deprecated dependency on gulp-util

└─┬<EMAIL_ADDRESS>└─┬<EMAIL_ADDRESS>└─┬<EMAIL_ADDRESS>└─┬<EMAIL_ADDRESS>└─┬<EMAIL_ADDRESS>└─┬<EMAIL_ADDRESS>└─┬<EMAIL_ADDRESS>└─┬<EMAIL_ADDRESS>└──<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

I think nobody can help you with too little information.


vscode-insiders: Add version info

Not all insiders versions come with both architectures and unless you have commit ID in version property you will not get updates.
Have nightly version with force updates is much more convenient.


4K Monitor Problem

Hello,
I'm using a 4k monitor but i can't get 4k resolution with Config.plist. When I use Config-UHD.plist, hardware acceleration does not work and applications are not displayed correctly.
How can I find a solution?

Can you check now please? This may be because of WhateverGreen and Lilu kexts.
I have updated in the newest efi. Please keep me updated.

Thanks, Config.plist now supports 4k but hardware acceleration is still not working.

Thanks but hardware acceleration is still not working.

Hi!
Did you manage to solve the problem?
Android studio doesn't work for me but xcode works well.

Thanks but hardware acceleration is still not working.

Hi!
Did you manage to solve the problem?
Android studio doesn't work for me but xcode works well.

Hi, I couldn't find any solution

The following bios settings helped me:
video configuration / primary display      -   IGFX
video configuration / internal graphic device / igd-dvmt pre-allocated       -   96MB

The following bios settings helped me:
video configuration / primary display      -   IGFX
video configuration / internal graphic device / igd-dvmt pre-allocated       -   96MB

@emredv please confirm if this solution works for you.

This menu does not have on my bios menu. Do I need to mod my bios?

Opened white list and hidden menus on this site:
https://www.techinferno.com/index.php?%2Fforums%2Ftopic%2F10022-lenovo-y50-70-unlocked-bios-menu-wlan-whitelist-mod-vbios-mod%2F

Thanks, when I set it this way it worked perfectly
video configuration / internal graphic device / igd-dvmt pre-allocated - 64MB


Review public pages for consistancy and accuracy.

Let's make sure our publicly facing things are accurate and contistant!

[ ] web site: http://openeugene.org
[ ] eventbrite : https://www.eventbrite.com/e/open-eugene-festival-tickets-52110392587
[ ] facebook: https://www.facebook.com/events/196679251226823/
[ ] press release: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Jd7_Mo3eZ4Akj0aQ4DyFNCjv8uhC36KJhED81p_zEVo/edit
[ ]

I'm looking at them --


Chronix Simple Ingestion Interface

We should provide a simple ingestion interface for time series data, e.g. pairs of timestamp, value. We should adapt the protocols of InfluxDB, Graphite, ...

We can use GRPC: http://www.grpc.io.

Thx to @phxql for implementing InfluxDB, Graphite, KairosDB, and OpenTSDB HTTP protocols.
Do we need a custom Chronix format?

That's great news! Are there plans to mimic the query interface of InfluxDB?

Hi Felix,
no there are currently no plans doing this or something similar.

Thx for the info. What's the state of the Grafana integration?

The Grafana integration works. There is still some work to do.
Please ask Grafana related questions in the chronix.grafana repository.

We should also add the Prometheus format: https://prometheus.io/docs/instrumenting/exposition_formats/

Hey, sounds like a good idea. I'll work on it.

@phxql Can we close this issue, or do you have outstanding work?

It's implemented, but i still have to write some documentation.

Great. Thus we can close the issue.


"Amount" label on gift card form is ambiguous

I've been using the gift card form, and I have found the "Amount" label to be a little ambiguous--is it asking for dollar amount or the amount of cards I want to create? I know that the dollar sign in the input itself helps to clarify, but when scanning the form for understanding, I'm seeing the label and not the faded dollar sign.
I think this would be improved and a little easier for folks to use by changing the "Amount" label to "Dollar Amount".

Thanks for the detailed issue @lencioni!
@cuiki Do you agree with this?

I get the point from @lencioni but disagree on the solution.
The problem is that the currency is unclear, $ can be the sign (and dollar the name) of many currencies (Canadian, Mexican, New Zealand).
I would propose to use 3 letters currency on the left (USD or US$) and double that with a plain english confirmation on the right (ie: amount in US dollars)

A $50 bounty was attached to this issue. Anyone submitting a Pull Request will be rewarded with $50 when the Pull Request is reviewed, accepted and merged. More info
This bounty is currently reserved to participants of the OSCA (Open Source Africa) event. If not completed there, it will be later open to everyone.

I'll like to work on this (OSCA PH)

Am from OSCA ph and I'll like to work on this

Please I need a link to an example of this issue @lencioni @znarf

Pull request for this issue

I'm from OSCA Lagos, I'm working on this

:trophy: Resolved by @Rexben001  in https://github.com/opencollective/opencollective-frontend/pull/2286
To claim the bounty, you can either:

Submit an invoice to https://opencollective.com/engineering/expenses/new (please mention the issue number in the expense's title)
Or ask for an Open Collective gift card of the same value (to donate to other collectives)

For more info about the bounty process and how to format your invoice, please read https://docs.opencollective.com/help/developers/bounties

This is not yet live, will be part of our next deploy.


Feat: Add Resource Locking to ALZ Bicep Modules

Overview/Summary
Adds the support for resource locking in all modules for resources that support resource locks.
See AB#30524 for additional details of feature request.
In response to #608
This PR fixes/adds/changes/removes

Allows for setting resource locking globally or at each individual resource within the module.
Resource locking at the subscription level is not supported in this release.

Breaking Changes
None
Testing Evidence
Each module that was updated to support Resource Locking was tested with successful deployments. Testing included setting the global parameter to different values as individual resources to validate resource locking logic.
As part of this Pull Request I have

[x] Read the Contribution Guide and ensured this PR is compliant with the guide
[x] Ensured the resource API versions in .bicep file/s I am adding/editing are using the latest API version possible
[x] Checked for duplicate Pull Requests
[x] Associated it with relevant GitHub Issues
[x] (ALZ Bicep Core Team Only) Associated it with relevant ADO Items
[x] Ensured my code/branch is up-to-date with the latest changes in the main branch
[x] Performed testing and provided evidence.
[ ] Updated one or more of the following tests (if required)

Unit
Linting
E2E (End-To-End)
ValidateAzCloud (Base validation in Azure Cloud)
ValidateMcCloud (Base validation in Azure China Cloud)

[x] Updated relevant and associated documentation (e.g. Contribution Guide, Module READMEs, Wiki Docs etc.)
[ ] If relevant, created or updated Code Tours here

Thanks @DaFitRobsta! Will go through this PR later this week. 👍🏼

Hey @DaFitRobsta, for the resource group module I see there is a new module called resourceGroupLock.bicep. Can we instead just use the resource lock provider as you have done for the other modules instead?

Hey @oZakari,
Because the resource group module has a targetScope set to the subscription level, if placing the resource lock within the module, it locks the subscription and not the resource group. I used this site, https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-resource-manager/management/lock-resources?tabs=bicep#template, as an example to work around the issue. It's my understanding that I have to call a sub-module in order to set the resource lock at the resource group level. If you have other methods to execute this without the extra module, please let me know.

Hey @DaFitRobsta, for the resource group module I see there is a new module called resourceGroupLock.bicep. Can we instead just use the resource lock provider as you have done for the other modules instead?

Hey @oZakari, Because the resource group module has a targetScope set to the subscription level, if placing the resource lock within the module, it locks the subscription and not the resource group. I used this site, https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-resource-manager/management/lock-resources?tabs=bicep#template, as an example to work around the issue. It's my understanding that I have to call a sub-module in order to set the resource lock at the resource group level. If you have other methods to execute this without the extra module, please let me know.

Ah, that makes perfect sense. Thanks for the clarification on that!

/azp run validateazcloud

Hey @DaFitRobsta, the ValidateAzCloud pipeline failed due to parPublicIPLock not being declared within the hub networking module. Could you add that in when you get chance. After adding the fix, you can run put /azp run validateazcloud in a comment to re-trigger the pipeline.

/azp run validateazcloud


Actions - Incorrect job status

Description
In my job, I use a custom action to do some work. When I run the job on an image without node.js installed, the job will fail in the Set up job step because the image doesn't have a node.js runtime to run that action. However, the status of the job is Success, see the screenshot:

Gitea Version
v1.20.0+dev-426-gb7b887ba0
Can you reproduce the bug on the Gitea demo site?
No
Log Gist
No response
Screenshots
No response
Git Version
No response
Operating System
No response
How are you running Gitea?
command
Database
PostgreSQL

I encountered the same issue today with Gitea v1.19.1 and act_runner main branch.

Looks like this issue is related to act_runner, so I make a PR in gitea/act and close this issue.


just using this to see if Travis runs the tests..

i added a tiny patch to PR #95 by @jasonrhodes

Ah, sorry, didn't see this until I'd already put it into the db-factor branch, which is now landed.
Yes, that was the blocker, but the safe way to do it is to go ahead and throw in most cases, unless we're actively in test mode, so the test secret belongs only in test.js.