNameSingleCharWildcard
SupportsDirectoryNameWildcard
SupportsFileNameSingleCharWildcard
SupportsInterSegmentWildcard
UnionsMatches (the point of this test is that matches are unioned and not added (i.e. should not end up with duplicates)

I don't see any tests for case-insensitivity on Windows and case-sensitivity on Linux.

It looks like there is only one incomplete test for the includeDir parameter set to true. The assertions appear to be incomplete and also the arrange/act portion of the test appears to be inconsistent with the title of the test (Search recursively with exclude files with ignore dir).
It doesn't look like that overload is actually called from any task. It would be better to just remove it or throw not impl rather than invest in it since it likely will never be used anyway.

Some of the tests make a fragile assumption about the cwd. The cwd at the time the test runs happens to be the last place where tsc was invoked.
However, there is no reason to assume that should be the cwd when the tests are run (separate process invocation from tsc).
If you need control over the cwd, please use a try/finally pattern to remove that fragility (and future debugging for someone): store orig cwd ; set new cwd; try { ... } finally { restore orig cwd; }


Adding CoTraining class implementation

I have pushed my stompsjo/RadClass:cotraining branch to cnerg/RadClass:cotraining. I will close #42 and copy its contents here for review. This PR should be reviewed and merged before subsequent ones.
This introduces a new class called CoTraining which can be used for semi-supervised co-training using logistic regression. This includes typical scikit-learn-esque methods like train and predict as well as methods for hyperparameter optimization and saving the model to file.

Closing this PR in favor of #44.

Woops...closed the wrong PR.


[WIP] fix boarding - to use new tester api

Gemfile needs to be fixed once released.

carried on in - https://github.com/fastlane/boarding/pull/129


Removing border from subscribe button, fixes #271

Thanks @carliecope  :)

Yielding to @carliecope's PR, which is identical


Update Remoting V2 documentation for v3.2 changes

Could you please update the documentation in the Remoting V2 section and "How to use Custom Serialization with Remoting V2" with the changes in SDK v3.2.
Some interfaces changed and also the RemotingListener Attribute

Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

ID: 8902374b-b631-9d50-16ef-1899ea2dd29d
Version Independent ID: 55351e69-aa2a-901c-a563-106b62e3d6ac
Content: Service remoting using C# in Service Fabric
Content Source: articles/service-fabric/service-fabric-reliable-services-communication-remoting.md
Service: service-fabric
GitHub Login: @vturecek
Microsoft Alias: vturecek

Thanks for the feedback! I have assigned this to the content author to review.

January, 2 2019 - No Update on CreateServiceInstanceListener the example code call
return this.CreateServiceRemotingInstanceListeners();
No longer supported.

Looks like remoting docs all-up could use some maintenance with latest SDK. I've captured this issue in our work backlog. #please-close


GEODE-9642: skip RedundancyRecovery for colocated regions, if colocat…

…ion is not completed
Co-authored-by: albertogpz<EMAIL_ADDRESS>In this solution, for each server, if colocation is not completed (due to any possible reason), we are skipping RedundancyRecovery. So, when last server is registering partitioned region, he will set colocation completed and notify all other servers, and he will trigger creation of buckets on all other servers.

For all changes:

[*] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced in the commit message?

[*] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target branch (typically develop)?

[*] Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit?

[*] Does gradlew build run cleanly?

[*] Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?

[ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under ASF 2.0?

But recovery could be started, on more servers then just lust. In real situations when region is created, recovery will be started almost on all servers. So I am not sure that checking recovery only on one server is valid test.

It only depends if collocation is completed.

If servers are started sequentially, colocation will not be completed until the last one is started and that's why recovery will only be run in it.
If servers are started in parallel, it must be checked that recovery is executed at least in one of them.
As almost all test cases start the servers sequentially, I suggested to check recovery on the last one.
For test cases starting the servers in parallel, it must be checked that recovery is started in at least one of them or alternatively, the start could be changed to start all the servers in parallel except for one and then check that recovery was started on the last one.

We are talking about creation of child region on servers, not starting servers. Normal behavior, when you create region, is that it is created on all servers in parallel.

We are talking about creation of child region on servers, not starting servers. Normal behavior, when you create region, is that it is created on all servers in parallel.

You are right. I meant region creation on each server and not server start.

It would be good if any code owner could comment on this issue, and give his opinion on new solution, and what is expected from test.

@albertogpz Did your concerns get addressed?

@albertogpz Did your concerns get addressed?

I think the modified tests still need to check that recovery was started at least in one of the servers.

@albertogpz Did your concerns get addressed?

I think the modified tests still need to check that recovery was started at least in one of the servers.

As far as I understand the tests, any time checkIfRecoveryExecuted() is called, it's implicitly checking that recovery was started, because if recovery is never started on any servers, then the calls to recoveryStarted.await() will time out and recoveryExecuted will not be set to true.

@albertogpz Did your concerns get addressed?

I think the modified tests still need to check that recovery was started at least in one of the servers.

As far as I understand the tests, any time checkIfRecoveryExecuted() is called, it's implicitly checking that recovery was started, because if recovery is never started on any servers, then the calls to recoveryStarted.await() will time out and recoveryExecuted will not be set to true.

The problem is that the tests are not checking that recovery is started at least in one server. They are only checking that if recovery is started, then it will be done in a reasonable time.
But it could be that recovery is not started in any server and the tests will pass.

@albertogpz Did your concerns get addressed?

I think the modified tests still need to check that recovery was started at least in one of the servers.

My concerns have been addressed. Now, recovery started in at least one server is addressed.


chore(FN-2624): commonise currency definition

Introduction :pencil2:
Commonise currency definitions
Resolution :heavy_check_mark:

Use libs/common CURRENCY definition across services

Miscellaneous :heavy_plus_sign:

Not commonising the acbs implementation because it uses a different definition which we do not wish to merge at this time.

Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

:exclamation: No coverage uploaded for pull request base (feat/e2etf-sql@b3a5fae). Click here to learn what that means.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                Coverage Diff                @@
##             feat/e2etf-sql    #3040   +/-   ##
=================================================
  Coverage                  ?   50.29%
=================================================
  Files                     ?      705
  Lines                     ?    14812
  Branches                  ?     2591
=================================================
  Hits                      ?     7449
  Misses                    ?     6388
  Partials                  ?      975

Flag
Coverage Δ

api-test
0.39% <ø> (?)

unit-test
51.16% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Converting to draft as this is now going to be in release 2.2 so should not be merged until the base has been changed


cookies inside endpoints called from event.fetch are not correctly set

Describe the bug
When calling an endpoint from event.fetch that sets a cookie with httpOnly: false the actual response sets the cookie with httpOnly: true
Reproduction
https://github.com/david-plugge-reproductions/sveltekit-fetch-httponly-cookie
Logs
No response
System Info
System:
  OS: Linux 5.15 Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS 22.04.2 LTS (Jammy Jellyfish)
  CPU: (12) x64 AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor
  Memory: 11.99 GB / 15.57 GB
  Container: Yes
  Shell: 5.8.1 - /usr/bin/zsh
Binaries:
  Node: 18.16.0 - /mnt/wslg/runtime-dir/fnm_multishells/197_1683713854937/bin/node
  npm: 9.5.1 - /mnt/wslg/runtime-dir/fnm_multishells/197_1683713854937/bin/npm

Severity
blocking all usage of SvelteKit
Additional Information
No response

I have this fixed locally -- just having to think through the ramifications. I'll try to get a PR open tomorrow.

Here's a draft PR: #9909
I'm not sure if it'll actually get merged (I have a couple of concerns about the implementation that I'm discussing with Rich), but it at least identifies and documents the issue.


Multiple bbox

We currently display only one bbox, so we need to display all of them.

the algorithm is currently computing many bbox with different level of uncertainty for each picture and you would like to display all of them for each image, right ?


Azure AD source does not paginate

Describe the bug
It seems that the Azure AD source connector does not paginate the responses from Azure AD, thus only 100 groups and 100 users are ingested.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

Create the recipe according to https://datahubproject.io/docs/metadata-ingestion/source_docs/azure-ad pointing to a directory with > 100 groups or users
datahub ingest run -c recipe.yaml
See that only 100 groups and 100 users are ingested

Expected behavior
Use pagination to ingest all the groups/users (potentially thousands of each)
I'll dig a bit in the code and see if I can find out where this could be fixed.

@dingobar Please let us know!


Post-request processing

Hello everyone. Based on the Envoy documentation, there are processes that run after request processing. Is there any way through wasm to execute something at this stage?
I tried to find a way to send metrics and information through a queue to a Wasm Service at the end of request processing, in an attempt to not impact the response time, but I couldn't find it. Is this possible?
Thank you in advance.

Did you try https://github.com/tetratelabs/proxy-wasm-go-sdk/blob/main/proxywasm/types/context.go#L161C2-L161C18 ?

It doesn't have the behavior I was looking for, at least not in the test I performed. I conducted a test by creating the 'OnHttpStreamDone' function in my plugin and added a loop inside it with a log to delay its execution and check if I would receive the response before the log was displayed. The response was only received after its execution.
My idea was actually to see if there is any way to fully respond to the request for the consumer of the API, and only then execute something.

Please refer to https://github.com/tetratelabs/proxy-wasm-go-sdk/tree/main/examples/shared_queue


about the bug

when running the code of train_paper_field.py, the bug shows that "TypeError: an integer is required (got type bytes)". How can i solve it?

There may be a problem with your Python version


"Open Folder..." in Windows 11 unexpectedly opens a File Explorer

Select "Open Folder..." from the File Menu
Windows opens a File Explorer instead of a dialouge to choose a folder.

Instead I have to navigate in the File Explorer to some folder and then right-click, choose "Show More Options" and then select "Open With Code". I did not used to have to do this and it's really annoying. I'm not sure if its a Windows 11 thing or something I have set wrong in my configuration. I tried removing and reinstalling VSCode and it still does the same thing.

Nevermind. It turns out the "Open Folder" dialogue on Windows 11 looks exactly like a File Explorer. Closing.

You might want to subscribe to #127365


Consider mocking time in tests

To ensure the reliability of time-dependent tests and reduce their duration, I suggest mocking time in tests.
Currently, some tests implicitly rely on underlying platform performance by setting arbitrary sleep interval duration that would be enough for tests to pass (for example, in https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-python/blame/081285897e4471690ae52b3afe81a6a495f75ec8/tests/profiler/test_continuous_profiler.py#L232). While it is possible to empirically come up with values that would make tests complete on the infrastructures used by Python SDK for Sentry.io developers, there are other infrastructures that run these tests, and their performance will be different. On faster platforms, tests will execute slower than they would if sleep delays were optimal for this specific platform. Considering thousands of tests that run a few minutes per testing workflow (most recent runs on Test Common on GitHub Actions take 6-7 minutes to complete: https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-python/actions/workflows/test-integrations-common.yml, see screenshot), speeding up tests might be valuable. On slower platforms, tests might fail and this is the original reason for filling this issue. Building Sentry SDK on Fedora infrastructure occasionally fails (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=120920902, see screenshot) because time-dependent tests do not pass:
=================================== FAILURES ===================================
______ test_continuous_profiler_manual_start_and_stop[experiment-thread] _______
tests/profiler/test_continuous_profiler.py:234: in test_continuous_profiler_manual_start_and_stop
    assert_single_transaction_with_profile_chunks(envelopes, thread)
tests/profiler/test_continuous_profiler.py:86: in assert_single_transaction_with_profile_chunks
    assert len(items["profile_chunk"]) > 0
E   assert 0 > 0
E    +  where 0 = len([])

Another example: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265822.
It is worth noting that this issue is not unique to Fedora infrastructure, and apparently occurs elsewhere. For example, while searching for test_continuous_profiler_manual_start_and_stop on GitHub, I noticed this test (along with other time-dependent tests) is being disabled in Gentoo package specification: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/blob/997938b5b7bf5deb7943b44a2dc52485d14f8076/dev-python/sentry-sdk/sentry-sdk-2.7.1.ebuild#L117-L122.
I propose mocking time. While it is possible to do using the unittest.mock library directly, I suggest using a library for that, such as https://pypi.org/project/freezegun/ or https://pypi.org/project/time-machine/. The latter currently works with CPython only, however, Sentry SDK is currently tested with CPython only as well (at least on GitHub Actions), PyPy was removed from the testing suite here: https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-python/pull/1602:

Removed PyPy from the test suite because it was never run. We have to reevaluate support for PyPy.

What is your opinion on this issue? Will you accept a PR(s) that introduces mocking for time? If so, which library do you prefer me to use?

hey @rominf all great points overall, yes we could definitely write a lot of our tests better that have grown over time.
The gentoo link is very interesting since it points to a whole bunch of flaky and weird tests.
Feel free to pick a simple library that works for you and make a PR.
We will probably not prioritize this internally but if you make a contribution, we'd be happy to merge it in.


[ie/neteasemusic] Add additional quality formats

Description of your pull request and other information
This PR adds several format IDs to the extractor, allowing high quality audio to be extracted from Netease Music.
The list of format IDs are constructed based on API response of https://music.163.com/#/song?id=1952853555, and are cross-checked with a repo with similar mission based a rough GitHub search
I can't find any tests related to this part of the code, so I didn't change any.
Fixes #9196
Template

Before submitting a pull request make sure you have:

[x] At least skimmed through contributing guidelines including yt-dlp coding conventions
I've only skimmed though it - this seems like a simple code change so there's probably not much I can break regarding coding conventions.
[x] Searched the bugtracker for similar pull requests
[x] Checked the code with flake8 and ran relevant tests

In order to be accepted and merged into yt-dlp each piece of code must be in public domain or released under Unlicense. Check all of the following options that apply:

[x] I am the original author of this code and I am willing to release it under Unlicense
[ ] I am not the original author of this code but it is in public domain or released under Unlicense (provide reliable evidence)

What is the purpose of your pull request?

[x] Fix or improvement to an extractor (Make sure to add/update tests)
[ ] New extractor (Piracy websites will not be accepted)
[ ] Core bug fix/improvement
[ ] New feature (It is strongly recommended to open an issue first)

Following is the formats available without this PR:
[debug] Command-line config: ['--list-formats', '--cookies', '/home/hafeoz/.ytdlp-cookies.txt', '-vU', 'https://music.163.com/#/song?id=1952853555']
[debug] Encodings: locale UTF-8, fs utf-8, pref UTF-8, out utf-8, error utf-8, screen utf-8
[debug] yt-dlp version<EMAIL_ADDRESS>from yt-dlp/yt-dlp [f10589e34]
[debug] Python 3.11.6 (CPython x86_64 64bit) - Linux-6.7-arch3-1-x86_64-with-glibc2.38 (OpenSSL 3.2.0 23 Nov 2023, glibc 2.38)
[debug] exe versions: ffmpeg 6.1.1 (setts), ffprobe 6.1.1, rtmpdump 2.4
[debug] Optional libraries: Cryptodome-3.12.0, certifi-2024.02.02, mutagen-1.47.0, requests-2.31.0, secretstorage-3.3.3, sqlite3-3.45.1, urllib3-1.26.18
[debug] Proxy map: {}
[debug] Request Handlers: urllib, requests
[debug] Loaded 1798 extractors
[debug] Fetching release info: https://api.github.com/repos/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/releases/latest
Latest version<EMAIL_ADDRESS>from yt-dlp/yt-dlp
yt-dlp is up to date<EMAIL_ADDRESS>from yt-dlp/yt-dlp)
[netease:song] Extracting URL: https://music.163.com/#/song?id=1952853555
[netease:song]<PHONE_NUMBER>: Downloading song info
[netease:song]<PHONE_NUMBER>: Downloading song URL info: bitrate 128002
[netease:song]<PHONE_NUMBER>: Checking song URL
[netease:song]<PHONE_NUMBER>: Downloading song URL info: bitrate 192002
[netease:song]<PHONE_NUMBER>: Checking song URL
[netease:song]<PHONE_NUMBER>: Downloading song URL info: bitrate 320002
[netease:song]<PHONE_NUMBER>: Checking song URL
[netease:song]<PHONE_NUMBER>: Downloading lyrics data
[debug] Formats sorted by: hasvid, ie_pref, lang, quality, res, fps, hdr:12(7), vcodec:vp9.2(10), channels, acodec, size, br, asr, proto, vext, aext, hasaud, source, id
[info] Available formats for<PHONE_NUMBER>:
ID     EXT RESOLUTION │ FILESIZE PROTO │ VCODEC  ACODEC   ABR ASR
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
bMusic mp3 unknown    │  2.93MiB http  │ unknown unknown 128k 48k
mMusic mp3 unknown    │  4.40MiB http  │ unknown unknown 192k 48k
hMusic mp3 unknown    │  7.33MiB http  │ unknown unknown 320k 48k

And following is the formats with this patch (same song, logged in SVIP):
[netease:song] Extracting URL: https://music.163.com/#/song?id=1952853555
[netease:song]<PHONE_NUMBER>: Downloading song info
[netease:song]<PHONE_NUMBER>: Downloading song URL info: bitrate 855137
[netease:song]<PHONE_NUMBER>: Checking song URL
[netease:song]<PHONE_NUMBER>: Downloading song URL info: bitrate 1622742
[netease:song]<PHONE_NUMBER>: Checking song URL
[netease:song]<PHONE_NUMBER>: Downloading song URL info: bitrate 128002
[netease:song]<PHONE_NUMBER>: Checking song URL
[netease:song]<PHONE_NUMBER>: Downloading song URL info: bitrate 128002
[netease:song]<PHONE_NUMBER>: Checking song URL
[netease:song]<PHONE_NUMBER>: Downloading song URL info: bitrate 192002
[netease:song]<PHONE_NUMBER>: Checking song URL
[netease:song]<PHONE_NUMBER>: Downloading song URL info: bitrate 320002
[netease:song]<PHONE_NUMBER>: Checking song URL
[netease:song]<PHONE_NUMBER>: Downloading lyrics data
[debug] Formats sorted by: hasvid, ie_pref, lang, quality, res, fps, hdr:12(7), vcodec:vp9.2(10), channels, acodec, size, br, asr, proto, vext, aext, hasaud, source, id
[info] Available formats for<PHONE_NUMBER>:
ID      EXT  RESOLUTION │  FILESIZE PROTO │ VCODEC  ACODEC   ABR ASR
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
bMusic  mp3  unknown    │   2.93MiB http  │ unknown unknown 128k 48k
lMusic  mp3  unknown    │   2.93MiB http  │ unknown unknown 128k 48k
mMusic  mp3  unknown    │   4.40MiB http  │ unknown unknown 192k 48k
hMusic  mp3  unknown    │   7.33MiB http  │ unknown unknown 320k 48k
hrMusic flac unknown    │  19.57MiB http  │ unknown unknown 855k 48k
sqMusic flac unknown    │  19.57MiB http  │ unknown unknown 855k 48k

And same song without SVIP:
[netease:song] Extracting URL: https://music.163.com/#/song?id=1952853555
[netease:song]<PHONE_NUMBER>: Downloading song info
[netease:song]<PHONE_NUMBER>: Downloading song URL info: bitrate 855137
[netease:song]<PHONE_NUMBER>: Checking song URL
[netease:song]<PHONE_NUMBER>: Downloading song URL info: bitrate 1622742
[netease:song]<PHONE_NUMBER>: Checking song URL
[netease:song]<PHONE_NUMBER>: Downloading song URL info: bitrate 128002
[netease:song]<PHONE_NUMBER>: Checking song URL
[netease:song]<PHONE_NUMBER>: Downloading song URL info: bitrate 128002
[netease:song]<PHONE_NUMBER>: Checking song URL
[netease:song]<PHONE_NUMBER>: Downloading song URL info: bitrate 192002
[netease:song]<PHONE_NUMBER>: Checking song URL
[netease:song]<PHONE_NUMBER>: Downloading song URL info: bitrate 320002
[netease:song]<PHONE_NUMBER>: Checking song URL
[netease:song]<PHONE_NUMBER>: Downloading lyrics data
[debug] Formats sorted by: hasvid, ie_pref, lang, quality, res, fps, hdr:12(7), vcodec:vp9.2(10), channels, acodec, size, br, asr, proto, vext, aext, hasaud, source, id
[info] Available formats for<PHONE_NUMBER>:
ID      EXT RESOLUTION │ FILESIZE PROTO │ VCODEC  ACODEC   ABR ASR
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
bMusic  mp3 unknown    │  2.93MiB http  │ unknown unknown 128k 48k
lMusic  mp3 unknown    │  2.93MiB http  │ unknown unknown 128k 48k
mMusic  mp3 unknown    │  4.40MiB http  │ unknown unknown 192k 48k
hMusic  mp3 unknown    │  7.33MiB http  │ unknown unknown 320k 48k
hrMusic mp3 unknown    │  7.33MiB http  │ unknown unknown 320k 48k
sqMusic mp3 unknown    │  7.33MiB http  │ unknown unknown 320k 48k

And finally ffprobe output of logged-in sqMusic download sample:
Input #0, flac, from '采菊 [1952853555].flac':
  Duration: 00:03:12.01, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 855 kb/s
  Stream #0:0: Audio: flac, 48000 Hz, stereo, s16

Hi, @hafeoz. Maybe you could apply a small fix for the hint about --no-playlist :
diff --git a/yt_dlp/extractor/neteasemusic.py b/yt_dlp/extractor/neteasemusic.py
index e4876af5c..1877034e5 100644
--- a/yt_dlp/extractor/neteasemusic.py
+++ b/yt_dlp/extractor/neteasemusic.py
@@ -561,7 +561,8 @@ def _real_extract(self, url):
             'timestamp': ('createTime', {self.kilo_or_none}),
         })

-        if not self._yes_playlist(info['songs'] and program_id, info['mainSong']['id']):
+        if not self._yes_playlist(
+            info['songs'] and program_id, info['mainSong']['id'], playlist_label='program', video_label='song'):
             formats = self.extract_formats(info['mainSong'])

             return {

Comparison:
  [netease:program] Extracting URL: https://music.163.com/#/program?id=10109051
  [netease:program] 10109051: Downloading program info
- [netease:program] Downloading playlist 10109051 - add --no-playlist to download just the video 32591923
+ [netease:program] Downloading program 10109051 - add --no-playlist to download just the song 32591923

.

@pzhlkj6612 do you want to open a separate PR for that?

@pzhlkj6612 do you want to open a separate PR for that?

Done, #9488.

So it seems like this API is no longer useful (https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/issues/9196#issuecomment-2187265378 https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/pull/9197#discussion_r1651389618). Closing :(

Feel free to repurpose this PR if you want to implement extraction via the new API

Sorry I've re-forked (to make PR commit history clean) and GitHub won't let me re-open this PR with the new repo. I've submitted the change as #10258 :)


Fix bugs in ItemListLayouts/KubeObjectListLayouts

Bugs:

Scrolls to top when selecting a row - Closes #4793
Scrolls to top when selecting all rows
Rendering of contents flicker
Getting release values sometimes throw
Render-storm in Events - Closes #4769

Other changes:

Replace avoidable asyncComputed with normal computed
Remove noisy debugging from getDetailsUrl

Still to be fixed:

KubeObjectListLayout pages are re-rendered involuntarely losing scroll position

Some things I have noticed while testing this:

Clicking a row (say in pods) to open up the drawer still makes the list bounce around
Closing that drawer makes the list scroll to the top

Seems to solve described issues, but found another one. ItemListLayout gets empty and then refreshed every 30s or so.
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9607060/152166964-4111889b-eddf-45c5-a50e-1417fe7b7f5e.mov

Fixes https://github.com/lensapp/lens/issues/4512

Some things I have noticed while testing this:

Clicking a row (say in pods) to open up the drawer still makes the list bounce around
Closing that drawer makes the list scroll to the top

Yep, these are known. Separate PR coming for these.

Seems to solve described issues, but found another one. ItemListLayout gets empty and then refreshed every 30s or so.
refreshed.secret.list.mov

Known. Created separate issue for that. Happens on master as well.

The lists still scroll to the top when items are added to the list (Create a cronjob from the template under Create resource - this creates a new pod every minute)


NameCheap Whitelisted IPs

Have issues running this module through CI/CD solution, im using Azure Devops and the problem im having is that the client ips of the managed service constantly changes. Is there anyway I can whitelist a CIDR instead of a specific IP?

Hi!
Unfortunately this is a limitation of the Namecheap public API itself, rather than Terraform provider itself. Also there is no way to change whitelist via API as far as I know :(
I would advice you to contact our customer support team. They do track such client requests and as soon as there is enough demand on certain feature - it get's processed by respective product team.
Or you can always fallback to the static agents, if possible.

Is it possible to allowlist a CIDR range on the Namecheap API instead?

Duplicate of #62
Duplicate of #67

Thank you for reaching out and bringing this issue to our attention. After reviewing your request, it appears that the matter you're experiencing is tied to the underlying API implementation rather than the terraform-provider-namecheap directly.
Currently, the team responsible for the API does not have plans to implement this feature in the near term. However, understanding the importance of your request, I will forward your feedback to them. While I can't guarantee a change in priorities or timelines, highlighting user demand like yours can often influence future decision-making and prioritization.

Hi @vetal2409 , Where could be placed a feature request for the API itself then?
Currently there is a single API key that all whitelisted IPs can use. In terms of security, that's the same as having the same password for everything. If for any reason one of the whitelisted IPs gets compromised and the -master- API key have to be revoked/regenerated, all other whitelisted IPs get affected too.
With that in mind, please consider the following proposal:

Allow that each Whitelisted IP also have its own API key. With this, each key can be revoked/regenerated without affecting the remainig IPs.
Make the input of the IP as optional parameter. So, if a customer still wants to restrict the API usage per IP, can still do that too
(Optional) Disable the use of the "main" API key (thus effectively "moving" the API key to each "IP")

With that being said, would be best to rename the "Whitelisted IPs" as "API keys". Also, for safety, the API key (either main or per IP) shall only be visible once, either when being generated or in creation/regeneration of each API key.


feat(warn): Warn component names hyphenated into reserved names, fix #8025

Currently, component names like 'Map' is silently ignored, because they translated into reserved names but the component names are not exactly the same as the reserved names. The component names, thus, should be hyphenated before checking if reserved.
Resolve #8025.

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check at least one)

[ ] Bugfix
[x] Feature
[ ] Code style update
[ ] Refactor
[ ] Build-related changes
[ ] Other, please describe:

Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one)

[ ] Yes
[x] No

If yes, please describe the impact and migration path for existing applications:
The PR fulfills these requirements:

[x] It's submitted to the dev branch for v2.x (or to a previous version branch), not the master branch
[x] When resolving a specific issue, it's referenced in the PR's title (e.g. fix #xxx[,#xxx], where "xxx" is the issue number)
[x] All tests are passing: https://github.com/vuejs/vue/blob/dev/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-setup
[x] New/updated tests are included

If adding a new feature, the PR's description includes:

[x] A convincing reason for adding this feature (to avoid wasting your time, it's best to open a suggestion issue first and wait for approval before working on it)

Other information:
The reason of using hyphenate() instead of .toLowerCase() is that we should allow a name like MaP, as it is shown as ma-p in template and thus a valid component name.

Vue community has a lot of libraries that use Input or Select as component name. Say https://github.com/vuejs/vetur/issues/303 and https://github.com/vuejs/eslint-plugin-vue/issues/181 .
I don't know if it will be an annoying warning.  cc @icarusion

Didn’t know that these child components actually work when we use the capitalized name as it is. But I think it’s really ambiguous, because, as described in #8025, we are sometimes not sure if a name is reserved and should be used in case-sensitive way. I think it’s generally good to warn users when they’re using CamelCased reserved names.


Image for $SANTA coin from Dave Craige

Thank you for your help!

Awesome, but i like this one better https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1070742685546205184/SzQjMv5f_400x400.jpg