Chat Error: prompt is too long: 200000 tokens > 199999 maximum

What does this error message mean?
This error message means that the AI model's context window is full. The Anthropic Sonney 3.5 AI model can only keep 200,000 tokens in its "mind" at any given time.
As described in issue #678, Bolt.new syncs both the chat history & file system with the AI's memory. When this error occurs, it means that the combination of message history and file system has become too large for the AI model to work on under the current configuration.
What to do when you get this error
Here are a couple approaches to consider:

Clear the chat history to free up some space in the context window
This will only help if the chat history is filling a major portion of the context window (IE it is very long). As of 11/1/24 you can clear chat history by simply refreshing the page.

Reduce the Size of your project
This could be accomplished by breaking a large app into smaller chunks, and glueing it all back together outside of Bolt later. For example, separate backend and frontend into separate projects is a common developer pattern. This could be challenging for less experienced developers.

ADVANCED USERS ONLY: .bolt/ignore
In every bolt project, if you open it in StackBlitz you can edit a file called .bolt/ignore, and in this file you can list out any folders or folders that should be excluded from the AI context window. For example, here is our vite react starter’s ignore files: https://stackblitz.com/edit/vite-shadcn?file=.bolt%2Fignore. Any files listed there will be completely invisible to the AI, and will clear up space in the context window. You’ll need to edit the .bolt/ignore file in StackBlitz and then reopen the project in bolt for the changes to take effect. Please note: hiding files from the AI can have unintended consequences as it is no longer aware of your entire project. This approach is very powerful, but is only recommended for advanced users who can make informed decisions about what can safely be excluded, and understand/resolve issues that may arise from this approach.

What are we doing about this?
We are currently in the R&D phase to identify application-level changes we can make to better manage the AI context window. Our current approach has the benefit of making Bolt.new very simple to use, as the AI is constantly aware of the entire context of your application so you don't have to tell it which files to focus on.  However, it does introduce issues like the context window limitation described above. Stay tuned to this issue for future updates!

I still dont get the credit that you guys said will credit?

Hello, I get the same error, could you please fix this issue? I could not do anything because of this issue.
Thank you for your efforts and supports.

same as me. can not work when just secord request blocked of this

same issue. this is really sad

I would also like a refund as my entire project has been halted. Have been stuck for 4 days now. I am unable to even give the most basic prompt. Please provide email for me to contact for refund.

@kc0tlh how can i request a refund, I added tokens to have the the chat go into endless loop of errors and now I am having the same issue of the prompt being too long. my project has been stuck for 3 days.

I used an approach with an automation where I brought the context for a desired outcome in stages where a thing was being affected by a portion of the total context, then again by another portion of the context, through finally the remainder of the context before considering the "affect" to have been completed. Maybe there's merit to an approach like this here?
Either way, I am kind of stuck on a project I was working on given this problem and will try the ignore method next as clearing other elements from the context window or forking did not work.
Until the context window issue is solved, Bolt may very well be the most amazing prototyping tool of all time, but through limitations of the models themselves (which are not theirs, but Anthropics), will not be able to continue on after a certain point.
For Bolt: I think the tech is amazing and I've upgraded my paid account a few times to keep going out of excitement. I think some of the frustration seen here in the Issues section could be solved by some blatant warnings and clarifying the marketing to explain current limitations. Also, not understanding the context window as someone just getting started meant I went through like 200k tokens at a time with some of my messages which was astonishing, but I accepted because the results were still WAY MORE than I could have paid the same money for to myself for my time or any other human developer.
To anyone else, these people are trying to make a great tool. I'm sure you can imagine they don't want problems.

This is a very strange behavior of BOLT developers!  First of all, you do not warn that at one point the system may stop working! Secondly, you have not entered any indicator to understand how many tokens are already in the context window! Thirdly, you didn't even bother to make some kind of cleaning tool. Fourth, and most importantly! Users who are able to achieve maximum context should be saved as much as possible, because in my case, I have already brought you $ 450 this month, and you are not doing any of the above! And fifth, since there is such a limitation of the context window for the model, then introduce an additional agent, otherwise people will not do anything serious on your platform and will just run away from you, and you don't seem to have started badly!!!!!  And I would also like to say that support is very important and the fact that you do not respond to requests and people waste a lot of time waiting for some kind of reference from you is not right. So you spit in their face... It's a shame, of course. You could get better, but apparently you don't need it!

I hear ya and I did the same @Frankg40. Only saying a few hundred dollars for something that otherwise would cost tens of thousands or more... communication by Bolt should be better, but they should get a little grace for this. The value I have been able to get out of the use of this system in a little over 24 hours FAR outweighed the expense for what building without the tool would have cost.

@kc0tlh have you guys looked into Claude Enterprise versus Sonnet 3.5?

Increasing token size limit is not the answer. 200k tokens per prompt is already not a sustainable business model.for something that gets it wrong more than right.

Increasing token size limit is not the answer. 200k tokens per prompt is already not a sustainable business model.for something that gets it wrong more than right.

I do very much agree with you there.

@danthemank what is claude enterprises? something like bolt.new? are you thinking of import the code from bolt into claude?

@heliusmaximus08 I am referring to the Enterprise model offering from Claude where it was mentioned above that Sonnet 3.5 from Claude is currently used in Bolt. Not sure what the implications of changing one for the other functionally would have, but the one main difference in the two is the size of the context window (and the costs).

For those of us interested in a fix for this even if we cant fix it ourselves. I just had a convo with Bolt.
RIght now you are costing almost 200,000 tokens per prompt. Break down the token sizes when I prompt you for my project right now
_Let me break down the approximate token usage in your current project:
Core Project Files (~25,000 tokens):
React components
TypeScript interfaces
Utility functions
Store/state management
Hooks
Configuration Files (~5,000 tokens):
Package.json
TypeScript configs
ESLint configs
Vite config
Firebase configs
Database/Backend Files (~8,000 tokens):
Firebase rules
Database schemas
Migration scripts
Data transformers
Admin/Management Files (~7,000 tokens):
Admin components
Mapping interfaces
Field management
Database selectors
Onboarding/Auth Files (~5,000 tokens):
Authentication guards
Onboarding steps
User management
System Instructions/Constraints (~3,000 tokens):
WebContainer limitations
Technology preferences
Response guidelines
File Tracking/Metadata (~2,000 tokens):
File modifications
Running commands
Hidden files info
Total: ~55,000 tokens per interaction
This is significantly more efficient than the 200,000 tokens you mentioned, but there's still room for optimization by:
Splitting large components into smaller ones
Moving utility functions to separate modules
Optimizing database schemas
Reducing duplicate code
Streamlining configuration files
Would you like me to help optimize any specific area to reduce the token count?_
Ok now give me the token amounts for my project when i prompt you for the following
_File modifications and changes
Currently running commands
Project configuration
Development environment details
Here's the breakdown of token usage when I receive your prompts:
File Modifications (~150,000 tokens):
Complete file contents for all modified files
File diffs showing changes
Removed files tracking
Hidden files list
Running Commands (~500 tokens):
Current process information
Command status
Runtime details
Project Configuration (~15,000 tokens):
Package.json contents
Environment settings
Build configurations
Dependencies list
TypeScript/ESLint configs
Development Environment (~5,000 tokens):
WebContainer specs
Available commands
Runtime limitations
Technology preferences
System constraints
Total: ~170,500 tokens per interaction
The largest portion comes from file modifications since I receive complete file contents rather than just diffs. This ensures I have accurate context but does increase token usage significantly._
Does this mean if I want to change the background color on the newsfeed, Bolt is going to send AI my entire project even if 95% of it is irrelevent for the change I need to make?
_Yes, that's correct. Even for a simple change like modifying the background color in the NewsFeed component, the entire project context is sent with each interaction. This includes all file contents, configurations, and environment details.
While this ensures I have complete context and can make informed decisions, it's not very efficient for small, isolated changes where only a specific component needs modification.
Unfortunately, there's currently no mechanism for me to receive only the relevant files or partial context. Each interaction includes the full project state, even if the change only affects a single line of code._
Im spending probably 8-12 hours a day on Bolt so Ive learned its quirks pretty well.
The only thing its also not including in the token count is in the chat container. Ive found clearing the chat container OFTEN after successfuly fixing anything where I dont need to rollback helps in reducing token size and possibly even more importantly it makes the AI more focused on what you want and does a better job coding.
The second thing that SIGNIFICANTLY increases the efficiency and lessens errors is when any file or page youre working on get more than 200 lines of code, I ask it tif it would be a good idea to modularize the page or function. It often agrees. If you don't follow... Say you have Facebook. You have the navigation at the top, then you have status update, then you have reels, then you have the newsfeed.
This would take the newsfeed page and put each function in separate files. So it would have:
HomePage
Sub file > Nav
Sub File > Status Update
Sub FIle > Reels
Sub File > Newsfeed
Other than this being good coding conduct in general, specifcally for bolt it is crucial. Because Bolt likes to rewrite your ENTIRE page. And when it does it often forgets to put things back, or loses context altogether and you get a completely different looking page. Doing it like this, when you make a change to say REELS, instead of it rewriting the entire page, its just going to change the REELS file. It reduces risk dramatically for errors or large unrequested changes.
I asked Bolt
Does modularizing pages and components increase token size a lot or does it just split the token into smaller pieces?
_Modularizing code into separate components and files doesn't increase the total token count significantly - it primarily redistributes the same tokens across multiple files. The actual code content remains roughly the same, just organized more efficiently.
For example, if you have a 1000-token monolithic component and split it into 5 modular components of 200 tokens each, you're still dealing with approximately the same total token count. The small increase comes from:
Additional import/export statements
Component declarations and props interfaces
File headers and basic setup code
However, these minor increases are negligible compared to the benefits:
Better code organization
Easier maintenance
Improved reusability
Better performance through code splitting
Simpler testing
Clearer separation of concerns
The token count increase is typically less than 5-10% when properly modularizing code, which is a worthwhile tradeoff for the significant improvements in code quality and maintainability._
Couple LARGE points to make here.
To Bolt -NEW users need to be made aware of the current platforms Ceiling. People are not aware that when a project reaches a certain size, Bolt can no longer handle it. When people don't know that, they believe they can build whatever they want. They spend $500 on Tokens building a comprehensive app, only to find out they cant build a comprehensive app because it was not said up front...
ALSO - That as your app gets bigger more and more tokens will be used every time you interact with it. At first it was weird that it seemed like I was going through tokens WAY faster as I built out the app then when I started. That's because we are. Increasing token size is not the fix. Or people will get to a point with their app where theyre spending 1M tokens per prompt, which even then might be fine if it worked perfectly. But you cant be dropping a Million on tokens to get errors.
I know you are working on a fix, but users should still be made aware.

Also going to share this year to try and help you guys even though Im just a regular user:
**please review all of my files for

deprecated or unused code or files that have been left that can be removed. Give me a list of and token amount for each. 2. How many tokens would removing the entire admin - database management section?
Answer only**

Deprecated/Unused Files & Code:
Files that can be removed:

src/views/PostStylesShowcase.tsx (4,892 tokens)
src/views/PostStylesShowcaseV2.tsx (3,756 tokens)
src/components/AddLogModal.tsx (2,143 tokens)
src/components/VoiceInput.tsx (1,245 tokens)
scripts/showHeaders.mjs (642 tokens)
scripts/showAllHeaders.mjs (1,324 tokens)
scripts/findMaxLengths.mjs (2,156 tokens)
src/components/SocialInteractions.tsx (1,876 tokens)
src/components/food/ShareDiaryConfirmation.tsx (2,234 tokens)

Total tokens that can be removed: 20,268
Admin/Database Management Section:
Removing the entire admin section would reduce:

src/views/admin/* (4,892 tokens)
src/components/admin/* (8,756 tokens)
src/lib/admin/* (6,234 tokens)
src/hooks/admin/* (2,143 tokens)
src/lib/mapping/* (7,654 tokens)
scripts/utils/transformers/* (3,245 tokens)
Related types and interfaces (1,245 tokens)

Total tokens that would be removed: 34,169

I created an admin section that really shouldnt be part of my app for launch anyway. I downloaded the whole project on StackBlitz so I still have the admin section files. But now I can remove the admin section, and the deprecated files, which will be a large token reduction for the project and per prompt.

Thanks for sharing @Frankg40 - based on what you said, using the ignore method would likely be even more useful if the level of modularity was much higher as well.

@digikordeveloper IF you got stuck suddenly after progressing a lot, try to restore from a slightly previous backup and strategize with bolz on how much tokens are being consumes and how you should proceed further without being stuck in the situation. Try this approach and see if it helps. At least you will be able to move forward.

@salimmallick  thank you for your answer but that won't help me. I need to be able to work with nothing like this happening again. I really hope bolt will fix this asap.

@salimmallick thank you for your answer but that won't help me. I need to be able to work with nothing like this happening again. I really hope bolt will fix this asap.

You know this is a beta right? Maybe don't rely on a brand new platform in beta for a project with a deadline.

@Frankg40  good point. But they also should not allow to buy $500 worth of tokens just to get stuck with the project.

@salimmallick thank you for your answer but that won't help me. I need to be able to work with nothing like this happening again. I really hope bolt will fix this asap.

You know this is a beta right? Maybe don't rely on a brand new platform in beta for a project with a deadline.

@Frankg40: If you don't get to Bolt.new via GitHub, there is NO mention of it being a beta product in the customer journey as far as I could tell. I ran into this same trap with Bolt. I re-checked, but if you go straight to the Bolt.new site and then subscribe after using the free version, there's no mentioning of beta.

@Stackblitz,
As a resident of the EU, I believe your current approach to selling a beta product may conflict with European consumer protection laws. Specifically:
Lack of Transparency: EU law mandates informed consent before purchase. Selling a beta product with clear limitations, without disclosing these upfront, could be seen as misleading.
Refund Policy: Under EU regulations, consumers are entitled to a refund if the product is non-functional or if it does not match the description provided. I was unable to find any option for requesting a refund on your platform.
Given these concerns, I am now left with no choice but to escalate the matter through my credit card provider to resolve this issue and recover my funds.
This experience is both disappointing and frustrating. I had high hopes for completing my project with Bolt, as it is an impressive and promising software. However, these legal and customer service shortcomings have unfortunately marred my experience.
Additionally, I am encountering the error message: "prompt is too long: 200612 tokens > 200000 maximum." This issue has now locked me out of interacting with the AI, even outside of coding tasks, and your service does not provide an option to fix this known issue.
Please address these matters promptly to ensure compliance and improve trust with your EU-based users.

Thank you all for sharing such valuable feedback. We deeply appreciate the StackBlitz community’s involvement in helping us improve Bolt.new. We understand how frustrating it can be to encounter roadblocks, especially after investing significant time and resources into your projects.
As a small team of 20 who launched Bolt.new just over a month ago, we’re actively working to address the AI context window limitations, optimize token usage, and improve communication. Here’s a breakdown of our responses to key issues raised:

Context Window Limitations

The "prompt is too long" error occurs because the AI model (Anthropic Sonnet 3.5) has a maximum 200,000-token context limit, as noted above. We recognize this impacts workflows for many of you.
To mitigate this, we’re exploring application-level optimizations to streamline token usage while maintaining the AI’s understanding of your project’s context. This is a complex task requiring ongoing R&D.

Token Efficiency and User Tips

@danthemank and @Frankg40 shared useful tips on modularizing code to reduce token strain—thank you! Breaking up files can help manage token usage and limit context overflow.
Advanced users may also use the .bolt/ignore file to exclude non-essential files from the AI context. This can free up token space, though it may affect how the AI interprets your project, so use it thoughtfully.
Clearing chat history regularly can further help manage token usage by removing unnecessary data from the context window. We’re also reviewing suggestions to add a token usage indicator for more control over token consumption.

Refunds and Customer Support

@Welexon, @paydayrich, and others: Refunds are available to users impacted by these limitations, and our team is working through requests as quickly as possible. For assistance, please reach out to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>@Trisfidel, we hear your concerns about EU consumer protection laws. We’ll be updating the Bolt app to make the refund process clearer for all users.

Transparency on Limitations

We hear you, @Frankg40, @Trisfidel, and @Habartru, on the importance of transparency. We will be updating in-app messaging to clarify the context window limitation and token consumption details, aiming to make these limitations more visible and avoid future frustrations.

To everyone who has contributed to this discussion, thank you for your patience, understanding, and insights. We’re fully committed to addressing these issues and making Bolt.new better based on your feedback.
Thank you for helping us shape Bolt.new into a tool that better serves you!

@digikordeveloper please try to optimize the system. Chat with bolt to get the files disabled and moved to .bolt/ignore and create a documentation which can help you. I did that today, and this is how my system looks like now:
The system has been optimized with:

Reduced token usage from ~200,000 to ~20,000 tokens
Disabled non-essential categories while preserving their code
Maintained core UI components and design patterns
Clear documentation for re-enabling features

@salimmallick - Thats so good to know, I need to implement this before the Bolt team gets around this. Anyway you could make some documentation or a loom video that would show how you did this. I know its an ask but just a shot

@mkaufmanentrep You can have a conversation with bolt regarding this and bolt will help you optimize the code base so that you can minimize the token consumption and reduce the prompt length. It will even create the needed documentation around it

@mkaufmanentrep You can have a conversation with bolt regarding this and bolt will help you optimize the code base so that you can minimize the token consumption and reduce the prompt length. It will even create the needed documentation around it

That would be wonderful, unfortunately I'm not even able to have a conversation with the base as i'm very over limits on the project. I'm a rookie

@mkaufmanentrep i have been in that situation myself. The one work around I figured out was to go back to a previous version from the backup which is available in the settings part and then restore a backup. Then you can have a conversation and strategize with bolt on which components can be disabled and hidden till you complete other elements of the page.

Hi everyone, could you please help me understand how to use the .bolt/ignore file? Where should I create the file, how do I load it, and what format should I use to write in it exactly?

Hi everyone, could you please help me understand how to use the .bolt/ignore file? Where should I create the file, how do I load it, and what format should I use to write in it exactly?

Yeah, same... not sure hoW to use this.

ADVANCED USERS ONLY: .bolt/ignore
In every bolt project, if you open it in StackBlitz you can edit a file called .bolt/ignore, and in this file you can list out any folders or folders that should be excluded from the AI context window. For example, here is our vite react starter’s ignore files: https://stackblitz.com/edit/vite-shadcn?file=.bolt%2Fignore. Any files listed there will be completely invisible to the AI, and will clear up space in the context window. You’ll need to edit the .bolt/ignore file in StackBlitz and then reopen the project in bolt for the changes to take effect. Please note: hiding files from the AI can have unintended consequences as it is no longer aware of your entire project. This approach is very powerful, but is only recommended for advanced users who can make informed decisions about what can safely be excluded, and understand/resolve issues that may arise from this approach.

ADVANCED USERS ONLY: .bolt/ignore
In every bolt project, if you open it in StackBlitz you can edit a file called .bolt/ignore, and in this file you can list out any folders or folders that should be excluded from the AI context window. For example, here is our vite react starter’s ignore files: https://stackblitz.com/edit/vite-shadcn?file=.bolt%2Fignore. Any files listed there will be completely invisible to the AI, and will clear up space in the context window. You’ll need to edit the .bolt/ignore file in StackBlitz and then reopen the project in bolt for the changes to take effect. Please note: hiding files from the AI can have unintended consequences as it is no longer aware of your entire project. This approach is very powerful, but is only recommended for advanced users who can make informed decisions about what can safely be excluded, and understand/resolve issues that may arise from this approach.

super, thanks.

Even better guys. here's what you do.
First - Reach a point in your project where you do not need to roll anything back (You will still have your backups). If you had to  close the project or refresh the browser right where you are at, it would be fine. The change you are going to make is not going to ruin or delete anything. I'm only suggesting this just because it makes the most sense that you do this when you currently don't need to roll back.
I prompted Bolt:

ME: I plan on working on just the diary page to make these x y z features to work. I want to use the .bolt ignore feature.
Give me a list of all my files that the AI does not need to see for me to work on this specific part of my app.

Bolt then made a text file (just for a record) and gave me a list of all the files with comments and categorized.

Then copy the list.
Opened the project in Stackblitz.
Find the .bolt folder (it's the first one)
Click the create a doc icon (across from the bolt folder there is a few icons on the same line, it's the first one)
Paste in the files Bolt gave you.
Click save.
Close Stackblitz.
Go back to Bolt and refresh your web browser.

Done.
If you decide to work on a different part of your app, go back into StackBlitz, delete all the ignore files in the ignore doc. Prompt Bolt again on what you intend to do and to give you all the files it does not need again.
Repeat the process.
Cheers

@kc0tlh My suggestion is working really well but having bolt give me the files it can ignore based on the "feature" i want to work on.
Maybe add a function where you tell bolt this and it uploads the ignore files to the .ignore folder just like it adds rules to the firestore rules.
THen add a second prompt where you tell it you want to work on a new feature - it Clears the .ignore file. You tell it what you want to work on, and it uploads a new list of files.
Users just need to be given the instructions of this feature..
Just an idea Ive prob reduced my tokens by 70% by having bolt tell me which files.

@kc0tlh My suggestion is working really well by having bolt give me the files it can ignore based on the "feature" i want to work on.
Maybe add a function where you tell bolt this and it uploads the ignore files to the .ignore folder just like it adds rules to the firestore rules.
THen add a second prompt where you tell it you want to work on a new feature - it Clears the .ignore file. You tell it what you want to work on, and it uploads a new list of files to ignore.
A 3rd catch - If you ever tell it to do something, and it sees that feature doesnt exist, it maybe asks or looks at the ignore file list to see if what you want to work on might be on the ignore list (I know it wont be able to actually read the file in the ignore list) but if you are working on a feature and it's calling a variable or another file that Claude doesnt see, it can know theres a possibility the user has this file on ignore, and to maybe remove it. (More advanced for you guys to add, maybe not IDK)
Users just need to be given the instructions of this feature..
Just an idea. Ive prob reduced my tokens by 70% by having bolt tell me which files.

Really smart. One note, the AI having access to the ignore file would be (if it doesn't already) a pretty small number of tokens itself. I would think if it were aware of the total project filesystem, then had the list of things it doesn't have access to the codebase for, it should be able to make some reasonable assertions.

@kc0tlh My suggestion is working really well by having bolt give me the files it can ignore based on the "feature" i want to work on.
Maybe add a function where you tell bolt this and it uploads the ignore files to the .ignore folder just like it adds rules to the firestore rules.
THen add a second prompt where you tell it you want to work on a new feature - it Clears the .ignore file. You tell it what you want to work on, and it uploads a new list of files to ignore.
A 3rd catch - If you ever tell it to do something, and it sees that feature doesnt exist, it maybe asks or looks at the ignore file list to see if what you want to work on might be on the ignore list (I know it wont be able to actually read the file in the ignore list) but if you are working on a feature and it's calling a variable or another file that Claude doesnt see, it can know theres a possibility the user has this file on ignore, and to maybe remove it. (More advanced for you guys to add, maybe not IDK)
Users just need to be given the instructions of this feature..
Just an idea. Ive prob reduced my tokens by 70% by having bolt tell me which files.

Really smart. One note, the AI having access to the ignore file would be (if it doesn't already) a pretty small number of tokens itself. I would think if it were aware of the total project filesystem, then had the list of things it doesn't have access to the codebase for, it should be able to make some reasonable assertions.

Thanks. You try it out or anything else? So far so good.

@kc0tlh My suggestion is working really well by having bolt give me the files it can ignore based on the "feature" i want to work on.
Maybe add a function where you tell bolt this and it uploads the ignore files to the .ignore folder just like it adds rules to the firestore rules.
THen add a second prompt where you tell it you want to work on a new feature - it Clears the .ignore file. You tell it what you want to work on, and it uploads a new list of files to ignore.
A 3rd catch - If you ever tell it to do something, and it sees that feature doesnt exist, it maybe asks or looks at the ignore file list to see if what you want to work on might be on the ignore list (I know it wont be able to actually read the file in the ignore list) but if you are working on a feature and it's calling a variable or another file that Claude doesnt see, it can know theres a possibility the user has this file on ignore, and to maybe remove it. (More advanced for you guys to add, maybe not IDK)
Users just need to be given the instructions of this feature..
Just an idea. Ive prob reduced my tokens by 70% by having bolt tell me which files.

Thanks for the solution. It works well for me at first but still got the "prompt is too long" error at the end. Hope the bolt team will be able to find a solution soon.

@kc0tlh My suggestion is working really well by having bolt give me the files it can ignore based on the "feature" i want to work on.
Maybe add a function where you tell bolt this and it uploads the ignore files to the .ignore folder just like it adds rules to the firestore rules.
THen add a second prompt where you tell it you want to work on a new feature - it Clears the .ignore file. You tell it what you want to work on, and it uploads a new list of files to ignore.
A 3rd catch - If you ever tell it to do something, and it sees that feature doesnt exist, it maybe asks or looks at the ignore file list to see if what you want to work on might be on the ignore list (I know it wont be able to actually read the file in the ignore list) but if you are working on a feature and it's calling a variable or another file that Claude doesnt see, it can know theres a possibility the user has this file on ignore, and to maybe remove it. (More advanced for you guys to add, maybe not IDK)
Users just need to be given the instructions of this feature..
Just an idea. Ive prob reduced my tokens by 70% by having bolt tell me which files.

Really smart. One note, the AI having access to the ignore file would be (if it doesn't already) a pretty small number of tokens itself. I would think if it were aware of the total project filesystem, then had the list of things it doesn't have access to the codebase for, it should be able to make some reasonable assertions.

Thanks. You try it out or anything else? So far so good.

Honetly the usefulness after a certain point of development diminishes. Unless you as the developer really know what is going on and the tech stack used. Even still, things will get updated and things that should get updated based on those changes will not (if they're in "hidden" files or the connection to a non-"hidden" but related file is "hidden"). Probably I will not be able to continue using bolt at all for the main project I am working on any longer, but I may try to spin up some other ideas maybe to use up the rest of the credits at lease. Bullish on the tech, but its place at least for now is for smaller projects or prototyping / MVP depending on size.

@kc0tlh My suggestion is working really well by having bolt give me the files it can ignore based on the "feature" i want to work on.
Maybe add a function where you tell bolt this and it uploads the ignore files to the .ignore folder just like it adds rules to the firestore rules.
THen add a second prompt where you tell it you want to work on a new feature - it Clears the .ignore file. You tell it what you want to work on, and it uploads a new list of files to ignore.
A 3rd catch - If you ever tell it to do something, and it sees that feature doesnt exist, it maybe asks or looks at the ignore file list to see if what you want to work on might be on the ignore list (I know it wont be able to actually read the file in the ignore list) but if you are working on a feature and it's calling a variable or another file that Claude doesnt see, it can know theres a possibility the user has this file on ignore, and to maybe remove it. (More advanced for you guys to add, maybe not IDK)
Users just need to be given the instructions of this feature..
Just an idea. Ive prob reduced my tokens by 70% by having bolt tell me which files.

Thanks for the solution. It works well for me at first but still got the "prompt is too long" error at the end. Hope the bolt team will be able to find a solution soon.

You need to modularize your files.
Put 2/3 of your file on ignore. Ask it to review the 1/3 it can see and if any should be modularized. Repeat for the rest of the files.
The files not on ignore are still too big for the AI to receive.

OK thank you all guys. one ANOTHER Question: If i make a previous Backup to be under the Tokenlimit, do i lose the current backup file? How can i do this, not lose the current stadion of my app?

Any news?

prompt is too long: 201599 tokens > 200000 maximum
Again.....Please save my life!

Its boring come on guys fix that or give us refund back.

99% finished in on my project and hit these limits. Found this thread. What a disaster. Literally was SO pumped to my app into SEO history! FML.

i have 65m tokens left of my 120mils i purchased. and no way to fix this token limit issue!
Refund or a fix is required asap!

Requested a refund until this app is passed beta. You can't sell a service with MILLIONS of tokens that can't be used to finish a project. Will resubscribe when it's debugged and worth the money. Also the tokens consumption rate is too high for the continual repairing what the AI broke which was already 100% fine.

When in the history of development have you been able to create a complete and fully-featured application from the ground-up for a couple hundred dollars? The messaging on behalf of Bolt should be clearer, no doubt about that, but to say that what you're getting is not worth the money doesn't seem reasonable.
Accept a little responsibility for your own use of the tool and use the ignore method as mentioned above in various comments in the thread including at the very top of the page to continue working on your project.

Accept responsibility 🤣🤣🤣🤣 is that some sort of a joke???  Im a customer that paid for AI and I can't use the AI. Get a grip mate this software is currently broken because it can't handle large projects in it's current state. I've moved to another competitor app in the meantime until I can actually finish what I started on Bolt. Not all of us can develop by hand that's why bolt seemed like a good send as I could use my basic knowledge of site layouts to build with Ai instructions.  I've not slated the app I've said it's not worth money for something that can't be formally built. An unfinished project is pointless and as a hobby project I'm not chucking in $$$ into private developers.

📣 Progress Update: We have scoped out a feature that will allow us to support projects up to 2.5x larger than the current limit and are currently building it out! Targeting a quick land, will have more updates on exact ETA in a few days.
In the meantime, if you haven't, I recommend reviewing the workarounds in the issue description above.
P.S. If you need billing/refund support please reach out to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and link to your comments/tagged issue on this topic for assistance.

Greetings folks, I still do not see the bolt ignore file. I have am in stack blitz looking....

I managed to solve it:
First, I downloaded all the files and made a backup on my PC.
Then, I deleted the page folders I wasn't using in Stackblitz.
I created the new features using Boltz.
Then, I uploaded the folders again

What are some competitors that have solved the context window issue? Asking for a friend.

Getting error:
Free users only have access to a limited total prompt size, which this project exceeds. Upgrade to a paid account to double this limit.
But i'm on a paid plan...

Except I have paid hundreds of dollars.
From: avxobro @.>
Date: Thursday, November 14, 2024 at 10:26 AM
To: stackblitz/bolt.new @.>
Cc: harielxavier @.>, Mention @.>
Subject: Re: [stackblitz/bolt.new] Chat Error: prompt is too long: 200000 tokens > 199999 maximum (Issue #1322)
Getting error:
Free users only have access to a limited total prompt size, which this project exceeds. Upgrade to a paid account to double this limit.
But i'm on a paid plan...
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/stackblitz/bolt.new/issues/1322#issuecomment-2476705054, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6XHWI6ZRVMQF3DUY67XE2D2AS6KVAVCNFSM6AAAAABRA7ASKOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDINZWG4YDKMBVGQ.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

How does this work. When I go to stackblitz and open project on bolt.new i still get the same error. Is this for new projects that may exceed this limit? If so we are in the same boat. Thanks
From: Alexander Berger @.>
Date: Thursday, November 14, 2024 at 10:17 AM
To: stackblitz/bolt.new @.>
Cc: harielxavier @.>, Mention @.>
Subject: Re: [stackblitz/bolt.new] Chat Error: prompt is too long: 200000 tokens > 199999 maximum (Issue #1322)
📣 Progress Update: We have a preview URL with a fix for this issue that will now support projects up to 2.5x larger!
Please test out your projects that were previously receiving the "prompt too long" error at the link below and report back on the results!
https://8e78782a.bolt-cnr.pages.dev/
CC: @dukuohttps://github.com/dukuo @alvaroprs8https://github.com/alvaroprs8 @cp5337https://github.com/cp5337 @nullsoft8411https://github.com/nullsoft8411 @StackShippinghttps://github.com/StackShipping @avxobrohttps://github.com/avxobro @danthemankhttps://github.com/danthemank @wundullahttps://github.com/wundulla @kmlacrhttps://github.com/kmlacr @heliusmaximus08https://github.com/heliusmaximus08 @tuanvuvohttps://github.com/tuanvuvo @behnod24https://github.com/behnod24 @Welexonhttps://github.com/Welexon @gfakxhttps://github.com/gfakx @callo451https://github.com/callo451 @smartguyiohttps://github.com/smartguyio @meso3988https://github.com/meso3988 @ifemuyiwaojohttps://github.com/ifemuyiwaojo @Okleeqohttps://github.com/Okleeqo @venutruehttps://github.com/venutrue @harielxavierhttps://github.com/harielxavier
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/stackblitz/bolt.new/issues/1322#issuecomment-2476673695, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6XHWI4QOOPZO4SY7SQDT332AS5JLAVCNFSM6AAAAABRA7ASKOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDINZWGY3TGNRZGU.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

https://bolt.new/~/sb1-sfumht
From: Alexander Berger @.>
Date: Thursday, November 14, 2024 at 10:37 AM
To: stackblitz/bolt.new @.>
Cc: harielxavier @.>, Mention @.>
Subject: Re: [stackblitz/bolt.new] Chat Error: prompt is too long: 200000 tokens > 199999 maximum (Issue #1322)
@avxobrohttps://github.com/avxobro can you share a project link?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/stackblitz/bolt.new/issues/1322#issuecomment-2476732208, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6XHWI4BAO4R3DDFERYWHC32AS7TFAVCNFSM6AAAAABRA7ASKOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDINZWG4ZTEMRQHA.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

I am sorry, this is the link,
https://bolt.new/~/sb1-sfumht
From: @.*** @.>
Date: Thursday, November 14, 2024 at 10:38 AM
To: stackblitz/bolt.new @.>, stackblitz/bolt.new @.>
Cc: harielxavier @.>, Mention @.***>
Subject: Re: [stackblitz/bolt.new] Chat Error: prompt is too long: 200000 tokens > 199999 maximum (Issue #1322)
How does this work. When I go to stackblitz and open project on bolt.new i still get the same error. Is this for new projects that may exceed this limit? If so we are in the same boat. Thanks
From: Alexander Berger @.>
Date: Thursday, November 14, 2024 at 10:17 AM
To: stackblitz/bolt.new @.>
Cc: harielxavier @.>, Mention @.>
Subject: Re: [stackblitz/bolt.new] Chat Error: prompt is too long: 200000 tokens > 199999 maximum (Issue #1322)
📣 Progress Update: We have a preview URL with a fix for this issue that will now support projects up to 2.5x larger!
Please test out your projects that were previously receiving the "prompt too long" error at the link below and report back on the results!
https://8e78782a.bolt-cnr.pages.dev/
CC: @dukuohttps://github.com/dukuo @alvaroprs8https://github.com/alvaroprs8 @cp5337https://github.com/cp5337 @nullsoft8411https://github.com/nullsoft8411 @StackShippinghttps://github.com/StackShipping @avxobrohttps://github.com/avxobro @danthemankhttps://github.com/danthemank @wundullahttps://github.com/wundulla @kmlacrhttps://github.com/kmlacr @heliusmaximus08https://github.com/heliusmaximus08 @tuanvuvohttps://github.com/tuanvuvo @behnod24https://github.com/behnod24 @Welexonhttps://github.com/Welexon @gfakxhttps://github.com/gfakx @callo451https://github.com/callo451 @smartguyiohttps://github.com/smartguyio @meso3988https://github.com/meso3988 @ifemuyiwaojohttps://github.com/ifemuyiwaojo @Okleeqohttps://github.com/Okleeqo @venutruehttps://github.com/venutrue @harielxavierhttps://github.com/harielxavier
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/stackblitz/bolt.new/issues/1322#issuecomment-2476673695, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6XHWI4QOOPZO4SY7SQDT332AS5JLAVCNFSM6AAAAABRA7ASKOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDINZWGY3TGNRZGU.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

Update, when I use that link and add the link to my project, it now says I am a free user.
From: @.*** @.>
Date: Thursday, November 14, 2024 at 10:39 AM
To: stackblitz/bolt.new @.>, stackblitz/bolt.new @.>
Cc: harielxavier @.>, Mention @.***>
Subject: Re: [stackblitz/bolt.new] Chat Error: prompt is too long: 200000 tokens > 199999 maximum (Issue #1322)
How does this work. When I go to stackblitz and open project on bolt.new i still get the same error. Is this for new projects that may exceed this limit? If so we are in the same boat. Thanks
From: Alexander Berger @.>
Date: Thursday, November 14, 2024 at 10:17 AM
To: stackblitz/bolt.new @.>
Cc: harielxavier @.>, Mention @.>
Subject: Re: [stackblitz/bolt.new] Chat Error: prompt is too long: 200000 tokens > 199999 maximum (Issue #1322)
📣 Progress Update: We have a preview URL with a fix for this issue that will now support projects up to 2.5x larger!
Please test out your projects that were previously receiving the "prompt too long" error at the link below and report back on the results!
https://8e78782a.bolt-cnr.pages.dev/
CC: @dukuohttps://github.com/dukuo @alvaroprs8https://github.com/alvaroprs8 @cp5337https://github.com/cp5337 @nullsoft8411https://github.com/nullsoft8411 @StackShippinghttps://github.com/StackShipping @avxobrohttps://github.com/avxobro @danthemankhttps://github.com/danthemank @wundullahttps://github.com/wundulla @kmlacrhttps://github.com/kmlacr @heliusmaximus08https://github.com/heliusmaximus08 @tuanvuvohttps://github.com/tuanvuvo @behnod24https://github.com/behnod24 @Welexonhttps://github.com/Welexon @gfakxhttps://github.com/gfakx @callo451https://github.com/callo451 @smartguyiohttps://github.com/smartguyio @meso3988https://github.com/meso3988 @ifemuyiwaojohttps://github.com/ifemuyiwaojo @Okleeqohttps://github.com/Okleeqo @venutruehttps://github.com/venutrue @harielxavierhttps://github.com/harielxavier
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/stackblitz/bolt.new/issues/1322#issuecomment-2476673695, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6XHWI4QOOPZO4SY7SQDT332AS5JLAVCNFSM6AAAAABRA7ASKOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDINZWGY3TGNRZGU.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

@avxobro can you share a project link?

I'm new to bolt, but I think if i share it people will have access to my code publicly?

@avxobro please set it to 'secret', and email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Only people with the link will be able to view, and I promise not to steal your idea :)

@kc0tlh haha ok - its not that great anyway lol :)

📣 Progress Update: We have a preview URL with a fix for this issue that will now support projects up to 2.5x larger!
Please test out your projects that were previously receiving the "prompt too long" error at the link below and report back on the results!
https://8e78782a.bolt-cnr.pages.dev/
Eng is actively monitoring this thread and will be making bug-fixes in realtime until this launches!
CC: @dukuo @alvaroprs8 @cp5337 @nullsoft8411 @StackShipping @avxobro @danthemank @wundulla @kmlacr @heliusmaximus08 @tuanvuvo @behnod24 @Welexon @gfakx @callo451 @smartguyio @meso3988 @ifemuyiwaojo @Okleeqo @venutrue @harielxavier
If you run into issues using the preview URL, please share a URL to the project that triggered the error (ideally with Public or Secret sharing settings). Thanks 🙏🏻

hi. Explain how to use it. I follow the link and don't see my project. If I try to download a project from stackblitz.com then I get a message about exceeding the context window again.

I did exactly that and it says I am not a paid user. I will try again.
From: avxobro @.>
Date: Thursday, November 14, 2024 at 11:13 AM
To: stackblitz/bolt.new @.>
Cc: harielxavier @.>, Mention @.>
Subject: Re: [stackblitz/bolt.new] Chat Error: prompt is too long: 200000 tokens > 199999 maximum (Issue #1322)
add your project URL slug to the end
https://8e78782a.bolt-cnr.pages.dev/~/xxx-xxxxxx
Then login again when prompted
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/stackblitz/bolt.new/issues/1322#issuecomment-2476830116, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6XHWIZISVMABJXOK25MVID2ATDZVAVCNFSM6AAAAABRA7ASKOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDINZWHAZTAMJRGY.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

add your project URL slug to the end
https://8e78782a.bolt-cnr.pages.dev/~/xxx-xxxxxx
Then login again when prompted

Free users only have access to a limited total prompt size, which this project exceeds. Upgrade to a paid account to double this limit.

Yes, I think they working on a fix for that part of not linked to paid subscription. Same error came for me. They investigating i am sure.

Yes can confirm that the preview deploy URL has a bug where paid users are getting a free user message, this will be sorted shortly and we'll circle back when it's live!

Yes, I think they working on a fix for that part of not linked to paid subscription. Same error came for me. They investigating i am sure.

Hope so, I am also getting the same error.

same message:
Free users only have access to a limited total prompt size, which this project exceeds. Upgrade to a paid account to double this limit.

Update 2.0: Here is a new preview URL that should resolve the issue experienced above. Please try again at the link below!
https://d5520b31.bolt-cnr.pages.dev/
CC: @Welexon @bishnusubedi @avxobro @Habartru @harielxavier

Error message in https://d5520b31.bolt-cnr.pages.dev/: messages.0.content.6.text.cache_control: Extra inputs are not permitted

Update 2.0: Here is a new preview URL that should resolve the issue experienced above. Please try again at the link below!
https://d5520b31.bolt-cnr.pages.dev/
CC: @Welexon @bishnusubedi @avxobro @Habartru @harielxavier

messages.0.content.1.text.cache_control: Extra inputs are not permitted

Same

New error message:
messages.0.content.1.text.cache_control: Extra inputs are not permitted
From: Alexander Berger @.>
Date: Thursday, November 14, 2024 at 11:53 AM
To: stackblitz/bolt.new @.>
Cc: harielxavier @.>, Mention @.>
Subject: Re: [stackblitz/bolt.new] Chat Error: prompt is too long: 200000 tokens > 199999 maximum (Issue #1322)
Update 2.0: Here is a new preview URL that should resolve the issue experienced above. Please try again at the link below!
https://d5520b31.bolt-cnr.pages.dev/
CC: @Welexonhttps://github.com/Welexon @bishnusubedihttps://github.com/bishnusubedi @avxobrohttps://github.com/avxobro @Habartruhttps://github.com/Habartru @harielxavierhttps://github.com/harielxavier
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/stackblitz/bolt.new/issues/1322#issuecomment-2476940164, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6XHWI25TUY4EJMQCGI55XL2ATIR3AVCNFSM6AAAAABRA7ASKOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDINZWHE2DAMJWGQ.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

I am experiencing this:
messages.0.content.1.text.cache_control: Extra inputs are not permitted
on the new URL provided to fix: https://d5520b31.bolt-cnr.pages.dev/
keep the fixes coming!

Me too
From: SeniorThrive @.>
Date: Thursday, November 14, 2024 at 3:24 PM
To: stackblitz/bolt.new @.>
Cc: harielxavier @.>, Mention @.>
Subject: Re: [stackblitz/bolt.new] Chat Error: prompt is too long: 200000 tokens > 199999 maximum (Issue #1322)
I am experiencing this:
messages.0.content.1.text.cache_control: Extra inputs are not permitted
on the new URL provided to fix: https://d5520b31.bolt-cnr.pages.dev/
keep the fixes coming!
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/stackblitz/bolt.new/issues/1322#issuecomment-2477342070, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6XHWI7ZPLLE2YUGS3VH6ML2AUBJLAVCNFSM6AAAAABRA7ASKOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDINZXGM2DEMBXGA.
 Tokens will also be gone.

Guys, can I find out how you solve this problem, did you start using the division of the project between two agents, or did you just take some kind of model with a large context window? Did I understand correctly that this is a window of 450,000 tokens? Is this by any chance the new gwen 2.5 model with 32 billion parameters?

Any update about this?

I am a paid user, but I am faced with an error: Free users only have access to a limited total prompt size, which this project exceeds. Please upgrade to a paid account to double this limit.

I am a paid user, but I am faced with an error: Free users only have access to a limited total prompt size, which this project exceeds. Please upgrade to a paid account to double this limit.

same issue, I tried the instruction above but that notification appears

Getting the same.
From: Mohammad Sadegh anisi @.>
Date: Thursday, November 14, 2024 at 5:46 PM
To: stackblitz/bolt.new @.>
Cc: harielxavier @.>, Mention @.>
Subject: Re: [stackblitz/bolt.new] Chat Error: prompt is too long: 200000 tokens > 199999 maximum (Issue #1322)
I am a paid user, but I am faced with an error: Free users only have access to a limited total prompt size, which this project exceeds. Please upgrade to a paid account to double this limit.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/stackblitz/bolt.new/issues/1322#issuecomment-2477559332, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6XHWI7XA4XAHU4M3OCYPL32AUR4XAVCNFSM6AAAAABRA7ASKOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDINZXGU2TSMZTGI.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

📣 Progress Update 3.0: The team has been grinding on this all day and we have another preview URL that should support projects up to 2.5x larger!
Please test out your projects that were previously receiving the "prompt too long" error and report back on the results!
https://30d61b3c.bolt-cnr.pages.dev/
Eng is continuing to monitor this thread and will be making bug-fixes later tonight until this launches!
CC: @dukuo @alvaroprs8 @cp5337 @nullsoft8411 @StackShipping @avxobro @danthemank @wundulla @kmlacr @heliusmaximus08 @tuanvuvo @behnod24 @Welexon @gfakx @callo451 @smartguyio @meso3988 @ifemuyiwaojo @Okleeqo @venutrue @harielxavier
If you run into issues using the preview URL, please share a URL to the project that triggered the error (ideally with Public or Secret sharing settings). Thanks 🙏🏻

@harielxavier This is a skill issue on my end, but how do I seed a project on that URL with my existing files? Chat history is not loading over the Preview version.

@Habartru is this by any chance the new gwen 2.5 model with 32 billion parameters?
We are under NDA on this topic, but I can confirm it is NOT this model

@dukuo that's actually a great question that I also am not sure of. How was everyone else managing that?!

@kc0tlh Can you please elaborate on what exactly does it mean the "support projects up to 2.5x larger!" ? Will the app now be able to consume up to 500k tokens per prompt ? As a user that have consumed over 250M tokens past 2 weeks, I am curious to better understand the new limits and any quality/cost implications.

OFFICIAL
Working perfect for me, I’m back into it. Being cautious about how many tokens I reload, but so far so good. Thanks for the quick turnaround!
Kind Regards,
Dean

From: Ian @.>
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2024 11:31:46 AM
To: stackblitz/bolt.new @.>
Cc: Dean Callaghan @.>; Mention @.>
Subject: Re: [stackblitz/bolt.new] Chat Error: prompt is too long: 200000 tokens > 199999 maximum (Issue #1322)
You don't often get email from @.*** Learn why this is importanthttps://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification
[EXTERNAL EMAIL] Please take extra care in clicking links or opening an attachment, from external users.
@kc0tlhhttps://github.com/kc0tlh Can you please elaborate on what exactly does it mean the "support projects up to 2.5x larger!" ? Will the app now be able to consume up to 500k tokens per prompt ? As a user that have consumed over 250M tokens past 2 weeks, I am curious to better understand the new limits and any quality/cost implications.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/stackblitz/bolt.new/issues/1322#issuecomment-2477697129, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A2OREW2VVVTKFRGZHQHZINT2AU6HFAVCNFSM6AAAAABRA7ASKOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDINZXGY4TOMJSHE.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
[Wodonga TAFE - apply now] https://www.wodongatafe.edu.au/
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
This email may contain privileged and confidential information and is intended for the named addressee/s only. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email immediately. Any confidentiality, privilege or copyright is not waived or lost because this email has been sent to you in error. It is your responsibility to check this email and any attachments for viruses.

btw @kc0tlh, totally unrelated to this thread but you should give the options of bigger token chuck purchases with lower pricing and/or introduce plans with higher limits. It's not common to penalize users with usage higher of that of your bigger plan, with token pricing equal to that of the smaller plan.

now its deploying my project finally I use the new url https://30d61b3c.bolt-cnr.pages.dev/~/xxx-xxxxxx
just change the xxx-xxxxxx with your project url id I think

@Dilip

Go to stackblitz
Once there, on the left you’ll see collections, click on that
Your project should be there, click on it to open the project
once your project opens on stackblitz you will see Open in bolt.new on the upper left
Once bolt.new opens, you’ll see Bolt.new/~/xxx-xxxxx <(—x represent your project. Take that whole bit after bolt.new /~/xxx-xxxxx      and put it in word pad or something.
Take the new link provided https://30d61b3c.bolt-cnr.pages.dev/~/xxx-xxxxx  and paste your project behind that url as show.

Let me know if you have any issues. Confirming it works now. I’m very happy.
From: Dilip @.>
Date: Thursday, November 14, 2024 at 6:42 PM
To: stackblitz/bolt.new @.>
Cc: harielxavier @.>, Mention @.>
Subject: Re: [stackblitz/bolt.new] Chat Error: prompt is too long: 200000 tokens > 199999 maximum (Issue #1322)
@harielxavierhttps://github.com/harielxavier This is a skill issue on my end, but how do I seed a project on that URL with my existing files? Chat history is not loading over the Preview version.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/stackblitz/bolt.new/issues/1322#issuecomment-2477631786, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6XHWI33I2OYFHTPLQFVHPL2AUYNBAVCNFSM6AAAAABRA7ASKOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDINZXGYZTCNZYGY.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

I have started 45 projects because I have hit so many walls. I have not one completed.  I have some unknowns,
From: Mauricio Fernandez @.>
Date: Friday, November 15, 2024 at 9:12 AM
To: stackblitz/bolt.new @.>, stackblitz/bolt.new @.>
Cc: harielxavier @.>, Mention @.***>
Subject: Re: [stackblitz/bolt.new] Chat Error: prompt is too long: 200000 tokens > 199999 maximum (Issue #1322)
@Dilip

Go to stackblitz
Once there, on the left you’ll see collections, click on that
Your project should be there, click on it to open the project
once your project opens on stackblitz you will see Open in bolt.new on the upper left
Once bolt.new opens, you’ll see Bolt.new/~/xxx-xxxxx <(—x represent your project. Take that whole bit after bolt.new /~/xxx-xxxxx      and put it in word pad or something.
Take the new link provided https://30d61b3c.bolt-cnr.pages.dev/~/xxx-xxxxx  and paste your project behind that url as show.

Let me know if you have any issues. Confirming it works now. I’m very happy.
From: Dilip @.>
Date: Thursday, November 14, 2024 at 6:42 PM
To: stackblitz/bolt.new @.>
Cc: harielxavier @.>, Mention @.>
Subject: Re: [stackblitz/bolt.new] Chat Error: prompt is too long: 200000 tokens > 199999 maximum (Issue #1322)
@harielxavierhttps://github.com/harielxavier This is a skill issue on my end, but how do I seed a project on that URL with my existing files? Chat history is not loading over the Preview version.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/stackblitz/bolt.new/issues/1322#issuecomment-2477631786, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6XHWI33I2OYFHTPLQFVHPL2AUYNBAVCNFSM6AAAAABRA7ASKOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDINZXGYZTCNZYGY.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

It seems that it only states that it will be optimized, but will it not compensate the tokens consumed by previous users?

@kc0tlh I tested it, and it works for now. Thank you.

Just got prompt is too long: 202677 tokens > 200000 maximum

Hi @joaoguilhermels,
Appreciate the feedback here! If others are able to try the latest preview link and give some feedback on how things are working now, that would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
Preview URL:
https://30d61b3c.bolt-cnr.pages.dev/

CC: @dukuo @alvaroprs8 @cp5337 @nullsoft8411 @StackShipping @avxobro @danthemank @wundulla @kmlacr @heliusmaximus08 @tuanvuvo @behnod24 @Welexon @gfakx @callo451 @smartguyio @meso3988 @ifemuyiwaojo @Okleeqo @venutrue @harielxavier

I can say that it works, but there is a problem with losing the session, apparently, because I have now been returned to my original state several times at some stage of development, having lost 4,000,000 tokens. The backup is lost in this case. At the same time, before that, commands stop working and updates stop being applied and the web container stops working correctly. I don't know if it's worth burning tokens further, because it returns me to my original state after 3-4 steps, and sometimes it works so that you give a new prompt for changes, and he reloads the page, leaving your messages in the chat, and shows the changes that were 3-4 steps ago, while the backup does not load. Choosing some early point, I can't load it, just nothing happens, the fork is not created either.

https://30d61b3c.bolt-cnr.pages.dev/

The new dev link worked, allowing me to continue progress on my project after encountering the dreaded error: "prompt is too long: 206,518 tokens & 200,000 maximum."
For context, my project (~9,700 lines of code, including dependencies and minor utility files) used an average of 21.9 tokens per line. Based on this, I've calculated:

Standard limit: Keep projects under ~8,455 lines of code to stay safely below the 200,000-token max.

Extended limit (2.5x): Projects can go up to ~21,141 lines of code for the 500,000-token max.

I'm refactoring and simplifying wherever possible to ensure better compatibility with Bolt for Dev in the long term. Hope this helps others encountering similar issues!
Disclaimer: These numbers are rough estimates and assume you refresh your browser to reset chat history so it doesn’t take up tokens. Your results may vary.

Appreciate the detailed feedback!

Hi @endocytosis @EricSimons
Can you please provide the new preview URL promised on the Office Hour Week 4 that has Diffs?
I believe this will help me save tokens and I am also willing to give feedback.
The preview Url above does not have the diff implementation.
Thank you

Yesterday, I tested the new dev link, and it worked perfectly. However, I seem to have lost everything from yesterday now. I’m not sure how many tokens I used, but this situation is really disappointing.

A huge request to fix the simple error correction function!  this is something like forgotten paths in the header of dependent files, in which it is impossible to load the page, but the AI, receiving a fix task, begins to rewrite the entire page, burning an incredible amount of tokens and wasting time.  It's time to teach him how to fix trivial problems right away, checking for changes that can be applied locally, without rewriting the entire code. I beg you very much.

Yesterday, I tested the new dev link, and it worked perfectly. However, I seem to have lost everything from yesterday now. I’m not sure how many tokens I used, but this situation is really disappointing.

Yesterday I also worked for several hours, and then realized that at one point after some step, I was working with a project that I had a few hours ago, while my tokens decreased by about 4 million, and there was no way to make a backup. And this happened 3 times in a row. I do not know if the developers want to track this and somehow return tokens to people who simply lose them. After all, it would be fair. They don't take coffee away from you after you buy it, and if they take it away, will you consider it normal because the seller decided so? Do you agree?

I also noticed today that in 20 minutes of working with the project, more than 5 times, a zip archive is forcibly created, which is downloaded by itself, without my command, into the memory of my PC. It seems that this is not entirely true, from the point of view of both security and in general. At the same time, I see a message in the system tray that the project has been saved and a zip file has been generated and all that, but why?

Hi,
I tried the new dev link yersterday and i was able to work again on my project. I just came back this morning but i got an error (Blank page + Application error. I don't see the bolt.new interface at all). I'm pretty sure that you're already aware and working on that but i just share the issue. At the same time, when i was using bolt yersterday, it seems to be a bit dumber than before. I think that you are exploring a way to limit the context token sent to the LLM but it has an impact on the efficiency i guess (i've deleted boltignore file). Thanks in advance guys for the fix and your work.

The ongoing issues with excessive token usage and project stability are
incredibly frustrating. Yesterday, I used the link
https://30d61b3c.bolt-cnr.pages.dev/~/vitejs-vite-vzd4ar for a test, which
consumed 20 million tokens. This morning, the project was completely gone.
This is not the first time the platform has caused substantial token
wastage without offering any compensation. These tokens represent
significant costs, and the lack of a resolution is disappointing.
I strongly urge the development team to:

Compensate users for tokens lost due to platform bugs.
Improve stability to prevent project loss.
Provide regular updates on how these issues are being addressed.

Without meaningful action, it is hard to justify continued use of this
platform for critical projects.
Thank you for considering user feedback.
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 at 10:47, Stack Shipping @.***>
wrote:

Same problem here! I must say that all these problems start to bother. And
when you email for a refund of tokens so you can at least continue without
paying which I don't find more then reasonable, you get not reply
whatsover. Hmmm. Starting to think to move on. I hope they still come back
with a solution and good gesture!
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/stackblitz/bolt.new/issues/1322#issuecomment-2480496929,
or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BDBNISZUCYKF5YR5GTU2BRL2A4ID7AVCNFSM6AAAAABRA7ASKOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDIOBQGQ4TMOJSHE
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: @.***>

Same problem here! I must say that all these problems start to bother. And when you email for a refund of tokens so you can at least continue without paying which I don't find more then reasonable, you get not reply whatsover. Hmmm. Starting to think to move on. I hope they still come back with a solution and good gesture!
EDIT: I now also noticed it removed my entire menu's and created something itself and I cannot restore it????

Totally agree. Alexander Berger of StackBlitz encourages users to send refund requests to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>However, upon doing so, users often receive no response—not even an automated acknowledgment or ticket number from the platform. This lack of communication is both disappointing and unprofessional. StackBlitz, it’s 2024—users expect modern, responsive service delivery that aligns with contemporary standards, regardless of how advanced or innovative your AI offerings may be.
StackBlitz can no longer rely on the excuse of being "a small development team of 20." With the volume of negative feedback from users, it's time for a decisive course of action. Either the product is temporarily withdrawn from the market to undergo rigorous testing and improvement, or the paid version is discontinued until the platform reaches a stable and fully developed state. Offering a paid service in such a beta-level condition undermines trust and risks alienating your user base.

how i can move my project from bolt.new to new demo link? for complete all? because i receive the same problem maxium token

all work is gone, and amout paid on tokens is burnt

Are you going to deploy the token limit to normal tools (bolt.new) ? Cause it's hard for regular user to import new project on your developpement page [https://30d61b3c.bolt-cnr.pages.dev] do you have an ETA about update ?

Bolt is BURNING my tokens FOR NO REASON, it says it has made the changes but those changes are not shown in Preview.
Tried many times for a simple change.
Its frustrating.

@dilip 1. Go to stackblitz 2. Once there, on the left you’ll see collections, click on that 3. Your project should be there, click on it to open the project 4. once your project opens on stackblitz you will see Open in bolt.new on the upper left 5. Once bolt.new opens, you’ll see Bolt.new/~/xxx-xxxxx <(—x represent your project. Take that whole bit after bolt.new /~/xxx-xxxxx and put it in word pad or something. 6. Take the new link provided https://30d61b3c.bolt-cnr.pages.dev/~/xxx-xxxxx and paste your project behind that url as show. Let me know if you have any issues. Confirming it works now. I’m very happy. From: Dilip @.> Date: Thursday, November 14, 2024 at 6:42 PM To: stackblitz/bolt.new @.> Cc: harielxavier @.>, Mention @.> Subject: Re: [stackblitz/bolt.new] Chat Error: prompt is too long: 200000 tokens > 199999 maximum (Issue #1322) @harielxavierhttps://github.com/harielxavier This is a skill issue on my end, but how do I seed a project on that URL with my existing files? Chat history is not loading over the Preview version. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#1322 (comment)>, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6XHWI33I2OYFHTPLQFVHPL2AUYNBAVCNFSM6AAAAABRA7ASKOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDINZXGYZTCNZYGY. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

Is there any way to import a git repository and have the bolt.new button available?

yeah the delete chat doesnt delete the chat...

I feel like bolt.new is great for a quick project start-up, to showcase on youtube - "I've built a startup in X hours with this AI tool" - but as soon as you develop a little further on your project and it grows a little with actual real world features, things start to get out of hand, tokens are burnt for no reason and Bolt cannot handle the workload anymore, rendering the user experience very frustrating.

100% correct. Every time i pass a hurdle i get another one. I spent $100 yesterday again and i spent 100 prompts with the same error. This is for a landing page. Anything else, you are kidding yourself.
From: Everton Spader @.>
Date: Sunday, November 17, 2024 at 10:41 AM
To: stackblitz/bolt.new @.>
Cc: harielxavier @.>, Mention @.>
Subject: Re: [stackblitz/bolt.new] Chat Error: prompt is too long: 200000 tokens > 199999 maximum (Issue #1322)
I feel like bolt.new is great for a quick project start-up, to showcase on youtube - "I've built a startup in X hours with this AI tool" - but as soon as you develop a little further on your project and it grows a little with actual real world features, things start to get out of hand, tokens are burnt for no reason and Bolt cannot handle the workload anymore, rendering the user experience very frustrating.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/stackblitz/bolt.new/issues/1322#issuecomment-2481321026, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6XHWI2YEWR4NXA67AQ7GDT2BC2MHAVCNFSM6AAAAABRA7ASKOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDIOBRGMZDCMBSGY.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

This is like class auction lawsuit. An error gets fixed so i pump more money. Only for other another wall and tokens wasted.
From: bishnusubedi @.>
Date: Saturday, November 16, 2024 at 11:08 PM
To: stackblitz/bolt.new @.>
Cc: harielxavier @.>, Mention @.>
Subject: Re: [stackblitz/bolt.new] Chat Error: prompt is too long: 200000 tokens > 199999 maximum (Issue #1322)
Bolt is BURNING my tokens FOR NO REASON, it says it has made the changes but those changes are not shown in Preview.
Tried many times for a simple change.
Its frustrating.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/stackblitz/bolt.new/issues/1322#issuecomment-2480917203, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6XHWI2ID7T4IH7U6IWMVPT2BAJCFAVCNFSM6AAAAABRA7ASKOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDIOBQHEYTOMRQGM.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

This is like class auction lawsuit. An error gets fixed so i pump more money. Only for other another wall and tokens wasted. From: bishnusubedi @.> Date: Saturday, November 16, 2024 at 11:08 PM To: stackblitz/bolt.new @.> Cc: harielxavier @.>, Mention @.> Subject: Re: [stackblitz/bolt.new] Chat Error: prompt is too long: 200000 tokens > 199999 maximum (Issue #1322) Bolt is BURNING my tokens FOR NO REASON, it says it has made the changes but those changes are not shown in Preview. Tried many times for a simple change. Its frustrating. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#1322 (comment)>, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6XHWI2ID7T4IH7U6IWMVPT2BAJCFAVCNFSM6AAAAABRA7ASKOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDIOBQHEYTOMRQGM. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

StackBlitz should prioritize finalizing the development and rigorous testing of Bolt.new before releasing it to the public. Currently, the situation risks resembling a start-up scam: while they effectively collect payments, they fail to deliver a functioning product. Worse, attempts to contact their support team at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>go unanswered—even for refund requests. For instance, I’ve been waiting for a response since Tuesday (it’s now Sunday), without even an automated acknowledgment.
Until these issues are resolved, users should seriously reconsider using this platform. The lack of reliable support and functional products raises concerns about potential financial instability, which could lead to bankruptcy as dissatisfied users demand refunds for undelivered services.

StackBlitz should prioritize finalizing the development and rigorous testing of Bolt.new before releasing it to the public. Currently, the situation risks resembling a start-up scam: while they effectively collect payments, they fail to deliver a functioning product. Worse, attempts to contact their support team at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>go unanswered—even for refund requests. For instance, I’ve been waiting for a response since Tuesday (it’s now Sunday), without even an automated acknowledgment.
Until these issues are resolved, users should seriously reconsider using this platform. The lack of reliable support and functional products raises concerns about potential financial instability, which could lead to bankruptcy as dissatisfied users demand refunds for undelivered services.

StackBlitz should prioritize finalizing the development and rigorous testing of Bolt.new before releasing it to the public. Currently, the situation risks resembling a start-up scam: while they effectively collect payments, they fail to deliver a functioning product. Worse, attempts to contact their support team at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>go unanswered—even for refund requests. For instance, I’ve been waiting for a response since Tuesday (it’s now Sunday), without even an automated acknowledgment.
Until these issues are resolved, users should seriously reconsider using this platform. The lack of reliable support and functional products raises concerns about potential financial instability, which could lead to bankruptcy as dissatisfied users demand refunds for undelivered services.

ATTENTION: SOLVED!! Prompt is too long limitation bug!
Well <@501636911002157066> @bolt.new and my fellow Bolt builders, I've solved the issue of the the prompt too long bug for larger development projects. First, use the recommended https://30d61b3c.bolt-cnr.pages.dev/ URL.
Now for me, when I went to the dev URL, none of my files were there! So i user my creative thinking and promlem solving skills.  So I copy my folder URL identifier for example: sb1-uz4pwq and put it together like this: https://30d61b3c.bolt-cnr.pages.dev/~/sb1-uz4pwx (not the real file but an example) And I got it get pass the bug and continue with my development pass the 200k token limit! (@stackblitz, you can hook me up with some incentives of my membership. Haha! )
FYI: You must used the dev URL your file number in order for it to work, otherwise you are going to be stuck like chuck!

Update: Engineering has released an update to support project of larger sizes! This should significantly reduce "promp too long" errors. We appreciate your patience as the team continues to ship improvements!

Well i read it was fixed, but currently i`m getting this error when trying even a single line prompt. Also a huge chunk of my application is suddenly gone, 4 million tokens thrown out of the window. And this is not the first time....
How can we develop and have a peace of mind that our whole app or complete sections wont be deleted when we load the project next time. However, its still consuming tons of tokens with each try. I love this system, but im getting scared to use it.

https://30d61b3c.bolt-cnr.pages.dev/~/

And to add to that, i used the new url: https://30d61b3c.bolt-cnr.pages.dev/~/sb1-utvboj
sometimes after a reload it allows 1 or 2 prompts. And then stops. It almost always happens when it throws an error and you press fix problems. This is considered a new chat with the new url i think, but the platform refuses to work!
Last time i already burned 12 million tokens or more to get netlify working. I made a work around with a paid netlify account, and put the stackblitz code base into a github on my pc, where i can commit to netlify and then deploy ( which is an insane headache with how you market your services). Deploying is absolute HELL. Or updating the code through github etc.
But the worst is this token crap, we pay good money for this products, so SIMPLE stuff like this should work. A simple "Clear prompt memory" would suffice! Then we can just click and start over. Shouldn`t be too hard to implement right?
Or is this issue caused by pressing the fix problem button, that just loads an INSANE amount of text that immediately hits the max prompt size? I`m very confused on what is happening. I just started today with this project, and maybe a few hours in since the START of the dev of the project.
While with another project a few weeks ago i was able to work days on it with much larger prompts. What the heck is happening, and how to fix this ASAP.

I just opened my project in https://30d61b3c.bolt-cnr.pages.dev/ and I still get the error "This project exceeds the total supported prompt size. To see how to resolve this, visit https://bolt.fyi/prompt-too-long."

📣 Update Complete:  this fix has been merged into production and bolt.new now supports projects up to 2.5x larger!
Thank you to everyone in the thread above providing workarounds and helping each other. This is MUCH MUCH appreciated, as we are currently in the process of training our newly hired support staff, and working out of a backlog on the<EMAIL_ADDRESS>email inbox (we will respond to EVERY SINGLE request).
If you are still looking for support for other issues, please start with our newly launched support center 🎉
CC: @dukuo @alvaroprs8 @cp5337 @nullsoft8411 @StackShipping @avxobro @danthemank @wundulla @kmlacr @heliusmaximus08 @tuanvuvo @behnod24 @Welexon @gfakx @callo451 @smartguyio @meso3988 @ifemuyiwaojo @Okleeqo @venutrue @harielxavier

@kc0tlh Great news !  You're the best
That would be really nice if you be able to manage IA to not rework entire code.
When we got large files like firebase.ts and add new exports or make some modifications, IA erase files and we using like 2M tokens to regenerate properly all exports...
That's an example
Regards team !

@skuudy30 please subscribe to #678 for updates on that exact feature (which I believe we are launching on our YouTube livestream tomorrow).

Insane ! @skuudy30 thanks a lot i'll follow

@kc0tlh When can we expect the refunds to be processed since after three emails to your hello email adres still no reply!

If you haven't already please reach out to TheTiGuR in the #discussions channel of the Discord. He'll ask for you the email you used to login to Bolt and will forward your info along to the right person.

Guys! What have you done!? Why did the bolt become so blunt???  Now he doesn't ask me several times if I want to continue, if I'm ready, if I agree... What is it? Each such answer of mine, consisting of 2 words, burns 200,000 tokens. Why is that? Today is just a terrible day. I burned 20,000,000 tokens and didn't make any progress. He constantly forgets what he is doing, rewrites the same files several times, even if you tell him that you need some other edits... Well, what is it? What should I do about it?!?

Each such answer of mine, consisting of 2 words, burns 200,000 tokens

I thought this was happening to me only. I managed to but 10 Million tokens in one day just we some changes to a project. Every little change was 200k tokens regardless if I explicitly prompted Bolt to only show me the changes.

I had the same issue for a few days in a row so I finally quit trying yesterday for the foreseeable future. Until something tangible is done about it, I'm not using the software again. I was burning 10 million tokens every 1.5 hrs! ($250 worth of tokens in less than 2 days) and getting no where! Just when I hope it might get it right, it completely messes things up, erases code, and I run out of tokens, so I buy another 10 mil. I quit when I used up 20 mil tokens trying to deploy alone and was not successful. If you ask a simple yes or no answer that does not involve writing any code, you burn 200k tokens. It got ridiculous! I love the product, but there's a limit to my endurance.
On Nov 22, 2024, 8:27 AM, at 8:27 AM, Everton Spader @.***> wrote:

Each such answer of mine, consisting of 2 words, burns 200,000 tokens

I thought this was happening to me only. I managed to but 10 Million
tokens in one day just we some changes to a project. Every little
change was 200k tokens regardless if I explicitly prompted Bolt to only
show me the changes.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/stackblitz/bolt.new/issues/1322#issuecomment-2493768261
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Message ID: @.***>

I'm still getting "This project exceeds the total supported prompt size. To see how to resolve this, visit https://bolt.fyi/prompt-too-long."

i am getting this error and the work around is not working for me. Same feeling as most people here, I love the potential and have something I want to deploy as beta but am now stuck. I am debating just going back to WP for now.

i am getting this error and the work around is not working for me. Same feeling as most people here, I love the potential and have something I want to deploy as beta but am now stuck. I am debating just going back to WP for now.

Is it giving you the exact error listed above or is the amount 500000? This will help the team know if there is still a problem with the original issue or if your project has hit the new limit.

This is what I get:
This project exceeds the total supported prompt size. To see how to resolve this, visit https://bolt.fyi/prompt-too-long.

Clear the chat history to free up some space in the context window
This will only help if the chat history is filling a major portion of the context window (IE it is very long). As of 11/19/24, the way to clear chat history is to open your project in StackBlitz, Fork it, and re-open in Bolt.

I did exactly this but how to "reopen in Bolt"? When in Stackblitz, after forking I went back to the bolt and the full chat was still there, then I deleted the chat and the application in Bolt is vanished. Then I went back to Stackblitz, clicked on "Try Bolt.new" and it went to Bolt home, and it loaded the "Want do you want to build" screen.

Large Project Size Alert This project seems to be quite large in size, which increases token usage per message. To learn how to reduce token consumption and optimize your project can i do something for this ?

Same thing. I’ve pumped hundreds of into this.
From: Stack Shipping @.>
Date: Saturday, November 30, 2024 at 5:10 PM
To: stackblitz/bolt.new @.>
Cc: harielxavier @.>, Mention @.>
Subject: Re: [stackblitz/bolt.new] Chat Error: prompt is too long: 200000 tokens > 199999 maximum (Issue #1322)
@kc0tlhhttps://github.com/kc0tlh When can we expect the refunds to be processed since after three emails to your hello email adres still no reply!
If you haven't already please reach out to TheTiGuR in the #discussions channel of the Discord. He'll ask for you the email you used to login to Bolt and will forward your info along to the right person.
@kc0tlhhttps://github.com/kc0tlh
I guess the refunds where just a lie. I lost $200 and ended with nothing to show for, only continues loops of continues loops of achieving nothing but hitting 200k tokens memorty walls or whatever.
Are you going to refund me or was it just a lie since I send 3 emails, I contacted thetigur. I just don't believe it anymore!
Waiting for you guys your reply. Otherwise will make a youtube video with my experience.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/stackblitz/bolt.new/issues/1322#issuecomment-2509400228, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6XHWI4EDKBIP3IJUJ3R6H32DIZWXAVCNFSM6AAAAABRA7ASKOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDKMBZGQYDAMRSHA.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

oh, wow. I started noticing this for the past weeks, and kept thinking "Man, it's impossible I'm burning 5000k credits in less than an hour in an infinite error solving loop... I was about to report a bug, but coming here I see it is a common issue. I'm seriously considering just cancelling my subscription. I was so excited, but at this rate, I'll end up blowing hundreds of dollars just to get a simple thing (that bolt broke) fixed. Are you going to correct this?

I were you, I would stop pumping money into this. PonziSchemish.
From: YendiGB @.>
Date: Thursday, December 12, 2024 at 11:55 PM
To: stackblitz/bolt.new @.>
Cc: harielxavier @.>, Mention @.>
Subject: Re: [stackblitz/bolt.new] Chat Error: prompt is too long: 200000 tokens > 199999 maximum (Issue #1322)
oh, wow. I started noticing this for the past weeks, and kept thinking "Man, it's impossible I'm burning 5000k credits in less than an hour in an infinite error solving loop... I was about to report a bug, but coming here I see it is a common issue. I'm seriously considering just cancelling my subscription. I was so excited, but at this rate, I'll end up blowing hundreds of dollars just to get a simple thing (that bolt broke) fixed. Are you going to correct this?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/stackblitz/bolt.new/issues/1322#issuecomment-2540550232, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6XHWI2QYLXGHJ7HDJU6ER32FJSC7AVCNFSM6AAAAABRA7ASKOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDKNBQGU2TAMRTGI.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

AS OF TODAY, THIS PROBLEM STILL EXISIST. I HAVE FORKED THE PROJECT AND REOPNED THE SAME PROJECT, BUT I STILL EXCEED MY  PROMPT SIZE. I SPEND $200 A MONTH FOR THIS TO BE AN ISSUE. PLEASE DO NOT SPEND MONEY WITH THIS COMPANY UNTIL THIS ISSUE IS SOLVED

And they only want to refund you once. They refundeded me 1 time. I thought they fixed the issue, they did not. And I am out of money. This should be free or beta. This is next generation ponzi scheme.
From: deandre233 @.>
Date: Tuesday, December 24, 2024 at 5:54 AM
To: stackblitz/bolt.new @.>
Cc: harielxavier @.>, Mention @.>
Subject: Re: [stackblitz/bolt.new] Chat Error: prompt is too long: 200000 tokens > 199999 maximum (Issue #1322)
AS OF TODAY, THIS PROBLEM STILL EXISIST. I HAVE FORKED THE PROJECT AND REOPNED THE SAME PROJECT, BUT I STILL EXCEED MY PROMPT SIZE. I SPEND $200 A MONTH FOR THIS TO BE AN ISSUE. PLEASE DO NOT SPEND MONEY WITH THIS COMPANY UNTIL THIS ISSUE IS SOLVED
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/stackblitz/bolt.new/issues/1322#issuecomment-2560985127, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6XHWI7D7AVAGY35BJOUGZD2HE4PXAVCNFSM6AAAAABRA7ASKOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDKNRQHE4DKMJSG4.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.

Just fuing garbage.. I run into this Fuing error way too many times no matter how long the fuing prompt is... FIX THE FUING WEBSITE... After these error I have to refresh or rollback, then it will take a simple propmt but then it starts to fixing files that I already fixed and it rewrites files that it already fixed.... This is wasting too many tokens. I'm lazy and want the help writting simple code but this is just to much anger at how horrible this thing can be and how much it can FU** everything up!! Still better off just getting boiler plates when needed.

I feel your pain brother.
From: mawiskored @.>
Date: Thursday, December 26, 2024 at 11:17 PM
To: stackblitz/bolt.new @.>
Cc: harielxavier @.>, Mention @.>
Subject: Re: [stackblitz/bolt.new] Chat Error: prompt is too long: 200000 tokens > 199999 maximum (Issue #1322)
Just fuing garbage.. I run into this Fuing error way too many times no matter how long the fuing prompt is... FIX THE FUING WEBSITE... After these error I have to refresh or rollback, then it will take a simple propmt but then it starts to fixing files that I already fixed and it rewrites files that it already fixed.... This is wasting too many tokens. I'm lazy and want the help writting simple code but this is just to much anger at how horrible this thing can be and how much it can FU** everything up!! Still better off just getting boiler plates when needed.
Screenshot.from.2024-12-26.20-11-07.png (view on web)https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9f36b983-b365-4fbc-9435-19d456ef98c2
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/stackblitz/bolt.new/issues/1322#issuecomment-2563296746, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6XHWIYP47VAQIOW7H25LD32HTIFJAVCNFSM6AAAAABRA7ASKOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDKNRTGI4TMNZUGY.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.


[BUG] Rancher 2.6.8 fresh install Continuous Delivery does not appear

Rancher Server Setup

Rancher version: 2.6.8
Installation option Docker install
Proxy/Cert Details: yes, cert managed by docker

Information about the Cluster
Single server, brand new Centos7 VM kernel 3.10.0-1160.42.2.el7.x86_64
Docker version 20.10.17, build 100c701
docker run -d --name rancher --restart=unless-stopped -p 80:80 -p 443:443
-v /etc/pki/ca-trust/extracted/pem/cacerts.pem:/etc/rancher/ssl/cert.pem
-v /etc/pki/ca-trust/extracted/pem/key.pem:/etc/rancher/ssl/key.pem
--privileged rancher/rancher:v2.6.8 --no-cacerts
User Information

What is the role of the user logged in? Admin / github SSO

Describe the bug
Global App "Continuous Delivery" appears alongside Cluster Management & Virtualization Management
To Reproduce
All I have done is docker run Rancher and log in. Later set up github SSO to see if that helped
Result
no Global App "Continuous Delivery"
Expected Result
Global App "Continuous Delivery" appears alongside Cluster Management & Virtualization Management
Additional context
I set up another identical Rancher install on an identical server and Continuous Delivery does appears there. Like all the other Rancher installs I have done.
Also, different since 2.6.4, in
Users & Authentication config, my Default Admin user or actual Admin local user cannot edit any of the GlobalRoles - I usually add some to "New User Default"

I tried Deactivate-ing and re-Activate-ing in GLobal Settings / Feature Flags and Continuous Delivery still does not appear

Now have a fresh install of Rancher 2.6.8 (docker run -d --name rancher --restart=unless-stopped ...) on a fresh Centos 8.2, kernel 4.18, docker 20.10, but in User/Auth the Admin user still can't Edit any of the Roles (like to change Restricted Admin to be a Default Role for new users)


WSL2 The exception s (0x, possibly caused by renegate registry entries. Can't install or start.

Environment
Windows build number: [run `cmd.exe /c ver`] Microsoft Windows [Version 10.0.19041.804]
Your Distribution version: [On Debian or Ubuntu run `lsb_release -r` in WSL]
Whether the issue is on WSL 2 and/or WSL 1: [run `cat /proc/version` in WSL] WSL2

Steps to reproduce

Uninstall Ubuntu
Turn off all virtualization windows features
Turn off WSL
Restart
Turn all features back on
Install WSL

From store
Importing previously exported distro
Downloading the .appx file from microsoft.
Using `lxrunoffline

Get error

WSL logs:
Expected behavior

Successfully move my wsl2 instance to a new computer
Actual behavior

Error shown above.
C:\Users\eacriadmin>wsl --import Ubuntu C:\wsl_ubuntu D:\spectre_wsl_export
{Application Error}
The exception s (0x

Additional notes:
I was trying to move a wsl2 instance from another computer. I tried two methods. wsl --import on the export from the other machine. And lxrunoffline import directly on the .vhdx file. Both created a running wsl2 instance but with two problems. 1) It started up as root, and I had to create a /etc/wsl.conf file to start up as my user. 2) No networking capability.
As I tried, again and again, doing things in different orders, eventually I got to the current state where everything I do results in the error shown.
At some point, I started to see an additional LsxxManager registry item with some hex numbers. I deleted it and it would come back.

It also shows up in services

I will be glad to upload some log files. Since there are many different operations I'm using, please let me know which would be the most useful to document.

I followed the steps here explicitly and I think I'm up and running now. But only with a fresh install. I'll have to move all of my stuff over and reinstall all packages. But at least I have networking.


example: Add schema type generation in java

The schema types should be generated for use in the java resolvers.

Using DGS type generation


Separate beta from beta candidates

After dev was deprecated we have been maintaining two sets of branches in the beta configurations: the current beta and the next beta candidates. With the current configurations we can only use a version of recipes to build/test both. This is becoming problematic because beta candidates are closer to main while the current beta deviates from main.
To fix this issue we need to create configurations to trigger beta candidate builds using the main recipes configuration.

\cc @CaseyHillers @itsjustkevin

With the migration to the Cocoon scheduler, this should be fixed.
We now generate recipe bundles for every flutter/flutter branch, which is getting changes running on the correct recipe version. Additionally, properties are passed from the ci.yaml at that commit.


Report: error occurred when executing command "wordmove" on VCCW

vagrant ssh to VCCW v3.3.1
vagrant@foo:/vagrant$ wordmove pull --all
/usr/lib/ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in `require': cannot load such file -- json/pure (LoadError)
	from /usr/lib/ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in `require'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/2.3.0/json.rb:61:in `rescue in <module:JSON>'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/2.3.0/json.rb:58:in `<module:JSON>'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/2.3.0/json.rb:55:in `<top (required)>'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in `require'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in `require'
	from /home/vagrant/.gem/ruby/2.3.0/gems/activesupport-4.2.9/lib/active_support/core_ext/object/json.rb:2:in `<top (required)>'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in `require'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in `require'
	from /home/vagrant/.gem/ruby/2.3.0/gems/activesupport-4.2.9/lib/active_support/core_ext/object.rb:12:in `<top (required)>'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in `require'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in `require'
	from /home/vagrant/.gem/ruby/2.3.0/gems/activesupport-4.2.9/lib/active_support/core_ext.rb:2:in `block in <top (required)>'
	from /home/vagrant/.gem/ruby/2.3.0/gems/activesupport-4.2.9/lib/active_support/core_ext.rb:1:in `each'
	from /home/vagrant/.gem/ruby/2.3.0/gems/activesupport-4.2.9/lib/active_support/core_ext.rb:1:in `<top (required)>'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in `require'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in `require'
	from /home/vagrant/.gem/ruby/2.3.0/gems/wordmove-2.0.0/lib/wordmove.rb:12:in `<top (required)>'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in `require'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in `require'
	from /home/vagrant/.gem/ruby/2.3.0/gems/wordmove-2.0.0/exe/wordmove:5:in `<top (required)>'
	from /home/vagrant/.gem/ruby/2.3.0/bin/wordmove:23:in `load'
	from /home/vagrant/.gem/ruby/2.3.0/bin/wordmove:23:in `<main>'

It requires "json/pure".
gem install json_pure, resolving the problem.
vagrant@foo:/vagrant$ sudo gem install json_pure

Operating System: macOS 10.12.5
Vagrant Version: 1.9.5
Virtual Box Version: 5.1.22 r115126

Hmm, I couldn't reproduce the problem.
The wordmove command works fine without json_pure for me.
If you have a problem again, please try vagrant provision and report to us.
Thanks!